My vote .... tubby tailor

Incredibly boring batsman = incredibly boring commentator.
How 'bout that?

James Brayshaw would run a very close second. What dull commentator. Then again he compares the CH9 footy show, but that's where his skill ends in regards to comparing anything outside this gig. He was dulllllll with the 3rd test in WA.

The commentators are positively invigorating compared to the game

I actually don't rate Skull. He's funny at first, but after a while you realise he is quite limited intellectually.

SandS said...

My vote .... tubby tailor

Geez that's harsh. Taylor is a great student of the game. He made shane warne

ikw777 said...

I actually don't rate Skull. He's funny at first, but after a while you realise he is quite limited intellectually.

And your on this forum for intellectual stimulation because KOK can't provide the brain food? Me too but I try not to stray too far from the one word at a time thread.

Stuthepirate said...

Ian Chappell is like listening to someone pulling teeth.
Has no constructive commentry unless it's to do with the 1970 Oz cricket team.
Why was/is he part of the selectors with such a negative outlook.??

Yes, I change my vote Ian Chappell is equal first !!!!

ikw777 said...

I actually don't rate Skull. He's funny at first, but after a while you realise he is quite limited intellectually.

What are you after intellectual conversation or good commentary with a bit of humour thrown in ??

I'll take the latter any day.....

And by the way, I've been to a couple of local cricket club fundraisers where he has been the guest speaker and he does have a broad knowledge of cricket along with a good ear for cricket gossip that goes well with his sense of humour. Well worth the effort to go along and have an enjoyable night without having to worry about over stimulating your intellect.

Funny combo that you are looking for there really - intellect and cricket commentary.

I look for a bit of light entertainment in cricket - don't always get it though.