CrossStep said.. Yes, but where did "everything that froze" come from?

There was a huge amount of stuff all compressed (where that stuff came from nobody seems to care)
after a while it was soooo compressed it exploded and made other stuff. (Nevermind that violates entropy)
The most basic atom - hydrogen - was made, and by joining together with energy input from radiation etc (no idea where that energy came from) protons and electrons and neutrons from hydrogen became other things. Eventually it also made oxygen.
Eventually hydrogen and oxygen met and made water - and that would occur. But lets neglect the fact that both are so reactive they would not exist in their natural state and would have reacted with everything else so water would be unlikely - or at least very little of it. For example ammonia would be way more prevalent but the earth got fkloads of water somehow. (Even thought that also violates entropy, all places should have more or less the same stuff after billions of years.)
Then clumps of stuff stuck together and made planets etc. They all rotate the same way for some reason, so we went back and made the aforementioned dense mass a "dense,
spinning mass...." That sounds better and makes us feel happy about why stuff spins. Yay for 'science'
Until somebody cluey figured out that
some things out there spin the wrong way and that violates the conservation of angular momentum (a thing chucked off a spinning thing will spin the same way). But we ignore that too.
So now we have where water came from and a really bad explanation that now most scientists say is not quite right but we will still teach it to kids at school.
I agree landing on a comet that has water, to figure out why we have water, is a phenomenal waste of money. How about making sure all people on earth have enough water first!!!!????
Or shall we move on to gravity waves, red shift, etc?
Heavy weather, here we come....