warwickl said..
myusernam
Agree with your view.
How would you interpret this from the PDS:
"?? floor coverings are damaged (including tiles)we will pay extra to replace continuously joined undamaged floor coverings of the same material in the same room, stairs, hallway or passageway where the damage occurred"
eg would a room open to a hall (no door) with continuously joined floating timber floor and the room has significant water damage - would the hall be included in the claim?
of course. they will try it on, just dont give in. read them the clause from the PDS. You have time on your side. They have to resolve claims, the longer it hangs on the books, the worse it is for their KPI's. Just hold out. If it says that in the PDS that's what it means. If they refuse, ask for it to be escalated. Recently suncorp tried the same thing on me with the exact situation. I said I would go all the way to the ombudsman if need be. It was escalated to the internal suncorp arbitration first of all. came back with a 180 degree backflip. You have got to remember they can save millions by saying no initially and holding out on people. Just be polite but firm and say that's what my PDS states and escalate everything till they capitulate. YOU hold the cards in the PDS, not them.
Many years ago on a different claim I rang the sales team as though I was thinking of taking out a new policy, ran the scenario I had suffered past them as a hypothetical, got the answer I wanted and then said I had that exact scenario and I had a policy but they wouldn't pay and asked to be put through to a manager. No need for that though, just read them the clause, take no excuse for an answer and escalate. There is a section in the PDS about disoutes and their internal process. follow that first letting them know you will go to an ombudsman once that avenue is exhausted (all the while politely) It says it in black and white in the PDS. They are legally bound to do so