colas forum posts in last 60 days

colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
23 Jul 2026 4:24pm
The transparency is impressive!
Reply in Topic: quabba experiment
colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
15 Jul 2026 5:36pm
Most products have been "out of stock" on their shop for a long time now.

Of their 9 types of sets now on the shop... 8 are out of stock. The only remaining one is FCS M.

Plus no R&D anymore: no quad sets, no shifter fins with the fixed rust problem.

My last email thread to them discussing my feedback on their shifter fin early model went unanswered 3 years ago. (June 2023).

Grab them while you can.
colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
14 Jul 2026 1:37pm
thegreatsup said..
Thanks Creek- so it’s the ‘snappiness’ rather than a smoother release which is the main reason of the squash vs going round / pin.


From what I understand of Bert video, a small squash or round pin is just for the looks. The area change between them is not significant compared to the whole section. Plus the water release comes from the rail shape at the junction with the hull. Look how sharp it is on the video, for the cleanest release.

This is why Starboard 2017 "two boards in one" gimmick of interchangeable tails was short lived, nor used by anybody else. Pure marketing, the area change was so small. Fins ore even the kickpad placement is much more important.

"It is quite revolutionary"... yeah, sure.



colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
9 Jul 2026 9:51pm
Nicely done!

I guess you will receive some flak from the AI-haters crowd... but it was fun and instructive.

PS: I was a bit afraid of the pun that was coming after hearing "the 3rd leg" :-)
colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
30 Jun 2026 10:56pm
thegreatsup said..
im debating buying a 8’1 ghost up when i get back to NZ after seeing Creek mention how fun the twins go. But also agree with no centre box variation I don’t really have a centre fin small enough yet.


I would look into fins that are "moved" to the back to emulate the position of twin fin boxes that are a bit farther aft than fronts of thrusters or quads.



See these videos, right on the subject:



colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
28 Jun 2026 11:22pm
Great report!

And this is why on my last board I had a US Box instead of a FCSII box for the center fin, and I use a finjak to move the fin on the water between waves without tools.
colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
26 Jun 2026 3:27pm
obijohn said..
Never heard of the brand, so that might be a gamble. The specs sound like what you are looking for, the description of the construction sounds reasonable if it is true, and the price is right if you are willing to gamble on the brand and shaper.


I remember it mentioned sometimes on this forum around 10 years ago.

You can see them with a google query:

www.google.com/search?cchannel=fs&q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.seabreeze.com.au%2Fforums%2F+atlantis
Reply in Topic: Shark Deterrent?:-)
colas
colas
5396 posts
5396 posts
21 Jun 2026 2:07pm
ptsf1111 said..
Yup, depending on which query you put in Google, you'll either find resources that tell you it deters sharks, or others stating it will actually attract them (and put others at a heightened risk).


Importantly, there are studies, but their results depend greatly on the shark species. Some sharks do not even use electric currents to hunt...

"The threshold for an electrical field to repel a shark can vary by species but ranges from about 3 V/m (to deter bull sharks) to 18.5 V/m (to deter scalloped hammerheads), with some species requiring even higher field strengths.
The key challenge, however, is to create an electric field that extends far enough into the surrounding water. Generating long-range electric fields in seawater is inherently difficult because seawater is highly conductive. The electric current disperses rapidly through the surrounding medium, causing a voltage gradient that drops sharply with distance."

spectrum.ieee.org/electric-shark-repellent

Or: " The effectiveness of the deterrents was variable, with the Freedom+ Surf affecting shark behaviour the most and reducing the percentage of bait taken from 96% (relative to the control board) to 40%. The mean distance of sharks to the board increased from 1.6 ± 0.1 m (control board) to 2.6 ± 0.1 m when the Freedom Surf+ was active. The other deterrents had limited or no measureable effect on white shark behavour. "

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6120439/

Also, beware of the studies that select specific species because they respond well to the electric devices... They are not wrong, but their results may apply differently to other species.
"The bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo L. 1758, was selected as the study species due to ease of acquisition and husbandry coupled with their documented use of the electrosensory system when hunting "


onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.70220