mareks360 forum posts in last 60 days

mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
17 Jul 2026 3:55am
joe87879 said..
Great info thanks Marek.

With my + fuse, I am very close to the mast cutout if I maintain a 71mm space between the saddles. (Roughly 0mm between the mast cutout and the new saddle cutout)

Do I risk that either (1) the aluminium sides are strong enough at the mast cutout or (2) do I cheat and shrink the distance between the wings say from 125mm to 95mm (would give me about 30mm between the mast cutout and the new saddle cutout)

It looks like Marek has ~ 50mm between the mast cutout and the new saddle cutout.

Edit: AI says 30mm is the minimum I could go


Joe,
My thinking is very similar to yours. "The chain is as strong as the weakest link". The thickness of the fuse at this point is 35mm, width 25mm, making a saddle narrows fuse to about 22mm . Major forces are the upward fuse pressure on front of the mast but the torque from the riding dynamics in particular during cranking upwind (railing, hilling) can not be ignored.
BTW: This is also why I wanted the foil fit very snug in the fuse (like it is in the original port).
Also, the mast socket is at an angle therefore if you leave 30mm (on top), as you plan, it will be about 35mm space between foil port and start of foil mast cavity.
To me, there is no reason how this could create the weakest link.
Also, your plan is like my plan: If I expect wind to be consistent over 11mph (9.5kt), lulls not dropping below 7mph (6kt), I would remove 800 and put dummy plug.
My personal preference is to play with changing foil wings rather than a rig. Faster. Simpler.
Since I created "dragonfly (M1000+800)" back in February this year, I rode about 300miles on it with max board/GPS speed at 16.7mph (14.5kt) .
BTW2: You already have in the post my total weight (gear + me) ands sail size to evaluate loads I am creating.
So far the setup works exactly as expected. No interference between wings.
I am really happy with the setup therefore I am happy to share what can help others too.
mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
16 Jul 2026 12:20am
Q1. Marek - can you compare the takeoff speed of your dragonfly vs slingshot i99 (I used to have a i99 so I can relate to that takeoff speed)?
I understand that the dragonfly will be faster but I am wondering about takeoff speed. From your graph it looks like the i99 takeoff is a touch earlier?

A1: Yes, it is the surface 1800cm2 dragonfly M1000+800 vs SS i99 2374cm2 BUT your only gain is between ~ 6.5mph and 7.0mph wind. The efficiencies (reduced drag) from HA twins are “tipping the scale” in so many aspects.

Q2. I have the + 115 fuse. Should I still use 71mm space or could I reduce the gap? (photo below with 71 mm space)

A2: The rough idea or “rule of the thumb” is that you would like to keep one chord length between the wings to avoid any interference at higher speeds. In my case the chord of M1000 is 125mm and the gap between trailing edge of M1000and leading edge is 800 I designed to be exactly 125mm. That means 71mm between the saddles.
Now, coincidently my second wing saddle is exactly as Starboard Black 75 Fuse distance between the saddle and the mast. I knew I do not compromise any structural integrity.
See the picture:





In your case, you need to evaluate what is a safe minimum distance between front of fuse for mast cavity and end of fuse for wing cavity.


Q3. How does it turn? Does it move the centre of lift back somewhat? Any weird control issues?

A3: I do not notice any turning impact. I have not noticed any control issues.
One interesting observation (after last session) is that I may adjust a stabilizer shim slightly to be more aggressive for lift. It seems like twin configuration already makes some “self stabilization” already so I need stronger initiation to pop it out of the water with stronger nudge than original 115++ with M1000 only.


Q4. I would probably 3d print a spacer to put back in if I wanted to run it as a single foil.
A4: I was lazy enough to make a dummy insert out of plywood.
See the picture:







mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
14 Jul 2026 8:11pm
Yesterday Session 7/13/26 (July 13th) on “dragonfly (SB M1000 +800) platypus” is a perfect example of what I stated earlier:
“5) If someone guarantees me wind speed between 7-11mph, I would be the fastest on SB mod mareks360 dragonfly”

Let’s examine some details:

Forecast:







Actual Wind for 7h 11min complete session duration: total 48.7 miles:
In red is a specific (best period) part for analysis 1h 40 min, 15 miles (for deeper dive):





Table of parts saved individually:









Best Wind Best Part (Board GPS Speed):












Conclusion:
With “dragonfly (SB M1000+800) platypus”, there is no way to sustain flight if “Lull” drops below 4mph (3.5kt) at total weight of 297LB = 135kg (more details shared in response to “Formula” User above).
Some flights in gusts possible as you can see from sub session average GPS board speed (and max speed).
When the “Lull” is at 4mph (3.5kt) and above, you can sustain continuous flights.

mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
14 Jul 2026 6:25pm
FormuIa said..
Nice write-up, and I'd love to try it at 6 knots - conditions where I can't pump.

My question is, what's with the seemingly low speeds on SB 1000 config? In measured ~8 knots of perfectly steady thermal wind, with close to zero chop, I can easily fly 20+ knots (23 mph) with 9+ m foil sail. Freshwater speed would probably be even higher.


Formula,
There are probably at least 3 aspects that differ:
1) Total weight: sailor + gear (wetsuit, backpack, etc.) + rig + board with hydrofoil. My case measured with a floor scale: me 198LB in shorts, me in wetsuit +backpack + harness+2L water pack, foldable paddles etc.: 218LB, Rig: 32LB, Board with hydrofoil: 47LB, therefore total is: 297LB = 135kg
2) Using relevant sensor at relevant height that represent windfoiler actual wind. I am using Tempest sensors that are on docks out on the water, at windfoiler /sailor height. Please note that wind increases with height and there are graphs /calculators to scale it down (if sensor too high above)
3) Wind definition: either "gust" or "average" will let you start flying (pumping or not) but it is the "lull" that defines sustainable flight after taking off (no pumping).
I will post about it shortly.
mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
13 Jul 2026 12:15am






3 years ago I did an elaborate deep dive post:
“Ultralight wind (~5mph or ~4kt) windfoiling BAF for older "Heavy Dudes" 90kg+ and no pumping”
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/Foiling/Ultralight-wind--5mph-or--4kt--windfoiling-BAF-for-older--Heavy-Dudes--90kg--and-no-pumping?page=1

Now people ask me directly about my new “mareks360 dragonfly” config therefore It is better to share the Concept, Design and its actual Performance in my “platypus” configuration.
Why “platypus” ? You got to read the old post above.
Lets get back to where we left 3 years ago Graph:





Basic conclusion is that the bigger the foil, the earlier take off, BUT the narrowest range where the foil outperforms all the other.
Therefore we have to find different solution to reduce overall drag in wider range.
Science of Aerial drones come to help and rather than explaining complex equations, dominant vs contributing vs none-dominant factors: “picture tells the 1000 words”:





Source: “ Improvement of Micro UAV Performance using Tandem-Wing Design “
Figure7 The comparison of Drag force between the two models

Lets examine now new graph and conclusions:
1) Despite my mareks360 dragonfly config (SB M1000+800) at 1800cm2 comparable to Slingshot Quantum 100 at 1724cm2, the efficiency of twin config reduces the drag (both induced and parasitic) to the extent of faster slogging, earlier take off and faster fly when wind increases.
2) If someone guarantees me wind speed between 4-5mph, I would be the fastest on SS i99 + i84 biplane (see other post for details)
3) If someone guarantees me wind speed between 5-6mph, I would be the fastest on SS i84+i76 (my past tested config)
4) If someone guarantees me wind speed between 6-7mph, I would be the fastest on SS i99
5) If someone guarantees me wind speed between 7-11mph, I would be the fastest on SB mod mareks 360 dragonfly
6) If someone guarantees me wind above 11mph, I would be the fastest on the original SB Millenium 1000 – please note this is only up to 20 MPH wind analysis





Recommended by me Resources for your personal “deep dive and study”:
1. “ Improvement of Micro UAV Performance using Tandem-Wing Design “
2. “Twin-Wing Design Options Used for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Achieve High Altitudes at Low Speeds”
3. “Hydrofoil Design, Build Fly” by Ray Vellinga – Outstanding book to understand how hydrofoil works !
4. “What wing spacing is best for a tandem wing configuration?”
5. “Exploring the Different Wing Configurations Used in Airplanes”

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here is Q & A:
From people asking directly:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Please note that I am using 115++ in this case. There is more space between the wing and the mast to add 2nd foil.
I also have 115+ unmodified I use with SB Race 100 board single M1000 wing.

Questions:

Q: - What distance is the second wing from the first? How far back
A: Now we have to distinguish distance between the wings (which is still variable) vs distance from end of front saddle to beginning of second saddle.
Keep in mind that Starboard made wings that are not centric to the saddle therefore it will be different distance between wings (for interference sake) if I swap 800 to the front and M1000 to the back or if I use other wings I have e.g. FR1100 or 500
Distance between end of front saddle and beginning of second saddle is 71mm while distance from Trailing edge of M1000 to front edge of 800 is 127mm.

Q: - What stabilizer goes best w/dual wings?
A: Before adding second wing, I foiled this setup for 1000s of miles in M1000/115++/255(-2ver) +0.5 shim with Starboard Go 180 board. You can see my older post for pictures that I references from 3 years ago.
So I added just 800 wing and the setup is still balanced therefore I did not feel to change anything.

Q: - Any structural reinforcements when the second wing is installed?
A: Nothing, There is no need. SB 115 fuselages are solid alumunum

Q: - How did you machine the profile?
A: This was a “labor of love” with simple tools with “measure twice cut once” approach.
First I drilled the fuse horizontally with many holes. Fuse in a vise, hand drill [Upd: I meant electrical handheld drill]. Used reciprocal saw [Upd: I meant electrical] to cut out the aluminum out. Then used hand files to get to profile marked with permanent marker on the sides. Then I drilled the smaller holes and used threading tool.
mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
12 Jul 2026 1:00pm
JDfoils and Mathew,

What are your preferences ?
Shall we create a separate topic under Windsurfing / Foil : "What a foil can do for you in gusty condition ?"
OR
Shall we continue here ?

We should first start that in windsurf foiling there are "main streams" and "side streams".
BUT there are at least 2 completely different styles explained by Starboard Tiesda Yu:

a) large foil, smaller sail - boards goes directly from slogging to foiling (due to foil early lift) - mainstream of windfoiling

b) smaller foil (often high aspect, high efficiency ), larger sail - board builds speed first, transitions from slogging to planing, to foiling - more traditional windsurf feel

First 2 minutes explain most (“a” versus “b”):


In my case, I clearly prefer "b) " for gusty conditions due to "a)" induced drag component from large foils, low aspect and low efficiency are additional factors.
I can elaborate more.
In my case, I am using high efficiency Starboard Race Foil M1000 with 115++ fuse (Starboard calls it high performance geometry), with proper shim set, the board accelerates in gust forward and you do not get "the elevator effect".
This is extremely stable (with correct shim adjustment) in wide wind range.
You do not need to shift your balance in gust. This is completely different from when I use any Slingshot Shovels: i76, i84, i99 in otherwise the same setup.

Here is more info on Starboard high efficiency concept:
2021 FREERIDE PLUS – Starboard Foils
starboardfoils.com/pages/2021-freerideplus

I can elaborate more with links, videos in case there is an interest.


mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
12 Jul 2026 12:46am
I will share some Conventional and Unconventional Wisdom for gusty conditions.

Conditions:
The most challenging wind direction at my location is SW direction where wind gets really shifty and gusty because of topography (hills and high rise buildings).
It can drop to 0mph any moment and can gust to 25-30mph in a next (back and forth).
I still use one sail (usually around 11m) for gusts up to 25mph but I am heavy. 200LB (90kg) net, often over 220LB in full gear.

I have a tendency to dive really deep, I will first do the highlights then I can elaborate on any specific item in case there is an interest.
I can also provide some videos that support what I wrote below.

So let’s start:


Sail:

Highly Cambered:
My preference for gusty conditions is to use race sails (highly cambered) and stable in wide wind range. They luff does not collapse in heavy gust, additional “bear wrestling” avoided.

RAF (no cams):
Counterintuitive: For 10.8m Loft Oxygen sail, I use adjustable outhaul to minimum tension in heavy gusts and longer boom setting. Therefore if no gust then boom tension downwards (seat harness) keeps the leach close but when gust hits the upper sail twists, opens and depowers.


Board:
There are several effects that are your enemies in heavy gusts:
1. Wetted area = drag (no matter wide or narrow)
2. Narrow board = board sinks in the chop in lulls instead of staying on top (vs Formula boards, wide boards stay on top and plane the earliest)
3. Fin vs hydrofoil – adding well balanced for speed (slippery) race hydrofoil can enhance early planing while avoiding excessive lift and induced drag
4. Weight of the overall gear: more inertia = less immediate acceleration


The Technique:
Being heavy back footed, and using seat harness with generating MBP (mast base pressure) gives you opportunity to react to the gust and shift weight forward.
I had many “wise guys” who are heavy front footed who tried to convince me that it is a better way, but they like “face planting” or they have never been in conditions where you have 0mph one moment then next 20mph.



Reply in Topic: IQ foil take off speed
mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
11 Jul 2026 1:25am
Think about Darwin and his study of finches evolution and “their customization” to local island conditions.

I am on a “unique island”, I am a unique “bird” where I want to plane or fly the earliest that is possible while also maximizing my distance sailed.

Extra Weight:
Considering my weight at 200LB in speedos, + wetsuit, +harness, +vest, +helmet, + 2L (4LB) water pouch + foldable paddles + accessories in my backpack. It all adds up to probably over 220LB.

Personal Preferences & Joy:
When I go skiing & snowboarding, I go for 4 hours of snowboarding then I switch to 4 hours of skiing (8h total). When I go swimming, I swim minimum 1 mile in one session, 3 miles most often in a day.

Conditions:
Seattle infamous convergence zone (CZ) makes it almost impossible for even the best models to predict what actually will happen on the water in 6-8h window.
Therefore, I target days when general predicted direction of wind does not change (either Northerly or Southerly). The forecast needs to be in 5-20mph range with gusts forecast up to 25mph.
Actual wind in 6-8h window still may greatly exceed forecast or there might be no wind at all.
Here is what I am looking for in forecast (forecast for May 11 session I shared):







I am sure I would have never “evolved” so much if I stayed in Sydney and continue sailing on Botany Bay like from 1997-2000:



I am just trying to help in particular “similar birds” (similar preferences and weight), facing “similar” wind challenges to maximize enjoyment of TOW (time on the water).
As the topic is about “ IQ foil take off speed” and I am still using “modified” SB race foils, I thought I share what might be relevant to the topic and do not drift to what might be irrelevant.
Reply in Topic: IQ foil take off speed
mareks360
mareks360
128 posts
128 posts
9 Jul 2026 6:39am
It took me 7 years of light wind windfoiling (including 46 years of windsurfing) to do pretty much impossible into possible.
I went from building biplane configurations (with 3600cm2 foils SS i84 +SS i76) to SB Millennium 1000 (1000cm2) for light winds. Using boards from Slingshot Flyer 280 to Starboard Race 100 (experimented with 7 different boards).
Please note I am currently at about 200LB - 90kg but I started windfoiling at 220LB or 100kg.
To answer your question:
I can take off, without pumping, with board speed between 4 and 5mph in wind of 8 mph. I am driving the MBP (mast base pressure) for the board to plane first to build speed then pop up to full foiling.
Gear:
Foil: My own innovation: Starboard 115++ fuse customized to 2 foils M1000 + 800 (SB race foils) in my "mareks360 dragon fly" - this concept comes from high efficiency aerial drones for high aspect double wings efficiency with appropriate wing spacing.





Board: I am using SB Go 180- 180 L, 100cm wide.- the board that planes earliest from all other 7 (wind-foil able) boards I have - without pumping.

Sail: I mostly use ~11m variety of race sails in winds from 5mph to 20mph. Still able to survive some gusts to 25mph for the same config.
In this case it is old KA-7 Phil McGain's Gaastra Nitro 4K Pro 11.0m sail.






Here is a session example where wind (even gust) never exceed 16mph (sensor is on the dock on the water) while average wind speed for my session is between 6 and 10 mph.
My average speed from Garmin Smart Watch is 8.2kt (9.4mph) max speed 14.3kt (16.5mph).
I did ~52 miles in ~5h30min.









Ultralight windfoiling was posted and discussed by me in 2023 posting (3 years ago) :
You will find more graphs for different foils I tested wind to board speed as well.

www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/Foiling/Ultralight-wind--5mph-or--4kt--windfoiling-BAF-for-older--Heavy-Dudes--90kg--and-no-pumping