Catalyst

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
24 Oct 2013 10:30pm
Just finished watching Catalyst on ABC or SBS about this myth that saturated fat causes high cholesterol leading to heart disease. Have believed for years it was a con. Replace your margarine with butter and fry with coconut oil for starters. And get off the cholesterol lowering meds as you don't need them anymore,now it's admitted that there is no correlation between a high saturated fat diet and high cholesterol. Have got to wonder what else they lied to us about.
Poodle
Poodle
WA
868 posts
WA, 868 posts
24 Oct 2013 10:54pm
Dr Mary Anne Demasi... Mmmmhhhh.....
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23678 posts
WA, 23678 posts
24 Oct 2013 11:05pm
no correlation between saturated fats and cholesterol - I dunno but yeah OK I'll believe it if a study ie: scientific method proved it

BUT how does that mean cholesterol lowering meds do not work?

I think pretty much everyone who is on them
(1) has a chol test which is bad
(2) gets prescribed pills
(3) a couple of months later records a lower chol result.

But you have better info? Go...

Or is this your anti-pharma thing again and you are drawing a long bow?
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
24 Oct 2013 11:38pm
Lowering cholesterol with meds will achieve nothing as having low cholesterol is not good. Mark,one day you just might wake up but I'm certainly not betting on it.


www.sott.net/article/267896-Saturated-fat-heart-disease-myth-UK-cardiologist-calls-for-change-in-public-health-advice-on-saturated-fat
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23678 posts
WA, 23678 posts
24 Oct 2013 11:45pm
Your link shows a bloke saying that reducing chiolesterol is not the ONLY thing to reduce heart disease, he talks about lowering sugar (cos too much causes you to get fat) and other aspects of diet.

Nowhere does it say that saturated fats are good or that they do not contribute to poor health.

Read it again- he is saying that reducing cholesterol is not the only way to improve health.
That is not the same as saying cholesterol levels are irrelevant.

I think you like butter and are reading into it what you want it to say.

patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
24 Oct 2013 11:57pm
Mark _australia said..


I think you like butter and are reading into it what you want it to say.



Everyone from WA that was around in the 70's knows the reason for liking butter Mark !

Remember the old Sunnywest butter ad......"Butter eaters make better lovers"
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
25 Oct 2013 12:02am
According to the experts on catalyst,cholesterol is needed by the body and the studies show from heart diseased patients that the level of cholesterol was both high and low.Commonsense should suggest that eating a coconut high in saturated fat will only have a beneficial effect on health. To believe that a superfood like a coconut is going to cause disease,well that is MSM brainwashing right there.
Glitch
Glitch
QLD
292 posts
QLD, 292 posts
25 Oct 2013 6:55am
I didn't see Catalyst, although it sounds like the scientists came up with a theory. So P33, why would you believe this theory if it has a scientific basis? Don't you see. You are now the sheeple. It is a conspiracy by the butter manufacturers and the coconut growers.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15101 posts
WA, 15101 posts
25 Oct 2013 5:34am
Wow, PM33 is watching the MSM! And believing it! Congratulations! Actual researched articles and testing.

I haven't seen that episode yet, but I saw the ads for it.

I am not sure where the 'commonsense should suggest eating a coconut... beneficial' bit came from though. What does commonsense have to do with something like that? Why is it obvious that a coconut would be good for you?

Anyway, it sounds like I need to use iview.
stamp
stamp
QLD
2798 posts
QLD, 2798 posts
25 Oct 2013 8:38am
^^^nothing was researched or properly tested. it was personal opinion and anecdotal evidence from a couple of doctors in the u.s.
that may be why pm33 has so readily accepted it
Chris6791
Chris6791
WA
3271 posts
WA, 3271 posts
25 Oct 2013 7:17am
I watched up to the bit where they pulled apart the validity of the original research in the 50's or whenever it was, then I figured, meh, this is what I pay my GP to know so I changed channel and watch a show on doomsday preppers.
smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
25 Oct 2013 7:38am
I'm with you on this one PM.
Fat is good.
Sugar is NOT!!
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
25 Oct 2013 10:47am
I eat a very high fat diet and have cholesterol just below the zone where you need to be concerned.

Nutritional science studies are very difficult to perform because the data is so varied and people don't often eat what they are supposed to...

Suffice to say, Americans eat **** and die.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23678 posts
WA, 23678 posts
25 Oct 2013 9:02am
patsken said..
Mark _australia said..





I think you like butter and are reading into it what you want it to say.





Everyone from WA that was around in the 70's knows the reason for liking butter Mark !

Remember the old Sunnywest butter ad......"Butter eaters make better lovers"


Bit young to remember that ad Ken
But am interested..... do you rub the butter on yourself or her..........?
myusernam
myusernam
QLD
6158 posts
QLD, 6158 posts
25 Oct 2013 11:57am
PM33! Finally something that I could possible believe
sausage
sausage
QLD
4874 posts
QLD, 4874 posts
25 Oct 2013 12:08pm
Woohoo.....KFC here I come
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
25 Oct 2013 11:04am
Mark _australia said..

patsken said..
Mark _australia said..





I think you like butter and are reading into it what you want it to say.





Everyone from WA that was around in the 70's knows the reason for liking butter Mark !

Remember the old Sunnywest butter ad......"Butter eaters make better lovers"


Bit young to remember that ad Ken
But am interested..... do you rub the butter on yourself or her..........?


I might leave that one for your imagination.....
Razzonater
Razzonater
2224 posts
2224 posts
25 Oct 2013 11:06am
Chris6791 said..
I watched up to the bit where they pulled apart the validity of the original research in the 50's or whenever it was, then I figured, meh, this is what I pay my GP to know so I changed channel and watch a show on doomsday preppers.



Doomsday preppers is quality also now I know where to go when it happens. Why doesnt anyone take the zombie apocolypse more serious.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
25 Oct 2013 2:47pm
petermac33 said..
And get off the cholesterol lowering meds as you don't need them anymore,now it's admitted that there is no correlation between a high saturated fat diet and high cholesterol.


Cholesterol is still bad for you. There's absolutely no argument about it.



Have got to wonder what else they lied to us about.


They didn't lie. They were wrong. They correct it. Faith, dogma or blamestorming is neither required nor wanted.

"The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge." - Boring Science.

NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
25 Oct 2013 2:38pm
evlPanda said..

petermac33 said..
And get off the cholesterol lowering meds as you don't need them anymore,now it's admitted that there is no correlation between a high saturated fat diet and high cholesterol.


Cholesterol is still bad for you. There's absolutely no argument about it.



Have got to wonder what else they lied to us about.


They didn't lie. They were wrong. They correct it. Faith, dogma or blamestorming is neither required nor wanted.

"The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge." - Boring Science.



I just watched it. It seems the original research that set off the cholesterol/saturated fat scare was a scam whereby the author cherry picked national dietary habits to draw a statistical correlation between heart disease and cholesterol.

There is good reason to believe that cholesterol is benign. In dietary studies that limit cholesterol uptake the body manufactures more to make up the discrepancy. Cholesterol seems to be a defense against inflammatory lesions cause by oxidised bits including cholesterol itself. More antioxidants mopping up free rads would probably work to minimize the lesions.

Free rads are a natural byproduct of the energy production cycle. Sugar is implicated in the production of excess free rads, carbohydrates less so.

I'm a fan of the Mediterranean diet. It's yummy. Spag bol, greek salads, lamb chops, pasta, more salads and bread and olive oil, basil pesto ... yummo. It has runs on the board. The Maccas diet doesn't.

FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15101 posts
WA, 15101 posts
25 Oct 2013 12:41pm
Just to add more clutter to this discussion, I think its awesome that I can go to the iView site, locate Catalyst, and watch it immediately!
If only you could do this anywhere in Australia
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15101 posts
WA, 15101 posts
25 Oct 2013 6:55pm
evlPanda said..

petermac33 said..
And get off the cholesterol lowering meds as you don't need them anymore,now it's admitted that there is no correlation between a high saturated fat diet and high cholesterol.


Cholesterol is still bad for you. There's absolutely no argument about it.




Well,... there is. The suggestion in the show was that cholesterol does not have a definite correlation to heart attacks.

A doctor on the program was saying that when he first started looking at it, he assumed that he was seen anomalies when he say people that died with high levels, and other people that died with low levels. After a number of years, he realised it wasn't an anomaly.
You should watch the program. Whether you believe it or not, its interesting.


There was also a suggestion that when you try to lower your cholesterol level, your body does what it can to try and restore it to the levels it was.

There was also the suggestion that only a very small amount of your cholesterol comes from your diet, and that the majority of its made by your body anyway.

decrepit
decrepit
WA
12884 posts
WA, 12884 posts
25 Oct 2013 8:38pm
Yep I saw the show, and found it very impressive.
Dr asked me to modify my diet several years ago to try and get my "Bad" cholesterol down. Diet didn't make any difference, so he concluded my body just makes too much so put me on pills.
So now what do I do?
See if my Dr watched the show, ask what she thinks?
Just stop taking them?

Or try a compromise and drop to half dose?
smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
26 Oct 2013 9:41am
Cut sugar out of your diet and really limit your carb intake. Lots of veg and meat, doesn't have to be lean, in fact it's the fat that stops hunger pangs. It's the reason why you can never last on those diets of lean meat (fish,chicken) and salad, you're always bloody hungry. Meat and bone broths stop hunger pangs too, protein is your friend. Raw nuts are a good snack too.

I've been grain, dairy and sugar free for about 4 months now, dropped 12 kilo and have never felt better. You may need to supplement zinc, magnesium and B6 but if you can stomach liver you can forgo them too.

The average GP knows sweet FA about nutrition, it's a tiny component of their training. In contrast a dietician puts in four years.

What you eat has very little effect on your cholesterol levels and regardless, cholesterol is good. Animal fat is good for you and safe to cook with, so is coconut oil. All other vegetable oils are unstable when heated, resulting in oxidation and the formation of free radicals. It's the free radicals that convert HDL to LDL cholesterol, that's the bad stuff.

Stop eating processed $hit, buy whole food and cook it yourself, remove preservatives from your diet. Find a good butcher. Anthony @ Morris pl in Innaloo is great, great value grass fed free range animals. Avoid farmed fish, they are fed crap.
stamp
stamp
QLD
2798 posts
QLD, 2798 posts
26 Oct 2013 12:06pm
smicko said..

Cut sugar out of your diet and really limit your carb intake. Lots of veg and meat, doesn't have to be lean, in fact it's the fat that stops hunger pangs. It's the reason why you can never last on those diets of lean meat (fish,chicken) and salad, you're always bloody hungry. Meat and bone broths stop hunger pangs too, protein is your friend.
I've been grain, dairy and sugar free for about 4 months now, dropped 12 kilo and have never felt better. You'll need to supplement zinc, magnesium and B6.

The average GP knows sweet FA about nutrition, it's a tiny component of their training. In contrast a dietician puts in four years.

most dieticians would never tell you to go on a grain & dairy free diet, nor recommend a high fat diet

http://daa.asn.au/for-the-public/smart-eating-for-you/nutrition-a-z/dietary-guidelines/

daa.asn.au/?page_id=268

daa.asn.au/?page_id=294
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
26 Oct 2013 2:25pm
I agree with smicko but some grains like brown rice are ok. All dairy is pasteurised so if possible stay away from that,raw milk the exception. For decrepit I would recommend watching The Beautiful Truth,a two hour doco that opened my mind up big time. Much of the food from overseas by law has to be nuked,irradiation i think they call it so buy local if possible. Just read the above link of dietary guidelines and what a croc! Coconut is a wonder food,super high in nutrients with great taste and they are telling you to avoid it.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
26 Oct 2013 4:58pm
decrepit said..

Yep I saw the show, and found it very impressive.
Dr asked me to modify my diet several years ago to try and get my "Bad" cholesterol down. Diet didn't make any difference, so he concluded my body just makes too much so put me on pills.
So now what do I do?
See if my Dr watched the show, ask what she thinks?
Just stop taking them?

Or try a compromise and drop to half dose?


I have heard (apocryphal) that a calcium scan may help. Plaques require calcium so if you are laying up plaques in your arteries there will be a tell tale trace in your blood. If the calcium is clear then it doesn't matter what your cholesterol count is.
dirtyharry
dirtyharry
WA
444 posts
WA, 444 posts
26 Oct 2013 4:28pm
What's so bad about grains?
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12884 posts
WA, 12884 posts
26 Oct 2013 8:21pm
NotWal said..

decrepit said..

Yep I saw the show, and found it very impressive.
Dr asked me to modify my diet several years ago to try and get my "Bad" cholesterol down. Diet didn't make any difference, so he concluded my body just makes too much so put me on pills.
So now what do I do?
See if my Dr watched the show, ask what she thinks?
Just stop taking them?

Or try a compromise and drop to half dose?


I have heard (apocryphal) that a calcium scan may help. Plaques require calcium so if you are laying up plaques in your arteries there will be a tell tale trace in your blood. If the calcium is clear then it doesn't matter what your cholesterol count is.


Wow, why did this get a red thumb?????

NotWal Hardie told me a similar thing yesterday, he'd heard it from a pharmacist.
Another thing to discuss with my GP.

I think it would be extremely hard for me to give up grains.
What's the negative impact of them, and is it the same for wholemeal and processed?
mineral1
mineral1
WA
4564 posts
WA, 4564 posts
26 Oct 2013 9:56pm
decrepit said..
NotWal said..



decrepit said..



Yep I saw the show, and found it very impressive.

Dr asked me to modify my diet several years ago to try and get my "Bad" cholesterol down. Diet didn't make any difference, so he concluded my body just makes too much so put me on pills.

So now what do I do?

See if my Dr watched the show, ask what she thinks?

Just stop taking them?



Or try a compromise and drop to half dose?




I have heard (apocryphal) that a calcium scan may help. Plaques require calcium so if you are laying up plaques in your arteries there will be a tell tale trace in your blood. If the calcium is clear then it doesn't matter what your cholesterol count is.


Wow, why did this get a red thumb?????

NotWal Hardie told me a similar thing yesterday, he'd heard it from a pharmacist.

Another thing to discuss with my GP.

I think it would be extremely hard for me to give up grains.

What's the negative impact of them, and is it the same for wholemeal and processed?


What about Freeka or Freekah grain, listening to the data on that grain (green wheat processed before ripe) This is supposed to be a super food
I did watch same program, and currently on medication to keep my counts low, but then I need to counteract the debilitation with muscle mass which is a side affect
smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
26 Oct 2013 11:54pm
Not so much wrong with grains, just the amount that the average person eats is the issue. The food pyramid is bull****, there's no way that our natural diet should consist of an intake of grain 4 times the amount of vegetables and 5 times the amount of protein that we are supposed to consume.
As a primate think of yourself as a chimpanzee, they don't run around collecting grass seeds, they eat predominantly vegetable matter in the form of roots and stems and protein via grubs and insects.
I'm not suggesting we eat grubs and bugs, merely that our diet should consist primarily of vegetables and protein.

We are animals. It makes no sense for us to wander around picking grass seeds (grain) and grovel under cows sucking their teats when our bodies find metabolising vegetables and meat so natural.

It just kinda makes sense to me.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply