GK judgement

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
dwp
dwp
1 posts
dwp dwp
1 posts
17 Jul 2007 9:30pm
See this news find on inflatablekite.com


In parallel to the case mentioned the 18/07/2006 in our news page, Diamond White continued its legal actions.
This time, it is the GLOBERIDER brand and one of its retailers, PALAWAI, who were condemned in appeal for counterfeiting and sale of conterfeiting objects.
Here is a partial and rough translation of the Judges' decisions:

FIRST JUDGEMENT
The publicly ruling Court, by contradictory judgement, in the first instance:

- says that by importing, offering on sale and by holding for sale the kites GK LIFT 6,8, GK LIFT 6,8, GK LIFT 8,8, GK LIFT 11,5, GK LIFT 14,2, GK LIFT 17,5 and the GK control devices, the companies GLOBERIDER and PALAWAI made themselves guilty of act of counterfeiting the claim 1 of patent BP-0.202.271 and claims 1, 3, and 4 of patent FRB-2762583 of DIAMOND WHITE company

- Prohibits to the companies GLOBERIDER and PALAWAI to continue the acts of importating, offering on sale and selling in any place including internet, or any other act of selling kites and control devices, and this under penalty of euros 1.000 for each recorded breach as from the notification of the judgment to intervene.

- orders the publication of the judgement in five newspapers or magazines at DIAMOND WHITE's choice and at GLOBERIDER and PALAWAI expenses but within the maximal limit of euros 3.000 per publication, and this, if required, as additional damages.

- orders the GLOBERIDER company to display on its web site's front page, in readable characters, a copy of the sentence, as soon as the sentence is served, and under Euro 1000 penalty per day of delay, and this during two months.

- enjoins the companies GLOBERIDER and PALAWAI to pay to DIAMOND WHITE a Euro 100.000 deposit insolidum at the height of Euro 50.000 for the repair of the patent breach as well as of the economic damage.

- establishes a damage valuation and appoints, to make it, Mr....

JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL (may 2007)
The court,
Confirms the referred decision in all its dispositions not contrary to those of the present judgment. But reforming it for the surplus

Tells that there is no need to damage valuation and condemns in solidum the companies PALAWAI and GLOBERIDER to pay to the company DIAMOND WHITE the sum of Euro 100.000 for the damages;

And adding to it, condemns the company GLOBERIDER and Maitre MARION, as liquidator of the company PALAWAI, at the costs of first instance and appeal and authorizes the SCP SOREL DESSART, associated lawyers, to recover directly against it those of the expenses whose advance would have been made without having received sufficient reserve;

Condemns them to pay to the company DIAMOND WHITE the sum of Euro 5000 in pursuance of article 700 of the new civil procedure code.

---------------------------------------------------------------
We remember that any distributor and shop can be sued for selling without authorization products that fall in the scope of patents, in the countries where these patents are in force. It is thus in their interest to get the information from their suppliers and, in case of doubt, from Diamond White
meerkat
meerkat
WA
644 posts
WA, 644 posts
17 Jul 2007 11:37pm
Wow! so your very first post is to condemn another naughty kite manufacturer Well done to you and i will make sure i always buy from you instead. NOT! go do your name calling somewhere else spammer.

Laurie, is this sort of post(i.e. name calling and finger pointing) what sea breeze is about? would be a shame really.
laurie
laurie
QLD
3902 posts
QLD, 3902 posts
18 Jul 2007 1:39pm
Fascinating .. I originally read the 100.000 as a "$100" fine, but since found out that is a $100,000 Euro .. or around $160,000 Australian! Whoa.

Meerkat: There's no doubt that dwp is posting about how a brand was found guilty of not honouring patent agreements. Personally, I believe it's interesting and newsworthy - it's not a unfounded generic attack, but a statement of what was determined by a court of law.

I think it would be a shame if visitors to these forums where shielded from info this? Maybe I'm mistaken - interested in others thoughts.
meerkat
meerkat
WA
644 posts
WA, 644 posts
18 Jul 2007 11:43am
fair enough. Just seemed like he/she was going around to kiteforums all over the place and bad mouthing the GKs.

I also ride a GK(and its farking great, obviously) and am therefore immediately on the defense for them.
Saffer
Saffer
VIC
4501 posts
VIC, 4501 posts
18 Jul 2007 2:49pm
DWP might be Diamond White Patents or something like that.
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
18 Jul 2007 6:39pm
Old news and irrelevant buddy. Get your facts straight.

GK ceased manufacturing the Lift ages ago.

The Sonic and Trix are GK's offer these days and don't need DWP patent labels..

What about the other 500 brands?

Give an identity and stop hiding behind anonymity.
smitty
smitty
WA
14 posts
WA, 14 posts
18 Jul 2007 5:17pm
The lifts were produced in 03,04 and 05. The sizing refers to the 03 kites, this was before the original inflatable kite patent ran out.
Its got nothing to do with the more recent bow concepts/patent.

I really hope its not the case and that G.K wont suffer so badly, Matt Pendal came up with the whole SLE concept/KPO (Direct back line attachment) Many companies have copied this system so I`m sure Matt would be able to recover his coin if these fairly fuzzy patents do stand in court.

Harsh lines for the importer/shop.

I really hope none of this is for real, Matt used to work with Bruno both with Wipika and Takoon, then left to set up G.K.

As regards "the other brands" it could have something to do with where the patent would apply.As in, brands based in Europe would fall under these laws, maybe not in the states.
Spacemonkey!
Spacemonkey!
SA
2288 posts
SA, 2288 posts
18 Jul 2007 6:59pm
I don't have soo much a problem with the info in this thread, more the way it was bought up. Looking to fling mud! Reeks of a shop owner setting up an account just to bad mouth competition, their one and only post... Probably created accounts on other forums to spread the bad word too. Whilst someone like me is living proof that a high post count doesn't add credibility with only one anonamous post like that is gutless too bag out a brand. I am not associated with GK in anyway, just a person that hates marketing being bought into the forum.
Scottyyoung
Scottyyoung
NSW
129 posts
NSW, 129 posts
18 Jul 2007 8:05pm
ive got a 11m sonic that rocks..

So has anyone heard what they have coming 4 08??
be hard to beat the 07s
choicey
choicey
QLD
280 posts
QLD, 280 posts
19 Jul 2007 1:16pm
It sounds like Bruno can sue each company who infringe on his patent at any time. I wonder who is in his sights next?
Anyway we now have stock of GK Trix are we in trouble?
Spruk;Come and get them , these kites won't last , one night oly,liquadator says sel sell sell, come and see the infringement for yourself,bla,bla.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply