Severne Stone

3 months ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Brent in Qld
Brent in Qld
WA
1481 posts
WA, 1481 posts
22 Feb 2026 11:56am
I recently found myself in possession of a production Stone 94 for a few weeks. It is not my board, I was getting some sailing consumables and was asked if Id like to have a go on some new kit. Would've been rude to say no. Hopefully those with more time on the boards can add to this thread.

On land.
The board looks like a classic. Outline, length, the bottom shape, rails... it's all there. The finish of the Severne products keeps getting better, this is a thing of beauty on the rack. For a 94ltr product it's weight is impressive, its almost raceboard light and feels great in the hands.

On water.
I'm a quad/twinnie guy, so not a very good judge of thrusters and weigh in at 93-95kgs. I used the Stone 4-5 times, two lengthy sessions at Lancelin and the rest high wind, bump and jumpish at Dutchies. Unfortunately no serious down the line or down south but I've little doubt the board is made for those conditions, we've all seen the videos.
First saiI set up was with my usual quad fins, 14+10s and was overpowered with a 5.0 at Sth Passage, usual head to maybe 1/2 mast. The board was faster than expected and went upwind very well. Getting into position, bottom turns, top turns all feel natural and effortless. The board went exactly where I wanted and felt confident from the first turn. Just supremely capable without being radical, all in full control. I really noticed the weight, it makes everything easier which might be part of why it's being sailed so well by others. Shape wise is does everything you ask, the light weight just allows you to do the stuff you do better. A second session at Sth Passage was 5.0, a bit shifty, a little onshore now and then and got light. The float and ride was completely unexpected. Very stable slogging around, gets upwind off the plane and that little extra length combined with excellent volume distribution really allows good glide into waves when pumping for wave of the day. Once in the straps you're in a thinner part of the board chuck'n buckets.
I changed the fins to a 18+11 thruster set up, the wind filled back in and it became side shore. Certainly went well with only real difference being I thought the board had more drive off the top as a quad, but probably more to do with my technique than the board/fin arrangement.
At Dutchies I used it as a quad overpowered with a 5.3 and 4.5, also as a 19.5+11 thruster with a 5.6 S-1. It handled the lot with ease and was never fazed.

Thoughts
I have 2 Pyros and sail them a lot. Certainly the 94 Stone was fine with 5.6 to 4.5 as a thruster or a quad. Its surprisingly happy floating around in 10-15knts or having the hammer down in 25-30knts. Having handed the board back, the 2 key aspects of the Stone that sit in my mind are the length and ease of sailing.
The length maybe limits the Stone where the Pyro excels in smaller stuff. With the Stone you get serious all-round wave board performance, it's only upper limit in waves is probably decided by how big your balls are.
Secondly, I found I sailed at my local longer than usual on the Stone. When you step on a Pyro, it's game on, everything is happening fast and you need to be in control or it can chew you up and spit you out. Just blasting around enjoying what the day offers up, the lightweight Stone is almost relaxing to sail compared to a Pyro.

The Stone is a capable, proper wave board and the 94, or even the 88, would more than likely make a great one board solution for me in WA. A very good addition to the Severne wave board line up.
philn
philn
1110 posts
1110 posts
23 Feb 2026 10:07am
Great review, board sounds exactly what I'm looking for. Great in the float and ride to take to Pacasmayo and great in big waves to take to Caballos in Puerto Rico.
ptsf1111
ptsf1111
WA
589 posts
WA, 589 posts
23 Feb 2026 5:57pm
Thanks for the review. These boards seem to be popping up everywhere in WA now, give me one! Will see if I can get my hand on a 74 or 80 demo.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14965 posts
QLD, 14965 posts
23 Feb 2026 8:32pm
Would be keen to eventually get one too.. great review thx.
AI.Dave
AI.Dave
TAS
167 posts
TAS, 167 posts
23 Feb 2026 10:23pm
I had a quick spin on a 94 Stone on a flat but windy day. Completely agree with the ease of use comments, very smooth and immediately feels comfortable. For a DTL board I I was expecting it to be a bit draggy and slowish, but definitely not. Loved the wide strap positions too, great for us taller sailors. They are a good thing
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14965 posts
QLD, 14965 posts
3 Mar 2026 3:04pm
Brent in Qld
Brent in Qld
WA
1481 posts
WA, 1481 posts
3 Mar 2026 2:38pm


Looks like it's OK DTL
Manawa
Manawa
165 posts
165 posts
3 Mar 2026 4:03pm
Very nice test thanks
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14965 posts
QLD, 14965 posts
4 Mar 2026 7:17pm
Manawa said..
Very nice test thanks



I was a little surprised they thought it was something new design wise

Recently I gave a 65lt stone board to a local family of young groms that are frothing about windsurfing.

This new stone board has a lot of the DNA of that older shape. tail and rails especially look very similar. Wide point is a lot further forward with the newer shape and looks like a new rocker. The older one had a flat but looks like the entry rocker is reduced on the new board just based on the video. Still plenty of tail kick. Would like to measure one. Mark has always believed in wider straps too but all in all the DNA is there

Am a big fan of single to double to v bottom shapes. So keen to get one. IT looks epic on the wave.
Manawa
Manawa
165 posts
165 posts
4 Mar 2026 11:06pm
Gestalt said..

Manawa said..
Very nice test thanks




I was a little surprised they thought it was something new design wise

Recently I gave a 65lt stone board to a local family of young groms that are frothing about windsurfing.

This new stone board has a lot of the DNA of that older shape. tail and rails especially look very similar. Wide point is a lot further forward with the newer shape and looks like a new rocker. The older one had a flat but looks like the entry rocker is reduced on the new board just based on the video. Still plenty of tail kick. Would like to measure one. Mark has always believed in wider straps too but all in all the DNA is there

Am a big fan of single to double to v bottom shapes. So keen to get one. IT looks epic on the wave.


Great analysis. It's interesting how the Stone DNA remains so recognizable, especially in the rails and tail. Moving the wide point forward and tweaking the entry rocker seems like a smart way to modernize the shape without losing its soul.
Actually, I had the chance to hold an 80lt version here in my city just before Christmas. A friend of mine got one and immediately left for South Africa with it. Honestly, it felt like a real gem in my hands a proper 'war machine' for somewhere like Mauritius.
I'm a long-time fan of Mark's shapes I used to own several Starboard Ultra kode he designed (65, 76, 80, and 81lt). I absolutely loved how easily those boards turned. It would be very interesting to compare this new one with those old Ultra kode, especially for us mere mortals who never had the chance to get one of his full customs made in Australia. Having something with that same soul but a more aggressive edge for Mauritius would be a dream.
That said, I have a confession to make: my friend with the new Stone 80lt is back in town. I could call him right now to get his feedback after 2 months in Cape Town, but I haven't done it yet because I'm incredibly jealous! I know that if I pick up the phone, his stories will just destroy me lol. I'll need to find the courage to face him soon, then I'll report back!"
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14965 posts
QLD, 14965 posts
5 Mar 2026 5:49am
Please do.
sheddweller
sheddweller
288 posts
288 posts
5 Mar 2026 5:45am
Single screws on straps?
Crazy
Manawa
Manawa
165 posts
165 posts
17 Apr 2026 9:06pm
Not sure if you guys have seen it yet, but a French windsurf mag (Plancemag) just published a test of the Severne Stone 88 - and they absolutely loved it. Looking good for Oneye conditions .
Basher
Basher
597 posts
597 posts
2 Jun 2026 9:07am
Having seen the Severne Stone design in Cape Town earlier this year, I decided I wanted one.
It’s clearly a lovely board on a decent wave face, but it’s notably narrower and slightly longer than board designs from recent years - perhaps going back towards the optimal conventional shape.


My decision to buy one was then complicated here in the UK by my choice of board ‘size’ - because you may need a bigger volume one that you think - and also by the availability of sizes here, and the ££££cost. I was surprised to see Dieter Van Der Eyken on the 88 L Stone design in Cape Town, thinking he might normally be on the next size down. It’s a float thing, and a board width decision.

I’m still wavering between the Stone 84 and the 88 litre version myself, but the decision is now made harder, because Severne are revamping the Pyro for 2027, with these new shapes arriving in September. The new Pyro retains its speed and early planing prowess, but the claim is that a subtle change in shape and rockerline means it now turns better in the pocket of a decent wave.
I’m a Pyro fan, and currently have two of them .

Here in the UK, the Pyro has always been the perfect south coast board - where we get onshore winds and bump and jump conditions - but maybe this new version is better than the Stone design, for riding in our typical small wave conditions.
Rango
Rango
WA
860 posts
WA, 860 posts
4 Jun 2026 7:05pm
I,ve ridden the new Pyro 83 shape in gutless waves cross onshore on a 4.8 plenty of holes in the wind.The thing just keeps planing and trucks upwind .Biggest suprise was maintenance of speed dtl without much sail power with the ability to perform a tight snap .You could just glide dtl and pick your spot to hit the lip.
Highly recommended , and no I don,t own any Severne boards.Yet.
ptsf1111
ptsf1111
WA
589 posts
WA, 589 posts
5 Jun 2026 12:41pm
Re Stone size: bigger board, smaller sail seems to be the trend and from what I see, the larger sizes still work really well so in case of doubt, I'd lean towards the bigger size.


What's your weight?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply