12'6 class

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
paul.j
paul.j
QLD
3381 posts
QLD, 3381 posts
24 Jul 2009 9:46am
Just would like to get peoples thoughts on this class?
My thoughts are that it should be 100% stock boards only no race 12'6 boards as the idea with this class is to get more people in the the racing and if they could race there own board that they surf on and be competitive it would be a big plus and would attract more people. Then if people get more serious then they can get 14 and unlimited boards.

When i was in Germany the biggest success of the whole comp was the armatures because they were all on pure stock boards and the racing was so close.

Maybe a rule like there has to be 500 of that board in production to compete in the 12'6 class

I know some shapers might not like this idea but i would like to see the sport grow and the only way for real growth is to get more people in to the comps.

Just a thought!!!

Jacko
kiakaha
kiakaha
QLD
472 posts
QLD, 472 posts
24 Jul 2009 12:49pm
I think you need the 12'6 class for the ladies and lighter men. For me a 14ft board is to big for me to control and handle.

I want to race in some of the downwind races and can control a 12'6 specific board. I don't want to race on my SUp surfing board as it has no glide!!!!

Also depends if it is flat river paddling or ocean racing
firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
24 Jul 2009 1:25pm
what stage do you class a board as stock,in retail sales of a certain number where a stock production board has to be homlogated by the association before it is allowed to race as in the old australian touring cars,ie falcon gt,gods gift to aussie petrol heads,had to sell 500 units to qualify.or do we race them because they come from china and are readily available.what about our own race board specialist,stuey c and dale c,in real terms both their 12.6 boards are production race boards and are way better that the imports.
maybe you could organise one of the biggies(asian production) to have a one design 12.6 class.all boards equal weight and only the engine room is the difference,that way a manufacturer could heavily discount the board to racers and make it affordable to all.right now he with the biggest engine room will always win on a custom race board. i am dead serious,one design 12.6 production class,best quote gets the contract,lets see them put their hands up for this,i am sure that a dc or stuey c designed asian production board would fly.
Piros
Piros
QLD
7303 posts
QLD, 7303 posts
24 Jul 2009 1:37pm
Good call but what do you call stock Jacko ? Is my RH 12-0 gun stock ? I know which production boards are stock but what about if Dale Shaped me 12ft surf cruiser which was also very fast to paddle.

The 500 rule just won't work , you straight away eliminate any board made in Australia and that is something I would not support.

If you want the sport to grow in Australia we need to get behind companies like DC ,Laguna Bay & Stuey who in my opinion have already shaped some of the best Sups available on the market to date.

The good thing about the 12-6 class is the difference between something like a Starboard 12-2 and a custom 12-6 isn't massive and people who race this catergory aren't trophy hunters there just in it for the stoke , the serious racers will be in unlimited.

My 2 Bobs.

Rob

DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
24 Jul 2009 1:49pm
paul.j said...

Just would like to get peoples thoughts on this class?
My thoughts are that it should be 100% stock boards only no race 12'6

Just a thought!!!

Jacko


I agree 100%.. The 12'6" class should be stock (off the shelf) boards.. and out of a mold.. IMO

DJ

ChrisMcC
ChrisMcC
NSW
667 posts
NSW, 667 posts
24 Jul 2009 3:00pm
IMO, 12'6 14 and unlimited. As to question of limiting 12'6 class to stock only, I cannot see how limiting it would be beneficial for the sport, I think leave it as it is.
NewcastleSUP
NewcastleSUP
NSW
250 posts
NSW, 250 posts
24 Jul 2009 3:02pm
I read somewhere ISA classify stock as minimum 200 produced worldwide of the same model. Jacko and piros both have a point.
Casso
Casso
NSW
3785 posts
NSW, 3785 posts
24 Jul 2009 3:08pm
NewcastleSUP said...

I read somewhere ISA classify stock as minimum 200 produced worldwide of the same model.

So you'll have to retire the submarine mutant then, hey Sime?
tha dogman
tha dogman
NSW
2912 posts
NSW, 2912 posts
24 Jul 2009 3:09pm
Casso said...

NewcastleSUP said...

I read somewhere ISA classify stock as minimum 200 produced worldwide of the same model.

So you'll have to retire the submarine mutant then, hey Sime?



haha...lol.....
Casso
Casso
NSW
3785 posts
NSW, 3785 posts
24 Jul 2009 3:10pm
Piros said...

The 500 rule just won't work , you straight away eliminate any board made in Australia and that is something I would not support.

If you want the sport to grow in Australia we need to get behind companies like DC ,Laguna Bay & Stuey who in my opinion have already shaped some of the best Sups available on the market to date.

I agree - you can't do stuff that'll be detrimental to the local shapers.
Lfish
Lfish
402 posts
402 posts
24 Jul 2009 2:22pm
What's wrong with a 12'6" class that exists with simple restriction on length, width ( widest & narrowest dimensions) & weight (a realistic minimum to avoid high cost). The backyarders (like me!) & custom makers could be involved also, these classes shouldn't belong to the volume manufactures only. Windsurfing has this numbers thing (& a fee) in lots of it's classes & I don't think that has done the sport any good at all. Anyway, just my thoughts
paul.j
paul.j
QLD
3381 posts
QLD, 3381 posts
24 Jul 2009 6:42pm
The 500 rule was just a stab in the dark.

I'm sure when the stock 12'6 class was made they had the idea that people would not need to buy a second board and could race there surfing board and that would make a lot more sense to me and then everyone is in with roughly the same chance rather than one or two guy turn up with a custom board and smoke everyone else

If you think you paddle a 12'6 race board better than you paddle a 14 then that's cool just enter the 14 foot class on your 12'6.

12'6 in my book equals Amature, if from there you want to get more serious then buy a 14 or unlimited but leave the 12'6 class for guys wanting to get in to the sport.

I have a lot of people say they wont go in to a event because there is no point because of people on the race boards.

Really it should come down to some one on the beach its pretty obvious if its a purpose built race sup or a surf sup that way your normal DC or Stuy can compete the same as a 11'6 Naish.

All i see is the big companys putting on these events, If these local guys want there fast boards to win then maybe they should put on some events???

These are all just MO and nothing will probly come of it but i think as Aussie's we are leaders not followers.

Jacko
hilly
hilly
WA
8133 posts
WA, 8133 posts
24 Jul 2009 5:22pm
paul.j said...

The 500 rule was just a stab in the dark.

I'm sure when the stock 12'6 class was made they had the idea that people would not need to buy a second board and could race there surfing board and that would make a lot more sense to me and then everyone is in with roughly the same chance rather than one or two guy turn up with a custom board and smoke everyone else

Jacko


I agree, the whalebone race recently over here was open to anything so the guys who turned up on raceboards smoked everyone. Amateurs (note spelling jacko) on stock gear stood no show.

I do not see the point of going in a race when someone else is obviously going to flog you because of their gear. Flame suit on.

firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
24 Jul 2009 7:38pm
with all the bs going on about this class the answer is simple,ONE DESIGN,other than that all i see is a retail opportunity for anyone in retail sup trying to get a production 12.6 this just limits custom shapers and is downright discriminatory.lets see the bigtime race boys turn up on chinese unlimited popouts.
surfho
surfho
NSW
17 posts
NSW, 17 posts
24 Jul 2009 9:36pm
most of the production boards max out at 11.6 and 12.0ft right. would it not make sense then to have a "stock production" class of 12.0 max and restrict it to surf style sups - ie no displacement hulls. Keep the 12.6 race class because it is a more affordable class for the average punter who wants to get into serious racing without the huge expense of an unlimited board.
At the end of the day if you wanna race buy a race board - if you wanna surf get a surf board and if you wanna race your surf board, do the best you can but be realistic about your ability to be competitive.
What I would like to see is more comps consisting of surf/flatwater race where you have to use the same board like the honolua comp in qld. That is an awesome format and would make it easier for the average person to go in comps and only have to own one board.
lookielookie
lookielookie
QLD
347 posts
QLD, 347 posts
24 Jul 2009 9:42pm
so i want to compete.
I make my own boards or work with my local shaper..
Hang on, i have to go buy a mass produced pop out for $2000 by a big ass wind surf company.
dont think that will advance the design side of things!!!!
paul.j
paul.j
QLD
3381 posts
QLD, 3381 posts
24 Jul 2009 10:23pm
lookielookie said...

so i want to compete.
I make my own boards or work with my local shaper..
Hang on, i have to go buy a mass produced pop out for $2000 by a big ass wind surf company.
don't think that will advance the design side of things!!!!

No race your stock board. That's the whole point if you want to get in to racing then make a race board but for the 14ft class its not rocket science.

Hey Hilly i know my spelling is pretty average but that one was spell checks fault

Everyone knows that these boards aren't designed by the chinese and that they are designed by some of the best shapers in the world and just copied by the chinese so that we can all ride these boards.
Jacko


kiteslave
kiteslave
NSW
45 posts
NSW, 45 posts
24 Jul 2009 10:42pm
stop whingeing and start training
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
25 Jul 2009 12:08am
yeah, it's a hard one.i'm thinking 12'6" stock class and 12'6" race class- every bodies happy.i actually think a true stock class would be a hit.the semi serious can still get an affordable race board.also some people just don't have the room for bigger. my boards in my lounge room
cheers


firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
25 Jul 2009 12:15am
paul.j said...

lookielookie said...

so i want to compete.
I make my own boards or work with my local shaper..
Hang on, i have to go buy a mass produced pop out for $2000 by a big ass wind surf company.
don't think that will advance the design side of things!!!!

No race your stock board. That's the whole point if you want to get in to racing then make a race board but for the 14ft class its not rocket science.

Hey Hilly i know my spelling is pretty average but that one was spell checks fault

Everyone knows that these boards aren't designed by the chinese and that they are designed by some of the best shapers in the world and just copied by the chinese so that we can all ride these boards.
Jacko





who are the best shapers in the worldlet them design a one design race board at a reasonable price so we all can race where the best paddler will win,but then we will need one paddle design,there goes the sponsored racers,seriously tho,this topic is lame in oz because there just are not enough racers in any class of sup.
firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
25 Jul 2009 6:52am
we could forgetting the most important part here,we all weigh different weights and volume is made custom for that reason,that even stuffs my one design theory,oh well,back to the drawing board.
paul.j
paul.j
QLD
3381 posts
QLD, 3381 posts
25 Jul 2009 7:47am
firstpoint said...

we could forgetting the most important part here,we all weigh different weights and volume is made custom for that reason,that even stuffs my one design theory,oh well,back to the drawing board.


Yeah i like the one this idea and give all the companies who want to compete a certain board, they make a exact copy and put there name on it all brands big and small can enter. Board weight issue could be sorted maybe by 70kg guys certain volume 80kg a bit more, gets a bit tricky i know but the ideas are there. Don't forget bigger guys should have a bit more power.
How dose it work for windsurfing one design with weight and that?

DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
25 Jul 2009 9:04am
firstpoint said...

we could forgetting the most important part here,we all weigh different weights and volume is made custom for that reason,that even stuffs my one design theory,oh well,back to the drawing board.


A big board like the 11'6" Naish could be used as a one design board and would be ok for someone who's 40 kg up to someone who's 140 kgs... IMO.

DJ

ChrisMcC
ChrisMcC
NSW
667 posts
NSW, 667 posts
25 Jul 2009 9:08am
Is my 12'6 DC faster than my 12'6 Surfshapes ..... honestly ..... think they are the same when you put me on them, there might be about 1 minute or two over 8 klms. Jacko on the 12'6 Surfshapes and me on the 12'6 DC .... Jacko you would have me by about 15 minutes between Snapper and Currumbin. Still comes back to the motor. Alot of guys absolutely smashed me on Stock boards in the last Honolua and they were on stock 12 or less boards.
BWDave
BWDave
VIC
239 posts
VIC, 239 posts
25 Jul 2009 10:35am
Well, I think that there is a misconception that the stock class is for those who don't take racing as seriously, are lightweights or can't afford a bigger board. I don't think this is the case. There are many problems with owning, transporting, storing, maintaining and even paddling(in big winds) an 18 ft plus board. This makes owning and racing a 12'6 very appealing. Also there are many more competitors in the stock class making it more fun and competitive.

IMO it is absurd to have a one design for stock class as there is no way a person of 120kgs will paddle the same board as someone of 60 kgs. Also the constant development of shapes and design is great for the sport. Not everyone that paddles a race on a stock length is trying to win the race but those who are can use and should be able to use what ever shape they chose.

I think just have the 3 different lengths as the classes and have all boards fit into those.

Dave
firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
25 Jul 2009 1:39pm
volume is fairly easy to govern,1.5 x kg = volume.one design as in nose width,center width tail width with volume governed by thickness,could work,my thought in that for the 12.6 class only to find a true champion,would work world wide,all companies could get involved,because of quanties made price could be affordable and it wont rule out the true best shapers in the world,even the windsurfing companies could have a crack.leave 14 and unlimited for the developement shapers,revise bottom shapes and design every 3-5 years.
aus301
aus301
QLD
2039 posts
QLD, 2039 posts
25 Jul 2009 1:59pm
paul.j said...


How dose it work for windsurfing one design with weight and that?




For the Olympic class windsurfing which is a one design format the light guys with a good power to weight ratio generally win. A mate of mine that raced in a couple of Olympics weighed all of about 65-70Kg when racing. The down side of true stock class racing is that a certain body size seems to be perfect for a given size craft, if you fall outside of that perfect range you end up and a disadvantage.

For mine I would limit 12'6 class to being a planning hull, and apart from that leave it alone. Keeping it simple is what will get people involved.

Goochi
Goochi
WA
846 posts
WA, 846 posts
29 Jul 2009 10:35am
I reckon this is a good discussion,
I raced the whalebone 5km a couple of weeks ago that was up to 12'6 boards. The guy who won it was a pro rider and was on a proto type 'stand up canoe'. It was seriously fast, but what was the point?
I don't think 'class rules' for a 12'6 class should be limited to stock/production boards, but the design criteria should be defined. (like the America's cup class yachts)
A possible starting point:
1. Length = 12'6
2. Width = 30" (at widest part of Board)
3. Flat deck - no concave, no hollowed out section (it's standup paddle "boarding"). Race classes 14 foot and up can go mad with scoop out/canoe decks.
4. Volume? - this could be left open so as to suit the rider and avoid the class being rectricted to a certain body type.
5. Rocker? - left open - flatter shapes will do well in flat water, but suffer on the ocean or in windy conditions, so it would be swings and round abouts - down to the engine.

Naish has the Glide and Starboard is about to release the Pin. It would be great to compare these boards. The custom board makers would simply comply with 'simple' design criteria mentioned above.

Just an idea, that was developed from reading the early posts and recent experience.

Cheers

Gooch
Lobes
Lobes
885 posts
885 posts
29 Jul 2009 11:45am
Just restrict it to dimensions; 12'6 x whatever

I dont see any benefit restricting race entry to stock only boards. This just gives the big brands an advantage. I fail to see where the advantage is for the racer who will have his or her choice of board restricted. If someone told me that to race it was compulsory to use a board from xyz company I would say "Thanks but no thanks, enjoy your race".

No offence to Jacko b/c I dont think this is his intention but the whole thing reeks of a scam to lock out smaller designers and independent shapers. I would probably boycott it on principal even if I had the requisite board.

However there is some merit to the ideas of no scooped decks and planing hulls only. This is more of a dimensions criteria though.
firstpoint
firstpoint
QLD
613 posts
QLD, 613 posts
29 Jul 2009 2:49pm
12.6 planing hull ,who would own one,you cant surf them because they would be dogs,they could only be used for cruising and noboby would own one for that so it seems 12.6 class is a raceboard.maybe it is the wrong number,perhaps it should be 12.0 surfboard shape be it gun,big longboard shape ie laird shape 12.0 but if it is going to be a stock board anyone should be able to shape one.this still reeks of brand domination by someone
paul.j
paul.j
QLD
3381 posts
QLD, 3381 posts
29 Jul 2009 9:23pm
Lobes said...

Just restrict it to dimensions; 12'6 x whatever

I dont see any benefit restricting race entry to stock only boards. This just gives the big brands an advantage. I fail to see where the advantage is for the racer who will have his or her choice of board restricted. If someone told me that to race it was compulsory to use a board from xyz company I would say "Thanks but no thanks, enjoy your race".

No offence to Jacko b/c I dont think this is his intention but the whole thing reeks of a scam to lock out smaller designers and independent shapers. I would probably boycott it on principal even if I had the requisite board.

However there is some merit to the ideas of no scooped decks and planing hulls only. This is more of a dimensions criteria though.


This is a good topic and its good to see all the different points..

no one is taking advantage of the smaller company's if anything it is the other way around, the smaller company's come in to the event with a board no one else can get and takes the win while the bigger company pays out a heap of money to promote the sport and gets left behind. So my question is if you were a bigger company why wouldn't you make the rules to even out the playing field.

It will be a very interesting year for racing with the bigger company's making very competitive boards in most classes. I still think that stock should be stock and every thing else is fair game and with all the people that have come to the shop and talked to me about it it would seem about 95% of people agree.

Jacko

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply