Tangur forum posts in last 60 days

Show Edits
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
13 Jun 2026 11:24pm
highvolume said..
Hi,

Have been following this thread as the best guide for north wings.
I am not sure about which way to go with next purchase and wondering if you could suggest which way to go.
Wingfoil we 87kg currently have 1850mav2, 1500low aspect, 1350 mav1, 1100 mav2, I was thinking of replacing the 1500 low aspect with a 1500mav2 or should I go for some sort of more high aspect wing , how close so you go in sizing?mostly I use the 1850 or 1350. I'm Into riding a bit of general bay conditions and chop, intermediate stage.

I can't get my head around the newer high aspect styles and where they would fit in a quiver. Any suggestions on whether to get a 1500 ma or something different would be much appreciated.

Cheers chris w


SF1230.

Great low end, easy to pump, more playful than what you're on right now.
Could be a one foil solution for your weight and intermediate level.
Pair it with a S215 or S192
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
7 Jun 2026 8:27pm
FerK said..
I am having problems with the fit of my new S145v2 stabilizer. It seems that the stabilizer does not have the same curve as the fuselage, causing them to run unevenly. When I tighten the screws, tension builds up, and I am afraid it will cause damage. Does anyone recognize this problem?



Please post pictures
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
25 May 2026 9:38am
hilly said..




Microsurfer said..





Tangur said..






ilboarder12 said..
K.I.S.S. method for weight/board volume
>+20= full floater
+1-+19= semi floater
Kg= L is neutral
-1 to -19 semi sinker
<-20= full sinker









The argument I am trying to make here seems to be completely missed.

-20 L for a 50 kg rider is not the same as -20 L for a 110 kg rider.
The board volume under and above the waterline won't be the same in those 2 scenarios.
Absolute values are meaningless.
While % of BW is a much more meaningful and comparable metric from rider to rider.






What do you gain by having such a small board? Are you doing tricks- spinning the board in mid air or jumping loops etc?








I agree as I tow foil with a 28l board at 94kg and do not suddenly turn into Kai Lenny. Do the same turns on my parawing board or sup foil drive when I did that. Watch guys turn long DW boards and you realise it is more ability than tiny boards.




Why buy a 28L board to tow and not tow on your parawing board or your sup foil board? 🤔😉
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
24 May 2026 11:13am
Microsurfer said..

Tangur said..


ilboarder12 said..
K.I.S.S. method for weight/board volume
>+20= full floater
+1-+19= semi floater
Kg= L is neutral
-1 to -19 semi sinker
+20= full floater
+1-+19= semi floater
Kg= L is neutral
-1 to -19 semi sinker
<-20= full sinker





The argument I am trying to make here seems to be completely missed.

-20 L for a 50 kg rider is not the same as -20 L for a 110 kg rider.
The board volume under and above the waterline won't be the same in those 2 scenarios.
Absolute values are meaningless.
While % of BW is a much more meaningful and comparable metric from rider to rider.


What do you gain by having such a small board? Are you doing tricks- spinning the board in mid air or jumping loops etc?





I'll give you the benefit of doubt and assume that you're not trolling.

I'll also answer your question by asking you why don't you still use your beginner board?
Why did you downsize?
Why aren't we all riding 150L boards with a 2000 cm low-mid aspect foil? 🧐
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
23 May 2026 11:04pm
ilboarder12 said..
K.I.S.S. method for weight/board volume
>+20= full floater
+1-+19= semi floater
Kg= L is neutral
-1 to -19 semi sinker
<-20= full sinker



The argument I am trying to make here seems to be completely missed.

-20 L for a 50 kg rider is not the same as -20 L for a 110 kg rider.
The board volume under and above the waterline won't be the same in those 2 scenarios.
Absolute values are meaningless.
While % of BW is a much more meaningful and comparable metric from rider to rider.
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
23 May 2026 12:25pm
Venomguy said..
Anything below your body weight is a Sinker.


I'm 78 kg, so 77 L is a sinker for me then? 😉
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
23 May 2026 12:25pm
Venomguy said..
Anything below your body weight is a Sinker.


I'm 78 kg, so 77 L is a sinker for me then? 😉
Reply in Topic: Sinker + Parawing?
Tangur
Tangur
86 posts
86 posts
22 May 2026 7:38am
A "sinker" doesn't really mean anything, it does not tell the full picture.
Using -10/20/30/40 L as a metric is also meaningless.
-10 L for a 70 kg rider (77% of BW) is not the same as -10 L for a 100 kg rider (89% of BW)

I'm 78 kg and I usually wing either a
- 4'2 x 18 - 25 L (32% of my BW)
or
4'5 x 19 - 30 L (38% of my BW)
I fully sink nose and tail of both of these and I ride the same size wing as others who are on "semi-sinkers" or floaters as long as it's 15 knts and up. (my biggest wing is a 4.8m)

A 55L (70% of my BW) is also a sinker for me.
Yet it's 2x the % of BW of the 25L

My go to PW board is a 5'4 x 19- 60 L
I'm sinking the entire board except for the far end of the nose.
Is that a sinker?

I've also used my 5'0 x 18 x 44 L to PW
I fully sink the nose of that board
It does require for me to go up one size of PW to be able to get up which results in being lit once on foil.
Both my 44L and my 30L are full sinkers, but getting up on a PW with the 30L will probably require to size up 2 sizes of PW.

In all those examples, I'm using the same foils - my mini swell front wing is a 830, and bigger swell front wing is a 530 or 680.
I don't use "bigger" foils because I'm riding a smaller board, I size according to swell size.

So take everything with a pinch of salt when it comes to "sinkers" as the descriptive term doesn't tell the full picture.