cammd forum posts in last 60 days

cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
4 Oct 2026 6:32am
myscreenname said..


cammd said..
My opinion is based on what I think, not what the algorithm feeds me.




The algorithm owns you.



Haha, Yeah most likely does
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
3 Oct 2026 6:10pm
D3 said..

cammd said..


myscreenname said..




Mark _australia said..
What a load of crap. Right to protest does not exist at your paid employment.
if ya mates knew Epstein it’s irrelevant.


this whole thread is typical of the polarised view from social media sources only. Rise above your feed (that’s aimed at both sides of this debate)

unless any of you are actually privy to the contractual agreements in that situation? Or have actually spoken to people from both sides of that horrid conflict that’s murdering innocents? Both sides. The enemy is hate. Not Jews or Muslims






You have a right to protest in paid employment. But I'd imagine, from some of your comments here, you never would.






Folau got sacked for posting religious views on a personal social media account that had no links to his employer.

From what your saying he should have been within his rights to express his views even when he was playing test match.





Folau was sacked for breaching Rugby Australias code of conduct (questionable though that decision may have been).

Bit different to Macklemore being booted from a tour because future venues decided they didn't like his content, not the because Ed Sheeran (tour headline and presumably "principal" of the tour) did not like Macklemores content. No mention of Macklemore breaching any of the tours code of conduct or similar reasons.


Msn said you have a right to protest at work. I was just asking if he applies that principle to all people or just the ones he agrees with.
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
3 Oct 2026 3:53pm






Mark _australia said..


this whole thread is typical of the polarised view from social media sources only. Rise above your feed (that’s aimed at both sides of this debate)





The original author invited opinions , not facts, on the Ed Sheeran kerfuffle. So I expressed an opinion based on what I heard.

And pretty sure I didn't say macklemore should have been sacked for his views

And pretty sure I started off with stating he has a right to express political views

I just said, not on an employers time which I think you agree with, so I am hardly taking a partisan position based on left or right.

My opinion is based on what I think, not what the algorithm feeds me.





cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
3 Oct 2026 3:34pm
myscreenname said..


Mark _australia said..
What a load of crap. Right to protest does not exist at your paid employment.
if ya mates knew Epstein it’s irrelevant.


this whole thread is typical of the polarised view from social media sources only. Rise above your feed (that’s aimed at both sides of this debate)

unless any of you are actually privy to the contractual agreements in that situation? Or have actually spoken to people from both sides of that horrid conflict that’s murdering innocents? Both sides. The enemy is hate. Not Jews or Muslims




You have a right to protest in paid employment. But I'd imagine, from some of your comments here, you never would.




Folau got sacked for posting religious views on a personal social media account that had no links to his employer.

From what your saying he should have been within his rights to express his views even when he was playing test match.


cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
3 Oct 2026 11:26am
myscreenname said..


cammd said..
Well whats you point because

Its always leftys like antifa, trans activists or hamas supporters etc organising counter protests to shout down opposing political views

One Nation cannot hold an event without a pack of leftards doing there best to shut down democracy

Even the lefty labor government is doing its best to legislate againt free speech .....again

Does all that just go unnoticed by you. Take your blinkers off.




People have a democratic right to protest. What's wrong with you?

Did you take too many angry pills again?




A counter protest is held to stop or disrupt a protest and thereby denign or inhibit peoples democratic rights.





cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
3 Oct 2026 6:17am
hilly said..



cammd said..




hilly said..
The right claim it is about free speech. Until you express an opinion that does not align with their views.








Ok , so you would think its a right to free speech if Israel Folau did a bit of preaching at half time in a test match.









That is not my point.




Well whats you point because

Its always leftys like antifa, trans activists or hamas supporters etc organising counter protests to shout down opposing political views

One Nation cannot hold an event without a pack of leftards doing there best to shut down democracy

Even the lefty labor government is doing its best to legislate againt free speech .....again

Does all that just go unnoticed by you. Take your blinkers off.






cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
2 Oct 2026 6:29pm
Doesn't sound like Macklemore is a very good friend putting Sheeran in that position.

If just played the gig and kept his terrorist sympathies to himself at work they would probably still be mates.

Sounds like he's a fwit.



cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
2 Oct 2026 4:43pm
hilly said..
The right claim it is about free speech. Until you express an opinion that does not align with their views.




Ok , so you would think its a right to free speech if Israel Folau did a bit of preaching at half time in a test match.




cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
2 Oct 2026 3:27pm
I installed these davits last year, they make tying up and getting in and out of the dinghy very easy. Basically have a handrail to hold onto when stepping across.







cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
2 Oct 2026 8:15am
Free speech is a right that you should be able to express

On your own time

When your employed and working you keep your politics, religion, sexual fantasies and whatever else your into, to yourself.

Macklemore shouldn't be sacked for political views, but Ed Sheeran's tour is not there to give him a platform to express them. Try going to work ar woolies and start promoting your political or religious views to the customers, you will get sacked.

As for backlash that just typical lefty hysteria amd hypocrisy. If someone got sacked for wearing a MAGA hat on stage there would no backlash crying about free speech.


So its simple, he got sacked for breaching his employers policy.



Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
1 Oct 2026 10:33am
My condolences MSN, my mother died last year as well.



Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
28 Sep 2026 9:31pm
Carantoc said..

I don't think he is saying we should have a net zero policy and also include overseas emissions generated from whatever we export in that policy.





I think he might saying that
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
28 Sep 2026 9:30am
Wapiti has a sealed watertight bulkhead behind the anchor locker ,the windlass is arranged so the motor is behind the bulkhead but the chain feeds forward.

The aft bulkhead that seperates the lazarette from the aft cabin is sealed below the water line but above the water line exhaust hoses and electrical and plumbing come through. The lazarette has the skeg structure and rudder stock etc in it so I think if it was holed in some way the lazarette could flood but that wouldn't flood the main cabin as it would stop before reaching the point where it could enter the main cabin.

If water was entering via that bulkhead I think it could be slowed as it is plugged around the pipes and cables etc with rags etc . Haven't tested these theories of course.

Any thoughts, am I dreaming or making sense.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
28 Sep 2026 8:57am
Carantoc said..
Be-Jeezuz cammd, what's not to get ?

Real net zero demands that we sell it to others cheap and then pay them to burn it.

If we get real smart we can even pay them to mine it, process it and ship it as well.




Is that what MSN was alluding too? Australia should be held accountable for exporting coal and gas.

I read it that way but then thought nah surely not.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
28 Sep 2026 8:07am
myscreenname said..
I don't know if Net Zero is dead or not. I think it's a flawed policy. It doesn't make sense to me that Australia can export fossil fuel, and what we send overseas is not counted.

China is steadily becoming the dominant global force, partly because they had the foresight to see that renewable energy is the future.


Is doesn't make sense to me to send our cheap energy overseas to get used while we de industrialise our country for no reason.

Is that what you mean, or do you think the emissions from our exports should count against Australia as it's our responsibilty for digging it up in the first place.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
27 Sep 2026 12:41pm
Rango said..
Is anywhere $275 cheaper than it was a few years ago.


Yes, the places we export coal to.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
27 Sep 2026 9:37am



Mr Milk said..
Any profitable wind farm will pay company tax. If wholesale prices don't reduce, profitability should increase as the finance is paid off.
Chat GPT gave me a list of projects it thinks are making money.

Most likely profitable today (based on revenue + CF + QLD pricing):
Coopers Gap (47% CF)
Dulacca (45% CF)
Wambo (44.5% CF)
Clarke Creek (42.8% CF)
Granville Harbour (TAS) (52% CF, strong TAS wind resource)
These projects consistently show high output, strong revenue, and favourable regional capture prices.

However, in absolute terms, miners will pay more tax because mining is a much bigger industry.



Thats great, wind farms should pay be able to pay tax once they are profitable and if the price of electricity doesn't come down.

Not sure if your point is for or against netzero.

















Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
27 Sep 2026 8:24am
OmarShamgar said..

cammd said..

Buy whatever you want but stop the tax payer funded subsidies.




You are using your wealth of knowledge about climate science to consider fossil fuel subsidies right?

"Fossil fuel subsidies cost Australian governments $16.3 billion in 2025–26, an increase of 9.4% on the previous year. By contrast, the cost of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) increased by only 7.6% over the same period."

apo.org.au/node/333728


That would include tax credits for users such as miners or farmers who are not using the roads I assume.

Also the need to increase storage of fuel is in those numbers right.

Overall the government makes money off fossil fuels doesnt it. Fuel excise and revenue off coal and gas exports.

How much money are renewables contributing to the tax pool.

It seems your reference is not telling the whole story, its taking a tiny little piece of the puzzle to drive a narrative.

So net net when its all said and done fossil fuels benefit the tax payer, and renewables cost. Is that fair to say.




Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
26 Sep 2026 9:11pm
jn1 said..

cammd said..

I dont think the record reflects your observations, so to call people retards because they didnt imagine what you did is unfair



I was not referring to anybody (you) on this forum as that. I was referring to a given world leader with the attention span of a 7 YO ADHD. When global warming effects Him (and his cohorts), things will change. I lived in Darwin 20 years, and was an avid fisherman. I would follow the weather intently. Talking to my Darwin friends recently, and looking at the Darwin Airport historical records on BOM, I there have been 38s on October. As common as 42's in Adelaide in January. You can split hairs if you like.



Climate change is obviously real, the last ice age demonstrates that pretty clearly.

Netzero has only achieved moving local manufacturing to other locations overseas.

It has achieved nothing to affect the climate and it will do nothing. Surely that is easy to see. Australia is getting poorer for no measurable climatic benefit.

I think that is true.


Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
26 Sep 2026 10:52am


myscreenname said..


cammd said..
Looks like net zero is dead or dying, here and all around the world.




All that's left for you to do is to stop everyone buying cheap Chinese electric cars and solar panels.

Chinese were proven right by investing in a renewable energy future.



Buy whatever you want but stop the tax payer funded subsidies.

China stopped building coal power stations have they.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
25 Sep 2026 9:34pm
jn1 said..
But the tropics is getting hotter. I remember growing up in Darwin in the 80s. Wet season was 32C tops. There was no need for an A/C. I noticed the global instability effect after the 1991 Gulf war up there. This war seemed to dump a bunch of populates into the atmosphere during that time. I could see the oil wells burning in the aerial news footage. Then, after this war, the wet season temperatures went up to 33-34C. It was only a degree, but, after 1991, it never went back to 32 max. Now, it's normal for Darwin to be 38C in October,and the wet seasons lasting 10-11 months. I talk to SE Asian coworkers who take trips back to their home lands, and they tell me the same thing. They just don't remember the temperature gauge being that high when they were growing up in the 80s. It seems to me the tropics is the worse affected. So, for my point of view, to say global warming is a hoax, you would have to be some sort of complete retard if you lived in the tropics and dismissed this effect. I think the above was a crack at solving this issue.

I just think that until the world's rich people are affected by global instability (which I don't think they are yet), then, and only then, will there be movements to counteract this man made effect. Maybe all the rich people are all planning to build a spaceship and fly to Planet B ?. For everybody else, it's bad luck.


I dont think the record reflects your observations, so to call people retards because they didnt imagine what you did is unfair
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
25 Sep 2026 9:31pm
OmarShamgar said..
Thank you, I always appreciate perspectives from climate scientists.


Try thinking for yourself instead of just outsourcing it to vested interests.
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
25 Sep 2026 8:01am
When you have a look at the satellite images and compare them to the navionics chart there are many of those reefs in that area that navionics reads as 20mtr.

They sailed into a minefield, I am gobsmaked they did it at night or even at all.
Reply in Topic: Net Zero.... eeek
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
25 Sep 2026 7:47am
Looks like net zero is dead or dying, here and all around the world.

I guess it made some people rich, mostly China I guess selling all the "clean enery" infastucture.
Locally it destroyed a lot of bushland, put the cost of living up, made Australia less competitive, Whyalla being the latest victim to succumb.

Did absolutley nothing to affect the global climate, nada zero nilch.

Its not like it was difficult to understand that it would make Australia poorer and do nothing for the environment, if anything its made it worse.

How do people get sucked in and vote for it.

cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
24 Sep 2026 10:52am




saltiest1 said..



SeanTsv said..
The owner of the yacht that sank reported that their paper charts had the reef but the electronic charts didn't.
www.mackayandwhitsundaylife.com/article/family-marooned-after-yacht-strikes-reef
Not sure if that link is on a pay wall but the main part is copied below.
I have paper charts of The Withsundays but it only goes as far East as Cobham Reef which is about 7nm from the reef in question, which is off the page.







Here I am thinking it’s normal to cross reference a course on paper charts prior to departure.




I think a lot of people treat their chartplotter like google maps, hit auto route and go.

I followed 3 vessels yesterday from Townsville to Orpheus Isl, they went straight through the military exercise zone during announced exercises while we stayed the mandatory 5nm away. I assume they didnt read any cruising guides, look at any notice to mariners or phone anyone to check. VMR were announcing a securite periodically so probably not monitoring their radios either.
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
22 Sep 2026 1:18pm
EastCoastSail said..




Pretty challenging area to go sailing in.






I think this is where it ran aground, approx 120miles North of Mackay, 120 miles east of Townsville
,
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
20 Sep 2026 12:57pm


JonE said..


garymalmgren said..
Thanks East Coast .
And to think that Cook sailed through there with a non-operational chartplotter and a dicey GPS.

Gary




True but he was one of the foremost navigators and chart makers of his day and he did have nearly 100 crew including guys 100 feet up in the air on lookout.




The ship anchored or hove to at night and men were taking soundings with the lead line continuosly for over 360 leagues when they were inside the reef plus long boats out in front searching for a way through. They devised a signal system so the long boats could communicate with the ship instantly. The best bower was always ready to be dropped at a moments notice. I think the average speed was only 2 or 3 knots as they crept up the inside of the reef.

I just finished reading the book on him by Rob Mundle. Very Interesting.





cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
19 Sep 2026 9:43am
Brent in Qld said..




Défi Azimut Speed Runs: Sam Goodchild on Macif Santé Prévoyance clocks 32.1 knot average speed share.google/CXI1I1Ff8iyqlSRZ1



How do they sleep on those things doing 30knts in the Southern Ocean.
Reply in Topic: Marine Surveyor
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
19 Sep 2026 9:14am
PacificStar said..
hello all

i'm looking for a marine surveyor at botany bay (sydney) to look at the potential next boat

has anybody a recommendation for a suitable prefossional please ?

thanks in advance

cheers,



Depending on the value of the boat and I assume its significant given your looking for a surveyor. The due diligance should probably go further than just a general survey. They normally exclude the rig and engine. Also if its a registered ship you need to make sure the seller has all the paperwork in order. I changed mine from British registration to Australian registration and it involved quite a bit of documentation. Some of it I had to follow up after I took ownership because it wasnt present at the time of sale and I didnt know it was needed.

Then of course making sure its not encumbered etc or some other part owner is hiding in the shadows.
Reply in Topic: Race boards
cammd
cammd
QLD
4596 posts
QLD, 4596 posts
17 Sep 2026 12:27pm
Dex said..
Hi, I'm building/ repairing an old HiFly Race I scored, I would enjoy trying some races out if there are any (probably next season) .
I'm not 100% trusting of the mast track in this board (I haven't sailed it yet). Does anyone know if there are adjustable tracks available? Maybe not the $600 phantom one for a free, 40 yr old board. 😉
Thanks, how do I put my name down or get in contact for racing next season?



Send me a pm so I can add you to the qld raceboard facebook messanger group, although not much activity atm