IKO information

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
kitesurfjim
kitesurfjim
VIC
136 posts
VIC, 136 posts
23 Dec 2010 11:54am
Top Response

It doesn't matter how much sales banter these guys give, it doesn't change the fact that the IKO are now in Kitesurfing for the Money, not the growth of the sport.
You get put on the website and are sold that this will bring you more students as people looking into kitesurfing will look at the IKO site and see you.
what a crock, plus you only get all the bells and whistles if you buy their insurance and products.

The story i gave earlier was a very recent one, In March this year a certain instructor with the IKO was passed off as Level one, yet they couldn't even get up on the board.
This was done so a new school could be opened. despite that only a level 2 is qualified to run a school.

The IKO has been like this for a long while now, On the course i took there was myself and one other who were riding and staying up wind, whilst the others despite being on larger kites couldn't ride upwind yet let alone turn or jump, yet the whole course was passed.

On a Good note going forward with the BKSA Australia should really look at the program they run, not just for the teaching but how they help to protect the beaches and keep them accessible to the sport also the fact they help the up and coming riders to get into competition and internationally recognized where currently it depends on how much money your mum or dad has got in order to support you.


IKODave
IKODave
6 posts
6 posts
23 Dec 2010 10:23am
In response to Rob Smallwood,
I can relate to your problems, because I came up through the same IKO system from the bottom and worked my way up too.
I remember the old IKO system would kick you out if you did not have your level2 within 12 months of taking your ITC. I suppose that the ITC thought that newbie instructors at Level 1 were like new drivers on their "L" plates, just learning.
They were not considered as "real" instructors until they had 40 logged hours under their belts. Then they were called level2. Unfortunately there were subgroups of instructors like yourself who didn't teach all that many lessons who fell through the cracks. The IKO standard was too high, or unrealistic if you didn't live in a busy area with lots of wind. It was sad to see IKO loose so many instructors. Then the IKO responded with a one year grace period for a total of two years. This gave instructors double the time to get their hours up. Then after two years if instructors didnt meet the minimum hours, they fell out of the system. Then in 2008 the IKO changed to allow Level1 Instructors to stay in the system if they at least did some Online Education classes. This way the subgroup of guys who only taught occasionally could keep their credentials, and keep their certification alive by doing some online training. This was IKOs alternative solution for instructors who did not teach many lessons. If you taught a lot of lessons you would get CEPs from all the cards you certified your students with. If you did not need cards because you were not very active, you could get CEPs from online courses. The CEPs were required to ensure that instructors standards were kept high either by being active, or by getting additional education. Perhaps it was naive of IKO to think that this system would not have any flaws or not be open to abuse. It turns out that people thought that buying cards or buying courses was a rort. They thought why after paying my 900 bucks do I have to pay more?
Well the IKO probably thought that, spending 60bucks to keep your credentials alive is better than just expiring at the end of 24months.
This system has been "tweaked" lately and I think that it is better than before.
Mores courses and all that stuff.
But what my experience has shown me is that the IKO is not set in stone, it has always been willing to make changes to fix problems and tried to be inclusive, so any subgroups would not keep slipping through the cracks.
The IKO Standards are now 26pages long and they have many rules and exceptions to make the method fit to the membership. Unfortunately it is impossible to make everyone happy. But We are trying to do that. Sometimes making one subgroup happy, you will really upset one or two other folks. Sometimes way more than a few.
So I am not making excuses for IKO because I know they have had their challenges, especially in the last few years. But they now have new direction and new energy, and are trying to get back on track. So sorry to all the subgroups that slipped through the cracks over the years (i myself was almost one of them a few times). I can say that IKO has started a slow change for the better, and like Darren said, "time will tell".
Some of the changes you are just starting to see were put into process over 2years ago. Change is slow sometimes.

DD.
kiwimike
kiwimike
QLD
37 posts
QLD, 37 posts
23 Dec 2010 5:02pm
something for free from iko? there must be a catch. nothing for nothing from iko.
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
23 Dec 2010 10:49pm
I got the email from IKO. Free CEP's for experienced instructors?

No apology for the arrogant way we've been treated.

No offer of a discount on membership fees for the inconvenience.

These guys need some lessons in customer service. We are their customers and source of income.

I maybe would have re-subscribed if the attitude has changed.

No more money or support from me. I'll wait and see what BKSA has to offer.

Amazing how bad business tactics can ruin a business that has an excellent product. Maybe they should actually employ someone trained in marketing and customer development rather than kitesurfer mates looking for a job.

Merry Christmas all!
the skipper
the skipper
QLD
90 posts
QLD, 90 posts
24 Dec 2010 12:10am
If a Kite Instructor has 20K Public Liability Insurance from a major australian insurance company and is unaffiliated with any scheme, does that make him an outlaw?
Taurus
Taurus
VIC
189 posts
VIC, 189 posts
24 Dec 2010 1:11am
It makes him grossly under-insured.
the skipper
the skipper
QLD
90 posts
QLD, 90 posts
24 Dec 2010 12:12am
20 Mill sorry!

Or a Cowboy because he isn't in the scheme circle?
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
24 Dec 2010 12:55am
the skipper said...

If a Kite Instructor has 20K Public Liability Insurance from a major australian insurance company and is unaffiliated with any scheme, does that make him an outlaw?


No way. Belonging to IKO was just a way to obtain the insurance and get a "qualification" that is acknowledged by councils. (with no accepted alternatives)

A cowboy instructor is one that teaches without insurance or legal permits for cash on public beaches where these things are legally required.

Cowboy instructors undermine the reputation of legitimate businesses and compromise the safety initiatives that AKSA and the state associations are trying to maintain with authorities.
kitesurfjim
kitesurfjim
VIC
136 posts
VIC, 136 posts
24 Dec 2010 12:00pm
Typical response,
no dig at you Personally IKO Dave, but just like the IKO you pick and choose which comments you respond to, or not as the case may be.

i mention a major floor in the IKO training scheme and no response not even a PM asking for details, just goes to show, that truly the IKO is not dedicated to improving the system but more concerned with people leaving and trying to keep their sales up.
laurie
laurie
QLD
3902 posts
QLD, 3902 posts
24 Dec 2010 2:29pm
Admin Note:

Posts have been removed from this topic, as per forum 'rules of the game'

It is ok to:
Discuss a way of improving & fixing things

It is not ok:
- Post private emails in a public forum
- Post anecdotal stories of "he said, she said" / kangaroo courts

Seems the IKO are receiving feedback, nobody is complaining/reporting posts, the debate is healthy (except for above), and IKO are actively engaged, so we'll let it run.

If you don't agree, PM me with your opinion.
INTHELOOP
INTHELOOP
QLD
1855 posts
QLD, 1855 posts
25 Dec 2010 3:49am
We have used the IKO guidelines and teaching methods for our school and club for a long time now. Most of our instructors have been IKO certified.
The IKO course has helped me and many others to have a better and safer understanding for teaching kiting.
However, in OZ we are already bombarded with regulations, permits and costly insurances to run a kiting school so it's understandable that school owners are not keen on paying extra $ to an organisation like IKO for no benefit. If fees and such would be paid to an organisation like AKSA, the Aussie kiting community would benefit from it.

Continuous learning occurs every time you teach somebody and there are a lot of variables that determine good instruction at your local spot.
Experience is the best teacher and Australia has a lot of very experienced instructors like Darren M, Joe Millen, Bretto, Ed, Matty P, Dave, etc, so it would be best to have an Australian system for teaching methods in place that is specific for Australia. I am pretty sure this will happen sooner or later.

For example, in Germany the VDWS license is mandatory and a great framework/license; in the UK the BKSA; and in France you have to do a university degree to teach kiting-

Why not have an Australian Org./Aksa to qualify kiteboarding instructors in OZ?
I dont think it would be too hard to come up with an Australian system under AKSA!

I believe that some resistance will rise against the BKSA in Australia the same way it does now against the IKO because it is not a Australian system/org. that has been developed by us specific for Australia!

Im interested to see how the BKSA methods differ from the IKO.





kiwimike
kiwimike
QLD
37 posts
QLD, 37 posts
25 Dec 2010 12:47pm
i agree that each region must be locally run. there needs to be local reps to make sure minimum guidelines are met and an outside rep who can come in if the local rep can not sort out any problems. at the same time instructor and student qualifications must be recognised internationally which is where an international affiliation system is necessary. the iko system is very good. i have been a member for 4 years and have hosted several instructor training courses at my club. usually these are enjoyable and informative for the candidates. i have no problem with the iko system, which it appears does not differ greatly from the british standard. the problem is just sitting back in the DR collecting fees is not living up to the purpose of having an organization like this. the purpose of having a regulatory body for kiteboarding is to
1)set guidelines for safety
2)premote and expand kiteboarding
3)assist in insuring the schools and individuals
this should not be done by an organization looking to make the largest profit. i believe australia has people in the kiting business who would donate their time assist in these 3 objectives. i am going to start an organization for asia which i hope to affiliate with the new australian and british standards. i love kiteboarding and am prepared to put in the effort to start things of in my area.
kitesurfbali
kitesurfbali
WA
531 posts
WA, 531 posts
28 Dec 2010 1:00pm
Sorry Laurie,
you cancel my long post were I wrote copy of e-mail but I was careful in deleting every single name and company except mine...
That posting really show and PROVE the way IKO works!
That is why in my opinion it was important to be posted...
Not like I said, he said, bla bla bla..
After reading this latest crap by IKO officials I would like to ask you to reconsider the cancellation...
If is not possible maybe you can send it back to me as it took me long time to put it down and I may post it as it is in other forums where the same thing is going on.
Bye Jankie
Trant
Trant
NSW
601 posts
NSW, 601 posts
28 Dec 2010 5:00pm
IKODave said...

IKO announcement of disassociation...




kiwimike
kiwimike
QLD
37 posts
QLD, 37 posts
28 Dec 2010 5:33pm
WE DAVID AND EVERYONE ELSE AT IKO IT HAS BEEN A HELL OF A RIDE BUT MY TIME WITH DEALING WITH YOU IS OVER. I FEEL SOMEWHAT LIKE A LOYAL DOG THAT HAS BEEN GIVEN A GOOD BEATING FOR NO REASON.

TO ALL THOSE CANDIDATES WHO BELIEVE THEY WERE RIPPED OFF WITH THE SUB STANDARD ITC KAMIL DID THERE IS NOT MUCH MORE I CAN DO FOR YOU. YOU WILL HAVE TO CONTINUE THE FIGHT ON YOUR OWN. I SUGGEST HITTING KITEFORUM.COM AND SEEBREEZE.COM TO VOICE YOUR OPINIONS.

MY TIME NEEDS TO BE SPENT ON MORE PRODUCTIVE PROJECTS.




IKO Confirmation of disassociation

To Mr Mike Allen

Your actions during your Pattaya ITC have lead to your suspension as ITC organizer,

KAMILS LIES LEAD TO MY SESPENSION AS AN ITC ORGANISER. I PROVED THEM TO BE LIES WITH PHOTOS AND OFFERED THE ITC CANDIDATES AS WITNESSES. I EVEN SHOWED HIS MOTIVATION FOR DISRUPTING THE ITC.

And your school had quality issues that triggered your center’s probation pending a compliance check.

I FLEW ED TEO FROM AUSTRALIA AT MY OWN EXPENSE TO TO A QUALITY CHECK AND YOU REFUSED TO ALLOW HIM TO DO IT

We provided many opportunities for you to respond appropriately and supply justification why the sanctions should be lifted.

I RESPONDED DAILY, EMAILS WERE NEVER REPLIED TO. PHONE CALLS WENT UN RETURNED

You failed to provide adequate proof or answer the questions raised about your school or explain your actions during the course you were hosting.

ON EVERY POINT I RESPONED WITH PHOTOS AND OFFERED EYE WHITNESS ACCOUNTS FROM THE CANDIDATES.

However it was your inexplicable actions and unprofessional conduct since then that has lead to your subsequent suspension as head instructor and instructor.

MY EXTREEM FRUSTRATION HAS CAUSED ME TO VENT MY ANGER. I OFFER NO APOLOGY FOR THIS. THE ONLY TIME I EVER GOT A PHONE CALL FROM YOU WAS AFTER I SENT IKO AN EMAIL TITLED
'WHAT THE F**K ARE YOU IDIOTS DOING AT IKO'
SEEMS STERN LANGUAGE IS THE ONLY THING YOU WILL RESPOND TO.

Even after all of that we still gave you the opportunity for redemption, pending a review from our Training Master, which scheduled for the end of January.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I HAVE DONE EVERYTHING RIGHT. I DONT UNDERSTAND. I SOLVED EVERYTHING AND OFFERED SOLUTIONS. I AM DONE WITH YOUR ORGANISATION. THIS WILL NEVER END UNLESS I END IT NOW.

However rather then wait for your opportunity to prove yourself during this review and compliance check, you have instead decided to seek permanent separation from the IKO. This is entirely your choice. Please note that your request for complete separation from the IKO is hereby granted, and that you should no longer associate your activities with the IKO network, name or logo. We ask you to refrain from any continued communication with the IKO or cease contact with the clients of the IKO.

DONE DEAL. I AM JUST WASTING MY TIME WITH THIS AND WANT TO GO ON TO HELP FORM AN ORGANISATION THAT IS FOR THE GOOD OF THE SPORT, NOT THE GOOD OF THE BOTTOM LINE.

Your sister school in Hua Hin has decided to remain an IKO school and continue to host ITC courses. We will continue to support them.

YOU CALL THAT SUPPORT? YOU MEAN HUA HIN WILL CONTINUE TO FIGHT WITH IKO. SUPPORT HA HA. I AM LAUGHING SO HARD I HAVE TEARS IN MY EYES. DAVID, YOU ARE JUST TOO MUCH.

And deal with them directly. If you still have any unsatisfied clients from your ITC course they are welcome to contact IKO directly for ongoing support. Otherwise you should forward any enquiries to the Hua Hin center. Be advised that there will be a public announcement that you are now officially disassociated from the IKO network.

Regards,

IKO Training Committee
Eric Beaudonnat
Fred Bene
David Dorn
Bigwavedave
Bigwavedave
QLD
2057 posts
QLD, 2057 posts
28 Dec 2010 9:02pm
This can of worms would be better dealt with somewhere else.

kiwimike
kiwimike
QLD
37 posts
QLD, 37 posts
28 Dec 2010 9:44pm
i agree and laurie i think all these post should be deleted mine and daves. he should not have made that post here however i have to answer it. he is going to get a call from a lawyer soon anyway if he does not remove it, so one way or another i think it will end up removed.
IKODave
IKODave
6 posts
6 posts
29 Dec 2010 10:49am
Trant said...

IKODave said...

IKO announcement of disassociation...






You are right, I have removed the post. Other people are doing enough posting all by themselves.
thanks.
kiwimike
kiwimike
QLD
37 posts
QLD, 37 posts
29 Dec 2010 2:28pm
ok ikodave have removed my post as well and my lawyer will not be calling you. i will stop my email newsletters and i hope we can form a ceasefire. i wish we took care of this problem when it started. seriously this whole thig has caused me so much stress. this whole thing got blown out of proportion. why did you wait 3 weeks to call me?
AKSonline
AKSonline
WA
925 posts
WA, 925 posts
29 Dec 2010 6:47pm
Hey Guys,

It's great you have kissed and made up ..... well ..... sort of anyway. Perhaps the rest of your communications could happen behind the scenes instead of on this forum. Unless I'm grossly mistaken, it really isn't of that much interest to the masses.

Everybody wins! YAY!

DM
INTHELOOP
INTHELOOP
QLD
1855 posts
QLD, 1855 posts
29 Dec 2010 9:26pm
AKSonline said...

Hey Guys,

It's great you have kissed and made up ..... well ..... sort of anyway. Perhaps the rest of your communications could happen behind the scenes instead of on this forum. Unless I'm grossly mistaken, it really isn't of that much interest to the masses.

Everybody wins! YAY!

DM


famous last words.

can we now focus on an Aussie/AKSA accreditation system for teaching in Australia?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply