eppo said..
So, can anyone give an explanation on why the mast track is too far back just for Armstrong foils?
The fanatic was fine for my axis gear, worked well on my sons Konrad foil, but after I got the Armstrong gear, what hilly has said is the truth and only the truth.
went out on a 5'6 - 90L carbon YOB yesterday with the Wingman Aka Jason (WA Surf) yesterday arvo with a mast track in the right place and oh my god the 1250 came alive! Blew my mind. Was able turn into what was pretty average swell lines with maximum speed and pump link 3-5 swell lines with ease. Only my crappy fitness held me back.
my naive and ignorant analysis is that the Armstrong wing stays highly balanced across both feet even at high speeds - say going down a swell/wave. It actually craves speed. You don't get that almighty front push up against you. The force does increase but it's very linear, proportional to your speed. Which allows you to adjust to the point there is total balance across both feet even down the steepest pitch of the swell/wave.
the flip side is, front foot pressure can feel slightly vague if you ride too slow AND the mast plate maximum is set too far back. So it feels as though the board wants to drop forward off the front foil so you are continually using your back foot to keep on the foil - your back leg, whilst it's subtle, gets a serious workout over a session. Especially the continual adjustment in a swell line
on the YOB board yesterday I could still ride at slowish speeds and could keep that pressure balance - it wasn't vague. Could ride as fast as I wanted and the back leg never tired.
Those New YOB boards are worth checking out hey, really impressed.
That being said I can't fault the fanatic 5'4 I've been on, except it's not a great match with the Armstrong foil.
now maybe someone can give a proper explanation because I'm still a major kook regarding foil dynamics...
Seems like Armstrong is setup for the minimal amount of compensation from the tail. The tails only produce enough downforce to balance the lift for even foot pressure.This is a good thing because there is minimal drag being created by the tail which improves speed and efficiency.Just compare the 300 tail with -2 shim to the 212 tail with +1 shim with the same front wing, there is a huge difference between the front foot pressure in those to tail setups.
It's not so noticeable on prone boards, because it's easy to stand slightly further back or forward on the board and find a nice balance point, but with SUPs and bigger boards the weight of the board forward of the tracks makes more of a difference.
Armstrong boards would have the tracks placed to balance out the ride, but if you use another brand of board maybe not.
I have 2 fanatic boards a prone and a SUP and I have the foil all the way forward for both, and I just stand where I find the balance position that I like, but I'm interested to compare where the tracks are in the Armstrong boards.Another factor is the tail lift on boards, most boards are pretty flat in the tail, but fanatic have a slight tail lift.Piros has same fanatic SUP as me but uses Axis foil, and he has the opposite problem ,so he puts washers under the mast plate to flatten out tail lift effect and reduce the front foot pressure.
I guess there is no standard position as different foils and setups produce different amounts of lift , but it seems Armstrongs like the boxes further forward.