Oakagee update

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
buz
buz
WA
29 posts
buz buz
WA, 29 posts
24 Jul 2010 8:24pm

Cant find room in the budget to build an artificial reef
Cant find room in the surfbreak for a Port
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
25 Jul 2010 12:03am
Good Luck!
cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
24 Jul 2010 11:55pm
Impressive production, very dramatic.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15102 posts
WA, 15102 posts
25 Jul 2010 7:10am
Impressive, but I think the numbers must be wrong:

678,000,000 million from the federal and state governments? That's 678,000 Billion dollars, or 678 trillion dollars.

3,822,000,000 billion from the private sector? That's 3,822,000,000,000,000,000 AUD?

Wow, if they can get that sort of money, I am all for it. That should fund the country for a while. Everyone here can have a couple of billion dollars each, and we will all be laughing...

P.S. it is a lot, not 'alot'.

colinwill78
colinwill78
VIC
1395 posts
VIC, 1395 posts
25 Jul 2010 5:29pm
FormulaNova said...

Impressive, but I think the numbers must be wrong:

678,000,000 million from the federal and state governments? That's 678,000 Billion dollars, or 678 trillion dollars.

3,822,000,000 billion from the private sector? That's 3,822,000,000,000,000,000 AUD?


P.S. it is a lot, not 'alot'.




Makes them look bad when they dick-up something as fundamental as this.
well noted.
cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
25 Jul 2010 4:40pm
colinwill78 said...

FormulaNova said...

Impressive, but I think the numbers must be wrong:

678,000,000 million from the federal and state governments? That's 678,000 Billion dollars, or 678 trillion dollars.

3,822,000,000 billion from the private sector? That's 3,822,000,000,000,000,000 AUD?


P.S. it is a lot, not 'alot'.




Makes them look bad when they dick-up something as fundamental as this.
well noted.


My young bloke was watching it over my shoulder and commented on alot also, damn spelling nazis. I was at Oakagee the same day Barnett was in town, the day after the 4 mtr swell. It would have been interesting pushing a rock wall out that day.

deXtrous
deXtrous
NSW
451 posts
NSW, 451 posts
26 Jul 2010 12:18am
The production of that video was nice, I guess.

I felt like I was watching the opening scene of a movie, is it a movie? You call it a film in the first line.

The dialogue was extremely confusing, to someone who has never heard of this before. Example: "Given that the proposed site at Oakagee is not protected or sheltered. How do you think Oakagee is going to go". It sounds like you're talking about two different locations there. I had to rewind the video just to see if they both said the same place.

I was also confused on the money part and I stopped watching at 4:20 because the music and text was getting far too annoying. I wanted to keep watching so I knew what was going on, but can anyone provide me a nice text link instead?

I hope you posted this here for some critisism, or else I feel like a dick.
cranky
cranky
440 posts
440 posts
26 Jul 2010 2:41pm
deXtrous said...

The production of that video was nice, I guess.

but can anyone provide me a nice text link instead?




The short story is: They (they being the iron ore miners, the gov and anyone else who stands to make a buck or exploit it in some way) want to build a big arse deep water port from scratch with all the associated infrastructure in a questionable location which happens to be Oakagee. The opposition to this port is a hand full of greenies and windsurfers mostly because it has a nice little left hander that is going to be lost for ever. The other 90% of the local population either don't care because they have never been to Oakagee or believe there will be jobs for everyone,gold paved roads and development is good.





sausage
sausage
QLD
4874 posts
QLD, 4874 posts
26 Jul 2010 8:06pm
"Computer says NO"
buz
buz
WA
29 posts
buz buz
WA, 29 posts
19 Aug 2010 7:30am
ouch
Tux
Tux
VIC
3829 posts
Tux Tux
VIC, 3829 posts
19 Aug 2010 12:49pm
Its a ****ed idea....for the money they could upgrade the existing roads and infrastructer at the port, it would be way more protetcted and wouldn't ruin another pristine enviroment. BTW it has a nice left and right hnader on its day.....
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
19 Aug 2010 4:54pm
Tux said...

Its a ****ed idea....for the money they could upgrade the existing roads and infrastructer at the port, it would be way more protetcted and wouldn't ruin another pristine enviroment. BTW it has a nice left and right hnader on its day.....


I agree completely but if you look at from the viewpoint of the "investors" it has no bearing on the fact that a dollar will be turned over.

I posted last night about my mate who makes heavy duty springs for trains, leastways he is the maintenance manager for a company that does. They are replacing them on chinese coal carriages imported from china. They buy our coal but we have to buy their carriages.

It is irrelevant that they are ****ed And now they are talking about buying the railway!!!!!!!!!!!!

You only have to look at the infrastructure in africa which was installed but never espected to work. Have a look at some of the massive power installations in the Congo that fizzled before the lit a bulb. Likely that some of your money went into those too.

It never ceases to amaze me that we send all the raw ingredients for steel overseas and buy back crap quality at a premium.

The people who come up with this sort of crap have not a care in the world what impact it will have on you, on the environement or on your country. Keep up the good work Buz

Hopefully the flame will start a fire
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply