Something for the Socialists to Consider.

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
17 Nov 2011 12:25am
You know who you are and yes it is a copy/paste.
..........................................................................

Is this man truly a genius?

An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never
failed a single student before, but had recently failed an entire class.
That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked and that no one would
be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this class on
Obama's plan"..
All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no
one would fail and no one would receive an A...

After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The
students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little
were happy. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied
little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they
wanted a free ride too so they studied little.

The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.

As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering, blame and
name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the
benefit of anyone else.

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that
socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the
effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away,
no one will try or want to succeed.



Could not be any simpler than that. Remember, there is
a test coming up. The 2012 elections.
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
17 Nov 2011 1:53am


What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..

What's missing from our socialist country is the leadership with backbone that is required to make those institutions work for the people by representing the people and not pandering to banks and big business...


Agent000
Agent000
161 posts
161 posts
17 Nov 2011 12:45am
hey cisco, socialism is not communism.
those who strive to achieve are still rewarded, they just help out those less fortunate than themselves on the way.
sounds like a fair plan to me.
youngbull
youngbull
QLD
826 posts
QLD, 826 posts
17 Nov 2011 2:58am
Interesting - Could not agree more. You see it everywhere the slack getting slacker and the workers doing endless overtime to get what they/me wants.

People are not always unfortunate just lazy.


No free rides - not even family.
I also say abolish the dole and introduce food tokens and prepaid rent cards.





Underoath
Underoath
QLD
2434 posts
QLD, 2434 posts
17 Nov 2011 3:01am
youngbull said...

Interesting - Could not agree more. You see it everywhere the slack getting slacker and the workers doing endless overtime to get what they/me wants.


No free rides - not even family.
I also say abolish the dole and introduce food tokens and prepaid rent cards.




Good post,
Give it 10 years in this country, when a majority of baby boomers are retired. The gov might have to make some hard decisions to balance the books.

That is unless you like it Greek style?
sabydent
sabydent
360 posts
360 posts
17 Nov 2011 4:30am
theDoctor said...



What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..





And exactly who pays for all this free education, free health care and general laziness?

If it is such a good system and you truly believe in it, please send me $100. I want to go out for a nice supper and don't feel like working for it.

FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15105 posts
WA, 15105 posts
17 Nov 2011 4:44am
Most economies are a mix of capitalism and socialism.

What's the problem? You have just got to get the right mix.
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
17 Nov 2011 8:36am
sabydent said...

theDoctor said...



What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..





And exactly who pays for all this free education, free health care and general laziness?

If it is such a good system and you truly believe in it, please send me $100. I want to go out for a nice supper and don't feel like working for it.




Who pays?

There would be an equitable tax system where the high earners actually paid tax.....
barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
17 Nov 2011 6:43am
Hey everyone, I'm a Rule Nazi and rabble rabble rabble rabble..

* No abuse, insults or personal attacks
* No foul language
* No trolling
* No inappropriate or illegal material
* No "For Sale" or "Wanted to Buy"
* No business advertising
* No cross posting
* No forum spamming
* No religious or political debates
* No defamatory comments
* No duplicate logins
* No complaints about moderation (email us instead)


gibberjoe
gibberjoe
SA
956 posts
SA, 956 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:19am

Formular.......most economys are a mix of socialism and capitialism !

that's OK but, [}:)] any cooking show resipie dosn't stop there. There

are many additives to bring it all together, so now add religion, and then

education, a pinch off ethnicity, a blob of cultures, a handfull of ego's.

a two gear economy, wealthy and less wealthy, and a barrage of states

law and order policys, and dont forget the underbelly types. All needed to make it

a gower.......well sort of...just find your own nitch, maybe youll survive
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15105 posts
WA, 15105 posts
17 Nov 2011 6:58am
barn said...

Hey everyone, I'm a Rule Nazi and rabble rabble rabble rabble..

* No abuse, insults or personal attacks
* No foul language
* No trolling
* No inappropriate or illegal material
* No "For Sale" or "Wanted to Buy"
* No business advertising
* No cross posting
* No forum spamming
* No religious or political debates
* No defamatory comments
* No duplicate logins
* No complaints about moderation (email us instead)





Hey, you even cut and pasted it!

In all seriousness, where does the 'no cross-posting' one come from? That was relevant years ago on network newsgroups, but can you really cross post these days?

I figure most people here wouldn't even know what cross posting is. Ahh, the good old days when someone would cross post something to aus.cars and also alt.religion.evolution... Those were the days.



SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:58am
cisco said...

(drivel)


It might be something close to a reasonable summary if that was anything like real life. It isn't even close. You fail, cisco.

cisco said...

Could not be any simpler than that. Remember, there is
a test coming up. The 2012 elections.


While they may fiddle around the edges, all parties in Australia support the existing welfare system cisco so that last bit is completely irrelevant. Try removing your head from your clacker and you may find out what's actually going on.
Hiko
Hiko
1229 posts
1229 posts
17 Nov 2011 7:04am
Corrupt people wreck a socialist country and all the capitalists point the finger
Corrupt people wreck a capitalist country and all the socialists point the finger
So whats the common problem ?
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15105 posts
WA, 15105 posts
17 Nov 2011 7:13am
sabydent said...

theDoctor said...



What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..





And exactly who pays for all this free education, free health care and general laziness?

If it is such a good system and you truly believe in it, please send me $100. I want to go out for a nice supper and don't feel like working for it.




No worries. Send me your proof that you don't earn more than 10K a year, and I will arrange the necessary paperwork.

log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
17 Nov 2011 10:54am
Cisco! this is your crappiest one so far
theDoctor
theDoctor
NSW
5786 posts
NSW, 5786 posts
17 Nov 2011 11:14am
sabydent said...

theDoctor said...



What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..





And exactly who pays for all this free education, free health care and general laziness?

If it is such a good system and you truly believe in it, please send me $100. I want to go out for a nice supper and don't feel like working for it.




That's what I like about socialism, there's room enough for everyone, even stupid people like you...

You want a hundred bucks for a nice meal, go out and earn it.

You want to sit on your arse and watch the world pass you by go for it.

We will supply a safety net where by you can survive and if you pull your finger out and have a go you too can use your creative energies to contribute to our socialist society and be rewarded with the means to treat yourself to a hundred dollar supper.




poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
17 Nov 2011 8:53am
cisco copied and pasted...

stuff



You're taking the pi$$ right?
Poodle
Poodle
WA
868 posts
WA, 868 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:13am
I'm loving this!! I got a similar email a while back, and been saving it just for this special occasionan...

A young woman was about to finish her first year of university. Like so
many others her age, she considered herself to be Labour Party minded, and
she was very much in favour of higher taxes to support her education and for
more government programs - in other words, the redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch blue-ribbon
Conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that
she had attended and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her
father had for years harboured a selfish desire to keep what he thought
should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes
on the rich and the need for more government programs.
The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors must be the
truth, and she indicated so to her father.. He responded by asking how
she was doing at university.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 90% average,
and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was
taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her
no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even
have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many university friends
because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, "How is your friend Audrey doing?"
She replied, "Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes,
she never studies and she barely has a 50% average. She is so popular on
campus; university for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties,
and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too
hung over."

Her wise father asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean's
office and ask him to deduct 20% off your average and give it to your friend
who only has 50%. That way you will both have a 70% average, it would be
fair and you would both be equal."

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired
back, "That's a crazy idea; how would that be fair! I've worked really
hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work!
Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!"

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, "Welcome to the
Conservative side of the fence."
Poodle
Poodle
WA
868 posts
WA, 868 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:13am
But wait! There's more!!!!!

If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between Conservative and Labour/Greens, I'm all ears. If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative supporter doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a Labour/Green doesn't like guns, they want all guns outlawed.

If a Conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a Labour/Green is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Conservative is gay, he quietly leads his life.
If a Labour/Green is gay, he demands legislated respect.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A Labour/Green wonders who is going to take care of him.


If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Labour/Greens demand that those they don't like should be banned.

If a Conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A Labour/Green non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.
(Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a Conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
A Labour/Green will delete it because he's "offended."

Gunna1
Gunna1
154 posts
154 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:31am
Bigwavedave said...

sabydent said...

theDoctor said...



What an idiotic post.

Give me socialism any day.

Free and equal health care for all, free education for as far as you are willing to let it take you, welfare for those that need it, even for those too lazy to move out of their own shadow..





And exactly who pays for all this free education, free health care and general laziness?

If it is such a good system and you truly believe in it, please send me $100. I want to go out for a nice supper and don't feel like working for it.




Who pays?

There would be an equitable tax system where the high earners actually paid tax.....

This might be wayyyy to simple, however why not have a flat tax rate of say 15 or 20% across the board and NO deductions (business profits included) so everyone pays their share no matter what they earn. Seems to me that would create more tax and still maintain the incentive IF you want to put in the hard yards. Would also be a lot simpler to manage surely.

whippingboy
whippingboy
WA
1104 posts
WA, 1104 posts
17 Nov 2011 9:40am
Uh oh Cisco,
You are the Alan Jones of Seabreeze
Diver
Diver
WA
554 posts
WA, 554 posts
17 Nov 2011 10:14am
So the elections are due in 2012? Then the election must be getting called early.

By my reckoning the current government's three year term would end in 2013.

So what do you know that we don't Cisco? or did you copy and paste that idea as well.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
17 Nov 2011 2:14pm
Poodle said...

I'm loving this!! I got a similar email a while back, and been saving it just for this special occasionan...

A young woman was about to finish her first year of university. Like so
many others her age, she considered herself to be Labour Party minded, and
she was very much in favour of higher taxes to support her education and for
more government programs - in other words, the redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch blue-ribbon
Conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that
she had attended and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her
father had for years harboured a selfish desire to keep what he thought
should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes
on the rich and the need for more government programs.
The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors must be the
truth, and she indicated so to her father.. He responded by asking how
she was doing at university.

Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 90% average,
and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was
taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her
no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even
have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many university friends
because she spent all her time studying.

Her father listened and then asked, "How is your friend Audrey doing?"
She replied, "Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes,
she never studies and she barely has a 50% average. She is so popular on
campus; university for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties,
and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too
hung over."

Her wise father asked his daughter, "Why don't you go to the Dean's
office and ask him to deduct 20% off your average and give it to your friend
who only has 50%. That way you will both have a 70% average, it would be
fair and you would both be equal."

The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired
back, "That's a crazy idea; how would that be fair! I've worked really
hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work!
Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!"

The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, "Welcome to the
Conservative side of the fence."


You and Cisco should get together and trade ripping stories of politics, ideology, and feminism. .......... PS do you have a phone number for "Audrey"
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5124 posts
VIC, 5124 posts
17 Nov 2011 2:54pm
cisco said...

You know who you are and yes it is a copy/paste.
..........................................................................

Is this man truly a genius?

....


Massive fail. The economic model is unrealistic and leaves out any basic feedback loops and any concept of supply and demand.

A better metaphor is:

We have three hours to do this course. Because of the numbers I can only work with a third of you. We will assess how we are going at the end of each hour. The people doing well will be assigned to assist the people having trouble with the work. At the end the people who did well will receive extra credit. The people doing badly will be moved into another stream that they will find less difficult.

Liberal Social Democracy (Australia, Scandinavia, much of Eurpope.

1. At the end of the first hour the A students were assigned to help the C students. The teacher continued with the B students.

2. At the end of the second hour the B students were getting B+ or even A grades. Some of the C students were getting C+ and B. The A students had a much better understanding of the material and were developing their own ideas to take the work further.

3. At the end of the third hour the A and B students progressed onto the next course. Some of the C students got through. The rest were moved onto a stream that was more interesting to them.

Capitalist

1. The best/richest/most attractive kids got the most time from the teacher. Some bribed the teacher for good grades (or blackmailed him with an A for a lay scheme.)

2. Some of the poor kids worked hard and got into the A stream.

3. The C kids drew cock and balls on the desks and mugged the dweeby rich kid.

Totalitarian Regime

1. The biggest, fattest, ugliest kid stole everybody else's lunch money and bought junk food with it.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
17 Nov 2011 3:40pm
Poodle said...

But wait! There's more!!!!!

If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between Conservative and Labour/Greens, I'm all ears. If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative supporter doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a Labour/Green doesn't like guns, they want all guns outlawed.

If a Conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a Labour/Green is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a Conservative is gay, he quietly leads his life.
If a Labour/Green is gay, he demands legislated respect.

If a Conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A Labour/Green wonders who is going to take care of him.


If a Conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Labour/Greens demand that those they don't like should be banned.

If a Conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A Labour/Green non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.
(Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a Conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
A Labour/Green will delete it because he's "offended."




OK,OK, I'll have a go. With these things it's always really hard to start somewhere because the're usually concocted overseas by people with other agendas and barrows to push. So these rants usually don't fit a local scenario and often the're purpose is to dog whistle the gullible into a state of anxiety. So "messages" about pensioners getting paid less than asylum seekers strike a chord in middle Australia but originate with right wing bloggers in the states. ANYWAY, I think you'll find it was your own glorious leader Howard that introduced gun control......... AND GOOD ON HIM
* "if a conservative is gay he quietly lives his life" NO...sorry... not "quietly", however he ****ing well wants to lead his life... legislated equality,not respect. YUK, what a horrible attitude.
* "if a conservative is down and out he thinks how to better his situation"...... Everyone tries to better their situation, some people can't and as a society we catch them and try to help, then again we could follow your train of thought and implement the US healthcare system?????.... I thought not, ...... and while we're at it lets get rid of your parents pension, they really should have tried harder???
* "if a conservative doesn't like a talk show host........" No, look it may have escaped your attention but as someone who has been interested and active in politics for nearly 40 years, I have not seen anything like the biased, one sided, barracking that has come from the commercial media since the election of the Gillard Government...... It is overwhelming, it's unfair, it's undemocratic and, in the case of the Greens, it's personal, and it's unrelenting.
* "if a conservative is a non believer......."I'm not really sure what your getting at here but I think it could be the issue of Chaplains in schools. Well my side of politics believe in the separation of church and state, and I thought your side did too. And if your not prepared to support the Chaplains being Hindu, or seventh day adventists then you're playing favourites. the Chaplains should be qualified Child psychologists not do gooding christians
* "if a conservative reads this he'll forward it to his friends........", Well only if he didn't like his friends and he'd run out of funny youtube cat videos to annoy them.
* "a Labour/ Green will delete it because he's offended......", no not offended, bemused,...no ......... exasperated that someone could... a/ think this is good. or b/ display their ignorance as a badge of honour.
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
17 Nov 2011 12:42pm
Is this man truly a genius?

I doubt anyone who can't spot the diff between a safety net that allows people to stay healthy contributing members of society and Stalinist communism is anything other than a dead-set bacco chewin redkneck fool.

Being so righteous and all Cisco - I'm sure if you get cleaned up in a car accident, you will be firm at the hospital, and tell them you want no part of bludging off the socialist safety net and prefer to make your own way with your pack of bandaids you bought with zero govt assitance.


In the states if you arrive at emergency with no private health - no bandaids, no nuttin - GTFO!!
[}:)]

Seriously cut paste drivel like that above (sourced no doubt from a pro Republican/Tea Party site) are pandering to those that have and only want for themselves.

Hopefully we are a smarter - and much better off - country than that.

Been to a GP lately Cisco? Get a heart check (on the govt) next time. Maybe they will find one.. maybe they will give you some bandaids and tell you to GTFO!

SomeOtherGuy
SomeOtherGuy
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
17 Nov 2011 4:01pm
getfunky said...
Been to a GP lately Cisco? Get a heart check (on the govt) next time. Maybe they will find one.. maybe they will give you some bandaids and tell you to GTFO!


You, sir, get a green thumb and a smily face for the best comment so far.

evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
17 Nov 2011 4:05pm
Cisco doesn't understand politics and its many flavours.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

The example is about as pathetic as the example given to children in Soviet Russia:

An American is visiting Russia and he is walking around the park. An ice-cream vendor (yes it gets warm in Summer) asks him to mind the shop while he runs some errands. Quickly the American decides he can raise the price of ice-cream to make more profit. Now the ice-cream is twice as expensive as it was before. See how evil Capitalism is.

See how pathetic demonising the other can be.

The flaws in both systems are usually human traits - corruption, power and greed.
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
17 Nov 2011 6:44pm
evlPanda said...
The flaws in both systems are usually human traits - corruption, power and greed.


Do you really believe that human traits are corruption power and greed? Some would even appear to believe that they are genetic.

I reckon it is a completely false premise.

I believe that it is the system that corrupts.

Have a think about it. If we evolved to where we are now through the generally accepted path of evolution there is no way we could have got here with human traits you describe. It would just not have been possible because, like the majority of social primates, the well being of the individual is entirely reliant on the well being of the group. There are still vestiges of this today if you look to PNG, Kalahari bushmen and some isolated tribes in the Amazon.

There is no corruption within their groups, very little violence. They cannot survive without a very high level of cooperation. This results in an incredibly strong social structure all of which contributes to the groups survival.

I believe my ancestors lived in this way so where did it all go wrong? Of course if you are and Adam and Eve man then the argument is not for you
Silence
Silence
NSW
123 posts
NSW, 123 posts
17 Nov 2011 7:16pm
japie said...

evlPanda said...
The flaws in both systems are usually human traits - corruption, power and greed.


Do you really believe that human traits are corruption power and greed? Some would even appear to believe that they are genetic.

I reckon it is a completely false premise.

I believe that it is the system that corrupts.

Have a think about it. If we evolved to where we are now through the generally accepted path of evolution there is no way we could have got here with human traits you describe. It would just not have been possible because, like the majority of social primates, the well being of the individual is entirely reliant on the well being of the group. There are still vestiges of this today if you look to PNG, Kalahari bushmen and some isolated tribes in the Amazon.

There is no corruption within their groups, very little violence. They cannot survive without a very high level of cooperation. This results in an incredibly strong social structure all of which contributes to the groups survival.

I believe my ancestors lived in this way so where did it all go wrong? Of course if you are and Adam and Eve man then the argument is not for you


as you said, they cannot survive if they don't cooperate. they don't do it spontaneously, they are forced to do it. If they had a choice they also would show greed and corruption, it's just that the survival instinct (that is the basic and more important one) kicks in before the others.
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
17 Nov 2011 7:28pm
Poodle said...

But wait! There's more!!!!!

If anyone has a better explanation of the difference between Conservative and Labour/Greens, I'm all ears. If you ever wondered what side of the fence you sit on, this is a great test!

If a Conservative supporter doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a Labour/Green doesn't like guns, they want all guns outlawed.

yada yada dribble dribble alan jones for PM



Congratulations you're forwarding (half of) the same brainless drivel chain email as my elderly rellos. This what I sent back to them.
--------------------------------------------

This annoyed me enough to respond. Not looking for an argument or even a reply.
I'm not a labor/green fanatic, but I certainly wouldn't vote for libs under that jug-eared goose. I probably would have voted for them under anyone else.

For a start the email makes (in smug tones) the dangerous assumptions that:
all poor people are that way due to laziness
All well off people are that way due to honest hard work
All government programs benefit poor more than rich
Secondly it's a poor rip off of an American email, just with the words republican/democrat/college substituted.
Wrong or irrelevant for our different political scenario
For a start there's no real difference between our parties and their supporters

If a Liberal doesn't like guns, he doesn't buy one.
If a Labor/Green doesn't like guns, they want all guns outlawed.

This is for a US audience and irrelevant. Didn't our one and only gun debate/law change happen under Howard after martin bryant?

If a Liberal is a vegetarian, he doesn't eat meat.
If a Labor/Green is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

Errr what? not in this country.

If a Liberal is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a Labor/Green is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

So.. don't fight for equal rights if that's what you believe in?


If a Liberal is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A Labor/Green wonders who is going to take care of him.

Generalise much? That's a stupid assertion.


If a Liberal doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Labor/Greens demand that those they don't like be shut down.

possibly relevant for US only.. but I've never heard of it. Padding for a dumb email.


If a Liberal is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A Labor/Green non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

I'm comfortable with that. The best religious people are very quiet about it. There's far too much religious influence in US politics.


If a Liberal reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
A Labor/Green will delete it because he's "offended."

Well D'uh. Is it not right to be "offended" (in unneccessary quotes) after a string of insults?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply