why we follow diffent board size rules for racing

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
scotty100
scotty100
QLD
235 posts
QLD, 235 posts
25 Jul 2010 9:48am
why in oz do we classify stock sup boards 12.6 and under when the unofficial world championship the molikai race classify stock class as fixed rudder under 14 ft. which makes a lot more sense than 14fters racing 16- 18 foot boards that have rudders.

excert from molikain rules ;;

Competitors can choose to race in either the traditional Paddleboard or the Stand Up Paddboard (or SUP) as a solo paddler or as a team. The solo paddlers can choose to paddle in either the unlimited class (no size limit and with a movable rudder system) or stock class (12 feet or under for paddleboard, 14 foot or under in SUP with fixed rudder).

i know a lot of peple with 14ft racing boards that don't bother racing as the classes arn't just. why don't we change now so we can be in line with overseas races which we aspire to go and race.
Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
25 Jul 2010 10:04am
And another thing !!

www.davidkalama.com/2010/06/my-two-cents-the-bop/

Dave says;
On another note I think they need reexamine the equipment rule for the elite race. It’s just not fair that a two hundred plus guy, like Chuck, has to compete on the same size board that a 130 lb.guy, like Connor, does. I’m not sure there is a way to make it truly fair, but I know the way it is now really favors the smaller guys. Maybe start the length at 12'; for guys 125 lb. to 150, then 12'6"; for 150 lb. to 175, then 13'; for 175 to 200 lb. and 13'6"; for 200 plus. Might be worth testing to see if there is any merit to it.
DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
25 Jul 2010 11:22am
I agree, it's a good point.

I think there should be just two classes.. 14' and under (without rudders) "Stock class" and anything bigger (with or without rudders) "Unlimited class"

It's also a good point about forcing bigger guys to try and paddle 12'6" boards because they will never be competitive against a lighter person on the same board.

DJ
PTWoody
PTWoody
VIC
3982 posts
VIC, 3982 posts
25 Jul 2010 12:53pm
I love Dave Kalama but that issue of handicapping according to weight is nonsense. They don't raise or lower a basketball hoop according to the height of the player attempting to slam dunk. They don't ban a 110kg monster from tackling a 75kg running player in rugby, aussie rules or grid iron. So this sport of SUP arguably favours a smaller, lighter competitor. So what? That will make up for all the sports where height and might rule.
scotty100
scotty100
QLD
235 posts
QLD, 235 posts
25 Jul 2010 1:44pm
I agree if you want to be a long distance paddler , loose weight you can't handicap people because they train hard and are trim . we just need the 14ft and under fixed rudder and unlimited class
PTWoody
PTWoody
VIC
3982 posts
VIC, 3982 posts
25 Jul 2010 2:16pm
Indeed, a set of scales on the beach would be quite ridiculous. And what happens if a competitor has travelled 100's if not 1000s of kms to take part in a race, is right on the cusp between weight divisions and has brought the longer board... but his training regiment has seen him drop a kg or so in the previous week. Would we then see the unedifying situation of a competitor on the sand, shoving copious amounts of food down his throat trying to pork up so he can compete?
DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
25 Jul 2010 3:52pm
I can remember the early days of windsurfing and with the racing (regatta's) and there was a one-design board and to make it fair there was weight categories.

I knew friends that would drink gallons of water before their weigh in so they could get into a heavier class.. and then rush to the toilet before the start of the race..

DJ
husq2100
husq2100
QLD
2031 posts
QLD, 2031 posts
25 Jul 2010 6:47pm
I guess with it being small here and having to travel far.....along with the costs of boards people want to compete in a class with similar competitors....

regarding the weight issue...I call BS! the bigger guys are stronger and most of these top dogs have custom boards so even though they are 12.6 they are different volumes to suit....did a small kid win the BOP? nope...chucks size is and advantage and a disadvantage ...AS FOR EVRYONE IN LIFE!
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
25 Jul 2010 7:10pm
anyone every heard of custom boards, you know- the boards you get made for you. you don't have to buy a 'pop out' that isn't going to suit you. it's not rocket science, if the brand boards don't do it for you get one made. the aussie manufacturers could sure do with the orders the way things are with the economy
cheers
DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
25 Jul 2010 7:52pm
Not all big guys have super powers.. or are built like Chuck Patterson.. They just need bigger boards..

DJ

Simondo
Simondo
VIC
8025 posts
VIC, 8025 posts
25 Jul 2010 8:02pm
You could have a situation where everyone is a winner if we awarded by Board Length, Age Bracket, gender and Weight Division.

Boards - Sport, under 10'6, 10'7 to 12'6, 12'7 to 14', and Unlimited (4 divisions)
Ages Groups - Juniors, Early Teens, Mid Teens, Open, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, etc (8-10 Divisions)
Gender - M&F (2 Divisions)
Weight Division - Under 150 pounds, 151-175, 176-200, 201+ (4 Divisions).

So statistically I think that is 4x8x2x4 categories, so is that 256 possible divisions / trophies / bragging rights, or is my maths seriously stuffed up ?? !!!

Nah seriously, weight division doesn't work does it.... different weights will suit different conditions on the day anyway.... Yes Lacey I agree, custom boards.

I like SUP Vic's 10'6 and under Sport Division, where you can have a crack on your surfing SUP. But the serious racing will no doubt head towards (or stick with) just 14 foot, and unlimited.

(PS - that's gold DJ !)

Secret Agent
Secret Agent
QLD
289 posts
QLD, 289 posts
25 Jul 2010 10:24pm
I believe there are a few reasons and issues that arise from this 12'6" stock board classification that are just not in Australia alone. Australia didn't make the classification agreement nor do we have the amount of races that our US counterparts arrange. I think Australia being such a young culture to embrace the sport has just followed suit in what was happening in the SUP world of the US and Hawaii.

From what I have read in magazines and watched in SUP films, 80 to 90% of races are about an average of 6-8 mile events. Especially in California, when they have a few hundred people entering in these events, with most of the competitors being of recreational enthusiasts. These races have been capped at 12'6" limits to cater for the majority of SUP'ers, where a great percentage of the boards designs are stock standard surfing SUP's. Hence why these events attract so many participants.

The Molikai race as it states that the SUP stock length class is 14 ft and under. No one in their right mind would paddle 32 miles on a 12'6" race board. (Although some do) So in a lot of races and cases (distance that is), the 12'6" length does pull up a bit short. Although some specialist event's such as the BOP, suits the 12'6" length. So if the event is 14 ft and under class, will we see the recreational SUP'ers get to the line? I don't think so.

There are alot of races that do have their own stock classification guide lines, mostly in Hawaii and Europe. But these races too, are of elite status. Maybe there should be three different classes to accomodate everyone. Where do you draw the line? I think as the sport grows in Australia, we will see alot more races where maybe, these events can multiple categories. Keeping in mind that the sport is here to house everyone, and it is the affordability of the craft aswell.
Al Hunter
Al Hunter
NSW
367 posts
NSW, 367 posts
25 Jul 2010 11:00pm
I did enter the 18km race in byron last week end
We were....4 SUP against about 250 ocean skis.
Nobody amongst these 250 was arguing about weight. They were just there to do their best.
I was ashamed we were only 4 of us even if the conditions were not fantastic. And I understand the molokai is on and NSW title was on the day before but still...only 4!!
So before complaining about categories, size, age and weight we should maybe just have a go. And if in the future we have numbers the organisers will cater for us, but in the meantime I think we should stop thinking too much and paddle more.
Personnally I don't care to be beaten by a longer board or a lighter paddler, I am out there to have fun and I know who I would never beat even if we were on the same board anyway.
Secret Agent
Secret Agent
QLD
289 posts
QLD, 289 posts
25 Jul 2010 11:32pm
Al, well done mate. SPOT ON!
PTWoody
PTWoody
VIC
3982 posts
VIC, 3982 posts
26 Jul 2010 12:00am
In Melbourne last summer, we had 3 different promoters running separate events or series'. Each of these promoters is a SUP retailer, and they each had a different approach to board sizes.

In the Port Phillip Cup, the SUP Bus crew decided on a stock class of 12'6 and under. They did not officially recognise placings for any other board size.

The RPS/Starboard series of 3 races also had a stock class of 12'6 and under, but also a 10'6 and under, and a 9'6 and under class.

The SHQ series, planned for 4 races but reduced to 2 races, was unlimited with no recognition to any other classes or board sizes.

So from this distinct array of rules and regulations, one thing is clear... the 14' board was either banned or in the case of SHQ's 2 races, comfortably beaten by 17' boards. Not a single race acknowledged a 14' class. Unless these promoter/retailers can be encouraged to change their regulations, there seems to be little point in buying a 14' race board in Melbourne.
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
26 Jul 2010 10:08am
Hey Woody,

The range of rules in Melb also means that in our case where Kristi, Nesha and I all wanted to race that may mean upto 9 boards just to meet the 3 different board length regulations.

Then you also have flat water racing and down wind bay (short sharp wind generated chop) and down wind open ocean (longer period ground swell) to consider as well.



The BOP 12.6 format from what I have seen is the most inclusive and to a degree the most challenging due to the surf transition phase in each lap. Maybe thats why it draws the crowds.

Hopefully things settle down and there is some nationally agreed structure to it.

Phill.






Al Hunter
Al Hunter
NSW
367 posts
NSW, 367 posts
26 Jul 2010 10:21am
I think that without C4 making the vortice XP the 14’ category would never be there.
But now they will come out with a 12’6 because they realised Battle of paddle had a big commercial impact. And if in the future they make a good enough 16’ Todd Bradley will come up with a video convincing everybody you need to ride a 16’ and not a 14’.
So where do we go?
I paddle about 4 times a week and I might enter 3 or 4 races a year. What do you think I will take into account, pleasure or racing? I should just buy the board I prefer to paddle on.
Some weeks ago I had a good DW with mikeman. He was on his 14’ and he loves it. He would not change. I tried it and the truth is it was fantastic on some runners, really responsive like a small racing car (light lotus cabriolet kind of thing). But for me it would not be my only board because it was too demanding.
So I guess I will stay around 16’. Not to beat mike because I will go wider and more confortable anyway.
So there is a place for some guys with 14’ and even 15’. Dale has been shaping some 15’ that have a very nice feeling. In fact they are maybe the most versatile boards I have tried. Nobody wants to buy them because they think there is no place for it.
Big mistake. If you have only one board it could be the one. And travis won the unlimited in byron the saturday race with one of these 15’...
So at the end of the day just try boards and take the one you like.
I have been lucky enough to succesfully convince my wife to get a 12’6...so if there is a popular race limited to 12’6 I’ll be able to come in.(in fact I am sure a lot of us have a wife that favors paddling in easy conditions and don’t want to carry a 17’ out of the car) But if I have to paddle with this 12’6 in the under 14’ category for another race I will.
Since I don’t win anyway I’ll have the opportunity to tell everybody that was because of the board.
And to answer Phill I think everybody started to agree on under 12’6 and unlimited at some stage. I have the feeling it will prevail at the end, a bit like paddle boarding, 2 categories are far enough. But as I say, still worth buying a 14’ if you like it and if you want to do some downwind and come back to the beach surfing the last wave without breaking your last 17’ carbon weapon
DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
26 Jul 2010 10:47am
It's not just big 'guys' that need big boards..

DJ

DavidJohn
DavidJohn
VIC
17570 posts
VIC, 17570 posts
26 Jul 2010 10:55am
We shouldn't be turning away large people from this sport just because they're large.

DJ

CMC
CMC
QLD
3954 posts
CMC CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
26 Jul 2010 10:59am
Great points both Peasey and Al.

I will apologise firstly for not coming to the Byron race, I planned to but could not make it. Wedding in a couple of weeks!

Al's point is the best I have heard. Before anyone complains about the classes, get out there and race..... People are tacking the SUP divisions on to bigger events at the moment, if people don't come they simply won't bother.

As for board sizes etc, the one thing I do know is that the motor is far more important than the hull..... Go back in time a little. Trav Grant beats a guy on a 17' by over 5 mins at the Doctor on a 12'6. The excel race on the Gold Coast. Kelly Margetts comes 2nd on a 15' board with no rudder to Billy who would have been at the front on a plank of wood. Not far behind Kelly was Peasey and Chris Maynard on 12'6's also versus most others on 17' and 14'ers mixed in around these results.

I train sometimes with Lacey, he beats me on my board an older DC and he also beats me on his brand new DC. I'll need to worry about changing my board when I beat him on his and lose on mine......

One more point.... It's great that there is a focus on DW racing and amazing if the conditions prevail. BUT it has happened once now at the Salt race in how many races? Why bother putting people through the hassle of car swapping, getting to a start point etc etc when you could make it up and back or out to sea around a buoy and back to the start/finish line. Why is BOP popular to watch? Because you can watch the race..... Byron race for example. They were unsure of the winds, why not in funny situations like this start, go around a buoy 9 k's down the coast and come back, it has be Downwind for 1/2 eh? No car ferrying, no drama, show up and race and go home........ 99% of Outrigger races are ran this way, if you get a DW section it's a bonus.

Sorry for the rant. Too many coffees this morning.


Al Hunter
Al Hunter
NSW
367 posts
NSW, 367 posts
26 Jul 2010 4:57pm
DJ
Where do you get all your pics?
Do you have a special team working for you?
I love them anyway
BIGFELLA
BIGFELLA
5 posts
5 posts
26 Jul 2010 3:30pm
An interesting topic. What do people think of a handicap system based on previous times over specified distances in properly run events. Say a similar handicap system to golf for example. Would this not even up the field no matter what size shape you are and what board you paddle. Just a thought.
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
26 Jul 2010 5:55pm
BIGFELLA said...

An interesting topic. What do people think of a handicap system based on previous times over specified distances in properly run events. Say a similar handicap system to golf for example. Would this not even up the field no matter what size shape you are and what board you paddle. Just a thought.


that has some merit. me, being the despicable person that i am , immediately started thinking about which races i could dog leading up to a big race
cheers
ps got that sort of thinking from bingo
BIGFELLA
BIGFELLA
5 posts
5 posts
26 Jul 2010 4:10pm
People are always going to rig a handicap system but they are only cheating themselves. Winning under those circumstances would be a pretty hollow victory dont you think?
laceys lane
laceys lane
QLD
19804 posts
QLD, 19804 posts
26 Jul 2010 6:18pm
BIGFELLA said...

People are always going to rig a handicap system but they are only cheating themselves. Winning under those circumstances would be a pretty hollow victory dont you think?


true. don't think i would do it, i don't like anybody going past me if i can help it. still happens a lot unfortunately
Al Hunter
Al Hunter
NSW
367 posts
NSW, 367 posts
26 Jul 2010 8:07pm
why bring some handicap?
I am looking at the molokai result. I am so impressed with DW'er phil for example because we are around the same age and I can relate to him.
So if in the future I want to be in front of him I should wake up earlier and train more. To finish in front of him because of some handicap would not bring me any satisfaction since I know I would be cheating myself already.
We just have to accept that the guys in front of us are better and learn from it, if not, we are not talking about sport anymore, we are talking about a paddling afternoon party with a lucky draw for the winner.
Why not? but the satisfaction at the end will be different.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply