Life jacket anyone?

8 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
waxer
waxer
SA
247 posts
SA, 247 posts
2 Dec 2017 9:29am
Not that good at judging distance,but anyone on a paddle board 400 metres offshore will be forced to wear a life jacket pfd etc .As of yesterday $160 if you are "apprehended" after the 12 month "warning" period.As I said not that good at distance ,how far off shore is U turns,or Seaford reef?
Welcome all ,our new numberplates SA "the nanny state".
JEG
JEG
VIC
1469 posts
JEG JEG
VIC, 1469 posts
2 Dec 2017 10:56am
Is it only SA and how about the other state.
I guess its safety 1st or just be cool not to have PFD or because its too hot.
RPG
RPG
41 posts
RPG RPG
41 posts
2 Dec 2017 10:04am
Hi Waxer,
The Port Noarlunga Jetty is 330m long and about 30m is over sand.... so i would say another 100m from the end of the jetty. Its a fair way out!
GizzieNZ
GizzieNZ
4103 posts
4103 posts
2 Dec 2017 11:30am
We lucky here......if you have wetsuit and legrope.....and a self paddled craft.......all good within a direct line from young nicks head to tuahine island
GizzieNZ
GizzieNZ
4103 posts
4103 posts
2 Dec 2017 11:33am
Quite sensible really......but am totally obsessed with future wind changes :)
WaveScience
WaveScience
VIC
131 posts
VIC, 131 posts
2 Dec 2017 3:56pm
JEG said..
Is it only SA and how about the other state.
I guess its safety 1st or just be cool not to have PFD or because its too hot.


It's the same in VIC unless you are in a surf zone.
stubear
stubear
36 posts
36 posts
2 Dec 2017 1:51pm
Does it mean you must be wearing a 'solid' PFD or can you still go with a waistbelt PFD?
riverider
riverider
TAS
1112 posts
TAS, 1112 posts
2 Dec 2017 5:24pm
In Tassie you need a pfd at all times unless in the surf zone, bum bag is ok, you also need a legrope at all times.
Nede
Nede
NSW
38 posts
NSW, 38 posts
3 Dec 2017 8:15am
So I can swim further than 400m offshore and don't require any floatation aids but need to have a PFD when on a foam filled board. Makes a whole lot of sense. Not...
waxer
waxer
SA
247 posts
SA, 247 posts
3 Dec 2017 11:28am
The new laws apply to boats as well,except that you are required to be wearing a jacket at all times if the craft is under 4.8 metres.So I go for a dive from my 3.8metre inflatable.I wear my lifejacket out the spot,take it off ,don my gear and do my dive or snorkel.On returning to the boat, I by law have to put my lifejacket back on in case I happen to fall overboard, haven't I just returned from being overboard without it on.
As some one else has noted when on the sup I am attached to my flotation device.We all know the risks ,and we assess and manage them.Honestly what is next compulsory shark shields,helmets,epirbs.
Are the pollies really worried about our lives or more realistically the cost of search and rescue.I for one would waive that right.
tikipurple
tikipurple
SA
132 posts
SA, 132 posts
3 Dec 2017 2:20pm
I think the pollies are more worried about the revenue the "fines" will raise.
We have 1 or 2 fisheries officers to patrol the whole of our metro coastline.
Who is going to enforce and hand out the fines????

E T
E T
QLD
2286 posts
E T E T
QLD, 2286 posts
4 Dec 2017 4:47pm
More Nanny State nonsense.

What happened to being responsible for yourself and your actions.

Yes I understand that not all people are fit and healthy and capable and blah blah blah, but if your are not what are you doing in the ocean anyway.

To my knowledge, no such nonsense in QLD.

ET.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply