colas forum posts in last 60 days

Reply in Topic: SUP paddle
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
1 Oct 2026 1:36pm
If the carbon fiber is not degraded, just apply some protective varnish of a very thin layer of epoxy resin. (I wet a glove with epoxy and pull it across the surfaces to make a poor man epoxy varnish)

If carbon fibers flakes are getting off, dump it.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
1 Oct 2026 1:31pm
Reach said..
a very capable tech guy


That's the issue. Of all the possible persons on earth, Musk is the least "tech" guy.
Listening to him about tech is listening to a naive 12 yo kid believing his science fiction young adults reads.
He has obviously uncommon financial and business qualities, as well as a charisma that can fool investors. But the least will to help others.

The point is that this petition should either target people with real interest in solving tech problems or help others, or if targeting Musk, show him how he could get tons of money with it. Maybe that the research could be hugely funded by governments. Or that the sharks are "woke"?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
29 Sep 2026 8:16pm
Rango said..
Doing a great job of that ,we have record number of nurses quiting the public sector record police quiting record ambulance ramping and chronically under supplied armed forces .


Thats on purpose.
They do not dare cut the programs, they just reduce funding so they dysfunction, and they use this pretense to privatize them.
That's exactly what the infamous "Project 2025" plan is.
And then the costs explode.

Just compare the operating costs of public and private health insurance, or utilities, or prisons before and after privatizations.
In France, where we have both public and private health insurance, the operating costs of social security is 5% and the private insurances, for the same service, more than 20%, because they must spend on marketing and dividends.

The political strategy of deliberate underfunding to force structural spending cuts or private market adoption is academically referred to as the "Starve the Beast" strategy. The Concept: First coined in the United States during the Reagan administration and revived under subsequent conservative administrations, this policy uses deliberate revenue reductions (tax cuts) or funding freezes to create artificial budget deficits. These deficits are then cited as an unavoidable crisis requiring the downsizing or outsourcing of state functions.

pinguet.free.fr/bartlett7.pdf
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
29 Sep 2026 2:19pm
Rango said..
Yep pretty much everything government wants gets done through buisiness ,they do not have that capacity.


Please, this kind of blanket statement is just propaganda that started with Reagan.
[1] lots of missions are better done by the government (army, police, justice, healthcare, utilities such as water or broadband...)
[2] one of the missions of a government in non-mafia states is to provide a fair ecosystem for private companies to compete.

Oligarchs like Musk do everything to avoid [2]: get their cake (subsidies) and eat it {no competition), and establish de facto monopolies to get even more anticompetitive leverage. The "robber barons" of a century ago (which Trump admires) is the reason of the anti-trust laws.

tl;dr: Musk wont care about anti-shark devices. Shark devices development needs millions, not billions. There are plenty of decent human beings that can fund this development without begging the worst human being on earth.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
28 Sep 2026 8:46pm
Rango said..
Isnt that how sh#t gets done .


In dictatorships, maybe.

Musk is actually behaving exactly like an oligarch, he uses any means possible, including massive corruption, to make business by getting profits while making taxpayers support the costs. Starlink could only exist because the (private) cost to launch via Falcon9 was heavily state-subsidized... as in your typical oligarchy.

An oligarch is defined as an individual who uses concentrated wealth to exert direct control over political outcomes, public policy, critical national infrastructure, and information channels, often blurring the line between private interest and state power. QED.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
28 Sep 2026 4:19pm
hilly said..
Elon Musk is a very low life form. Possibly worse than Trump which is an exceptionally low bar.


Yes. Just the fact that he gladly got money from USAID before killing it and kill hundred of thousand people as a side effect and gaslighted the public about it shows what a vile scum of the earth he is.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
28 Sep 2026 3:47pm
Rango said..
Starlink helping out Ukraine a bit.


He did it only because he managed to use it to get government subsidies, as most of his ventures.

Refs:

SpaceX/Elon Musk received substantial government funding, international financial support, and defense contracts for providing Starlink hardware and services to Ukraine, despite initial public perception framing it as an entirely private donation.

The government funding and advantages broke down as follows:

Early U.S. Government Funding (2022): While SpaceX donated a portion of the initial hardware and service, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) paid millions of dollars to purchase and transport thousands of Starlink terminals to Ukraine shortly after the invasion began.

Allied Country Contributions: Foreign governments funded a major share of the equipment and ongoing monthly subscriptions. Poland, for example, paid for over 10,000 Starlink terminals for Ukraine and covered their ongoing service fees, alongside contributions from the UK and other NATO members.

U.S. Department of Defense Contract (2023): In late 2022, SpaceX formally requested that the U.S. Pentagon take over funding for Ukraine's Starlink operations. In June 2023, the U.S. Department of Defense officially signed a contract with SpaceX to procure Starlink satellite services for Ukraine under defense assistance budgets.

Strategic and Commercial Advantages: The high-visibility deployment proved Starlink's resilience in an active conflict zone. This real-world battlefield validation helped SpaceX secure lucrative government defense contracts, including Starshield—a dedicated, classified military satellite network for U.S. defense and intelligence agencies.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
27 Sep 2026 3:32am
Given that Elon Musk has never, ever, invented anything nor gave even one cent to help others, this is beyond hilarious.

Plus the irony to ask a business shark to make a shark-deterrent device...
Reply in Topic: Starboard weight
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
26 Sep 2026 4:36am
Fold the tape this way, and use 4 as the sides of the "basin"

Reply in Topic: Quiver advice
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
25 Sep 2026 3:40pm
To complement obijohn advice, you can look at how I re-cut my rear fin(s) for exactly this purpose:
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Quobba-Fins-?page=10#2788032

and also how to move the rear fin, toolless, on the water:
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Quobba-Fins-?page=7#2683476
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Let-s-talk-about-Fin-s#2859473
Reply in Topic: Starboard weight
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
22 Sep 2026 2:10pm
did you weight it after the ding repairs?

create small basins of folded tape around the suspected parts. (also around the handle and fin boxes)
pour some soapy water (water + some drops of dishwashing soap) in the basins
put the board in the sun 2mn

Do not leave in the sun more than 5mn. If there is a leak, it will bubble in the first minute.
Reply in Topic: New board suggestions
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
15 Sep 2026 4:31pm
+1 for custom.
For my retirement at 62, I had customs made by the shaper (Gong, but it applies to any brand than make production and custom) of the production boards I was using (and liking), so I could get a custom, but based on shape I know I loved.

So I basically I got the production model, but wider.
Reply in Topic: New board suggestions
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
15 Sep 2026 3:49pm
What do you mean by stability?
- lateral stability (falling by rolling to the side) ==> you need more width (especially at nose and tail), not necessarily volume.
- longitudinal stability (falling forward or backwards, having a hard time getting up because the tail sinks) ==> you need more volume, and probably more length.

I agree with jviesinga, the simplest solution could be the hipster 8'10".

And also, look at these tips, it is very important to keep your feet away from the rails:
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Mastering-lateral-balance-on-a-small-SUP-board
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
14 Sep 2026 9:37pm
My only regret about having to switch from surfing to SUP was no longer having a twin-fin in my quiver, even though I’d loved twin-fins when I was younger.

There are quite a few different styles of twin-fin surfboards:
- the short, “competitive” ones with wide tails, popularized by Mark Richards
- the retro “fish” boards focused on speed
- and now the “mid-length” round-pin-tail boards, often with channels (e.g Gong’s Fury)

Since I already have a SUP thruster that’s very much geared toward smooth glide (my custom 8'1" hybrid shape between a Curve SP and an Alley) with a fast rocker, which I’d been riding with small fins to maximize its glide, I decided to have two fin boxes installed to convert it into a twin. This will serve as a test to see if I need to (even more) pester the Gong shaper for a future genuine Twin Fin SUP.

It cost me €140 at my local shaper (Spoutnik Surfboards, 200 meters from my house). Great work (FCS II boxes in Airex PVC foam cassettes), 220 g of weight added total. What I asked was for maximizing glide, speed and hold:
- the rear of fin base set 28 cm (11") from the tail, aft enough for drive and grip, as I planned to use Quobba L fins, smaller than usual Twin Fin fins for the less drag. I thought that the thin rails would provide enough bite to not require big fins.
- very little toe-in—about 1°— speed at the expense of looseness
- not too close to the rail, to mitigate the risk of spin-outs due to ventilation

Before, a thruster 3-boxes setup:



After:



As you can see, the twin fin boxes are just between the side and central thruster boxes. 1" more to the rear than most 8'-ish twin fins.





First session, I rode some tiny but fairly hollow waves: not enough to attempt turns, but the speed was definitely there. Getting into the wave was noticeably easier than with its thruster setup.



Second day, the waves were a bit bigger but pretty mushy. I was really surprised by the grip: the fins set further back provide insane drive (and also less toe-in/fin pinch), and excellent stability in turns—despite their small size for twins: L —. That said, since the Quobba fins have both less drag and more stability than normal fins, it makes sense.
This board, already fast thanks to its rocker, is going to become a speed monster. Can’t wait to test it tomorrow in bigger waves (head high).

Third day: I’m blown away by this transformation:

- The board has perfect grip; the tail is anchored in the water like a single fin, with no wobble, no sloppiness, and no skidding that twin fins can get. I think this is due to the fin placement and their slight toe-in, combined with the thin rear rails.
- The board is still easy to turn by its pulled-in tail, but you must use the rear rails in turns (roll the board into turns).
- The natural speed gain is noticeable compared to its previous thruster setup—even with small fins—and especially the acceleration at the bottom turn, the “drive,” is on par with the best thrusters, plus it has the low drag of a twin fin.
- No issues on the backside—that’s always my concern with twin fins.
- The ride feels more like a mid-length Simmons than a Mark Richards-style twin.
- No need for big “twin” fins with all their drag. Good, standard yet effective fins are enough, and they’re significantly faster (less drag).

The board setup is more technical and less playful than a "pro" model like the Gong Alley; you have to set up your turns more carefully, push into them, and follow through—a bit like riding a single fin... but with the acceleration out of turns of a multi-fin setup..
It combines the teachable and reliable nature of a single fin with the drive and speed of a twin fin.

So, converting a board to a twin fin works.

I'd recommend however to put the fins 1" from the tail, with standard (similar to a thruster sides) toe-in, if you want a more balanced compromise speed/looseness, and use real (bigger) Twin Fin fins however. Also plan a box to add a central trailer if your rear rails are not very thin.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
12 Sep 2026 12:57am
Sideshore said..
One doubt. you say in the first paragraph that the NFA 8 can turn from the middle with a particular fin configuration and in the last paragraph you say it has the same longboard feeling so it's not suitable to turn from the middle?.


My mistake. I though at first that you owned a NFA 9'0 XS, so I was giving advice to tweak it a bit.
I forgot to modify that advice once I realized you just tried one.

Basically, for noseriding you want the board to "lock" into the curl so you have a stable platform to walk to the nose.
So you definitely want to avoid any SUP with a longboard feel. Thus I won't advise the NFA 8'0".

The Mob has a wide tail and a quad setup, so you need to get back on the tail to drive it. But it has a modern feel, unlike a longboard, and the rad is more streamlined so it may be more spontaneous. But I only rode the Cool.
The Mob is designed to generate speed in weak and slow waves, so in faster and bigger waves, the tail will transmit a lot of wave power, that you will have to control by stepping on it.
I had to cut down the rear fins on my Mob to make it more lively without to have the foot on the tail.
The Mob paddles surprisingly well for its length, I guess the nose is pulled-in enough and with a bit of rocker so as not to plough in chop like a noserider.

From what you describe, the Karmen seems ideal for you. The modern, "pro", feel of the Alley, but with user-friendly stability, especially in chop.
It will be less dynamic in tigh-high waves than the Mob, though.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
10 Sep 2026 2:48pm
Sideshore said..
I've tried the gong NFA 9'0" XS and I don't like how it surfs. You need to be in the tail if you want to make it turn.


The NFA can turn from the middle, as it is a kind of hybrid do-it-all shape between a retro and performance longboard.
You may want to switch to a thruster setup, with the center fin quite forward, or even better twin fins + trailer to enhance its turn-from-the-middle behavior.
On the opposite, a big single fin with or without side bites in the rear of the box will turn the dial towards retro, pivot turns.

Longboards that can noseride are designed for the rider to walk (cross-step!) from the nose to the tail and back. That's an essential part of the fun of longboarding.

If you want a long board that turns from the middle, you will have to get shapes with more rocker, but sacrifice glide, there is no free lunch. Guns have this kind of rocker, as they need control, not glide. Gong does not make them currently (people wanting a gun will get a custom Alley: the Zero is a design fro bigger waves, but still with a longboard feel), but for instance JL has the bombora and the stun gun.

The NFA XS is narrow, so not as stable as wider boards by design.
The NFA 8'0" will have the same feel, as it is a mini-longboard. It will turn a bit easier because it is shorter, but I wouid definitively advise you to get a a Karmen instead, a stable but easy to turn shape.
if you do not want to get on the tail, you will not like longboard shapes.
Reply in Topic: Quatro Kai boards?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
10 Sep 2026 2:29pm
Rossall said..
I have a Mid Length arriving in a few weeks and was wondering what fins everyone is using, the site recommends FCS II Power Twin + 1, Fin Set, L – XL. Has anyone tried anything else ????


Well, I guess you have to have a look at: www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Quobba-Fins-?page=12

(I only use Quobba fins since I discovered them)
Reply in Topic: SUP Buying Advice
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
8 Sep 2026 4:48pm
I was going to say the same as Mark.

Life is too short, especially at our ages, to not go custom :-)
Reply in Topic: Quiver advice
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
6 Sep 2026 10:50pm
You should go wider for balance.

And if you get stiffer (like me, at 66), and struggle to get on your feet as nimbly as before, longitudinal stability becomes more critical, so more board length and/or wider tips will help.

[1] going to a Spice is the safest bet, The only drawback is the wider tail that means that on powerful fast waves, it may feel harder to go rail to rail, and increase the spinout risk at bottom turns.
I got a spice-like board (Gong Karmen) that I had to mount as a quad to fight spinout in hollow sections.
But since then I had a custom made Karmen made with thinner tail rails, which hold nicely as a thruster, even with a smaller center fin.

[2] going to a bigger pro will keep you the nice fluid rail to rail of a narrower tail, but the extra volume may bring a cork effect when paddling around in chop.

Choose your poison :-) ... or go custom with a wider "pro" but with not extra volume.
Reply in Topic: Quatro Kai boards?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
5 Sep 2026 11:55pm
You must ask first the brands whether their published weights include pads and/or fins, before comparing them.
Mail them, or comment under one of their post, they answer quickly.

The Starboard weights seem accurate, from an owner post on FB, it was in the +5% of the stated weight, which include pads (I asked).

For the Quattro, a full sandwich vaccuum-bagged construction 8'4" can definitively get to 6.5kg (14.3 lbs) with pad. So it is possible, but I did not see any independent weight measures.
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
30 Aug 2026 3:15pm
Nice to year from you! Even though we all have to manage the ticking of time...

I follow Pono on Facebook, and he is still incredible mentally, his use of AI especially.
Reply in Topic: JP surf pro update?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
27 Aug 2026 10:38pm
stamp said..
I have had a few JP surf pros and had no build quality issues. Maybe the plus is a different construction.


I have no idea of what JP is doing, but in these times where there is a huge price increase of the cost of materials, some brands may be tempted to save some bucks on the board construction of latest models rather than raise their prices too much. There are even words for this, Skimpflation or Cheapflation.
Reply in Topic: JP surf pro update?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
25 Aug 2026 1:25pm
stamp said..
Does anyone know when a new surf pro model is likely to be released? Or if it will be updated?


Brands will never tell this in advance, they are too wary of the Osborne effect.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect
Reply in Topic: Quatro Kai SUP Feedback?
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
25 Aug 2026 1:23pm
I guess it is because the SUP market has slowed down considerably, there are now very few buyers of new SUPs, especially ones that do not seem to bring anything obviously new.
Here in France for instance, in the same shop , the Quattro Kai is 58% more expensive that the Quattro carves currently on sale.

I only found SurfKiteSup feedback at the end of www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/Review/New-Quatro-Midlength-Twinfin-Kay-Lenny-Edition?page=1
colas
colas
5420 posts
5420 posts
5 May 2017 5:00pm
Let's start a subject to collect the interesting SUP / Surf foil videos.

I'll start with Alex Aguera I find this video really interesting because it shows having smooth arcs in crappy onshore waves, and even zips along broken sections (which is definitely not easy).

On the bad points, his footstraps placement seems bad: the longitudinally aligned front one is awkward, you can see is foot at a 45 degree angle, and the rear one is so open that his foot is fully engaged, which can be quite dangerous, I guess because the strap is not enough close to the rail...