PSH 9 6 Wide AA v 9 6 Wide Ripper

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
hilly
hilly
WA
8133 posts
WA, 8133 posts
19 May 2009 7:51pm
Got some good waves on the weekend and got to go back to back on these two boards.

Me - 105kg, 2 years sup, 30+ years surfing, previous boards Naish 11 6 and JL 10 8. I own the Ripper.

Ripper - Very stable for its size but does get effected by chop due to its outline and has a far amount of yaw. First time riders, myself included coming from a larger board will struggle if you are near the 0.1 tonne club. Had my best surf yet on the weekend as close as I will get to short board style - cutbacks, off the lips even a little barrel or two. Not in Dogman's league but good for me. This really is a performance board. If you want to go vertical this is a good choice.

Wide AA - I thought I would be taking a giant step back in performance jumping on a 'All Rounder' after my Ripper. Getting up it felt a bit more stable than the Ripper but still a challenge in less than perfect conditions. More stable at a halt front to back. Glide was much better, the more parallel rails must help here as it has a surprising amount of tail rocker maybe even more than the ripper.
On the wave it was very lively and performance was close to the ripper with the only limiting factors being the slightly fuller nose and less rocker in the nose. Vertical manoeuvres where definitely more challenging in the small waves. Larger waves would be ok I think but the wider thicker tail may be a limiting factor. Very nice carving back into the foam on the small waves and bouncing out.
It really did surf well which surprised me, it would be an excellent board for someone into surfing but still wanted the glide of an all round board.
Sorry no action shots



Rocker Shot


Both boards were fitted with better quality fins which do improve the performance.


Casso
Casso
NSW
3785 posts
NSW, 3785 posts
19 May 2009 10:12pm
Nice comparison review Hilly.

What fins were in each one?
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
19 May 2009 10:29pm
Hey Hilly,

Thanks for the comparision. I too weigh 105kg but I have only had my 9'6 AA out 4 times. The board seriously rocks for me as a gumby surfer. Tonight all I had to do was tilit it up in the wave and let it run. The slightest presure on heel side or toe side and the carve is on! I still have a 9 incher in the center box but that is going tomoz as it stops the board turning from mid board.

Notes the 9'6s weight was gumby paddlers 200lb opps maybe its over loaded with my big ass on it lol!

Huge difference between it and the 10'6' wide AA, however I can ride the 10'6 in just about all conditions!

Might be able to get a quick trial on Rich's 9'6 ripper when it comes! if I ask nicely lol.

Unfortunatey this board is way more FUN than the 10'6, I will never become a serious surfer now!!!!! I will just be smilin way to much! Damn F word!

Phill
Lobes
Lobes
885 posts
885 posts
19 May 2009 8:33pm
Interesting difference in deckgrips. Which ones better?
hilly
hilly
WA
8133 posts
WA, 8133 posts
19 May 2009 9:33pm
Casso said...

Nice comparison review Hilly.

What fins were in each one?

We changed a bit best was:

Ripper 6.5 Fluid foils centre, FG7 FCS side

Wide AA 7.5 Fluid Foils centre, Sunny Garcia FCS side

Interesting difference in deckgrips. Which ones better?

Both felt good I like the kick in the tail on mine.

Agree Phill it is a fun board. If I did not have the Ripper I would be tempted.
loco4olas
loco4olas
NSW
1525 posts
NSW, 1525 posts
20 May 2009 11:51am
I'm only about 77-78kg and have been riding a 910 Ripper as a demo and rode the 906 WR on the weekend in REALLY fun 2 feet of glassy running shorey. Despite my light weight for such a volumed board, it was a really fun ride-super stable, easier to get into waves and fine with late take offs. Was surprisingly nimble on a wave (even at my relatively light weight), you can do round house cut backs and floaters etc on it super smooth, fast and loose. I think the 906WR would be a great board for a heavier person wanting to get into some serious surfing.

I gave a ride to a 48kg relatively inexperience girl friend (coming off an 11' Southpoint I think her is) and she was INSTANTLY smitten with the board-loved the stability without compromise in maneuverability-again, even at her light weight.

I rode a 906WAA and found that it just didn't have the maneuverability of the 906WR-also felt like the 906WR was more stable-although the conditions were pretty shti when I took the 906WAA out. It still floated over sections OK-but, for me, felt like it lacked the looseness and liveliness of the 906WR. The 906WAA was definitely a better paddler/glider than the 906WR.

Just my 2 cents.
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
20 May 2009 12:14pm
Off topic, but are you still gonna demo the 9 3 ripper loco4olas? I'm 83kegs pretty new to this and loving it. Did Jun have a go yet on the 9 3?
hilly
hilly
WA
8133 posts
WA, 8133 posts
20 May 2009 11:08am
loco4olas said...

I'm only about 77-78kg and have been riding a 910 Ripper as a demo and rode the 906 WR on the weekend in REALLY fun 2 feet of glassy running shorey. Despite my light weight for such a volumed board, it was a really fun ride-super stable, easier to get into waves and fine with late take offs. Was surprisingly nimble on a wave (even at my relatively light weight), you can do round house cut backs and floaters etc on it super smooth, fast and loose. I think the 906WR would be a great board for a heavier person wanting to get into some serious surfing.

I gave a ride to a 48kg relatively inexperience girl friend (coming off an 11' Southpoint I think her is) and she was INSTANTLY smitten with the board-loved the stability without compromise in maneuverability-again, even at her light weight.

I rode a 906WAA and found that it just didn't have the maneuverability of the 906WR-also felt like the 906WR was more stable-although the conditions were pretty shti when I took the 906WAA out. It still floated over sections OK-but, for me, felt like it lacked the looseness and liveliness of the 906WR. The 906WAA was definitely a better paddler/glider than the 906WR.

Just my 2 cents.


Totally agree about the ripper my wife loves it as well.

My weight was an advantage on the WAA for surfing maybe, it is not as loose as the ripper.
loco4olas
loco4olas
NSW
1525 posts
NSW, 1525 posts
20 May 2009 4:08pm
goatman said...

Off topic, but are you still gonna demo the 9 3 ripper loco4olas? I'm 83kegs pretty new to this and loving it. Did Jun have a go yet on the 9 3?


No need to demo-pick it up next week! Thanks, naturally, for the generosity. Jun is riding one now-Matt Lumley's old one-and stoked on it-I think he'll be picking up his new one next week too.
goatman
goatman
NSW
2151 posts
NSW, 2151 posts
20 May 2009 5:25pm
Sweet!!
Casso
Casso
NSW
3785 posts
NSW, 3785 posts
20 May 2009 5:34pm
loco4olas said...

No need to demo-pick it up next week! Thanks, naturally, for the generosity. Jun is riding one now-Matt Lumley's old one-and stoked on it-I think he'll be picking up his new one next week too.

Cool. The first comp of the Sydney Paddle Surfing Club is going to be loaded with 9'3" Rippers!
loco4olas
loco4olas
NSW
1525 posts
NSW, 1525 posts
21 May 2009 1:24pm
Casso said...

loco4olas said...

No need to demo-pick it up next week! Thanks, naturally, for the generosity. Jun is riding one now-Matt Lumley's old one-and stoked on it-I think he'll be picking up his new one next week too.

Cool. The first comp of the Sydney Paddle Surfing Club is going to be loaded with 9'3" Rippers!



And an 808 DC?
Casso
Casso
NSW
3785 posts
NSW, 3785 posts
21 May 2009 2:17pm
loco4olas said...

And an 808 DC?

Yep. Depends on what the surf is like as to which one I'll compete on.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply