Parking at Ricketts

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5127 posts
VIC, 5127 posts
6 Dec 2010 11:53am
I notice that the whole beach side section of Beach Rd at south Ricketts has No Standing signs.

The only legal parking is in front of the houses or around the corner in Dalgetty Rd, or down in the car park near the lifesaving club.

It's a bit rude that this happened with no warning. It is fair enough to restrict parking near the pedestrian crossing but closing off the whole area is unrealistic.

A few strong protests to the council or the local paper would be in order.

Perhaps also ask for the lifesaving club car park to be upgraded. It's not at all pleasant packing up among the dead animals and used frangas.
Albos
Albos
VIC
162 posts
VIC, 162 posts
6 Dec 2010 1:33pm
i think they have done that because it is a bad place to park. You have a crest of a hill on one side and a blind corner on the other. If you added parked cars, pedestrians and cyclists it becomes a tight squeeze.

I do agree about upgrading the car park though
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5127 posts
VIC, 5127 posts
6 Dec 2010 3:18pm
The section they have sign-posted is on the approach to the crest and is reasonably visible.

They have left parking on the house side on the down side of the crest so traffic cannot see the parked cars until after they have cleared the hill.

That bit of road has been legal and safe to park for decades and suddenly it becomes unsafe and illegal?

Either way, they have removed the only accessible parking to a popular family beach with a life saving club. It's also one of the few dog walking beaches in the area.
harry potter
harry potter
VIC
2777 posts
VIC, 2777 posts
6 Dec 2010 5:40pm
it has been done to appease the cyclists who ride of a morning..............that means although the majority of people want to use the public land and beach they cannot beacuse of a few winging cyclists....

FFS..... there is a purpose built bike path....why the FK cant they use the bloody bike path it even has a stenciled outline of a bike.

Sorry but it really annoys me as well
Albos
Albos
VIC
162 posts
VIC, 162 posts
6 Dec 2010 6:39pm
if it was just for the cyclist it would only have times on it like all the rest of beach road. Between 6-10am on weekends there are no standing zones from mody to pretty much st kilda
foorked
foorked
VIC
152 posts
VIC, 152 posts
14 Dec 2010 3:09pm
please beware the signs have also shifted at brighton, at the south-westerly end. look out
lostinlondon
lostinlondon
VIC
1159 posts
VIC, 1159 posts
14 Dec 2010 7:02pm
harry potter said...

it has been done to appease the cyclists who ride of a morning..............that means although the majority of people want to use the public land and beach they cannot beacuse of a few winging cyclists....

FFS..... there is a purpose built bike path....why the FK cant they use the bloody bike path it even has a stenciled outline of a bike.

Sorry but it really annoys me as well


Riding a road bike at 40km/hr on a two way (shared use) bike path... riiiight. The bike path is there for families and kids.

Something like 10 thousand cyclists use Beach Rd on the weekend - that's hardly minority use of the road.

What's wrong with parking on a side street and walking?



harry potter
harry potter
VIC
2777 posts
VIC, 2777 posts
15 Dec 2010 2:32pm
^^^^^ families (who pay rates by the way ) looking to spend a day at the beach are now forced to unload umbrellas, chairs, eskys and kids now have to park 100s of metres away in side streets overcrowding them causing problems for the residents of those streets, they ( parents ) have to now cross the road fully loaded with beach gear and kids ( who are usually super keen to get to the beach ) etc.. etc... Creating a dangerous situation.

Cyclists do not pay registration are not insured don't pay rates they contribute nothing to the service and maintenence of our roads oh and barely ever follow road rules.

I am quite happy for them to be on the road I am not happy about having lanes closed or parking removed for them.
Taurus
Taurus
VIC
189 posts
VIC, 189 posts
15 Dec 2010 2:47pm
I agree with Harry, the cyclists are too greedy. Your riding a bike, use the designated bike path!!!
Saffer
Saffer
VIC
4501 posts
VIC, 4501 posts
15 Dec 2010 3:35pm
harry potter said...

^^^^^ families (who pay rates by the way ) looking to spend a day at the beach are now forced to unload umbrellas, chairs, eskys and kids now have to park 100s of metres away in side streets overcrowding them causing problems for the residents of those streets, they ( parents ) have to now cross the road fully loaded with beach gear and kids ( who are usually super keen to get to the beach ) etc.. etc... Creating a dangerous situation.

Cyclists do not pay registration are not insured don't pay rates they contribute nothing to the service and maintenence of our roads oh and barely ever follow road rules.

I am quite happy for them to be on the road I am not happy about having lanes closed or parking removed for them.



Agree. When cyclist start abiding by the road rules, then they can start asking for these types of restrictions. I can't count how many times cyclist wind their way between cars at traffic lights and then hold up 20 cars while they cycle along at 30km/h in a 60km/h zone. Add to this the cyclists that ignore traffic lights and use pedestrian crossings and they're more of a danger to pedestrians and cars than the other way around.
lostinlondon
lostinlondon
VIC
1159 posts
VIC, 1159 posts
16 Dec 2010 1:49pm
harry potter said...

^^^^^ families (who pay rates by the way ) looking to spend a day at the beach are now forced to unload umbrellas, chairs, eskys and kids now have to park 100s of metres away in side streets overcrowding them causing problems for the residents of those streets, they ( parents ) have to now cross the road fully loaded with beach gear and kids ( who are usually super keen to get to the beach ) etc.. etc... Creating a dangerous situation.

Cyclists do not pay registration are not insured don't pay rates they contribute nothing to the service and maintenence of our roads oh and barely ever follow road rules.

I am quite happy for them to be on the road I am not happy about having lanes closed or parking removed for them.



I love these kinds of debate - bring it on

Solution - Drive into carpark, unload gear and kids 1 person stays with gear and kids while other parks car on side street. BTW everyone pays rates - including people without kids. Rates don't pay for maintenance of Beach Rd.

Registration does not pay for the maintenance of the roads - taxes (which I pay a lot of) do. Rego is for covering the cost of registering your vehicle on an annual basis.

Insurance - I'm a Bicycle Victoria member which includes insurance so I am a responsible insured cyclist. They also provide legal assistance when involved in an accident.

Cyclists barely following road rules - For every cyclist I see disobeying a road rule I see a car disobeying a road rule, including driving with excessive speed, half lane changing, sitting in painted bike boxes at intersections - everyone is disobeying road rules, including pedestrians who cross the road with their kids without using the pedestrian crossing when there is one 20m away. Should none of us use the road then? In the last 12 months, with improved access to Beach Rd cyclists have been working hard to pull the rule breakers into line, not unlike the "self regulation" that we engage in when we see dickheads on our kitebeaches.

As for the bike path, keeping the faster cyclists off the bike path (which is actually a shared use path - which has kids on trikes, plus parents carrying umbrellas) is far safer for everyone.

Having the left lane clear of parked cars makes it safer for drivers - it means cyclists don't have to veer out into the middle lane to avoid parked cars and allows cars to pass us freely.

I know the area you are talking about - I grew up around there - cars rip around there - the speed limit should be 40km/hr on weekends. (Possibly permanently) That would make it safer for everyone. As well as banning trucks on the road. It should be a recreational road and local access not arterial road.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5127 posts
VIC, 5127 posts
16 Dec 2010 2:52pm
The laws are not really important. What matters is what is right and fair and decent.

It is not right to point at the poor behaviour of car drivers to excuse the poor behaviour of cyclists. Bad is bad no matter who is doing it. Car drivers eventually get booked for doing the wrong thing. It never makes sense to say "that wrong thing is bad so I can do this other thing that is wrong." Are you keeping score?

It is not right that cyclists choose to use the public roads as their exercise and fitness training venue during peak hour.

It is not right that the 2% of travellers at peak hour on bikes ride two abreast and hold up the 98% of traffic during peak hour.

It is not right that hoons ride bicycles at 30-40 kph on the road blocking traffic. It is equally not right that bicycle hoons ride at 30 kph on cycle paths. If they were decent people they would travel at a speed that allowed them to safely deal with vulnerable pedestrians and other cyclists. I do on my bicycle commute to the city. Why can't you? (... and why can't you ring your bell before passing me on the cycle track? Even call out "passing" would do.)

It is not right that cyclists place the responsibility for their safety completely in the hands of the drivers (who they accuse of being dangerous and irresponsible). Prohibiting parking partially solves the problem. It does nothing to deal with cyclists who persistently diverge into the right lane to pass other cyclists without looking.

Many bicycles are unroadworthy in both technical terms and in terms of fitness for purpose. Excessively thin, slick tyres. Negligible brakes. No bells. No mirrors. Inadequate lighting. It's worth mentioning that many cyclists insist on wearing black and have LED lights with flat batteries. If they were cars they would be confiscated. They are not much different to the teen hoons in overly hotted up sports cars.

It is not right that Beach Rd, which is the only access and parking place for most of the beaches, has been hijacked by a vocal and aggressive political minority. Many of the best and most popular beaches have no other parking. Many families were using the beaches between 8:00-10:00 am so they could enjoy the beach before the peak heat and UV times of the day.

It is not right that packs of cyclists skim the doors of parked cars and terrorise anybody who accidentally gets in their way.

This debate has nothing to do with cycling for transport. The high speed, race-oriented riding is purely an ego-centric sporting activity taking place on public roads, often during peak hours. It has nothing to do with health and fitness. You can get a better workout riding a heavier bike on hilly terrain than rolling around the virtually flat Beach Rd on a carbon fibre race machine in look-at-me team logoed race outfits.

PS An ongoing study by the Department of Transport has shown that car drivers do not hate cyclists. They are terrified that they are going to hurt a cyclist. They react very badly when a cyclist does something that a) scares the driver and b) requires the driver to do something to avoid hurting the cyclist.
harry potter
harry potter
VIC
2777 posts
VIC, 2777 posts
16 Dec 2010 3:41pm
Saffer said...

harry potter said...

^^^^^ families (who pay rates by the way ) looking to spend a day at the beach are now forced to unload umbrellas, chairs, eskys and kids now have to park 100s of metres away in side streets overcrowding them causing problems for the residents of those streets, they ( parents ) have to now cross the road fully loaded with beach gear and kids ( who are usually super keen to get to the beach ) etc.. etc... Creating a dangerous situation.

Cyclists do not pay registration are not insured don't pay rates they contribute nothing to the service and maintenence of our roads oh and barely ever follow road rules.

I am quite happy for them to be on the road I am not happy about having lanes closed or parking removed for them.



Agree. When cyclist start abiding by the road rules, then they can start asking for these types of restrictions. I can't count how many times cyclist wind their way between cars at traffic lights and then hold up 20 cars while they cycle along at 30km/h in a 60km/h zone. Add to this the cyclists that ignore traffic lights and use pedestrian crossings and they're more of a danger to pedestrians and cars than the other way around.


I have a good method for dealing with those cyclist ( the ones you pass and then at the next set of lights they ride up and pull in front of you) .... When slowing to the lights pull over hard to the left ( wheels in the gutter style ) they then have to wait behind. If they pull out and attempt to lane split, I open my door... I have every right to do so and they are not allowed to lane split.

Sometimes you get a mouthful of abuse but I just give it back 2 fold then reach for the axe handle on the back seat
lostinlondon
lostinlondon
VIC
1159 posts
VIC, 1159 posts
16 Dec 2010 7:04pm
Gorgo said...

The laws are not really important. What matters is what is right and fair and decent.

It is not right to point at the poor behaviour of car drivers to excuse the poor behaviour of cyclists. Bad is bad no matter who is doing it. Car drivers eventually get booked for doing the wrong thing. It never makes sense to say "that wrong thing is bad so I can do this other thing that is wrong." Are you keeping score?


I never keep score on who does the wrong thing as there is terrible driving and cycling in Melbourne -but the difference is if you do something wrong in a car the consequences are far less - you don't face the prospect of being scraped off the tarmac with a putty knife.


Gorgo said...


It is not right that cyclists choose to use the public roads as their exercise and fitness training venue during peak hour.

It is not right that the 2% of travellers at peak hour on bikes ride two abreast and hold up the 98% of traffic during peak hour.

It is not right that hoons ride bicycles at 30-40 kph on the road blocking traffic.


I don't know which cyclists are out "training" during peak hour - its not exactly like you can ride at a decent pace - more often than not you can ride faster than the traffic.

Cyclists are legally entitled to a lane on the road and to ride two abreast. If you are passing a cyclist, you should not be in the same lane. It's not right that cars pass you giving you 30cm of space either.

Gorgo said...



It is equally not right that bicycle hoons ride at 30 kph on cycle paths. If they were decent people they would travel at a speed that allowed them to safely deal with vulnerable pedestrians and other cyclists. I do on my bicycle commute to the city. Why can't you? (... and why can't you ring your bell before passing me on the cycle track? Even call out "passing" would do.)



I agree, more courtesy is required when you use a cycle path. But you say cyclists shouldn't ride at 30-40km on the roads and then at 30km/hr on a cycle path either - where do you ride? Through the sky? Besides, with a moderate amount of fitness and a reasonable bike 30km/hr is pretty easy to maintain.

Gorgo said...


It is not right that cyclists place the responsibility for their safety completely in the hands of the drivers (who they accuse of being dangerous and irresponsible). Prohibiting parking partially solves the problem. It does nothing to deal with cyclists who persistently diverge into the right lane to pass other cyclists without looking.

Many bicycles are unroadworthy in both technical terms and in terms of fitness for purpose. Excessively thin, slick tyres. Negligible brakes. No bells. No mirrors. Inadequate lighting. It's worth mentioning that many cyclists insist on wearing black and have LED lights with flat batteries. If they were cars they would be confiscated. They are not much different to the teen hoons in overly hotted up sports cars.



I agree, fixies suck. No brakes, and pretty much a fashion accessory. Don't tend to see them out on Beach Rd, more in Northcote though!

Gorgo said...


It is not right that Beach Rd, which is the only access and parking place for most of the beaches, has been hijacked by a vocal and aggressive political minority. Many of the best and most popular beaches have no other parking. Many families were using the beaches between 8:00-10:00 am so they could enjoy the beach before the peak heat and UV times of the day.


There is plenty of off road parking. Besides, 20000 cyclists use Beach Rd over the weekend mornings that's hardly a minority. Its about the only suitable road in Melbourne that can cater for cyclists to ride on the road safely.


Gorgo said...



It is not right that packs of cyclists skim the doors of parked cars and terrorise anybody who accidentally gets in their way.

This debate has nothing to do with cycling for transport. The high speed, race-oriented riding is purely an ego-centric sporting activity taking place on public roads, often during peak hours. It has nothing to do with health and fitness. You can get a better workout riding a heavier bike on hilly terrain than rolling around the virtually flat Beach Rd on a carbon fibre race machine in look-at-me team logoed race outfits.



Skimming doors is a bit of a catch-22 If I ride 1m out from the parked cars (like I do), I get honked and buzzed by cars who think they can hang left. If I ride right against the door of parked cars I run the risk of hitting a door as someone opens it and FAILS to check for cyclists, and I have to be scraped off the bitumen with a putty knife.

I understand the merit of the heavier bike argument, but I ride all the way to Rye and back from St Kilda - so Beach Rd is just part of my ride. I don't see much pack riding at peak hours... part of the attraction of the pack ride is winding up in a group and driving each other along at a decent clip, you just can't do it in peak hour! Guys meet up at 530am to do their pack rides. On Saturday riders might start at a more civilised time of 7am - but do 4 hours of riding.

Trying doing that on a knobbly tyre heavy framed bike. I didn't own a car until recently, so I had to start and finish in St Kilda. I agree, people pay way too much for their bikes and they are often way over spec'ed but you could make that argument about a lot of kitesurfers too, riding Hadlow Pros and only riding in and out.

Gorgo said...


PS An ongoing study by the Department of Transport has shown that car drivers do not hate cyclists. They are terrified that they are going to hurt a cyclist. They react very badly when a cyclist does something that a) scares the driver and b) requires the driver to do something to avoid hurting the cyclist.


That may be so, but I have seen a lot of aggression towards bikes - guys think they are teaching you a lesson in life by driving up close behind you and leaning on the horn. I have ridden throughout UK, France, Italy, Switzerland and I have never seen that kind of aggression anywhere but Australia. It sucks. In France I have seen people sit behind a bike at 20km/hr and pass only when they can move to the other lane and pass all the way around you, doing only 30km/hr as they pass.

Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5127 posts
VIC, 5127 posts
16 Dec 2010 8:21pm
lostinlondon said...
...
I never keep score on who does the wrong thing as there is terrible driving and cycling in Melbourne -but the difference is if you do something wrong in a car the consequences are far less - you don't face the prospect of being scraped off the tarmac with a putty knife.



But cyclists continually put themselves in the position where a car driver must see them and avoid them and cater for whatever silly thing the other car drivers and the cyclist does.

lostinlondon said...
...
I don't know which cyclists are out "training" during peak hour - its not exactly like you can ride at a decent pace - more often than not you can ride faster than the traffic.

Cyclists are legally entitled to a lane on the road and to ride two abreast. If you are passing a cyclist, you should not be in the same lane. It's not right that cars pass you giving you 30cm of space either.



There are any number of mini-pelotons on Beach Rd on any morning. They create a slow moving bottleneck that backs up traffic for hundreds of metres. Some are commuting in a pack. Others are out for their morning training ride.

There are clearway signs that prohibit parking but these groups of bikes act as a virtual parked car that makes a mobile blockage.

It is not right that the minority of cyclists should ruin the traffic flow for the vast majority of commuters.

lostinlondon said...
...- where do you ride? Through the sky? Besides, with a moderate amount of fitness and a reasonable bike 30km/hr is pretty easy to maintain.

...


That is ultimately the point. If you want to commute then ride on the bicycle path and limit yourself to 15-20kph. It's not hard. I do it all the time.

If you want to blast along at high speed then find an empty road, outside of peak hour and ride. Don't impose your desire to ride at excessive speed on everybody else.

lostinlondon said...

....I agree, fixies suck. No brakes, and pretty much a fashion accessory. Don't tend to see them out on Beach Rd, more in Northcote though!

...


I was not referring to fixies. I was referring to road racing bikes. Those side-pull brakes are adequate for slowing down. They are not adequate for stopping in a hurry and the tyres have no significant grip. I assume you've seen what happens when a peloton tries to stop.

lostinlondon said...
...
There is plenty of off road parking. Besides, 20000 cyclists use Beach Rd over the weekend mornings that's hardly a minority. Its about the only suitable road in Melbourne that can cater for cyclists to ride on the road safely.

...


No there isn't. Hampton beach has no off street parking. Black Rock has one small one just down from the life saving club. Same for Brighton. Green Point has one at one end and a bit of a strip. Sandringham has a few scattered car parks.

It's called Beach Rd because it accesses the beach. You can't get to the beach any other way.

lostinlondon said...
....
I understand the merit of the heavier bike argument, but I ride all the way to Rye and back from St Kilda - so Beach Rd is just part of my ride. I don't see much pack riding at peak hours... part of the attraction of the pack ride is winding up in a group and driving each other along at a decent clip, you just can't do it in peak hour! Guys meet up at 530am to do their pack rides. On Saturday riders might start at a more civilised time of 7am - but do 4 hours of riding.

...


So we get back to the essential argument, you want to use the public roads as your sport and training ground.

Why is it ok for a pack of 20-50-100 bikes to blast along on the public roads but if it was motor bikes or cars or runners or pedestrians then it would be bad?

If it was a slow moving truck it would be required to have an escort vehicle and a permit.

It makes some sense on the weekends and if that was all it was then people might not mind so much. But dozens of people do it weekdays during peak hour.

There's heaps of roads out the back of Werribee that are deserted. I've seen guys out there training. Nice and flat. A bit of wind to provide some resistance. You could jump on the train and get yourself to somewhere perfectly suited to what you want to do.

There is an argument that the helmet, lycra, race bike scene has killed cycling culture in Australia. I see the sense in that. I and others will not ride on the road for fear of being identified with the road racing hoons and fashion victims.
Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5127 posts
VIC, 5127 posts
16 Dec 2010 9:12pm
To use a beach example, it is perfectly legal for me to kite from the beach. I am reasonably competent and I can launch and land safely. But if the beach is crowded I go away and come back later. Why should I ruin somebody else's day when I can easily come back later?

On the water I could call my right of way over sailing boats and runabouts. I am far more manouverable than them and can easily turn around and go somewhere else.

Why can't cyclists exercise basic judgement and consideration to avoid blocking up the roads for everybody else?

Why do cyclists put themselves in the position on the roads where everybody else is responsible for their safety?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply