I had a shocker. I thought I was replying to a post but must of pressed new topic instead and saw this subject box and started to waffle on about why I need to come up with a subject then hit post and realised I started a new thread. Anyway WTF.
I had a shocker. I thought I was replying to a post but must of pressed new topic instead and saw this subject box and started to waffle on about why I need to come up with a subject then hit post and realised I started a new thread. Anyway WTF.
I had a shocker. I thought I was replying to a post but must of pressed new topic instead and saw this subject box and started to waffle on about why I need to come up with a subject then hit post and realised I started a new thread. Anyway WTF.
^^^^^Mac, this time of the season there is always teams that get written of due to poor current form and teams that are on a good winning streak and then the tide changes. Brace yourself as we still got 3 rounds to go.
What do you win for coming second, weeks out from the finals.
(Yeah,Yeah,Yeah,Scotty88......Easts etc etc etc)
I just thought of something dude, 2 weeks ago you mentioned that the Roosters are the only team to have been in since 1908. Well since they changed their name to Sydney Roosters and are no longer called Eastern Suburbs which is the name they entered in 1908 then fark me you don't qualify either.
What do you win for coming second, weeks out from the finals.
(Yeah,Yeah,Yeah,Scotty88......Easts etc etc etc)
I just thought of something dude, 2 weeks ago you mentioned that the Roosters are the only team to have been in since 1908. Well since they changed their name to Sydney Roosters and are no longer called Eastern Suburbs which is the name they entered in 1908 then fark me you don't qualify either.
Sort of right.... but not..... based on your method Newcastle could be claiming to be a foundation club on their jersey. The bulldogs could not claim as many grand final wins as they were known as the Canterbury/Bankstown "berries" ....