Far Right Gaining in Europe - Same Here Next??

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
8 May 2012 12:18pm
log man said...

Gunna1 said...

log man said...

How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"? OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?


Loggy, if it is not a "dismal failure" please enlighten us as to where it has worked successfully.



Australia!



You cracked a joke loggie!! Congratulations!!

dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
8 May 2012 1:00pm
log man said...
Integration/assimilation was a idea of the "white Australia policy" days. It was a shameful policy. Dinsdale can you not see the authoritarian tone in your posts. "go back to where you came from" etc?

Look, loggy, integration/assimilation was an idea - period!! The "white Australia policy" was most certainly a regrettable phase in Australia's history, and whilst never being an actual official, written policy, it most certainly existed and was maintained ably both both sides of Australian politics, but it's NOT synonymous with integration/assimilation, nor must nor do they go hand in hand. Social coherence is an admirable goal for any "people" to aspire to. It's what keeps countries going. Australia has enjoyed, in the context of the wider world out there, quite a long period of enviable social coherence, not least in part because Australia's pollies endeavoured to import those groups from around the world who, in their opinion, would most likely "fit into" the socially coherent society which was already established.

So what changed? We still enjoy relative social coherence, in the context of the wider world out there, but it's obvious, even to blind Freddy, that it's breaking down. It's then fair, in my opinion, to look around that same world and see who's experiencing the same or similar problems, and look for common threads to see if there's a way for us to not fall into their pitfalls. Any factors which are at glaring odds with hopes and aspirations of those who are going to foot the bills, or have to deal with ramifications of said factors. Europe/GB are probably the best examples for us to look towards, as they're more or less the progenitors of our established cultural/societal norms.

There is, today, a glaring common thread. It's not the only thread, I'm sure, but it's the glaring, main thread. I think it's fair to then have a look at the homelands of that "common thread" and see if there's any standout factors which have played a major role in the (quite rapid) demise of Europe/GB. The homelands of that subset of immigrants into Europe/GB are little short of 7thC hellholes and one can easily see the link - IF ONE LOOKS!

Some groups integrate/assimilate much more smoothly than others. The Chinese, for instance (don't run away with this - it's just 1 very good example), have, for millenia, been travelers and traders, and have been able to adapt to their surroundings remarkably well. I know quite a few 1st, 2nd and now 3rd generation Chinese, and despite their very different native culture, they've come here to "begin a new life" as Ozzies. I have friends, born in Asia, with the broadest of chinglish (they love the term, with affection) accents who take marked exception to being called Chinese - they're OZZIES!! ... and they're proud of it! The vast, vast bulk of various Europeans (from N,S,E and W) have assimilated into our communities and been absolutely invaluable in the development of this country. These groups all still keep their links and identities with their respective homelands, whilst being cohesive, productive members of Australia. There are many exceptions to this (just look at SW Sydney for instance), but in my reasonably wide experience the exceptions are the minority.

In EVERY racial/social/cultural group (including amongst our native Ozzies and our Caucasian Ozzies) there are, and always will be those who (for who knows what reason) make it their life's work to be antisocial and to try to tear apart that social cohesion. We are now, as a nation, importing a whole cultural group for whom that is true. That is, the majority are disposed towards breaking down our culture/social cohesion and the minority are here to join us in the rich blessings this country has to offer.

The main reason multiculturalism has sort-of worked in Oz, in my opinion, is that despite the governments policy, the bulk of our immigrants have, of their own accord, integrated and assimilated, because of their thankfulness for a country which 1. welcomed them, 2. offered them peace (a big factor that one) and 3. offered them social and financial security. I'm close with 2 separate families who landed in Oz as boat people from Vietnam. (I was flying in the Australia's permanent defense forces during that conflict) These are the things which they've told me. Their kids are middle aged now, and whilst genetically 100% Vietnamese, are 100% nationally Ozzies.

I, and I believe most Ozzies with more than 2 functioning brain cells, don't care where a person came from, what they look like, what accent they have, how poor their English is, what religion they are, what they do for a job and (I even surprised myself here) who they fought for in Vietnam. So long as they've come here to become full, productive members of our country. So long as they've decided to leave their wars and hatreds behind them and start a new life, for themselves and their progeny.

If you've come here to bless us with all the shyte that has destroyed your own country - GO BACK THERE!!

Does that sound authoritarian? Oh well, so be it.

ps I think you'll find that I was able to refute your assertions and develop my own arguments without once attempting to belittle you or put you down. The same courtesy would be an outstanding aspiration for everyone on SB.





harry potter
harry potter
VIC
2777 posts
VIC, 2777 posts
8 May 2012 4:46pm
dinsdale said...

log man said...
Integration/assimilation was a idea of the "white Australia policy" days. It was a shameful policy. Dinsdale can you not see the authoritarian tone in your posts. "go back to where you came from" etc?

Look, loggy, integration/assimilation was an idea - period!! The "white Australia policy" was most certainly a regrettable phase in Australia's history, and whilst never being an actual official, written policy, it most certainly existed and was maintained ably both both sides of Australian politics, but it's NOT synonymous with integration/assimilation, nor must nor do they go hand in hand. Social coherence is an admirable goal for any "people" to aspire to. It's what keeps countries going. Australia has enjoyed, in the context of the wider world out there, quite a long period of enviable social coherence, not least in part because Australia's pollies endeavoured to import those groups from around the world who, in their opinion, would most likely "fit into" the socially coherent society which was already established.

So what changed? We still enjoy relative social coherence, in the context of the wider world out there, but it's obvious, even to blind Freddy, that it's breaking down. It's then fair, in my opinion, to look around that same world and see who's experiencing the same or similar problems, and look for common threads to see if there's a way for us to not fall into their pitfalls. Any factors which are at glaring odds with hopes and aspirations of those who are going to foot the bills, or have to deal with ramifications of said factors. Europe/GB are probably the best examples for us to look towards, as they're more or less the progenitors of our established cultural/societal norms.

There is, today, a glaring common thread. It's not the only thread, I'm sure, but it's the glaring, main thread. I think it's fair to then have a look at the homelands of that "common thread" and see if there's any standout factors which have played a major role in the (quite rapid) demise of Europe/GB. The homelands of that subset of immigrants into Europe/GB are little short of 7thC hellholes and one can easily see the link - IF ONE LOOKS!

Some groups integrate/assimilate much more smoothly than others. The Chinese, for instance (don't run away with this - it's just 1 very good example), have, for millenia, been travelers and traders, and have been able to adapt to their surroundings remarkably well. I know quite a few 1st, 2nd and now 3rd generation Chinese, and despite their very different native culture, they've come here to "begin a new life" as Ozzies. I have friends, born in Asia, with the broadest of chinglish (they love the term, with affection) accents who take marked exception to being called Chinese - they're OZZIES!! ... and they're proud of it! The vast, vast bulk of various Europeans (from N,S,E and W) have assimilated into our communities and been absolutely invaluable in the development of this country. These groups all still keep their links and identities with their respective homelands, whilst being cohesive, productive members of Australia. There are many exceptions to this (just look at SW Sydney for instance), but in my reasonably wide experience the exceptions are the minority.

In EVERY racial/social/cultural group (including amongst our native Ozzies and our Caucasian Ozzies) there are, and always will be those who (for who knows what reason) make it their life's work to be antisocial and to try to tear apart that social cohesion. We are now, as a nation, importing a whole cultural group for whom that is true. That is, the majority are disposed towards breaking down our culture/social cohesion and the minority are here to join us in the rich blessings this country has to offer.

The main reason multiculturalism has sort-of worked in Oz, in my opinion, is that despite the governments policy, the bulk of our immigrants have, of their own accord, integrated and assimilated, because of their thankfulness for a country which 1. welcomed them, 2. offered them peace (a big factor that one) and 3. offered them social and financial security. I'm close with 2 separate families who landed in Oz as boat people from Vietnam. (I was flying in the Australia's permanent defense forces during that conflict) These are the things which they've told me. Their kids are middle aged now, and whilst genetically 100% Vietnamese, are 100% nationally Ozzies.

I, and I believe most Ozzies with more than 2 functioning brain cells, don't care where a person came from, what they look like, what accent they have, how poor their English is, what religion they are, what they do for a job and (I even surprised myself here) who they fought for in Vietnam. So long as they've come here to become full, productive members of our country. So long as they've decided to leave their wars and hatreds behind them and start a new life, for themselves and their progeny.

If you've come here to bless us with all the shyte that has destroyed your own country - GO BACK THERE!!

Does that sound authoritarian? Oh well, so be it.

ps I think you'll find that I was able to refute your assertions and develop my own arguments without once attempting to belittle you or put you down. The same courtesy would be an outstanding aspiration for everyone on SB.








here here well put 100% agree
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
8 May 2012 3:24pm
Well said Mr dinsdale sir!
And thanks for going to the effort to put it all together so well.
I would just make one small addition to it where you said "If you've come here to bless us with all the shyte that has destroyed your own country - GO BACK THERE!!".
In view of the fact that some people are definitely at risk if they return to where they came from I would add, "or if you can't go back there then go somewhere which is already inflicted with the same disease. Don't bring it here!"
As I have said before, they are all welcome so long as they leave their baggage at the border.
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
8 May 2012 3:31pm
pweedas said...

As I have said before, they are all welcome so long as they leave their baggage at the border.



That never happens and never will.
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
8 May 2012 3:47pm
doggie said...

pweedas said...

As I have said before, they are all welcome so long as they leave their baggage at the border.

That never happens and never will.

It has, it does and it will again. My Viet friends are living proof. They ARE Ozzies, and woe to anyone who tries to tell them differently. They all carry scars, as we all do to some degree, but all the hatred, bitterness and bile was left behind. They came here specifically for a new life, not to carry on the old life. Many, many others have too, and many will as time goes by. The aforementioned group who primarily come here to bless us with their baggage are, of course, the exception.



doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
8 May 2012 4:08pm
dinsdale said...

doggie said...

pweedas said...

As I have said before, they are all welcome so long as they leave their baggage at the border.

That never happens and never will.

It has, it does and it will again. My Viet friends are living proof. They ARE Ozzies, and woe to anyone who tries to tell them differently. They all carry scars, as we all do to some degree, but all the hatred, bitterness and bile was left behind. They came here specifically for a new life, not to carry on the old life. Many, many others have too, and many will as time goes by. The aforementioned group who primarily come here to bless us with their baggage are, of course, the exception.






I have some friends like that, they have been here for a long time and are very nice people. Vietnamise people are such funny people and I like them alot.
Cant say that I have any muslim friends tho.
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
8 May 2012 4:34pm
doggie said...
[I have some friends like that, they have been here for a long time and are very nice people. Vietnamise people are such funny people and I like them alot.
Cant say that I have any muslim friends tho.

My earliest cross-cultural experiences were whilst house sharing with a selection of Asian students. I still find Asians, of most ilks, really easy people to get along with. We have quite a large Philippino bunch in my town (457 visas). They're very easy to get along with. Most are seeking permanent residence in Oz, and all the ones I've met and come to know would be welcome in my home.

evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
8 May 2012 6:41pm
Gunna1 said...

log man said...

dinsdale said...

Gwendy said...

If you don't agree with Milti-culture policies Mark, Would you support the segregation of shortboarders from the SUP heathen?
And what about me form of barrier to protect the sailboarders from the darkside scourge.

The opposite multiculturalism is NOT segregation - it's integration, and yes, multiculturalism is a dismal failure. Multiculturalism is really voluntary segregation. Integration is what we should be requiring from ALL immigrants to this country.

How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"? OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?


Loggy, if it is not a "dismal failure" please enlighten us as to where it has worked successfully.



Australia?


...Is this a trick question?

dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
8 May 2012 4:56pm
log man said...
[How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"? OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?

Only just saw this. Sorry loggy, I usually just skip over most of your stuff. Any'ow, to answer you with respect to personal attack:-
log man said...
How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"?

That's not.
log man said...
OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?

That is, and. of course it was meant to be.

You see, you're just not capable of conducting a coherent debate without personal sleights. You really are a true leftie to the core. If you have no cogent argument for the proposition, go for the man. That's how the left works. We could be discussing wet cement and if you couldn't think of something meaningful to add to the discussion you'd have to vent your misothiest bile. Oh well, if it makes you feel good loggy.


evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
8 May 2012 7:00pm
dinsdale said...

log man said...
Integration/assimilation was a idea of the "white Australia policy" days. It was a shameful policy. Dinsdale can you not see the authoritarian tone in your posts. "go back to where you came from" etc?

Look, loggy, integration/assimilation was an idea - period!! The "white Australia policy" was most certainly a regrettable phase in Australia's history, and whilst never being an actual official, written policy, it most certainly existed and was maintained ably both both sides of Australian politics, but it's NOT synonymous with integration/assimilation, nor must nor do they go hand in hand. Social coherence is an admirable goal for any "people" to aspire to. It's what keeps countries going. Australia has enjoyed, in the context of the wider world out there, quite a long period of enviable social coherence, not least in part because Australia's pollies endeavoured to import those groups from around the world who, in their opinion, would most likely "fit into" the socially coherent society which was already established.

So what changed? We still enjoy relative social coherence, in the context of the wider world out there, but it's obvious, even to blind Freddy, that it's breaking down. It's then fair, in my opinion, to look around that same world and see who's experiencing the same or similar problems, and look for common threads to see if there's a way for us to not fall into their pitfalls. Any factors which are at glaring odds with hopes and aspirations of those who are going to foot the bills, or have to deal with ramifications of said factors. Europe/GB are probably the best examples for us to look towards, as they're more or less the progenitors of our established cultural/societal norms.


[cough cough]

The same thing, the exact same paranoia and perceived threat to our society happened when the Italians arrived en masses during the forties. And the Vietnamese during the 70's. In 30 years you'll probably be holding up these scary Muslims as examples of a people that assimilated and extended our culture nicely.

Wikipedia said...
Nevertheless, the way Italian migrants were conceived by Australian society was not going to change after its perception had formed in the early 1900s. With respect to this attitude, MacDonald wrote: "Italian immigration became the largest non-British movement after the entry of Melanesians and Asians was stopped by the new federal government in 1902. This put Italians at the bottom of the Australian 'racial totem pole', just above other southern Europeans and Aborigines. The volume of arrivals, the proportion of settlers in the total population of Australia, and the size of Italian agglomerated settlements were trivial by international standards. Yet the establishment of fifty Italian households within a radius of five miles (8 km) or the employment of twenty Italians on a job were cause for alarm in Australian eyes, The 'inferiority' of Italians was generally seen in racist terms as well as specifically in terms of their threatening to compete with labor of British stock because of their 'primitive' way of life".


I live with a very devout Muslim colleague most of the week. He prays ...a number of times a day. He has never drunk, no pork, yada yada. He's a seriously nice guy. He is perhaps the nicest guy I have ever known. We'll often debate philosophical ideas while I get drunk and/or lightly toasted on the other couch (while I thank multiculturalism for pizza). He minds his own business and I mind mine. Love thy neighbour. This is how multiculturalism actually works.

There are a lot of different cultures in Australia. some sub-cultures are radically different to the mainstream, more so than these new arrivals. Some long existing (sub) cultures in this country I am sick of.
log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
8 May 2012 7:20pm
dinsdale said...

log man said...
[How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"? OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?

Only just saw this. Sorry loggy, I usually just skip over most of your stuff. Any'ow, to answer you with respect to personal attack:-
log man said...
How is "multiculturalism a dismal failure"?

That's not.
log man said...
OOOPPS sorry is that a personal attack?

That is, and. of course it was meant to be.

You see, you're just not capable of conducting a coherent debate without personal sleights. You really are a true leftie to the core. If you have no cogent argument for the proposition, go for the man. That's how the left works. We could be discussing wet cement and if you couldn't think of something meaningful to add to the discussion you'd have to vent your misothiest bile. Oh well, if it makes you feel good loggy.





Geez Dinsdale, I say "good morning dinsdale" and you go "IT'S A PERSONAL ATTACK". FFS, your such a precious......OOPPS too personal
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
8 May 2012 7:21pm
...I can't help also but notice that most of the complaints about this so-called horror of multiculturalism come from Western Australia. Is it really that prevalent over there? It seems to me that it is accepted more and even enjoyed where it actually exists. Am I right?
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
8 May 2012 5:34pm
evlPanda said...
[cough cough]

The same thing, the exact same paranoia and perceived threat to our society happened when the Italians arrived en masses during the forties. And the Vietnamese during the 70's. In 30 years you'll probably be holding up these scary Muslims as examples of a people that assimilated and extended our culture nicely.

Mmmaate, I'm a Freo kid! That's Freo - little Italy. After the WW2 people were very wary of immigrants from countries which had just been our adversaries. Just the same as with the Vietnamese boat people. And more qudos to them for proving us all wrong, if not the original arrivals, then their progeny. However, none of them came here with an open aim of converting us to their way of life. Whilst we did inherit some criminal elements, in the main we got peaceful people looking for a new and peaceful way of life. I'm not aware of even 1 Italian or Viet being arrested for plotting to blow up public venues, with the aim of killing or maiming as many civilians (women, children, men, old folks) as possible. I'm not aware of any Italian priest or Viet holy person (don't know their predominant religion) ever standing in the pulpit preaching hatred and venom for their hosts.

The folks who are currently our main imports are of the ones conducting all terrorism globally. The Tammil Tigers have been put down and the IRA (at least I think so) are conducting a strained peace. Besides, with those 2 groups there were clearly defined targets with clearly defined desired outcomes - that doesn't mean that I agreed with either of them. What other group conducts completely indiscriminate terrorism where ever and when ever they can?

There are basic and fundamental differences between all of our previous immigrant groups and the current main batch. All of the others have come in peace. The current batch have not! And (this get loggy and few others salivating) it's not racial at all!! What's happening now is unprecedented in Australian history. It's a religio/political idealogical bunch whose great high priest has ordered them to kill anyone who doesn't submit to them. That's what most people miss. This is a new experience for us all.

Any'ow, 'nuff said. You all know best.



log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
8 May 2012 9:54pm
dinsdale said...

log man said...
Integration/assimilation was a idea of the "white Australia policy" days. It was a shameful policy. Dinsdale can you not see the authoritarian tone in your posts. "go back to where you came from" etc?

Look, loggy, integration/assimilation was an idea - period!! The "white Australia policy" was most certainly a regrettable phase in Australia's history, and whilst never being an actual official, written policy, it most certainly existed and was maintained ably both both sides of Australian politics, but it's NOT synonymous with integration/assimilation, nor must nor do they go hand in hand. Social coherence is an admirable goal for any "people" to aspire to. It's what keeps countries going. Australia has enjoyed, in the context of the wider world out there, quite a long period of enviable social coherence, not least in part because Australia's pollies endeavoured to import those groups from around the world who, in their opinion, would most likely "fit into" the socially coherent society which was already established.

So what changed? We still enjoy relative social coherence, in the context of the wider world out there, but it's obvious, even to blind Freddy, that it's breaking down. It's then fair, in my opinion, to look around that same world and see who's experiencing the same or similar problems, and look for common threads to see if there's a way for us to not fall into their pitfalls. Any factors which are at glaring odds with hopes and aspirations of those who are going to foot the bills, or have to deal with ramifications of said factors. Europe/GB are probably the best examples for us to look towards, as they're more or less the progenitors of our established cultural/societal norms.

There is, today, a glaring common thread. It's not the only thread, I'm sure, but it's the glaring, main thread. I think it's fair to then have a look at the homelands of that "common thread" and see if there's any standout factors which have played a major role in the (quite rapid) demise of Europe/GB. The homelands of that subset of immigrants into Europe/GB are little short of 7thC hellholes and one can easily see the link - IF ONE LOOKS!

Some groups integrate/assimilate much more smoothly than others. The Chinese, for instance (don't run away with this - it's just 1 very good example), have, for millenia, been travelers and traders, and have been able to adapt to their surroundings remarkably well. I know quite a few 1st, 2nd and now 3rd generation Chinese, and despite their very different native culture, they've come here to "begin a new life" as Ozzies. I have friends, born in Asia, with the broadest of chinglish (they love the term, with affection) accents who take marked exception to being called Chinese - they're OZZIES!! ... and they're proud of it! The vast, vast bulk of various Europeans (from N,S,E and W) have assimilated into our communities and been absolutely invaluable in the development of this country. These groups all still keep their links and identities with their respective homelands, whilst being cohesive, productive members of Australia. There are many exceptions to this (just look at SW Sydney for instance), but in my reasonably wide experience the exceptions are the minority.

In EVERY racial/social/cultural group (including amongst our native Ozzies and our Caucasian Ozzies) there are, and always will be those who (for who knows what reason) make it their life's work to be antisocial and to try to tear apart that social cohesion. We are now, as a nation, importing a whole cultural group for whom that is true. That is, the majority are disposed towards breaking down our culture/social cohesion and the minority are here to join us in the rich blessings this country has to offer.

The main reason multiculturalism has sort-of worked in Oz, in my opinion, is that despite the governments policy, the bulk of our immigrants have, of their own accord, integrated and assimilated, because of their thankfulness for a country which 1. welcomed them, 2. offered them peace (a big factor that one) and 3. offered them social and financial security. I'm close with 2 separate families who landed in Oz as boat people from Vietnam. (I was flying in the Australia's permanent defense forces during that conflict) These are the things which they've told me. Their kids are middle aged now, and whilst genetically 100% Vietnamese, are 100% nationally Ozzies.

I, and I believe most Ozzies with more than 2 functioning brain cells, don't care where a person came from, what they look like, what accent they have, how poor their English is, what religion they are, what they do for a job and (I even surprised myself here) who they fought for in Vietnam. So long as they've come here to become full, productive members of our country. So long as they've decided to leave their wars and hatreds behind them and start a new life, for themselves and their progeny.

If you've come here to bless us with all the shyte that has destroyed your own country - GO BACK THERE!!

Does that sound authoritarian? Oh well, so be it.

ps I think you'll find that I was able to refute your assertions and develop my own arguments without once attempting to belittle you or put you down. The same courtesy would be an outstanding aspiration for everyone on SB.







Integration and assimilation were and are ideas of the 1950's. Aboriginals were expected to dress white, talk white, go to church and subordinate their culture for the "superior" culture of the white man. And what did it get us. **** all! unless you count the disappearance of language, culture, tradition and more. Australia is the poorer for "assimilation". Assimilation and integration were practiced on newcomers to Australia in the form of the dominance of the British empire. If you didn't come from a country that was coloured pink in the atlas the you were considered 2nd class unless of course you came from india and you were 3rd class because you were coloured. And what a joke that was. Australia's immigration policy was a racist policy. Australia would be poorer for the loss of other nationalities cultures. I don't really understand why you would want to homogenize Australia more than it is already. And by the way, how do you think it's possible to surgically remove parts of the culture that you don't want from a prospective immigrant. Do you think it's possible for a Bosnian to just wipe their memory of the things that happened in that conflict? or do you think that by telling the Bosnian that "this is Australia and in Australia we don't like people bringing their baggage from the old country" that somehow he'll just go "ah well fair enough". People have "baggage". ALL people have "baggage". The baggage can be treated with understanding, tolerance, time, and acceptance. No amount of "you've got to do this and feel this" has ever worked or will ever work unless it's at gunpoint. So as I see it that's the controversial side of multiculturalism. the other side is the huge enrichment of culture flowing both ways. I shudder to think what Australia would have been had it not been for the bipartisan policy of varied Prime Ministers over the years. Dinsdale, if you want to live in a world where everyone's the same, we all go to the Church of England on Sunday, eat crap food, and think that the world ends at New Zealand then go to Adelaide, see how long you last. OK, so here's the other thing, usually these discussions are NOT transparent. I mean, usually people on this site say "I hate multiculturalism" and what they really mean is I hate Muslims. Especially if their black.....no evidence apart from heresay, but that's their agenda so facts are not that important. So my radar is always tuned to those bogus ideas. Dinsdale, you make lot's of assertions, like "the demise of Europe/GB" What demise.....Indians, West indians? What is the cultural group of trouble makers? Are you being transparent or are you going down the same I hate Muslims road
SandS
SandS
VIC
5904 posts
VIC, 5904 posts
8 May 2012 10:00pm
Loggy , could you start to use paragraphs please ?
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
8 May 2012 10:12pm
So eloquent dinsdale, and to my mind, faultless in your reasoning and moral stance.

In the various waves of immigration to Australia, most people have come to join in what they saw as a better society.

This does not appear to be motivation of those in the current wave of immigration.
kiteboy dave
kiteboy dave
QLD
6525 posts
QLD, 6525 posts
9 May 2012 1:40pm
I've worked it out! Cisco = Old fart Qld'er, Loony right winger, in a hat.

CISCO = BOB KATTER !!!

Sorry bob, secret's out mate.
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
9 May 2012 2:16pm
cisco said...

So eloquent dinsdale, and to my mind, faultless in your reasoning and moral stance.

In the various waves of immigration to Australia, most people have come to join in what they saw as a better society.

This does not appear to be motivation of those in the current wave of immigration.


Examples please, because y'all sound a bit like terrorists to me.

japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
9 May 2012 3:16pm
SandS said...

Loggy , could you start to use paragraphs please ?


When he writes stuff that I don't read it. Not because I don't want to but because it makes my eyes swim. It has been pointed out before.
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
9 May 2012 2:11pm
log man said...
Blah blah blah etc and then,..
People have "baggage". ALL people have "baggage". The baggage can be treated with understanding, tolerance, time, and acceptance. No amount of "you've got to do this and feel this" has ever worked or will ever work unless it's at gunpoint.
and then more blah blah blah


There were lots of things in this post which should be replied to but I only have time for this one particular point because it is the most critical
We should NOT have to accept some of the "baggage" that some groups bring.
It is the root cause of most of the conflict and problems in the country that they are seeking to escape from and it is a ridiculous proposition that we should allow the importation of this cancer into our country. And it is a cancer.
It starts out small and inconspicuous until it reaches a certain size and strength and then metastacises into a terminal disease.
It is this "understanding, tolerance, time, and acceptance" that you speak of which they take advantage of to establish their "disease" in this country.

How much "understanding, tolerance, time, and acceptance" do western cultures get in the countries where these people come from?
d1
d1
WA
304 posts
d1 d1
WA, 304 posts
9 May 2012 2:29pm
pweedas said...


it is a ridiculous proposition that we should allow the importation of this cancer into our country. And it is a cancer.
It starts out small and inconspicuous until it reaches a certain size and strength and then metastacises into a terminal disease.
It is this "understanding, tolerance, time, and acceptance" that you speak of which they take advantage of to establish their "disease" in this country.


I wonder where I've read something like this before... Ah yes - it was in "Mein Kampf".

Congratulations, you've successfully completed the first 3 stages of Genocide:

1. Classification (us and them)
2. Symbolization (group them all into "muslamics" or whatever)
3. Dehumanization (call them "cancer")

Dudes, you should really be ashamed of yourselves posting racist junk like this. The whole world reads this forum, so can you just imagine the impression you give?
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
9 May 2012 2:40pm
You should re read everything I've ever said on this matter, in this thread and others.
I've always said they are welcome so long as they leave their "baggage" behind.

I dont claim the people are second rate or inferior but I do state that the blind acceptance of their cultural baggage is a recipe for disaster.

The views that you express here are part of the problem because you imply that by rejecting their cultural baggage, which is the cause of most of the grief in their own country, then we are being racist and unreasonable.
We are not.
We are being realistic and sensible.
What we have here is worth defending from what they have where they come from.


evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
9 May 2012 5:21pm
pweedas said...

You should re read everything I've ever said on this matter, in this thread and others.
I've always said they are welcome so long as they leave their "baggage" behind.

I dont claim the people are second rate or inferior but I do state that the blind acceptance of their cultural baggage is a recipe for disaster.

The views that you express here are part of the problem because you imply that by rejecting their cultural baggage, which is the cause of most of the grief in their own country, then we are being racist and unreasonable.
We are not.
We are being realistic and sensible.
What we have here is worth defending from what they have where they come from.



Read D1's point #2 again. And again.
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
9 May 2012 3:52pm
d1 said...
Dudes, you should really be ashamed of yourselves posting racist junk like this. The whole world reads this forum, so can you just imagine the impression you give?

That's a good thing. Most of the rest of the world is far less isolated and cloistered than Australia. They're (UK, Europe (generally), USA, Canada) miles further down the same track than we are.

The problem here is that if anyone points you (that's a 3rd person plural you now, not the 1st person singular) at any news service which is actually telling the world what's going on in these countries you lot simply dismiss it out of hand as being some loony right winger. Most won't even look past the banner on the site.

Who cares about the message - it's the messenger that counts to most of you. You don't care what lies you're fed, so long as the feeder is of the correct political persuasion.

Oh, and remind me again, what race is Islam?

cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
11 May 2012 11:02am
dinsdale said...
The problem here is that if anyone points you (that's a 3rd person plural you now, not the 1st person singular) at any news service which is actually telling the world what's going on in these countries you lot simply dismiss it out of hand as being some loony right winger. Most won't even look past the banner on the site.

Right dinsdale. These kinds of people, by their own logic, have to call anything by Sacha Baron "Racial Slurrs".

www.mail.com/int/entertainment/celebrity/

Who cares about the message - it's the messenger that counts to most of you. You don't care what lies you're fed, so long as the feeder is of the correct political persuasion.

Oh, and remind me again, what race is Islam?



pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
11 May 2012 4:47pm
evlPanda said...




Gee I don't think he should be pushing for that too hard.
If we all left then who will provide his health care, education, law enforcement, free housing, free beer, free cigs, free everything else.
From the picture there it doesn't look like he is the CEO of BHP.

That's a flippant comment I know, but the reality is that when stone age collides with the 20th century there is bound to be some damage.
It was always going to happen regardless of whether it was by the french, the dutch , the poms, the japanese, the chinese, or numerous others who were running around the world taking up land around that time.
Of all the possible alternatives I think the poms were probably one of the better options.
It's a bit sad that after surviving forty thousand years in such a hostile country, hanging in there by the skin of their teeth, they finally fall down at the last hurdle.

log man
log man
VIC
8289 posts
VIC, 8289 posts
11 May 2012 8:34pm
pweedas said...

evlPanda said...




Gee I don't think he should be pushing for that too hard.
If we all left then who will provide his health care, education, law enforcement, free housing, free beer, free cigs, free everything else.
From the picture there it doesn't look like he is the CEO of BHP.

That's a flippant comment I know, but the reality is that when stone age collides with the 20th century there is bound to be some damage.
It was always going to happen regardless of whether it was by the french, the dutch , the poms, the japanese, the chinese, or numerous others who were running around the world taking up land around that time.
Of all the possible alternatives I think the poms were probably one of the better options.
It's a bit sad that after surviving forty thousand years in such a hostile country, hanging in there by the skin of their teeth, they finally fall down at the last hurdle.



Oh My God! How can 1 man be ssooooo wrong sooooooo often.
dinsdale
dinsdale
WA
1227 posts
WA, 1227 posts
11 May 2012 6:40pm
log man said...

pweedas said...

evlPanda said...




Gee I don't think he should be pushing for that too hard.
If we all left then who will provide his health care, education, law enforcement, free housing, free beer, free cigs, free everything else.
From the picture there it doesn't look like he is the CEO of BHP.

That's a flippant comment I know, but the reality is that when stone age collides with the 20th century there is bound to be some damage.
It was always going to happen regardless of whether it was by the french, the dutch , the poms, the japanese, the chinese, or numerous others who were running around the world taking up land around that time.
Of all the possible alternatives I think the poms were probably one of the better options.
It's a bit sad that after surviving forty thousand years in such a hostile country, hanging in there by the skin of their teeth, they finally fall down at the last hurdle.

Oh My God! How can 1 man be ssooooo wrong sooooooo often.

A question I've often pondered myself. I've no idea loggy, but you accomplish it with aplomb, every time .

pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
11 May 2012 8:10pm
log man said...

pweedas said...

evlPanda said...




Gee I don't think he should be pushing for that too hard.
If we all left then who will provide his health care, education, law enforcement, free housing, free beer, free cigs, free everything else.
From the picture there it doesn't look like he is the CEO of BHP.

That's a flippant comment I know, but the reality is that when stone age collides with the 20th century there is bound to be some damage.
It was always going to happen regardless of whether it was by the french, the dutch , the poms, the japanese, the chinese, or numerous others who were running around the world taking up land around that time.
Of all the possible alternatives I think the poms were probably one of the better options.
It's a bit sad that after surviving forty thousand years in such a hostile country, hanging in there by the skin of their teeth, they finally fall down at the last hurdle.



Oh My God! How can 1 man be ssooooo wrong sooooooo often.



Just out of curiosity then, given that for a certainty, at some point australia would have been colonised by some other country, what country do you think the original inhabitants would have done much better under?
The Spanish?
The Dutch?
The Portugese?
The French?
The Russians?
The Japanese?
The Germans?

The Kiwis maybe? aww noo!
Take your pick.
And then tell me in what way things would now be better.

Or if you like, say by divine intervention nobody ever managed to arrive here, what do you see as being the most likely state of the nation.?
Interesting ?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply