Compromising strength for weight

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
shi thouse
shi thouse
WA
1159 posts
WA, 1159 posts
14 Jul 2005 11:02am
At what stage will board production companies stop compromising strength for weight in the production of their boards. Are these boards being made this light to meet the sponsored/professional riders requirements who can in turn afford to regularly break/damage boards?? New technology is a great thing dont get me wrong, however if I had the choice of buying two identical boards with the only difference being the weight and strength factor, I would definitely go for the strength. As far as I am concerned an extra layer of wood may mean an extra 300grams or more, and to me that is the difference between one beer at the pub the night before or 20 beers at the pub the night before plus a kebab(minus the wrapper) on the way home.

When I buy a new board I not only want good performance but also a board that will last a number of seasons. Wave and style boards tend to have the double wood sandwich while everything else stops at the single layer. With the cross-over capabilities of so many of these boards now days why not make them all that strong? Or at least give the consumer that option of weight v's strength in their board choices. I know what I would choose.
surfingdave
surfingdave
12 posts
12 posts
14 Jul 2005 4:52pm
I totally subscribe to your view. I know that I am not up to standard but I still like surfing my good old 250er Tiga Wave, called "Hughes". Granted a bit "flexible", but it doesn't break and I have already had a lot of fun with it

Do you think, the locals are going to laugh, if I show up with that stuff?
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
14 Jul 2005 7:07pm
quote:
Originally posted by surfingdave

I I still like surfing my good old 250er Tiga Wave, called "Hughes". Granted a bit "flexible", but it doesn't break

Do you think, the locals are going to laugh, if I show up with that stuff?


Not at Geraldton, you could have a lot of fun at coronations with that gear, but I'm not sure about gnarloo. OK if it's small and high tide, you'll have room to get back over the reef. But if it's big and low tide, you might find out how tough it isn't.
And yes take booties, there's lots of nasties on the reef and it's quite sharp.
surfingdave
surfingdave
12 posts
12 posts
15 Jul 2005 6:29am
quote:
Originally posted by decrepit


Not at Geraldton, you could have a lot of fun at coronations with that gear, but I'm not sure about gnarloo. OK if it's small and high tide, you'll have room to get back over the reef. But if it's big and low tide, you might find out how tough it isn't.
And yes take booties, there's lots of nasties on the reef and it's quite sharp.


Thanks for your tipps. I have experienced a lot of ups and downs during the last 20 years or so, I am used to suffer and I am addicted to the great feeling windsurfing can give. No doubt, you can break every board if you surpass a critical load in a critical situation. I'll do my very best to keep my board. On the other hand: There must be a lot of attractive wave boards in West-Oz!?
Hang loose, Michael
Paul
Paul
WA
346 posts
WA, 346 posts
15 Jul 2005 12:48pm
Unfortunately not everyone supports your idea shi house. 8 out of 10 people that pick up boards in a store complain when a board is a little heavier.
Those old plastic boards didn't snap too often but they got some wicked creases in them, but after much serious abuse.
poor relative
poor relative
WA
9106 posts
WA, 9106 posts
15 Jul 2005 12:55pm
8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskers
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
15 Jul 2005 6:22pm
quote:
Originally posted by surfingdave

There must be a lot of attractive wave boards in West-Oz!?



Certainly no shortage, Perth and Geraldton have good shops for buying production boards new & secondhand, but if you really prefer sacrificing lightness for strength, there's also some good custom builders you could persuade to add some extra strength.

It's not really economic for production boards to cater for all preferences.

I don't know if Paul would agree with me here, but sometimes the problem is with the salesperson. A friend was told a board would be OK to use in light winds in waves, it has a wideish back and rear footstraps only on the rails, no center strap for wave riding. He was told just to take his back foot out of the strap when on a wave. Well it worked for a while, but then the deck delamned where his back foot went. Guess what, no reinforcing there, but plenty around the footstrap area, this board wasn't designed for wave riding. and wasn't reinforced for it. It's a low wind blaster, and plenty strong enough for that.
bluejuice
bluejuice
WA
334 posts
WA, 334 posts
16 Jul 2005 12:19am
I think thats because whiskers has a higher fat content in it and therefore it's more appealing, it's a bit like offering us Mackas fried chips or a boiled potatoe.
shuee
shuee
WA
114 posts
WA, 114 posts
16 Jul 2005 6:04am
i look at it being more of built in obsolesence. The windsurfing industry would probably suffer to survive if their equipment lasted more that 2/3 years, or was not supposedly obsolete within one. So why make a board that will last, design and strenght wise, five years. Is that good business sense? No, i would think not. Looking at the industry it is interesting what happens every year in regards to equipment relative to the previous year.

cheers

s
Paul
Paul
WA
346 posts
WA, 346 posts
16 Jul 2005 10:11am
It's like cars. How many people expect to keep a new ford or holden for more than 5 years before serious problems occur. My old EH was about 25 years old when I had it, my uncle still drives it 15 years later. My subaru is 25 years old with 420k's and still goes. Don't expect to see too many vt's vy's ect in 25 years.

Yes I agree with decrepit. there can be a problem with the sales people Or the expectations of the customer with the tool they want.
A sledge hammer can bang in nails but it want do a great job. A Kia will go off bitumen but that doesn't mean you should take it bush bashing.

If I buy a new tv for $10K I would expect it to last at least 15 years. But these too like windsurf gear are fashion items and constantly evolving and subject to break downs.

Sometimes the desire in the mind (or the cash in the wallet)is different to the reality of the product. While some will be conned others can't be convinced.

Decrepits enjoyment certainly doesn't suffer for using home made boards. You must be high on the list for number of waves per year.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
16 Jul 2005 5:04pm
quote:
Originally posted by Paul


Decrepits enjoyment certainly doesn't suffer for using home made boards. You must be high on the list for number of waves per year.



Thanks Paul, haven't done an exhaustive comparison between my boards and production ones, but my little yellow one is now 5 years old, a few small dents, but no fractures or creases, but then us fly weights don't put the same strain on gear as heavier sailors do!
had a nice surf today, (on my home made mini mal). Went too aggresively into a bottom turn, and my old back didn't stand up to the gs, only lasted another 2 waves and limped home. Hope it comes good soon, there's more wind and waves coming!!!!
rosey
rosey
NSW
575 posts
NSW, 575 posts
16 Jul 2005 7:36pm
boards are that light these days that putting on even a kilo wouldnt be the wnd of the world..older wave boards that are 7kg or so still perform excellent, so compromising some weight for strength on new boards would still only make them 6kg...
shi thouse
shi thouse
WA
1159 posts
WA, 1159 posts
17 Jul 2005 9:26pm
If I am paying over $2k for a new board and the missus (minister for planning and finance) takes at least 2 years to convince that a new board is needed, then I want it to last. It seems with all technological advancements comes a lighter weight product that does "does an even better job".... In fact one way (not necessarlily a good one) to reduce the weight of the board and rig would be to do away with the mast and boom, make an even smaller board and shape the sail like a kite. Mmmmmm....now all I have to do is think of a name for this sport?
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
17 Jul 2005 9:45pm
Whatever happened to the use of stringers in boards to create strength ?
They never added much to the overall weight.
ninja
ninja
WA
9 posts
WA, 9 posts
18 Jul 2005 9:44am
Yes they do, stringers add about 1kg they also don't help with heels going soft, delams, noses getting smashed by masts or fin boxes rolling.
If you bought a nice car smacked it around with a mast, drove it off ramps to jump it, bumped into other cars with it. It too would look worse for wear. I'll bet the car dealer would then not replace it on warranty.
vando
vando
QLD
3419 posts
QLD, 3419 posts
18 Jul 2005 3:45pm
bring back those glass boards they might be a bit heavier.
but you can ding them put holes in them and still keep sailing.
easy to repair and a lot cheaper.
unfortunately there not many people that make them anymore.
everyone gets suck in by those magazines that promote production boards.
hardman
hardman
1116 posts
1116 posts
18 Jul 2005 2:53pm
"but then us fly weights don't put the same strain on gear as heavier sailors do!"

Decrep,

Who are you referring to here? You eat one too many big macs and people start referring to you as the larger gentleman
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
18 Jul 2005 6:00pm
quote:
Originally posted by hardman


Decrep,

Who are you referring to here? You eat one too many big macs and people start referring to you as the larger gentleman



Hey, Hardy, did I mention any names????
But there are 2 gentlemen who's boards seem to spend a disproportionate time in my repair bay!!!!
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12885 posts
WA, 12885 posts
18 Jul 2005 6:04pm
quote:
Originally posted by ninja

Yes they do, stringers add about 1kg they also don't help with heels going soft, delams, noses getting smashed by masts or fin boxes rolling.



Sorry Ninja, no use trying to convince slave about stringers, I've been trying for the last 8 years or so with no effect at all.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23684 posts
WA, 23684 posts
18 Jul 2005 9:26pm
Vando... you must be joking right? The old glass boards were a hell of a lot weaker than a current sandwich board (wave board). I have a video from when the first epoxy sandwich boards became common in Maui (about late 90's) and top shapers on it remark that you could not jump an old board 50ft at Pozo cos it would break. Pro's jump new boards to that height regularly. Yes I know they land better than us but the guys who know were commenting on the same hypothetical guy riding an old board and a new one... whcih would break first do you think?
I have a 2001 Sonic waveboard (Cobra made) which I have jumped between mast and double mast often (and landed flat mostly, yes my knees are now stuffed) and it has no heel dents at all.... with 4mm thick (thin?) ****ty pads on it. Further I ran it over the reef in a bottom turn at Gnaraloo and only put holes thru the first sandwich layer (just) so no water got in and it was a 10min repair then back out. An old glass board would have been torn 2 inches deep from end to end in that one trust me.
We're doing pretty good I think (in real money terms) when my glass board in 1990 lasted 3 years and it was rooted. I now hammer a board a lot harder and both my new style boards have had 5 years with no discernable damage at all. Even with 5% inflation the new board is cheaper.

I do agree with the original poster that a bit more strength in slalom / freestyle / freeride boards would be nice. Maybe that is what the Super-X boards do well as they are designed to be fast and flogged hard ????
vando
vando
QLD
3419 posts
QLD, 3419 posts
19 Jul 2005 9:00pm
Mark I can only comment I my experiences ive never broken a glass board however the conditions where I sail aren't as wild as W.A.
I still have a 8 year old glass wave board and yer sure its got some dents in it but still goes fine(only cost me $800 brand new.)
And who can afford $2000 for a new board.And as for those pro's doing 50ft jumps how long do you think they keep there boards for maybe 1 or 2 seasons.
pole boy
pole boy
WA
292 posts
WA, 292 posts
20 Jul 2005 1:58pm
mark also you'll find that the top pro wave riders aren't on production boards, but reinforced customs so they can take those drops.

also when the wind is 20+kn who really cares about another kilo or two in the board?

poley
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23684 posts
WA, 23684 posts
21 Jul 2005 3:58am
I am aware of that.... though I doubt very much there is much, if any, reinforcing added to a pro's custom.... they would not want to add weight. Most of it is shape changes to make them slashier and looser (to the extent most of us would not like to ride it) or a little faster rockered etc.
I used to agree with your high wind comment, but changed my tuen when I got my first sandwich board a few years ago. You think they will be harder to hold down in nukin' conditions but it's the opposite, because the light weight means less of you body weight or mastfoot pressure needs to be exerted, for a shorter time, to correct changes to the boards attitude.
But yeah I hate the fact a new board is $2K but in real terms it's the same price as a polyester board 10yrs ago, and stronger, and more developed shapes etc.
bluejuice
bluejuice
WA
334 posts
WA, 334 posts
21 Jul 2005 7:38pm
After repairing a few production boards and custom boards I can say there is less glass in a production as compared to a custom of similar weight. Not all glass is the same! some are stronger than others, also the weave of a glass can change it's strength, hopefully your board manufacturers is using the strong expensive glass.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23684 posts
WA, 23684 posts
22 Jul 2005 1:52am
What would you know about board construction
I stand corrected Mike. Are you saying the pro's use different glass such as S vs K, or a denser weave like crowsfoot weave etc to obtain a stronger board? So it would basically have the same thickness of laminate but stronger?
The only productions I've seen busted (limited) were ones where the glass was not fully wetted out... you'd see white (not wetted out clear) glass all around the fracture and it stuck out like dogs balls. Of course once its out of warranty they tell you to get lost which is a bit wrong when you can see quite plainly that the Thai laminator bloke at Cobra was ready for early knockoff on Friday arvo.
bluejuice
bluejuice
WA
334 posts
WA, 334 posts
22 Jul 2005 6:55pm
I'm not sure about the pros but I believe the custom boards should be using S glass, satin weave or crowsfoot or maybe a 60/40 unidirectional, which would give a stronger laminate as you say. I've seen inside an old 5.6kg wave board that was used by a Hawiaiin pro sailor it had no pvc over the polystyrene just 2 layers of carbon 4 layers of kevlar and then 2 more layers of carbon thats about $1000 in carbon and kevlar for just the deck!
Mark I know what you mean about that dry production glass, infact that dry inside glass looks more like canvas/cotton than glass. Have you seen all the metal staples used inside the productions as well?
Bugger....
I didn't want to get sucked in to this post
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
22 Jul 2005 7:05pm
Ofcourse the pro-riders are going to be using the speckies.......
The punters get the allround versions with the cool graphics.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply