Retina said..
I heard from a person (has 4m and 3m) that they are easier/better then hybrid . In drainage and maneuvers. Is that true?
I've owned the 2.5/3.1 (3.1 demo) Hybrid and 2.7/3.5 Orbit.
I think the Orbit is the winner for drainage. The Hybrid cells are a little more constricted where the water exits. I think we are talking about a difference of single digit seconds here.
3.1 Hybrid vs 3.5 Orbit is tough to say. The Hybrid had WAY more top end in my experience but that also means it was juicy wind when I tested it (gusting over 40 knots) so light wind handling might vary. The 3.5m Orbit became definitively less fun over 30 knots and since I owned that one I definitely got more time in on it. Neither seemed noticeably better or worse than the other though. I just remember appreciating that I didn't have to worry about the Hybrid line length vs the Orbit which needed to be stashed faster.
2.5 Hybrid vs 2.7 Orbit though.... That 2.5 Hybrid is an absolute joy. Super snappy/playful, short lines, fast upwind, the only one of the 4 I tried that I felt like was a must have after 1 session. The 2.7 Orbit is definitively better than the 3.5 Orbit when it comes to maneuvers but it still has comparatively long lines (116cm for the Hybrid and 147cm for the Orbit) vs the Hybrid which is less playful in my experience.
2.5 Hybrid vs 2.7 Orbit: 116cm vs 147cm = 31cm difference.
3.1 Hybrid vs 3.5m Orbit: 129cm vs 152cm = 23cm difference.
4.2 Hybrid vs 4.5 Orbit: 152cm vs 160cm = 8cm difference.
5.7 Hybrid vs 5.9 Orbit: 176cm vs 178cm = 2cm difference.
So, you can see the that the lines get closer with the larger sizes. My takeaway having ridden these is that difference sizes in difference lineups are going to be better for different riders. Difference strengths and weaknesses for each size in each range.