Did we really win at Mullaloo?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
18 Mar 2009 10:22am
Hi Everyone,

Many thanks to all involved for our small victory last night at the Joondalup Council Chambers. You all know who you are so I don't feel the need to mention names.

Something to think about: Although the councilors rules in favour of not banning kitesurfing at Mullaloo for the moment, the threat has not gone away at all, it is still very real and in fact I would suggest that this setback has reinforced and galvanised our opposition to be even more vigilant and better prepared than ever. [}:)]

We as kitesurfers did not win any victory last night despite the outcome being in our favour. The victor was the democratic process of good government, we were merely public bystanders and onlookers.

Our oppostion turned up with quite convincing arguments, two petitions signed by hundreds of local residents, half of whom were in favour of a total outright ban on kitesurfing on all of Mullaloo Beach, loads of reports and heaps of photographs showing our alledged indescretions. I put it to you that if they had followed the correct procedures required to legally mount a proposal to ban kitesurfing at Mullaloo, the sport of kitesurfing may have been walking away dragging it's heels and sporting a black eye.

We have been given the chance by the very sharp and diligent Councilor Young, to put together a case in our favour so that we may retain some access to the beaches of Mullaloo. I say some, because I feel certain we will lose some access to at least part of the beach.

At last nights meeting we had around 35 kiters turn out to support impending bans which are likely to set a precedent for all other councils which rule over ALL other favoured beaches we ride at. These councils who are unsure as to what to do about Kitesurfing issues may well be shown the light if things go badly for us.

It would be easy to say that we were unprepared and hard done by, that we didn't know about the case being formulated against us, but if you cast you minds back and click the link below, you will see that we indeed were notified on the 22 of November last year. However, everyone yelled agreement, did nothing, and then shoved their heads back in the sand where it's safe and everything is good. We were in a position of being caught napping and were fortunate that the "against case" dropped the ball in regards to due process. We were spared ..... this time!

What we won was not a battle, but a postponement.

www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=43784

WHAT CAN YOU DO TO HELP?

Firstly, know that the "against crowd" will be on the beach arming themselves with more photos, video, noting dates and putting in official complaints in writing on EVERY incident they witness to council and rangers. This will strongly build their case. They were told what they did wrong at the meeting so expect them not to make mistakes like this again in the future. Their case will be stronger next time.

Your version of a safe distance and speed is totally different to that of the unknowing public, they don't have a clue about upwind or downwind or how "in control" you are. Play it safe.

1/ Stay a good 50m away from swimmers and other beach users if at all possible.

2/ Do not rig amongst families on crowded days, if you have to go further North, DO IT!

3/ Do not kite anywhere near the MSLSC even if there are no flags out.

4/ Stay away from all clubbies carrying out training. Be very respectful and keep a very safe distance.

5/ Lend support to the people championing your case. Join WAKSA and lend support to MUGS. Public liability and membership was brought up by the opposition stating few kiters were members and therefore uninsured. Whether this be correct or not, we all need to join WAKSA for the goods of all!

6/ Be the beach police. If you see someone doing the wrong thing, let them know and offer a hand. Do not sit idly by and watch, this makes you more guilty than the perpetrator, because you know better and did nothing.

7/ Do not come in to a crowded beach at speed. Approach slowly and sensibly.

8/ Do not walk upwind flying your kite over the heads of families enjoying the beach. If you can't stay upwind and handle the conditions, you shouldn't be at a beach like Mullaloo or Scarborough.

9/ If you cannot relaunch your kite, don't just drag through the flags, flag your kite and roll your bar and lines in the water, then self rescue responsibly.

10/ Be pleasant and a good ambassador for the sport when talking to ALL members of the public, they may just be a councilor swimming at the beach enjoying the public space.


This battle is far from over and in fact the worst is yet to come so please, don't slip. DON"T give them ammo in the next fight, they have a good enough case already, we were saved by democracy and the democratic process and nothing else.

Good winds,



getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
18 Mar 2009 11:05am
Top work by all concerened.

I must say it is such a shame that a threat of having acces taken away, is what it takes for the points listed above to be taken seriously by a lot of kiters. These are simple common sense and co-operative behaviour that should be the default attitude. Sadly they are not - yet.

Movin in the right direction though, and with some luck a happy balance can be reached with those that have probably lived there for ages, and want to enjoy the beach/their activities that probably have zero impact on those around them (unlike the potential of kiting)

Best of luck with the ramapant councilors the forces of evil. er.. the folks that are (maybe correctly) pissed with some kiter's behaviour

Mr float
Mr float
NSW
3452 posts
NSW, 3452 posts
18 Mar 2009 1:35pm
getfunky said...

Top work by all concerened.

I must say it is such a shame that a threat of having acces taken away, is what it takes for the points listed above to be taken seriously by a lot of kiters. These are simple common sense and co-operative behaviour that should be the default attitude. Sadly they are not - yet.

Movin in the right direction though, and with some luck a happy balance can be reached with those that have probably lived there for ages, and want to enjoy the beach/their activities that probably have zero impact on those around them (unlike the potential of kiting)

Best of luck with the ramapant councilors.




i don't think its rampant councillors that you have to worry about .it is members of the community with what they see as legitimate complaints and concerns .My advice is to re read kitehards email and get involved in the process .
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
18 Mar 2009 11:48am
Oops. I did read the post but stuffed my reply... On a roll today


I could add a minor point to KH's post too.

If you buzz a surfer (swimmer/kayaker - whatever) accidentally - as we all have with sun in our eyes or just not noticing them - waive in an apologetic manner, say "Sorry mate" and make it obvious you didn't intend to get within their comfort zone. I am pretty sure this would have a calming affect on most reasonable peeps.

I always feel sorry for the surfers that try to get away from the crowds between Scarbs and Flozzer, who have to contend with wave after wave of downwinder kiters streaking through the isolated 20-30 metre stretch they are trying to use. Not bad enough, but the kiters insist on boosting and landing adjacent to them (usually clustered together with 2-3 mates and hoping for safety in numbers) or worse throwing a carve and spraying right in their faces..[}:)] Not cool really..
rusty7
rusty7
QLD
504 posts
QLD, 504 posts
18 Mar 2009 2:09pm
well done guys ......but kitehards message brings up an old topic and one we need to take seriously. Self police-ing of our kite spots. 2 weeks ago i spoke to a guy who 4 times kited through swimmers on our local spot. He looked to be anything but in control of what he was doing, pooh-maning his way along the beach. I informed him that as a rule we don't kite through swimmers on our beach in fact swimmers have the unwritten right of way on any beach. We don't have a very big spot and the council actually like us being there, they even promote it in their tourist info. I was probibly less than friendly and suggested he take the sex and travel option back to his own local spot if he didn't like that. He acknowledged he was probibly in the wrong and agreed that you shouldn't really kite through swimmers.
A week or so earlier a learner out in light winds dropped his kite right on top of swimmers at our beach and the relaunch nearly collected a kid with the lines as it went trough the window. I spoke to him also. Gave him the same suggestion. I kind of felt like who am i to do so.. but up until now i have just stood back with the rest of our local crew and watched these incidents like its not really my place to do anything about it. I don't want to be a policeman but i don't want to loose our spot either. I like the idea of signs to which you can politely direct anyone that is not fimiliar to you. Maybe AKSA could produce something.
I really think that locals need to take responsibilty for their own spots ensuring the safety of all beach goers, after all we are fully aware of the hazards on our particular spots and the safety requirements. These blokes I spoke to probibly think i am a prick but at the end of the day while we are still welcome on our beach and people still come to watch and everyone enjoys the beach in safely ...i don't really care.( Number 6 and number 10 in kitehards list very important)

getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
18 Mar 2009 2:09pm
The info is still not getting to everyone unfortunately.

I know WAKSA etc are doing their best but I had a yarn, a fortnight ago, to two 1st season guys who had just had a wicked downwinder from Leighton to Brighton (a decent long run so you'd think the skill levels were pretty good). I was shocked when they mentioned hitting the Cott main break and being tempted (jocking though) to jump the Cott bell. "Fek!!" I thought - the council will be fuming over this..

I spoke to them about how this was a definate no-no and how much shizen has gone down over kiting in and around the Cott area. They were genuinely (I thought anyway) surprised and accepted that they couldn't repeat the stuff-up.

They apparently read Seabreeze and have a reasonable awareness etc but this had escaped them. If they launched at Cott they may have seen the info but from Leighton I believe there is nada?

What to do?

How about a sticky at the top of the Kitesurfing general section that links to WAKSA/restricted area maps for each state?

Anybody else got the answer to the $40,000 question?
newo
newo
WA
250 posts
WA, 250 posts
18 Mar 2009 2:18pm
I just had a session at Mullaloo
sir ROWDY
sir ROWDY
WA
5378 posts
WA, 5378 posts
18 Mar 2009 3:00pm
What is wrong with people? anytime someone is having fun or doing something that someone else cant do there seems to be a "dark force" of bitter people trying to shut it down. Usually for no good reason exceept they have nothing better to do.

We had a similar problem at my local kiting spot a few years back, a couple of longboarders were jealous of what we were doing and tryed to shut us down, from not only the beach they surfed at but every beach in the shire.
It just so happened that one of those longboarders was a local conciler and it actually got pretty out of hand. They were using all sorts of false statistics and made up story's about people dying from kite lines and kites killing people along with other various inciddents at the spot that simply never to place.... Which meant i (and others) had to reply to these false claims and outrageous calls that were placed in the paper with the real storys and facts.
(made me think can you just make up stuff like that and post it off to the paper? is that agaainst the law?)

To make the whole thing even more ubsurd we probably only ever coincide at the spot about 5 times a year.. if that, in the past year or more i havent even seen them there once.... goes to show that some people are just F3cking arseh()les.

Best of luck guys and i hope you get the outcome your hoping for.
lemming
lemming
WA
75 posts
WA, 75 posts
18 Mar 2009 3:20pm
Kitehard said...
1/ Stay a good 50m away from swimmers and other beach users if at all possible.


All excellent points but can I still urge everyone to refer to the WAKSA local beach guidelines so that we are all sticking to the same distances.

* Do not launch or land your kite with other beach users downwind of you. Maintain a minimum safety distance of 100m. Where possible move downwind of other beach users.
* Do not kite amongst swimmers. Always remain downwind of the main swimming area near the MSLSC building. Maintain a minimum distance of 100m upwind from any other swimmers in the water.

http://www.waksa.com/files/MullalooFlyer.pdf
sandgroper
sandgroper
WA
368 posts
WA, 368 posts
19 Mar 2009 9:46pm
Kitehard said...

Hi Everyone,

Many thanks to all involved for our small victory last night at the Joondalup Council Chambers. You all know who you are so I don't feel the need to mention names.

<SNIP>

This battle is far from over and in fact the worst is yet to come so please, don't slip. DON"T give them ammo in the next fight, they have a good enough case already, we were saved by democracy and the democratic process and nothing else.

Good winds,




SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE.

And did I mention we need to have SIGNAGE

Why? Because tourists will always be dropping by without a clue and start doing all the bad things, and kiting will be banned...without INTERNATIONAL SIGNAGE!!!

Council need to do this. We need to engage them to tell them what to put up and where. (Councils just love signs.)

The first sign that should go up is

KITESURFING (big)
TAKE NOTICE : RESTRICTIONS IN FORCE
1. You MUST be a member of WAKSA to Kitesurf at this beach and be able to produce your WAKSA membership on demand. (NB: not AKA or IKA - WAKSA membership proves you have made contact with locals and have valid insurance)
2. NO KITING IN FRONT OF THE MULLALOO SURF LIFE SAVING CLUB (MSLSC) BUILDING AT ANY TIME.
3. Do not launch, land, set up or pack down kite boarding equipment within 250m of the MSLSC building.
4. Do not launch or land your kite with other beach users <100M downwind of you.
5. Do not kite between, or within 250M of, the flags.
6. Do not kite amongst, or within 100M of, swimmers.
7. Exercise extreme caution when launching and landing due to the fence line.
8. It is mandatory that all kiters have public liability insurance. This is included
with your annual WAKSA membership.
9. Do not kite here when there are a larger number of other beach users frequenting the area.
10. "Downwinders" must land at least 500m north of the MSLSC in the main kiting area.

Please refer to www.waksa.com/site/locations/mullaloo_beach/ for full details of the local guidelines.


Each of the above numbered point to be subject to $100 on the spot fine issued by surf patrols and rangers, and confiscation of equipment to guarantee payment.

I'm telling you guys, HELP and ENCOURAGE the Councils to REGULATE it to protect everyone (including us) from the TOURISTS/HOONS or they'll see banning it as the only option.

BANNING IS BAD, BUT
REGULATION IS GOOD

James
James
WA
549 posts
WA, 549 posts
19 Mar 2009 11:22pm
sir ROWDY said...

What is wrong with people? anytime someone is having fun or doing something that someone else cant do there seems to be a "dark force" of bitter people trying to shut it down. Usually for no good reason exceept they have nothing better to do.



This dude is right, I'd bet my nads on it, that the bulk of those who signed this petition really could'nt have given a **** either way before they were asked , and given some degree of persuasion , however mild , to do so. Mullaloo beach , north of Rob's trailer , to the next car park is almost deserted in a fresh to strong sea breeze.
boost75
boost75
WA
26 posts
WA, 26 posts
19 Mar 2009 11:26pm
Some great ideas being tossed around especially sandgropers signage plan.
Only problem is when you work out the physical size of mullaloo and start working in your safe dist from buildings, a person in water, on the beach, walking their dog, etc it give you a window to kite in of about 6.4m long-ok fraction bigger but i think 100m from all obstacles is sufficient. 25m of lines leaves 75m of clearance-bloody long way!!!
$100 on the spot-not sure how you would regulate that one. . .

I realise waksa has the flyer and its a great start but its frustrating having to put such large distances from buildings, swimmers etc in to apese the public.

THE BIGGEST PROBLEM THOUGH are inexperienced riders. we could all recall numerous stories but what i fail to figure out are these riders that think that they can ride 2m from a swimmer-seriously get a brain. Not even world champs are doing that stupid !!!.
and yes the locals, im sure some have nothing better to do so while you are being filmed from the dunes waiting for you to "nearly kill a swimmer or the like" keep the thought tucked away and show some common sense.
If they roll up to council meeting with photos and videos of us kiters a good 100m from anything it will be hard for them to ban us.
Lastly dont be shy to tell another kiter of the local kite rules and get up em if they break em-but explain it as well

KEEP EVERYONE ON SEABREEZE UP TO DATE ON THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING SO WE CAN ALL GET UP THERE AND SHOW OUR SUPPORT.
THIS WILL BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END IF THEY WIN.
WELL DONE TO ALL WHO ATTENDED

Happy Kiting
tightlines
tightlines
WA
3510 posts
WA, 3510 posts
20 Mar 2009 1:00am
Good point about the camera's boost75, just remember fellow kiters that if you see someone on the beach pointing a camera at you they are probably not marveling at your tremendous kiting skills and trying to catch a snap of you throwing up a big spray as you do a carving turn right on the shoreline.

Those opposed to kiting will have nothing better to do than spend countless hours just waiting for that moment when it all goes pear shaped before capturing their perfect shot.

They won’t have been too happy with the result of the council meeting so will be working overtime trying to get their revenge and will stop at nothing to get a shot that appears incriminating.
hirschausen
hirschausen
WA
422 posts
WA, 422 posts
20 Mar 2009 6:19am
And remember,
All councils in WA have the same insurance underwriter (well did have in 2006) - upon any change that occurs within one shire some revision of process occurs in ALL other shires in WA.

Any loss of access to beaches will have a trickle effect on all others.
metalmongrel
metalmongrel
SA
118 posts
SA, 118 posts
20 Mar 2009 8:04am
Well done. Tightlines is right, they have an agenda and won't give up. In SA we have the same thing with the proposed Marine Parks being driven by a handful of people who have an agenda, them and the World Bank that is. I would photograph the people taking the pictures as I'm sure that if the same people are targeted over an extended period of time they could persue it under the stalking legislation. The reality is we live in weinersville in Australia at the moment where a handful of people want to ban anything and everything except what they do which is self appoint themselves as environmental police and give everyone a hard time. Some people just never achieve puberty and stay trapped as petty children in adult bodies and don't like other people in their sandpits. Stupid people shouldn't breed.
GreenPat
GreenPat
QLD
4107 posts
QLD, 4107 posts
20 Mar 2009 10:41am
Kitehard is right, due process probably won this round for us, though I think it was good that we got up and made statements of our case. The other thing that I think was good was that despite the supporters of the ban - there were about 4 or 5 of them in the gallery - having two petitions with about 200 signatures between them, we had the 30-odd supporters against the ban in the gallery, people committed enough to actually show up at the meeting.

I found a news story this morning about another motion at another government meeting that was possibly not appropriately prepared: www.perthnow.com.au/

gruezi
gruezi
WA
3464 posts
WA, 3464 posts
20 Mar 2009 11:38am
I gave you a green thumbs up Groper.....as much as I dislike more rules etc., I think we need to have a plan in place for the eventuality of regulation. I vote for WA Metro as WAKSA reg. kiters only. No wind in sight
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
20 Mar 2009 2:10pm
tightlines said...

They won’t have been too happy with the result of the council meeting so will be working overtime trying to get their revenge and will stop at nothing to get a shot that appears incriminating.



Absolutely. We had a battle. Now we have a fierce battle.
If you want to kite anywhere in the area be prepared for some very swift & heavy handed self regulation if you even look like doing the wrong thing. And if the regulars aren't prepared to carry through that way then you can say goodbye to Mullaloo. As the first in a series.
There is No room for irresponsible kiting anywhere in Perth anymore. And there is no room for kiters allowing others to get away with it. We are the only ones who can police our sport without living with unnecessarily harsh bans being imposed.
the walks
the walks
WA
448 posts
WA, 448 posts
20 Mar 2009 3:24pm
we don't let our learners drift through swimmers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
20 Mar 2009 3:55pm
Hey GD,

Rob's school is well downwind of the main swimming area. The school is not the issue here. It's the ignorant and care less kiters who generally don't kite there regularly.

Kiters doing downwinders through the flags and swimmers. It's most likely quite accomplished riders whom show disrespect to other water users and need to stroke their rampant ego's by showing off at close distances to others.

With the current state of things at Mulla's, expect a swift dressing down by anyone effected by a potential ban. The local riders are pissed [}:)]

Good winds,

Durks
Durks
WA
118 posts
WA, 118 posts
20 Mar 2009 8:38pm
Hear hear guys, I posted my reply to the ABC thing, the opposers have got a fair bit of ammo. I'm all for kitehards points eh some heavy handed self-regulation before we're regulated from someone else.

I for one am joining WAKSA today
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
21 Mar 2009 7:40pm
Kitehard said...

It's the ignorant and care less kiters who generally don't kite there regularly.

Kiters doing downwinders through the flags and swimmers.


I believe the ordinary 'downwinder' may play a large part,
and sometimes be the actual cause......
of bitter conflicts between competing beach users.
Due to the straight beaches of Perth, the downwinder is a commonplace kiting practice in this city.
Because of the lack of bays and points, windshadows and deadmeat water aren't really an issue.
These long stretches of beaches form a watery edge to an ocean highway that's used by these kite-powered commuters.
In rush-hour, the traffic moves from one surfbreak to another.....
like wave-riding vehicles delayed at a red light,
only to move on when the signal changes to green.

The invaders take no prisoners.....
the surfbreak is burned, raped and pillaged,
and the regulars are left to pick up the pieces.

vishy
vishy
WA
451 posts
WA, 451 posts
21 Mar 2009 8:55pm
From my observations at mullaz the main issue is people that are the "give it a go mate" guys that have just purchased a cheap c-kite and proceed without lessons, they should not have a place at mullaloo in my opinion. People are welcome to learn that way, given they go to an area with no pending restrictions or by-standers that may get in the way. *Edit* Regardless of the perpetrators, as others have mentioned, we need to be more vigilant and educate those in the wrong.

Listening to the talkback radio segment(posted earlier this week on seabreeze), kiters had little to no presentation as any punter had a great time writing us off. As the official body of kitesurfers in WA should WAKSA not have a formal/well spoken reply to this uninformed garbage. I am also referring to the news articles that may eventually follow etc. Do we need petitions as well?

Regards
Matt
tightlines
tightlines
WA
3510 posts
WA, 3510 posts
22 Mar 2009 1:32am
The handful of people that are out to have us banned were obviously prepared for that talk back segment, they would have approached the media and all been on standby, that is why we only really heard their side of the argument. Not much that WAKSA or anybody can do when (i take it) they once again were not consulted.
As I said previously they will stop at nothing to get their way.
What really pisses me off is the blatant lies that they were coming out with, such as the caller that said when the wind is up there is as many as 50 kiters on the water.
I am a Mullaloo resident and am on the beach virtually every afternoon, the most I have ever seen out would be about twenty but there is usually less than ten.
Mmmm one of us is lying or blind no prizes for guessing who.

There was more in the Joondalup Weekender and here.
www.inmycommunity.com.au/
puppetonastring
puppetonastring
WA
3619 posts
WA, 3619 posts
22 Mar 2009 8:52am
Hey Vischy
Posted this on the other thread.
I didnt hear the first callers - just the last 2. The segment was over by the time I rang. They said thay would ring back for a WAKSA interview sometime soon. No bias I dont think. Probably just didnt know we existed.
The last two callers were excellent backers of kiting.

quote ....
Thanks to a phone call I caught the end of it as well - two very good replies.
1) the mum from Safety Bay - thank you for that.
2) Pat from Hillarys ? excellent call Pat. Very informed, accurate and reasoned response - esp re self regulation & needing 'no go zones' rather than 'go zones'.
WAKSA will be interviewed as well some time soon.
cwamit
cwamit
WA
1194 posts
WA, 1194 posts
22 Mar 2009 9:26am
Kitehard said...

Hey GD,

Rob's school is well downwind of the main swimming area. The school is not the issue here. It's the ignorant and care less kiters who generally don't kite there regularly.

Kiters doing downwinders through the flags and swimmers. It's most likely quite accomplished riders whom show disrespect to other water users and need to stroke their rampant ego's by showing off at close distances to others.

With the current state of things at Mulla's, expect a swift dressing down by anyone effected by a potential ban. The local riders are pissed [}:)]

Good winds,





could also have something to do with the shore dump .....


good luck, least try to keep it open in winter... thanks




tightlines
tightlines
WA
3510 posts
WA, 3510 posts
22 Mar 2009 12:14pm
For anyone that missed it there is a link to the talkback segment lurking in the kitesurfing news section over on the right(thanks Laurie or Pat), but I will post it here aswell.

www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2009/03/20/2521988.htm?site=perth&rotator=true


Everyone is probably getting sick of hearing about this but I am pretty passionate about it because it is my beach ...... but I'm happy to share as long as you do the righty.
jimcanada
jimcanada
WA
19 posts
WA, 19 posts
22 Mar 2009 1:07pm
To everyone helping out on this issue, thank you!
Kitehard, thanks for spending the time to also brief us on the outcomes and suggestion on ways forward.
Sandgroper absolutely like the idea, I believe the strength of the regulation will resonate with the council's. Put a sign at every beach entry of Pinnaroo, Mullaloo.

I haven't had time to read all the threads, so apologies if it has been discussed previously already.
- But have we socialised the approach suggested by sandgroper to the council, and most of all with the mlsc? Sometimes, demonstrating initiative and aligning with the enemy serves goodness for both sides. Or are they just to stubborn to listen (the opposition)?
- How can we present this as a case to show our legitimate desire to improve and mitigate risk (buy us some time)?
- Would we need to seek legal advice to present something of quality?
- Do we know the list of CR not in favour of Kiting in Mullaloo? Some of the CR terms are expiring in October 2009...

Is WAKSA helping in any way with this? Do we have a legal representative? As I have read from previous posts, Mullaloo today, Scarbo, Leighton, etc tomorrow. As many mentioned it previously, we need to do something about it.

If still relevant, I would like to give a hand and help out, join in the plan and alternatives. Socialise with WAKSA, council and mlsc, etc. Who
Mullaloo is the beach we go to

Let me know your thoughts.

Cheers
JM

sandgroper said...

Kitehard said...

Hi Everyone,

Many thanks to all involved for our small victory last night at the Joondalup Council Chambers. You all know who you are so I don't feel the need to mention names.

<SNIP>

This battle is far from over and in fact the worst is yet to come so please, don't slip. DON"T give them ammo in the next fight, they have a good enough case already, we were saved by democracy and the democratic process and nothing else.

Good winds,




SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE.

And did I mention we need to have SIGNAGE

Why? Because tourists will always be dropping by without a clue and start doing all the bad things, and kiting will be banned...without INTERNATIONAL SIGNAGE!!!

Council need to do this. We need to engage them to tell them what to put up and where. (Councils just love signs.)

The first sign that should go up is

KITESURFING (big)
TAKE NOTICE : RESTRICTIONS IN FORCE
1. You MUST be a member of WAKSA to Kitesurf at this beach and be able to produce your WAKSA membership on demand. (NB: not AKA or IKA - WAKSA membership proves you have made contact with locals and have valid insurance)
2. NO KITING IN FRONT OF THE MULLALOO SURF LIFE SAVING CLUB (MSLSC) BUILDING AT ANY TIME.
3. Do not launch, land, set up or pack down kite boarding equipment within 250m of the MSLSC building.
4. Do not launch or land your kite with other beach users <100M downwind of you.
5. Do not kite between, or within 250M of, the flags.
6. Do not kite amongst, or within 100M of, swimmers.
7. Exercise extreme caution when launching and landing due to the fence line.
8. It is mandatory that all kiters have public liability insurance. This is included
with your annual WAKSA membership.
9. Do not kite here when there are a larger number of other beach users frequenting the area.
10. "Downwinders" must land at least 500m north of the MSLSC in the main kiting area.

Please refer to www.waksa.com/site/locations/mullaloo_beach/ for full details of the local guidelines.


Each of the above numbered point to be subject to $100 on the spot fine issued by surf patrols and rangers, and confiscation of equipment to guarantee payment.

I'm telling you guys, HELP and ENCOURAGE the Councils to REGULATE it to protect everyone (including us) from the TOURISTS/HOONS or they'll see banning it as the only option.

BANNING IS BAD, BUT
REGULATION IS GOOD




jimcanada
jimcanada
WA
19 posts
WA, 19 posts
22 Mar 2009 1:32pm
Thanks TL, I have enjoyed the broadcast (both positive and negative comments).

We can't ignore the opposition's fears and concerns and I believe that coming with something like regulations on time, designated area etc. would help us and the beachers to co-exist at mullaloo without requiring a FULL ban.

tightlines said...

For anyone that missed it there is a link to the talkback segment lurking in the kitesurfing news section over on the right(thanks Laurie or Pat), but I will post it here aswell.

www.abc.net.au/local/audio/2009/03/20/2521988.htm?site=perth&rotator=true


Everyone is probably getting sick of hearing about this but I am pretty passionate about it because it is my beach ...... but I'm happy to share as long as you do the righty.


Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
28 Mar 2009 11:29am
BUMP!
This issue hasn't gone away. Just a reminder.
Good winds,

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply