d1 said...
It's not a conspiracy, just normal market economics.
To be fully grid-independent, you need to meet your current energy needs. Let's assume you'll go with PV (photovoltaic) solar, as this is currently the most applicable technology.
The daily energy you need in summer is roughly (peak period):
12 kW/h for the pool pump+chlorinator (1500W running 8 hours per day)
7.5 kW/h for the evap (but if you live in a place more humid than WA, multiply this by 5 as you'll be using a proper heatpump-based and very energy-hungry reverse-cycle aircon)
2.5 kW/h for energy-efficient lighting
5 kW/h everything else (fridge, music+tv, etc...)
let's assume cooking and hot-water are through natural gas.
Total: 27 kW/h per day. Looking at my utility bill - sounds about normal.
Now let's dimension your solar system:
Assuming 8 hours of sunlight at 80% average insolation.
Assuming you are using the best PV panels money can get (Sunpower 318's?) that are 19.5% efficient.
Assuming peak solar irradiation per square metre is 1 kW.
Assuming inverter efficiency of 98%.
You need about 14 panels - a 4.5 kW system.
You need 25m2 of North-facing, sun-lit area (roof?).
You need heaps of lead-acid battery backup capable of storing about 10 kW/h or energy (if your pool pump and aircon are set to work during the day time). You will need lots of indoor space for the batteries!
This should cover your needs 95% of the time, but for the remaining cloudy days, you need a backup diesel generator.
The inverter needs to be really fancy, in order to control the batteries AND the diesel genny.
I'm not in this business, but my guess is that it will set you back $30000 minimum. However, this will not add nearly as much value to your house, so it's a very poor capital investment. I don't have Excel around to do the PV/FV calculations, but I suspect you can settle your regular electricity bills for about 20 years, given the current value of $30k. After 20 years, your photovoltaic system will need replacement anyway.
It just doesn't make financial sense. Makes more sense to go for a grid-tie system that covers the majority of your daytime peak demands only, and can pay itself back after 8-10 years or so...
Thanks for that comprehensive response.

Let's take out the pool and air conditioners as they are not essentials. Proper insulation and ventilation and visits to the municipal pool eliminate them.
Let's also take out the nonsensical and egotistical crap that we are sold by the multi-media such as home theartres, dish washers (you married one didn't you?), coffee machines, etc, etc, etc.
For a reasonably sophistical life style energy needs are for lighting, heating of food and water, cooling of food and drink and multimedia entertainment (TV, internet etc.).
Electricity is one of the most, if not the most inefficient forms of energy.
Gas is about THE most efficient form of energy which by ignition transforms directly from chemical energy to heat energy and by clever use one can cool with it. Electrolux gas fridges are very efficient.
Lighting and entertainment can be run on low voltage supply. People living on yachts have been doing it for years.
So do we stay on the grid just because of our washing machines and tools in our sheds that are quite easily powered by a small generator??