thedoor forum posts in last 60 days

Reply in Topic: Jonah Lepak interview
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
28 Sep 2026 1:32am
This guy is a local legend. Could of been a three hour interview 😂 I was left with many questions
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
28 Sep 2026 1:29am
Hard to go wrong with 909. Razor might be faster but unless you are riding macking ground swells, I don't think you need the speed of the razor. Also the 909 has an excellent low end for a quickish foil
Reply in Topic: One Ocean mast and foils
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
23 Sep 2026 2:25am
Still ripping!

That one ocean and foils go on any axis fuselage? Or they make a one ocean fuse too?
Reply in Topic: Windfoil in the waves
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
20 Sep 2026 2:12pm
Paducah said..


Best WWF ever!
Reply in Topic: RAD flight club
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
15 Sep 2026 3:56am


oh snap 😬
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
15 Sep 2026 3:48am
Grantmac said..
Thoughts on putting a mast track on a higher volume flat rocker wing board?


Should be fine geometrically as long as the foil tracks are not too forward. Not sure if most wing boards are strong enough to handle a mast track though.
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
13 Sep 2026 1:37am
Grantmac said..
There is a Fanatic Bee 120L for sale locally if I want a hybrid SUP set-up. Probably want something shorter though.


At your weight I would go the Bee, if in the $500 range.

Looks great


You can gamble on a slingshot freestyle at 115L as they are super cheap but my gut says that its less than actually 115L . If you had lots of fin experience recently then I am sure you could uphaul the freestyle but sounds like you might struggle?
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
9 Sep 2026 1:46am
PatK said..
After riding the Severne Alien some years i got a Predi 110. It is great. I love the skateboard feeling. The SAB 799, 909 and 969 are amazing. The 999 needs to remove the straps forward to get it balanced. Missing tracks, also missing a soft deck around the footpads.


I shim my 999s tail 1.5 deg to get it to match the geometry of the 799, 899 & 909
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
7 Sep 2026 12:24pm
Love the look of the that foil slate. APB for JJ to get some video please 😂

I saw the predator, might be a bit small for OP but great shape.

For the blokes using "sup-ish" boards what are your thoughts on these for OP

tillosports.com/tillo-element-82/

bigwinds.com/products/naish-windfoil-crossover-131-liter/

thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
6 Sep 2026 11:23am
Grantmac said..
After a multi-year relationship with winging I'm becoming tempted by some freeride foil and moving towards foilstyle.

Thing is I'm pushing 100kg in gear and I don't want to be swimming home. All the equipment looks to be barely uphaulable at most or a full on sinker at worst. Availability isn't great either.
Would I be completely off base trying to find a Wizard 130? Or should I focus on the 114 and deal with a lack of low end. Ideally I'd like to be getting on the water in 12kts.

Foil I'm less concerned about. I've got the Balz 909/370/93cm and all I should need to get is the 903K fuselage.


I have never been a swing weight guy, maybe if I did aerial stuff I could see swing weight mattering. its hard to get better at foiling if you are slogging, so my vote would be 130L. Although, I would also look at slightly narrower shapes in high volume. Personally, I have more success with my non=aerial freestyle on the earlier Balz 99 series than the pro series, but that might just be me (I have only tried the 909). If you can find a cheap 999 I would definitely recommend it, esp at your weight.

In this recent helitack video I am on 999.


Reply in Topic: RAD flight club
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
6 Sep 2026 5:35am
utcminusfour said..
Bang Bang Pow! I think your gonna pass me, wow! I need to get on the water now! Gotta find some wind somehow! Gotta learn to heli here and now! Bang Bang Pow!

Thanks for the motivation mate!


😆😆😆
L
utcminusfour said..
Bang Bang Pow! I think your gonna pass me, wow! I need to get on the water now! Gotta find some wind somehow! Gotta learn to heli here and now! Bang Bang Pow!

Thanks for the motivation mate!


utcminusfour said..
Bang Bang Pow! I think your gonna pass me, wow! I need to get on the water now! Gotta find some wind somehow! Gotta learn to heli here and now! Bang Bang Pow!

Thanks for the motivation mate!



Pretty sudden I wouldn't be this close without your videos
Reply in Topic: RAD flight club
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
5 Sep 2026 2:05am
More progress


thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
27 Aug 2026 11:32am
I think those screw dents were in that blue board when I got it. Screws ain't bottoming out on the drag board with carbon tracks

thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
27 Aug 2026 1:47am
Mark _australia said..
I would expect a carbon track has an outer glass layer to prevent metal to carbon contact. Metal and carbon in saline is literally a battery. Electrolytic corrosion.



Mark _australia said..
I would expect a carbon track has an outer glass layer to prevent metal to carbon contact. Metal and carbon in saline is literally a battery. Electrolytic corrosion.



Does the type of metal matter? Should I be using those brass tnuts or something else different than stainless steel?
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
25 Aug 2026 11:56pm
I have been using a project drag board for about 2 months (grey board). Its the first board I have had with a carbon track box. Anyways, I have experienced rapid corrosion on my stainless nuts. I am currently on my second set.

Generally I am not good about making sure my tracks are dry before storing the board and I seem to have been storing it up-side-down so the water isn't draining out. Also, I tend to leave my hardware in the track either with mast attached or nut. I have done this with other boards consistently and haven't seen this rate of corrosion.

Going forwards I plan to remove hardware and drain the boxes, but did the carbon track box contribute to more rapid corrosion?





PS:
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
21 Aug 2026 12:12pm
jaumet said..

thedoor said..
If we keep asking Jaumet questions maybe he will hit image posting status😂

Hi Jaumet

From your article







What I am hearing is that for pitch stability the further the COG is from the Neutral Point the more likely the craft will continue on its pitch. From practical experience I totally get that. Longer heavier boards and longer fuselages seemed to be easier to gybe because if you messed up your inputs it would tend to carry on its flight path . However, when navigating swells or jumping shorter boards and shorter fuselages were necessary to unlock the pitch control.

So if I have that correct, then if the goal was to improve stability we could ride with more board out in front. How do we estimate the Neutral Point of the system (foil, board and rider)?

I guess I am wondering how we could manipulate moving the neutral point aft by changing gear or geometry.

One more question: I am assuming that as you move the COG forward, you need to generate more lift with the foil to get the craft to fly?


Hey thedoor!

Yeah you got it right.
If you want to improve pitch stability on an wing-tail configuration you can either move the CG forwards or moving the NP Aft.
In these foiling craft the position of the CG is driven mainly by the weight of the Rider. However, the position of the rider cannot be arbitrarily set like in an aircraft (a wingfoil has no control surfaces) and so its position is a consequence of the overall external pitching moments (Drag and Lift of the Foil, Board and Sail). Lets say that the rider position is the control surface for pitch balance.

Therefore the only thing that we can actively in this case to improve Stability to move the NP aft is to increase the Tail Volume (again aircraft terminology).
In plain english this is to produce as much lift and as far aft as possible. This can be done by means of a larger fuselage (longer lever) or by making the stab larger or running it at a higher angle of attack.

Making the board longer from the front would not impact the stability as it does not affect the weight or the forces on the system much.

Hope this answers your question


Very much thank you bro
thedoor
thedoor
2538 posts
2538 posts
16 Aug 2026 1:07am
If we keep asking Jaumet questions maybe he will hit image posting status😂

Hi Jaumet

From your article







What I am hearing is that for pitch stability the further the COG is from the Neutral Point the more likely the craft will continue on its pitch. From practical experience I totally get that. Longer heavier boards and longer fuselages seemed to be easier to gybe because if you messed up your inputs it would tend to carry on its flight path . However, when navigating swells or jumping shorter boards and shorter fuselages were necessary to unlock the pitch control.

So if I have that correct, then if the goal was to improve stability we could ride with more board out in front. How do we estimate the Neutral Point of the system (foil, board and rider)?

I guess I am wondering how we could manipulate moving the neutral point aft by changing gear or geometry.

One more question: I am assuming that as you move the COG forward, you need to generate more lift with the foil to get the craft to fly?