Sail rigging tips...

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Crash Landing
Crash Landing
NSW
1173 posts
NSW, 1173 posts
7 Aug 2006 4:12pm
Guys

I have a 5.3m wave sail that says it has a luff of 426 and recommends a 430 mast. The pulleys on my extension are about 8 cms below the end of the mast. What this results in is my sail having a gap at the bottom of about 12-25cms.

What would be best out of the following 3 options:

1. Keep it as it is (as it's a wave sail does the gap really matter?)
2. Adjust the head/top cap so the sail finishes flush (but this makes the sail rig on a stiffer part of the mast - although i have an RDM)
3. Use a 400 mast with extension (but this might be too soft)

Any ideas??
racycoot
racycoot
WA
315 posts
WA, 315 posts
7 Aug 2006 2:15pm
Try options 1, 2, 3 and see which you like the best!
Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
7 Aug 2006 2:29pm
quote:
Originally posted by racycoot

Try options 1, 2, 3 and see which you like the best!



he he he... Yep...

I'd try option 2, then option 3. I always try to rig my sails so the sail pulleys are as close (as practicable) to the mast extension pulleys as possible...

Pugs
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23684 posts
WA, 23684 posts
7 Aug 2006 4:15pm
Yup and that is what I HATE about sail manufacturers.... whined about it on the Gaastra forums and got sledged for it but I still think they need to realise that a 426 luff on a 430 is silly. Design the damn thing on a 400 for Christ's sake!!!! My Simmer 5.0 with a luff of 428 rigs on a 400 IE they used their brains and realised the pulley / cleat assembly is WELL below the bottom of the mast at minimum extension.

Anyway bitch session over.

Option 2 is for a heavier than average guy. On a stiffer section of mast, lets say about 10cm lower down the mast than what it was designed for, will require more downhaul but suit a heavy guy. It will be a bit more powerful but will not respond to gusts as well as the leech wil not open up quite as much.

Option 3 suits a lighter guy as it has the opposite effect.

At a very rough guess, if the sail is being used in the middle of it's comfy wind range, option 2 if you are 85kg plus. Option 3 if you are less than 80kg. If you're 82.5, well nobody can help you

Pugwash
Pugwash
WA
7733 posts
WA, 7733 posts
7 Aug 2006 4:20pm
quote:
Originally posted by Mark _australia

...option 2 if you are 85kg plus.


Sure am I like option 2
Crash Landing
Crash Landing
NSW
1173 posts
NSW, 1173 posts
7 Aug 2006 6:51pm
So am I! So I guess option 2 is the one for me aswell!

Thanks for the help!

And Mark - completely agree with you, it can't be that difficult to add 4cms to the length of the luff (but then I'd need an extension that didn't add on 8cms!)
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23684 posts
WA, 23684 posts
7 Aug 2006 4:51pm
Yeah I am too

Trouble is for eg my 4.0 should be on a 370, but I rig it on a 400 so it will be more like a 3.7 - 3.8 power-wise .... which is fine for me being 90kg. Buuuuttttt my 4.0 is an old 2000 model, and my new new 4.5 has so much wind range that it almost overlaps the 4.0. Time for a new 370 skinny and new 4.0 but who can justify that for 3 days a year?

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply