On 19 Feb 10, KBV made the following comment in a post to a discussion forum re self-regulation at Altona
kbv said...
And a final note to remind kiters that if they are in a zone not designated for kiting (beach or water) and have an accident then any form of insurance will not be valid.
KBV, could you please elaborate on this? The primary reason for my membership of your organisation is the insurance (of course, I'm also appreciative of the advocacy role you play).
Could you please identify what areas in Victoria are 'not designated for kiting (beach or water)'? I am aware of some oft discussed restrictions at St Kilda (outside the Sea Baths, close to the Jetty) and the recent discussions about the transition area at Altona. But are there other areas at say Brighton, Inverloch, Rosebud, Sandy Point, Port Melbourne (just to name a few places that I kite)?
Could you also please point me to the relevant paragraphs in the AKSA QBE Insurance Policy?
Sorry to be a pain, but this comment cause me much concern. What if I have an incident (say broken line) in a permissible zone that results in me being dragged into an area 'not designated for kiting' and causing injury to some third party in that zone? Would I then not be covered?
Looking forward to your response.