Property prices and stuff

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
2 Apr 2011 5:15pm
I'm in my mid 40's with two teenageers, one who is now 18 and is experiencing the pleasures of work. As a checkout chick in IGA she get's $15 per hour.

I recall when I was her age I think I was earning roughly 2/3 of that wage, maybe $10 an hour.

I bought my house when my wife was pregnant with Hollie for $180K in Elwood we had another one, Seb, and later moved further East - as you do - to a bigger home. We sold our place for 400k and bought a bigger one in the East for the same value.

I think now our home is worth 1.1M

If you do your maths I think I'm better off not working - the price of our house/land makes more income than I make.

It doesn't make sense. I reckon there is definitely a housing bubble that's going to burst.
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
2 Apr 2011 8:46pm
Classic!

Work!? - you need some sort of steady income to pay for groceries!

Bubble!? - they are quoting intake into greater Melbourne of 1500 people per week. That softens any bubble. Plus we dodged the global recession on the back of resources. I can't see a significant "bursting of the bubble". But perhaps a flattening period.

Move again ! - to the coast to your South East, or South West!

Mining/Resources - don't underestimate the collateral wealth that it provides to Australia... the guys working in the field, transport operations, a plethora of suppliers and their workers, white collar project management, accommodation services, pubs & restaurants near the sites, etc, etc. Then plenty of that money finds its way back to city bakeries, restaurants, grocery stores, car yards, footy clubs.... Mining & Resources collateral should never be underestimated.... (then a government sees an opportunity... another tax or two gets invented! - mining & carbon taxes are quite popular in their concepts to some,.... but plain and simple, cost of living increases again... - yes we need a sustainable future... no easy answers... )
lotofwind
lotofwind
NSW
6451 posts
NSW, 6451 posts
2 Apr 2011 9:42pm
Do you hate your puppy as well yet?????LOL
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
2 Apr 2011 10:19pm
Recently had an old buddy staying from London. He moved out after a couple of weeks into a share house. I saw him about 3 moths ago he said he was moving back to London. He said he couldn't afford to live in Melbourne!!!!
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
2 Apr 2011 7:32pm
log man said...

Recently had an old buddy staying from London. He moved out after a couple of weeks into a share house. I saw him about 3 moths ago he said he was moving back to London. He said he couldn't afford to live in Melbourne!!!!


see ya buddy, bye buddy, have a great trip buddy, bon voyage buddy, enjoy the rest of your miserable life buddy, buddy.
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
2 Apr 2011 8:31pm
log man said...

here's a bit of perspective http://www.historicproperties.com/results.asp


Thanks buddy. I tried to look up McKinnon and after some frustration I thought to myself that I should start smoking again.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
2 Apr 2011 11:44pm
Mckinnon, I'd rather live in London
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
2 Apr 2011 8:45pm
log man said...

Mckinnon, I'd rather live in London


Not only do I live in stupid McKinnon, I'm living in the shadow of a Henley Home going up right next door. I'm going to have a fag right now.

I sure have made some poor life choices.

Thanks buddy
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
3 Apr 2011 12:10am
oliver said...
If you do your maths I think I'm better off not working - the price of our house/land makes more income than I make.


I know somebody that has done exactly this for 8 years now. Super nice place too. Just keeps taking out equity.

evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
3 Apr 2011 12:13am
log man said...

Recently had an old buddy staying from London. He moved out after a couple of weeks into a share house. I saw him about 3 moths ago he said he was moving back to London. He said he couldn't afford to live in Melbourne!!!!



What? I'm starting work there next week week and I'm seriously considering buying instead of renting because studio units (all i need) in the city start at $135,000. < That is not a typo.

That said I'm waiting a few months for them to fall further.
FlySurfer
FlySurfer
NSW
4460 posts
NSW, 4460 posts
3 Apr 2011 12:27am
I've been a property bear and expecting a global crash since 2003.

I've given up trying to predict property prices, but I will tell you this... I work with some Chinese, last week a Chinese woman came to see another and they started talking:
C1: I worry my Chinese asset, I have x, y z; China economy maybe have big problem.
C2: I already sell my Shanghai property, make 4x what I pay
C1: I only buy x 2 year ago
C2: Leave it, sell y & z bring some money Australia
C1: Australia maybe no good, remember 2 year ago A$ go down 30% (actually went down 35%)
...
I was quite surprise 2 chinese women were discussing chinas economy in a concerned manner.

Is the Aus property market a bubble? I think so, but bubbles are relative.

I know I'd prefer to buy my mates place near Daytona beach FL for $240k vs a shack somewhere in Aus.
Or a villa in Marbella Spain.

But I look at property as a place to live vs an investment. My investments are up some 100% in the past year, and I rent.
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
3 Apr 2011 11:42am
I'm not sure how Sydney property prices can be said to be overpriced.

I bought my first house in 1994 for $100K in Nambucca Heads. I was earning $20K a year. So the house cost me around five times my salary. Mortgage interest rates were about 13% a year.

We bought a unit in Sydney in 2007 for again around five times my salary.

We bought a house on the Central Coast of NSW last year for a bit over $300K. Again thats about five times my salary.


Sure if I bought a house in Neutral Bay it would cost probably 15 or 20 times my salary but that was probably the case back 15 years ago too.

Right now in Sydney where I live it costs about $420 a week to rent a two bedroom flat. You can buy the same flat for around $410K. If you have a deposit and buy the flat you won't pay much more in mortgage payments than what you will for rent. One of my neighbours did exactly that last year. Bought a unit nearby to live in.

Rents in Sydney are so high and they are the reason why real estate prices will not drop. Why would a place renting for $400 or $500 a week suddenly drop in value to $150K to $300K? If they did people would buy them and get positive gearing on them. Buy 10 and don't work any more. Prices would go back up very quickly.

Unless Sydney experiences a drop in income due to high unemployment then prices won't drop. The other issue is a lack of land in Sydney. We have the mountains to the west, the national parks to the north and south and the ocean to the east. There really isn't that much spare land in the Sydney basin. Mean while tons of people move here from interstate, country NSW and overseas. Is the only place where there are the goods, services and jobs people want. The big problem with Sydney is there are too many people here. Too many people raises rents. Too many people cause congestion. It took me two hours on Friday afternoon to drive from Campsie to Hornsby. Thats around a 30km trip. Traffic jam after traffic jam. To many cars on the road.

I'm not sure about Melbourne or Brisbane prices. In Melbourne there seem to be tons of new units going on the market all the time. We don't get that in Sydney. Also when flying into Melbourne you see all that flat land stretching out forever. We don't have that in Sydney either. Looks like you could fit a few hundred thousand houses out there no worries. Brisbane has a lot of flat land around it too.

How will a buyers strike work? Withdrawal of capital? Problem is you may go on strike but what about the couple living down the street who won't? You won't buy the place but they will. So you just refuse to buy somewhere. Thats fair enough but in the meantime you are paying someone else's mortgage by renting or you have to live with your family or something like that.

Whenever a place is up for rent around where I live they have an open day on a Saturday and about 20 or 30 people come around. There is really a shortage of housing. A supply shortage plus high demand is driving the rents up and that is pushing prices up.

Economists in England or Geneva don't get that. They think Australia is a big empty country. In one respect it is but on the other hand its not. People don't or can't live out in rural and regional areas. Besides housing prices in many country towns are not that cheap anymore either.




oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
3 Apr 2011 3:45pm
Maybe, it's a little different comparing suburbs of Melbourne to regional areas of NSW.

I bought my first house in 1993 and in the past 18 years it's probably gone up 500% , I'm guessing my wages have increased about 300% during the same period.

I just did a quick lookup of Nambucca Heads and can see that medium home prices are around $300,000 So I'm assuming that it's gone up around 300% during the same period. What was odd about these stats is that units in Nambucca Heads have gone up much more than houses and in 2010 had the same median price.

www.realestate.com.au/sold/?a=sp&s=nsw&u=nambucca%20heads

This got me thinkin' If I buy a median priced home there for $300K, bowl it and build a block of four flats and sell them at the median price of $300K each my income would go through the roof and I wouldn't need to hop on this forum and whine about rising house prices and working at dead end jobs.
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
3 Apr 2011 5:59pm
You need to be careful with those Nambucca Heads stats. They might have dropped a big block of premium beach front units onto the market to skew the stats....
dirtyharry
dirtyharry
WA
444 posts
WA, 444 posts
3 Apr 2011 7:34pm
Mobydisc said...

I'm not sure how Sydney property prices can be said to be overpriced.

I bought my first house in 1994 for $100K in Nambucca Heads. I was earning $20K a year. So the house cost me around five times my salary. Mortgage interest rates were about 13% a year.

We bought a unit in Sydney in 2007 for again around five times my salary.

We bought a house on the Central Coast of NSW last year for a bit over $300K. Again thats about five times my salary.



Wouldn't this argument only make sense if you were earning the same salary now as you were in 1994 (in relative terms)? Doesn't your point indicate for someone to buy a Sydney house today that they would need to be in a point in their career 17 years further ahead than they would have had to have been if they were to buy an equivalent place back in 1994? If this is the case then I reckon you have demonstrated that Australian houses are indeed overpriced.

Or am I missing the point? Or are you earning the same salary now as you were in 1994 (plus CPI)?


cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
3 Apr 2011 11:43pm
Some say Real Estate is the basis of all wealth. Usually that is what wars are fought for.

Others say Cash Flow is King. Cash flow enables accumulation of asetts (be they precious property, metal, paper, vehicles or yachts) by using leverage (borrowing somebody else's money).

Some others say family, friends and memories are the most valueable things in life (ie, money spent on doing things is better spent than on buying things).

What say Ye??
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
3 Apr 2011 9:50pm
I'd say your third option is the most valuable to me, what do you think is most valuable - fence sitter - errr I mean Cisco?
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
3 Apr 2011 11:56pm
I am in the first and the third options and am looking at the second....angry man ..err oliver.
bownes
bownes
122 posts
122 posts
4 Apr 2011 3:33am
"It doesn't make sense. I reckon there is definitely a housing bubble that's going to burst."

I agree...The long term average house price in Australia was equal to 4 to 5 times the average wage..now it is nearing 9 times average wage.

Simple reason is the banks have steadily increased the loan to value ratios injecting more liquidity to the market place pushing prices up...

The cracks have started to appear and when you have some of the biggest fund managers in the world like George Soros shorting the Ausie property market via the banks I think you have to take note. These guys made billions off the back of the US and Europe property melt down.

Negative gearing an investment property could be financial suicide as equity slides away in what I believe is an upcoming credit squeeze..

www.macrobusiness.com.au/2011/03/what-did-he-just-say/

macrobusiness.com.au/2011/01/the-gold-coasts-other-casino/

www.macrobusiness.com.au/2011/03/what-did-he-just-say/

Little Jon
Little Jon
NSW
2115 posts
NSW, 2115 posts
4 Apr 2011 2:06pm
I think immigration is too high putting pressure on housing. If we cut back on immigration then their is more for the rest of us!
NasiGoreng
NasiGoreng
VIC
260 posts
VIC, 260 posts
4 Apr 2011 2:21pm
oliver said...


It doesn't make sense. I reckon there is definitely a housing bubble that's going to burst.


I am lucky enough to of seen this before.

The population of Aus is being divided into two types of people.

*Young people that can get on the property ladder - "the owners" and pre existing property owners

*Young people and families that cant afford to purchase a property - "the renters"

property prices will continue to rise for years to come, (far quicker than the average CPI wage increase) dividing the classes and as the renting market grows so does the demand for rental properties. which makes more capital/ equity for the "owners" to increase their property portfolio.

welcome to the class system australia.
patsken
patsken
WA
717 posts
WA, 717 posts
4 Apr 2011 3:21pm
Property prices are one of the top dinner party topics of discussion anywhere in Australia ... and I would guess in any part of the "first world" regions.

Ozzies seem to do it best though by beating themselves up over whether they have TOO much invested in property, over committed themselves, don't have enough property or the hottest one -- how are the young ones ever going to afford to enter the property market ???

Well regardless of where you sit in the equation there AINT too much you can do about it. The market is the market and if you do decide to jump on for the ride you ( like most of us ) will do your utmost to pay the mortgage -- even to the detriment of having a new board or sail every year...

Having said that I would probably baulk at locking myself into the level of debt required now but don't forget younger folk ( I'm ++50 ) have a different tolerance to life's challenges than someone of my vintage.

The worst that could happen is another GFC where you see property prices dropping way below what was paid for them a month or two before
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
4 Apr 2011 8:01pm
My ten cents.

I was in London jumping up and down saying that it was unsustainable.

We had a murder outside our house and the estate agent lifted up the police tape to show someone round a 1.5 bedroom tiny appartment upstairs from us that was for sale for 450 GBP.

Yet still it sold.

House prices need to make sense in the context of the value that you get from living in the house otherwise it is just speculation. With this in mind, you need to look at long term rental vs buying.

In the UK it became cheaper to rent at one point (with all the economics and projected inflation, discounting of future returns etc, long term house price accumulation), at that was when the bubble burst... but not what caused the bubble to burst.

All bubbles are different to one another (something Greenspan said in the wake of the last bubble bursting - not that he is necessary a great person to quote at this point in history).

The UK bubble was a combination of speculation based

perceptions on population growth (it's not far off growth in Oz - and oz has space to use)

www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=wb-wdi&met=sp_pop_totl&idim=country:GBR&dl=en&hl=en&q=uk+population

stupid lending (aussie banks are not stupid but not great either and are dependent upon foreign creditors)

good news (bankers getting silly bonuses)


It ended when the banks were not able to lend as much, meaning they stopped the good news


Ultimately the same thing won't happen in the same way in Australia. However a few things look a bit wobbly....

1 Australian retail employs a lot of people and it's terribly uncompetitive and over priced

2 Australian retail pays huge rent on the properties that are owned by Aussie super funds

3 Aussie super funds are invested heavily in Aussie companies

4 Apart from mining. What is growing in the economy? And mining profits don't necessarily stay in Australia

5 The average house price to median wage ratio is extremely high


I know everyone will start banging on about immigration. You can't say that immigrants are unskilled impoverished and taking from society, whilst also maintaining that they are able to push the housing market up with their immense wealth....
roder
roder
27 posts
27 posts
4 Apr 2011 8:27pm
When comparing average incomes to average prices, one significant, often overlooked factor is increase in dual incomes in paying off house. Probably more important is that banks now assess ability to pay on dual incomes and having children will not necessarily mean that dual income stream will cease.
dirtyharry
dirtyharry
WA
444 posts
WA, 444 posts
4 Apr 2011 8:44pm
roder said...

When comparing average incomes to average prices, one significant, often overlooked factor is increase in dual incomes in paying off house. Probably more important is that banks now assess ability to pay on dual incomes and having children will not necessarily mean that dual income stream will cease.


True. Another point indicating that growth in house prices in recent times is unsustainable. There is no 3rd income to start bringing in to maintain the growth rate after everyone is using 2 incomes.

roder
roder
27 posts
27 posts
4 Apr 2011 8:48pm
correct in the sense that any further growth is unsustainable, but any growth attributable to dual incomes is heree to stay... unless number of dual incomes declines.

dirtyharry
dirtyharry
WA
444 posts
WA, 444 posts
4 Apr 2011 8:52pm
Yep, maybe. But how many property investors are sitting on negatively geared properties purchased in the last 5-10 years based on the excellent capital gains they've seen? When the capital gains cease due to the need for a non-existent third income to maintain the growth rate, the negative gearing situation starts looking pretty unattractive and everyone bolts for the exist (popping the bubble).

Maybe, maybe not. Time will tell.

bownes
bownes
122 posts
122 posts
5 Apr 2011 3:23am
Immigration will not stop the housing bubble from bursting.
It did not stop the bubble bursting in Ireland and the US which were countries of high immigration why are we so different....
It's about affordability, return on investment and liquidity.
IMO property is currently a high risk low return investment. Australian housing is the most expensive its been in history relative to the average income and yields are lowest. Negatively geared property could be the financial death of many if capital values slide.
Lending is down 20% so far this year compared to last year according to Broker News (I will try and find the link to that info).



Little Jon said...

I think immigration is too high putting pressure on housing. If we cut back on immigration then their is more for the rest of us!


bownes
bownes
122 posts
122 posts
5 Apr 2011 3:36am
roder said...

When comparing average incomes to average prices, one significant, often overlooked factor is increase in dual incomes in paying off house. Probably more important is that banks now assess ability to pay on dual incomes and having children will not necessarily mean that dual income stream will cease.


Exactly right IMO and that is another reason why we won't see great capital gains on property which we have enjoyed over the last decade or more....there won't be a third income into these house holds.
The second income is fully factored into the high prices of Australian residential property...

Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5124 posts
VIC, 5124 posts
5 Apr 2011 12:52pm
If you lived on the capital growth of your houses you would be working, just in a different profession. You would be a property speculator. Lots of people do that.

That's fine as long as you can generate enough income to live and to purchase new properties. You can also renovate or subdivide or whatever you want to do to increase the income you gain. It's all work, just different to what you are doing.

I would not debate that property is expensive now. But that has awlays seemed the case.

In the late 70s, when I started working, houses in Bentleigh were around $45000. With my $5000 annual income and the prevailing social attitudes it made more sense to spend my money on cars, surfboards, drugs and women. There was no way I would ever be able to save up enough to buy a house or submit to the horror of having a mortgage for the rest of my life.

Looking back, I could have bought a cliff top property near Flinders with my own beach for $7000, which is what I paid for a car at the same time. That property recently sold a few years ago for $8m.

We used to hang out in farms out the back of Mullumbimby and I could have bought great chunks of land near Byron for $100,000. Of course I didn't do that. Who in their right mind wants to go into a business partnership with a bunch of flea bitten drug addicts on the dole?
NasiGoreng
NasiGoreng
VIC
260 posts
VIC, 260 posts
5 Apr 2011 2:20pm
You have to think outside the box a little,

I went rural and just bought a BIG 1 bed unit for $107k.

* 25 mins from the bay
* 50 mins to Bells beach
* and commutable distance to work in Melb CBD

Unit is massive, modern, freshly renowed, new kitchen, huge yard and I sometimes get koalas come visit.
Been there 4 weeks now, and know half the town already.
Only place Ive ever lived where you dont have to lock your car/ house!!

Home Loan balance is 1.2 years wages....

Im 34.

RESULT?....
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply