myscreenname said..Cammd,
In an early post you think Russel Brand was 'set up' saying his arrest was related to his recent Christian faith and his embrace of far right politics?
cammd said..
He should have stayed a leftie, his crimes/ behaviour were brushed aside back then .
How do you explain his friend, David Walliams, recent arrest?
Was Russell Brand's arrest a set up, or are you just a stupid boring QLD Far Right twat, that parrots whatever your moronic racist algorithm feeds you?
Do you see why others think your posts lack substance, and attack you rather than your your boring racist posts?
I will ignore the nasty names you love to use.
I think Russell Brand has been a very naughty boy for a long long time. 5000 women was his goal and apparently he wasn't far off sleeping with that number. You have be pretty disrespectful and exploitative to do that, even with consent.
My comment wasn't about his innocence or guilt on rape, I have no idea.
The comment was more about when he was the darling of the establishment his behaviour was not only tolerated but even celebrated, at the very least his sex addiction problem was seen as a genuine thing. He was just living his truth expressing his identity etc etc.
Now he turns christian, he questions covid vaccines and shutdowns, worse he question the epstein files and digs into that. He directly challenges the establishment.
Suddenly accusations of rape from 20 years ago surface , he is deplatformed instantly before any process and then he prosecuted and convicted on no physical evidence. No physical evidence is grounds for reasonable doubt. That doesnt mean he is innocent it just means he is presumed guilty by all including MPs calling for the deplatforming whereas the law should presume innocence.
Now he gets 10.5 years in jail. An illegal immigrant rapist convicted of assaulting three women including a 13 year old girl get two years suspended.
Its difficult to not think the law is not being applied evenly when that stuff happens.
Back to the original point, not making comment on innocence or guilt, if he stayed the darling of the establishement would he have prosecuted.
Well whilst he in the fold he wasn't so what does that say.
Also just a brief comment regarding Tommy Robinson out manouvering the BBC when they actively tried to get a ex female employee to accuse him of sexual harrasment. The national broadcaster got caught out on tape asking people to lie and make obscene accusations .
Nothing happens, its overlooked by all, including yourself. The accusations against Russell Brand started on a BBC doco. That is cause for reasonable doubt initself given the BBCs track record.
It wouldnt surprise me one bit if Tommy Robinson didnt have an honest ex employee he might be facing rape charges to. The BBC would run that story in a second truth or not, if they could.
I dont know anything about David Williams or his arrest, my algo must be glitching, but reading Carantocs reply he sounds guilty of something.