Catalyst

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Mark _australia
Mark _australia
WA
23678 posts
WA, 23678 posts
26 Oct 2013 11:57pm
smicko said..
Not so much wrong with grains, just the amount that the average person eats is the issue. The food pyramid is bull****, there's no way that our natural diet should consist of an intake of grain 4 times the amount of vegetables and 5 times the amount of protein that we are supposed to consume.

.


We are also not supposed to sit behind a desk all day or watch TV all night.......

So, seeign as thought we fkd that up, I am getting Maccas and a case of beers

bye y'all

smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
27 Oct 2013 12:18am
Not at 11:15pm in Lano you're not Marky Mark.
Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
27 Oct 2013 8:56am
Last 4 generations on my fathers side died of heart attacks in their 50's. My father and uncle both would have also, except for quad bypass surgery. Both are skinny as a rake, eat like rabbits, exercise regularly, but had cholesterol readings close to double figures. Following surgery, cholesterol med's have kept their readings down from 9 to 2.5 and now they are both in their late 70's.

At age 45 and with a young family to look after, I was obviously concerned. My chol readings started to take an identical path to my father's, 4, then 5, and then 6. Chol meds brought it down to 2.5, but then they started to destroy my kidneys, so I had to go off them. Doctor suggested I have a heart CAT scan to see just what was happening, so we could then make a more educated decision whether to try other meds, or just stay off them.

They did two scans. One was a calcium scan to show plaque in the arteries, and the other was a radioactive iodine injection into my blood that can then let you see the blood flowing in the arteries, and shows if there are any blockages building up. The second scan is important, as there can be plaque that has not calcified, and therefore would not show up on the calcium scan. The downside of the scan is that I was exposed to the equivalent of 12 months of normal background radiation, an acceptable risk given my age and risk profile.

Expecting the worst, I was then told I am in the 0 percentile risk group, with 100% clear arteries. Life insurance companies would be lining up for my business with the results I had. The doctors explanation..."For some people the cholesterol sticks, for other people it doesn't. We don't know why."

Seems I must have heart genes from my mothers side. (That side of the family all drink, smoke and eat what they like until their late 80's or 90's.) Now I have to put more money in super to fund my longer retirement.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15101 posts
WA, 15101 posts
27 Oct 2013 6:28am
Harrow said..

Expecting the worst, I was then told I am in the 0 percentile risk group, with 100% clear arteries. Life insurance companies would be lining up for my business with the results I had. The doctors explanation..."For some people the cholesterol sticks, for other people it doesn't. We don't know why."
]


In the Catalyst article, someone was suggesting that plaque builds up where the arteries have an imperfection, in order to block the damage (I think I got that right).

Either way, I think its excellent that we live in a time where we can get these sort of scans done and try and head off any serious conditions.

I had a grandfather that died relatively early of a heart problem, so I have had checks done every now and then. I think the doctors think its overkill, but I'm sure they wouldn't be saying that if they found something.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12884 posts
WA, 12884 posts
27 Oct 2013 12:50pm
Thanks for that Harrow, puts a bit more light on the subject. And congrats on your clear result.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12884 posts
WA, 12884 posts
6 Nov 2013 7:46pm
Well I saw the Dr, she says, sure go off the pills for 6 months and we'll re-evaluate. Makes sense to me, I had the same thing in mind.
Even though I've just seen this.
scepticalnutritionist.com.au/?p=1121

Looks like Catalyst might have been duped by the Malaysian Palm Oil Industry.
Luma
Luma
WA
169 posts
WA, 169 posts
6 Nov 2013 9:55pm
petermac33 said..

Just finished watching Catalyst on ABC or SBS about this myth that saturated fat causes high cholesterol leading to heart disease. Have believed for years it was a con. Replace your margarine with butter and fry with coconut oil for starters. And get off the cholesterol lowering meds as you don't need them anymore,now it's admitted that there is no correlation between a high saturated fat diet and high cholesterol. Have got to wonder what else they lied to us about.


I was thrilled to see the program. Dr Dingle must be happy as he's very against statins.
Luma
Luma
WA
169 posts
WA, 169 posts
6 Nov 2013 9:59pm
sausage said..

Woohoo.....KFC here I come


KFC don't use butter they use trans fats - which most probably does cause harm
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
7 Nov 2013 12:41am
decrepit said..

Well I saw the Dr, she says, sure go off the pills for 6 months and we'll re-evaluate. Makes sense to me, I had the same thing in mind.
Even though I've just seen this.
scepticalnutritionist.com.au/?p=1121

Looks like Catalyst might have been duped by the Malaysian Palm Oil Industry.



God almighty. Catalyst a dupe or a shill? That's ****ing disappointing.
Luma
Luma
WA
169 posts
WA, 169 posts
7 Nov 2013 7:34am
A Perth health commentator has defended the ABC's controversial Catalyst program and accused the Heart Foundation of being compromised by financial ties with pharmaceutical companies.

au.news.yahoo.com/perth-doctor-defends-statins-show-19720821.html
shi thouse
shi thouse
WA
1159 posts
WA, 1159 posts
7 Nov 2013 10:17am
smicko said...
Not so much wrong with grains, just the amount that the average person eats is the issue. The food pyramid is bull****, there's no way that our natural diet should consist of an intake of grain 4 times the amount of vegetables and 5 times the amount of protein that we are supposed to consume.
As a primate think of yourself as a chimpanzee, they don't run around collecting grass seeds, they eat predominantly vegetable matter in the form of roots and stems and protein via grubs and insects.
I'm not suggesting we eat grubs and bugs, merely that our diet should consist primarily of vegetables and protein.

We are animals. It makes no sense for us to wander around picking grass seeds (grain) and grovel under cows sucking their teats when our bodies find metabolising vegetables and meat so natural.

It just kinda makes sense to me.



Mmmmmmmmmmmm............grains are used to make beer..............mmmmmmmmm.

Just as well beer is not eaten. I bet if chimps worked out how to ferment, add hops and yeast that they would consume more grain.
decrepit
decrepit
WA
12884 posts
WA, 12884 posts
7 Nov 2013 7:43pm
Luma said..

A Perth health commentator has defended the ABC's controversial Catalyst program and accused the Heart Foundation of being compromised by financial ties with pharmaceutical companies.

au.news.yahoo.com/perth-doctor-defends-statins-show-19720821.html



I have a suspicion, there is a middle ground somewhere between the 2 extremes.

Yes drug companies are there for their shareholders to make money.
And there's also vested interests who don't like the "bad cholesterol" theory.

My Dr, says there are people who will benefit from taking statins, the ones with obvious heart disease for a start.
But only a low proportion of people without obvious symptom will benefit, and it's very hard to identify the ones that will benefit.
That's one of the justifications for over prescribing.
petermac33
petermac33
WA
6415 posts
WA, 6415 posts
8 Nov 2013 1:20am
Commenting on Dr Malhotra's article, Timothy Noakes, a professor at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, said: "Focusing on an elevated blood cholesterol concentration as the exclusive cause of coronary heart disease is unquestionably the worst medical error of our time.

"After reviewing all the scientific evidence I draw just one conclusion - never prescribe a statin drug for a loved one."

Professor David Haslam, chair of the National Obesity Forum, said: "The assumption has been made that increased fat in the bloodstream is caused by increased saturated fat in the diet, whereas modern evidence is proving that refined carbohydrates and sugar in particular are actually the culprits."


www.sott.net/article/268441-Eating-fat-is-good-for-you-Doctors-change-their-minds-after-40-years
Paradox
Paradox
QLD
1326 posts
QLD, 1326 posts
8 Nov 2013 8:13am
smicko said..
Find a good butcher. Anthony @ Morris pl in Innaloo is great, great value grass fed free range animals. Avoid farmed fish, they are fed crap.


organicmeatonline.com.au/

I use these guys, brilliant meat both certified organic and just plain pasture fed. They source directly from the Farmers.

Delivery anywhere in Australia for under $10....

I've tried a lot of their meat and it's good.....
jfunk
jfunk
QLD
255 posts
QLD, 255 posts
8 Nov 2013 9:56am
Doen't your body use cholesterol to convert Vitamin D to energy?

Maybe high cholesterol means you aren't getting enough vitamin D
frothman
frothman
9 posts
9 posts
8 Nov 2013 8:04pm
Harrow said..

Last 4 generations on my fathers side died of heart attacks in their 50's. My father and uncle both would have also, except for quad bypass surgery. Both are skinny as a rake, eat like rabbits, exercise regularly, but had cholesterol readings close to double figures. Following surgery, cholesterol med's have kept their readings down from 9 to 2.5 and now they are both in their late 70's.

At age 45 and with a young family to look after, I was obviously concerned. My chol readings started to take an identical path to my father's, 4, then 5, and then 6. Chol meds brought it down to 2.5, but then they started to destroy my kidneys, so I had to go off them. Doctor suggested I have a heart CAT scan to see just what was happening, so we could then make a more educated decision whether to try other meds, or just stay off them.

They did two scans. One was a calcium scan to show plaque in the arteries, and the other was a radioactive iodine injection into my blood that can then let you see the blood flowing in the arteries, and shows if there are any blockages building up. The second scan is important, as there can be plaque that has not calcified, and therefore would not show up on the calcium scan. The downside of the scan is that I was exposed to the equivalent of 12 months of normal background radiation, an acceptable risk given my age and risk profile.

Expecting the worst, I was then told I am in the 0 percentile risk group, with 100% clear arteries. Life insurance companies would be lining up for my business with the results I had. The doctors explanation..."For some people the cholesterol sticks, for other people it doesn't. We don't know why."

Seems I must have heart genes from my mothers side. (That side of the family all drink, smoke and eat what they like until their late 80's or 90's.)
Now I have to put more money in super to fund my longer retirement.


sounds like my family history harrow, in fact my older bro(living a less healthy lifestyle to me) had a minor scare at 37
Dad died at 46 whilst having a root,(one of mums friends,dont you reckon that caused a few dramas)
like you ,i at times wondered about the merits of contributing to super etc.. when the odds of me reaching retirement age seem slim
all i do is live healthy , stay fit,take fish oil etc,eat well ,trim the fat off any meat i cook,etc..
dont get me wrong though ii still love a beer and the odd ciggie when im an the piss,at 42 im feeling fitter and healthier than i was 10 years ago i reckon.
no-one knows for sure about cholesterol but if you can stack the odds in your favour,by all means do whatever you can

I'm interested though harrow about approaching the doctor and asking for the same sort of tests you went through i.e. calcium scans and radioactive iodine,
trouble is everytime i go to the gp for a check up he tells me how healthy i am ,and i sorta feel like i'd be wasting everybodies time asking for all these tests
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply