Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Moon landing faked proof

Reply
Created by FlySurfer 6 months ago, 13 Dec 2018
hoop
WA, 1597 posts
9 Jan 2019 7:34PM
Thumbs Up

So Pm33, what's your call on the Chinese moon landing? Real or fake?

Buster fin
WA, 1902 posts
9 Jan 2019 8:07PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
IanR said..
Here's what Media Bias and Fact check have to say about World News Daily Report

World News Daily Report publishes fake news stories or hoaxes with the hope they will be shared on social media. The website contains a broad warning at the bottom of each page that indicates the website is satirical: "World News Daily Report assumes all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website - even those based on real people - are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any person, living, dead or undead, is purely a miracle."

mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-news-daily/


GOLD!

Harrow
NSW, 2624 posts
10 Jan 2019 11:48AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
stoff said..
did you actually look at some of the other stories on that site? ...Seriously, some of you guys are making yourselves look like idiots!

Of course I didn't. Everyone knows it's a satirical web-site, which I thought was quite appropriate for this thread. And you only need to take a casual glance at my avatar to see that I already look like an idiot, so nothing lost there.

Adriano
11047 posts
10 Jan 2019 2:01PM
Thumbs Up

This ought to make the flat earther moon landing idiots reassess a few things.

Enjoy this breathtaking and artful fusion of the finest modern music and science.

hilly
WA, 4627 posts
10 Jan 2019 3:56PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Adriano said..
This ought to make the flat earther moon landing idiots reassess a few things.

Enjoy this breathtaking and artful fusion of the finest modern music and science.



That is absolutely stunning. Retards will say cgi because there were no disks with a cover. Flat earth fecktards

Adriano
11047 posts
11 Jan 2019 12:00PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
hilly said..


Adriano said..
This ought to make the flat earther moon landing idiots reassess a few things.

Enjoy this breathtaking and artful fusion of the finest modern music and science.



That is absolutely stunning. Retards will say cgi because there were no disks with a cover. Flat earth fecktards

Indeed. Absolutely stunning. There is a lot of CGI to create the virtual space into which the raw NASA / Hubble ST imagaery is inserted true to red-shift spectral analysis measurements. A work that is truly the pinnacle of art and science in all of human history.

The music was written as a film score and is a tribute to the Hubble Space Telescpope project. The fading of images from focus to sharpness tells a story of the ill-fated beginnings of this miraculous machine. It initially went through a painstaking baptism of fire through failure and then finally after major repairs, capturing the climactic deep space images. Now beautifully reimagined here in realistically 3D rendered virtual space and made impossibly dramatic with the fine music.

All images are NASA / Hubble composited into this film.

I don't expect most people to grasp the import and ground breaking collaboration in this film, but I hope it will resonate more over time.

hilly
WA, 4627 posts
11 Jan 2019 1:18PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Adriano said..
I don't expect most people to grasp the import and ground breaking collaboration in this film, but I hope it will resonate more over time.

Totally agree it is a milestone.

petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
11 Jan 2019 2:09PM
Thumbs Up

Bono loves their heliocentric model to the degree of reaching intense big 0's.

You really think he's going to give up that model?

GeoffD
WA, 56 posts
11 Jan 2019 3:00PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
Bono loves their heliocentric model to the degree of reaching intense big 0's.

You really think he's going to give up that model?


Why would he? It's called "reality".

Adriano
11047 posts
11 Jan 2019 3:10PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
Bono loves their heliocentric model to the degree of reaching intense big 0's.

You really think he's going to give up that model?

I suppose the whole universe is flat too?

Why can't you see the staggering beauty of reality, instead of believing in this flat crap?

It's farking gorgeous mate.

Wake the fark up.

petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
11 Jan 2019 5:19PM
Thumbs Up

I agree it is gorgeous and supposedly resulted out of nothing aka their utterly ridiculous Big Bang theory.

That Big Bang in turn led to their other laughable theory of evolution.

Hey,if it helps you get your 8 hours deep sleep....

Kamikuza
QLD, 3913 posts
11 Jan 2019 8:22PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
I agree it is gorgeous and supposedly resulted out of nothing aka their utterly ridiculous Big Bang theory.

That Big Bang in turn led to their other laughable theory of evolution.

Hey,if it helps you get your 8 hours deep sleep....


Define nothing.

And your alternative explanation is...?

GeoffD
WA, 56 posts
11 Jan 2019 6:34PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Kamikuza said..

petermac33 said..
I agree it is gorgeous and supposedly resulted out of nothing aka their utterly ridiculous Big Bang theory.

That Big Bang in turn led to their other laughable theory of evolution.

Hey,if it helps you get your 8 hours deep sleep....



Define nothing.

And your alternative explanation is...?


^^^ What Kamikuza said.

I'm not holding my breath.

FlySurfer
NSW, 3993 posts
11 Jan 2019 9:20PM
Thumbs Up

Since some of you aren't smart enough to ask google, I'll lend a helping finger...

listverse.com/2015/12/27/10-alternatives-to-the-conventional-big-bang-theory/

hilly
WA, 4627 posts
11 Jan 2019 8:32PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
FlySurfer said..
Since some of you aren't smart enough to ask google, I'll lend a helping finger...

listverse.com/2015/12/27/10-alternatives-to-the-conventional-big-bang-theory/


No flat earth theories there.

Kamikuza
QLD, 3913 posts
12 Jan 2019 12:05AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
FlySurfer said..
Since some of you aren't smart enough to ask google, I'll lend a helping finger...

listverse.com/2015/12/27/10-alternatives-to-the-conventional-big-bang-theory/




No I want to know what Pete's explanation is that is powerful enough to go against scientific consensus. Not ten more random collections of whackadoodlery that have to be re-debunked by me personally.

"There are various problems with this theory" ... no ****, Sherlock.

...Photons lose energy LOL

petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
12 Jan 2019 2:25AM
Thumbs Up

You guys are not going to get your answer as I have no proof - suffice to say in the Bible it is mentioned frequently of a great deception on morality. I see this increasingly daily so I'm going with intelligent design / God.

Kamikuza
QLD, 3913 posts
12 Jan 2019 10:03AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
You guys are not going to get your answer as I have no proof - suffice to say in the Bible it is mentioned frequently of a great deception on morality. I see this increasingly daily so I'm going with intelligent design / God.



The Bible was written by men many years after the events and then compiled to suit an agenda hundreds of years later by another group of men.

"Great deception" ... you're not wrong, bub.

And god got even the simplest of science wrong eh.

Sucker.

vosadrian
NSW, 264 posts
14 Jan 2019 8:54AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
You guys are not going to get your answer as I have no proof - suffice to say in the Bible it is mentioned frequently of a great deception on morality. I see this increasingly daily so I'm going with intelligent design / God.


HI Peter,

I am interested in the conflict between bible base religion and the heliocentric model. Why is it not possible that God created the Universe in this way. How does this model in any way take away from the Bible and religions based upon it? This model is consistent with big bang and evolution, but the model is not proof for either of those things. Nor is it proof against the biblical creation?

mazdon
923 posts
14 Jan 2019 8:53AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
I agree it is gorgeous and supposedly resulted out of nothing aka their utterly ridiculous Big Bang theory.

That Big Bang in turn led to their other laughable theory of evolution.

Hey,if it helps you get your 8 hours deep sleep....



www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmD9ZWDUsNY

decrepit
WA, 9180 posts
14 Jan 2019 10:52AM
Thumbs Up

Not about the moon, but right here on Earth.

Select to expand quote

Rapid shifts in the Earth's north magnetic pole are forcing researchers to make an unprecedented early update to a model that helps ships, planes and submarines in the Arctic navigate, scientists said.

Key points:The wandering pole is driven by unpredictable changes in liquid iron deep inside the Earth. The recent shifts in the north magnetic pole will not affect most people outside the Arctic. In most places, smartphone compasses would be pointing fractionally wrong
Compass needles point towards the north magnetic pole, a point which has crept unpredictably from the coast of northern Canada a century ago to the middle of the Arctic Ocean, moving towards Russia."It's moving at about 50km a year. It didn't move much between 1900 and 1980 but it's really accelerated in the past 40 years," Ciaran Beggan, of the British Geological Survey (BGS) in Edinburgh, said.


The global Earth has a very logical explanation for this, how do flat earthers explain it???

petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
14 Jan 2019 12:46PM
Thumbs Up

"Scientists said" - yeah their scientists.

Biblical writings point clearly to the earth being fixed and unmovable.

The modern lie of Cosmology starts around the 44 minute mark. Their laughable theory of evolution is entirely dependant on their Big Bang theory which miraculously resulted in the heliocentric model. This vid explains how they tie them together - and it exposes it as a lie . Again,the cosmology part starts at around 44minures minutes.

FormulaNova
NSW, 8791 posts
14 Jan 2019 2:49PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
"Scientists said" - yeah their scientists.

Biblical writings point clearly to the earth being fixed and unmovable.

The modern lie of Cosmology starts around the 44 minute mark. Their laughable theory of evolution is entirely dependant on their Big Bang theory which miraculously resulted in the heliocentric model. This vid explains how they tie them together - and it exposes it as a lie . Again,the cosmology part starts at around 44minures minutes.



Why are you saying these theories are dependent on each other? Not at all.

How is evolution tied to a round earth?

How is the big bang theory tied to anything else?

For all you know, they could all be true and god was created from the big bang, and then went on to start the other processes.

Have you thought about becoming a Mormon instead?

petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
14 Jan 2019 1:14PM
Thumbs Up

Perhaps I have should not have used the word dependant.

One should never critically question science is the definition of scientism in the above doc.

The faked moon landings are a wake up call for many.

mclovin
SA, 723 posts
14 Jan 2019 2:48PM
Thumbs Up

Science is all about questioning science. If you didn't question things we'd all think we lived on a flat earth. That would be very very sad indeed if we were all that stupid.

GeoffD
WA, 56 posts
14 Jan 2019 1:39PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..
"Scientists said" - yeah their scientists.

Biblical writings point clearly to the earth being fixed and unmovable.

The modern lie of Cosmology starts around the 44 minute mark. Their laughable theory of evolution is entirely dependant on their Big Bang theory which miraculously resulted in the heliocentric model. This vid explains how they tie them together - and it exposes it as a lie . Again,the cosmology part starts at around 44minures minutes.



The bible isn't a science book. Not even close. It's a man made, historical, traditional political account justifying occupation and behaviour of a select group of desert dwellers, including propaganda and fictionalised accounts. Ask yourself - what's more likely for the spread of just another Mediterranean cult of a dying and rising God? The universal and inherent goodness of the message (debatable) or the fact In 313 AD, the Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in 313 AD and formalised Christianity as the state religion or the Roman Empire?

Are you seriously telling us with a straight face you take your world view from the literal interpretation of writings by a bunch of ignorant Bronze Age desert dwelling psychopaths who had no idea where the rain came from? And for the nth time - who, exactly, is "they"?



petermac33
WA, 5040 posts
14 Jan 2019 2:02PM
Thumbs Up

Their claims are not science either. Like sending space probes billions of kilometres away - no veritable evidence just claims and shady images.

Science should be verifiable - all their claims of the moon landings are not,not to mention they look completely fake too!

Adriano
11047 posts
14 Jan 2019 2:04PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
petermac33 said..Biblical writings point clearly to the earth being fixed and unmovable.


LOL

Well blow me down - who can argue with the bible?

It's NEVER been proven to be wrong!

rockmagnet
QLD, 1183 posts
14 Jan 2019 7:08PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Adriano said..


petermac33 said..Biblical writings point clearly to the earth being fixed and unmovable.




LOL

Well blow me down - who can argue with the bible?

It's NEVER been proven to be wrong!



I do like the bit about having a concubine, it's not all bad.

Adriano
11047 posts
14 Jan 2019 6:40PM
Thumbs Up

Exodus 21:7 7

"If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do."

Quality stuff.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Moon landing faked proof" started by FlySurfer