F'n Morons

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Woodo
Woodo
WA
792 posts
WA, 792 posts
16 Aug 2011 12:58pm
"But I can't help but think future generations will look upon us as for killing all the fish. As it is entirely possible that we will fish the oceans bare within a few generations."

Take only what you need and within the bag limits and keep the pro's out of the rec fishing areas.

"maybe catching Baldies for entertainment will be seen just as outdated in the near future.. Especially if they are extinct!"

i have never known anyone to catch baldies for entertainment, or any bottom species for that matter. Sambo's and sport fish yes but not a quality table fish.
barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
16 Aug 2011 1:09pm
doggie said...
[brI dont think the crow is native.

From Wiki - Crows appear to have evolved in central Asia and radiated out into North America, Africa, Europe, and Australia.


Yeah it seems so, but they are still native, I spose Crows are native world wide.. They may have radiated out of asia but that havre been here a looong time..

I really like Crows, I added them on my short list of animals that people now like, but I doubt thats true yet!!

Maybe oneday somebody will stand up to a bunch of Bogans throwing rocks at Crows! (not that crows are dumb enough to get hit, probably have a higher IQ than the bogans would)..


Wiki goes on..
The fossil record of crows is rather dense in Europe, but the relationships among most prehistoric species are not clear. The latest evidence appears to point towards an Australasian origin for the early family (Corvidae) though the branch that would produce the modern groups such as jays, magpies and large predominantly black Corvus, Crows had left Australasia and were now developing in Asia. Corvus has since re-entered Australia (relatively recently) and produced five species with one recognized sub-species.


Learn something new every day! Though it goes on to say that the Crows left Australasia 40 million years ago.. I bet Mark_Australia is gnashing his teeth at me using Fossils as evidence, and talking in millions of years.. lol
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
16 Aug 2011 1:59pm
Woodo said...

"But I can't help but think future generations will look upon us as for killing all the fish. As it is entirely possible that we will fish the oceans bare within a few generations."

Take only what you need and within the bag limits and keep the pro's out of the rec fishing areas.

"maybe catching Baldies for entertainment will be seen just as outdated in the near future.. Especially if they are extinct!"

i have never known anyone to catch baldies for entertainment, or any bottom species for that matter. Sambo's and sport fish yes but not a quality table fish.


I love a baldie
Woodo
Woodo
WA
792 posts
WA, 792 posts
16 Aug 2011 2:29pm
doggie said...

Woodo said...

"But I can't help but think future generations will look upon us as for killing all the fish. As it is entirely possible that we will fish the oceans bare within a few generations."

Take only what you need and within the bag limits and keep the pro's out of the rec fishing areas.

"maybe catching Baldies for entertainment will be seen just as outdated in the near future.. Especially if they are extinct!"

i have never known anyone to catch baldies for entertainment, or any bottom species for that matter. Sambo's and sport fish yes but not a quality table fish.


I love a baldie


felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
16 Aug 2011 2:49pm
Bogans...... are they Australian natives
doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
16 Aug 2011 3:06pm
felixdcat said...

Bogans...... are they Australian natives


Yep, generally from inland/landlocked suburbs
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Aug 2011 6:17pm
poor relative said...

I always find clubbing seals to death with a blunt object far superior than stoning them.


So, a baby seal walks into a club.





... yeah that's the joke.

But I don't know, at least there was a purpose for killing the seal. Like killing a cow for steak, or a sheep for its wool. These bogans sounded like they were just getting pleasure from an animal's potential pain.
Glitch
Glitch
QLD
292 posts
QLD, 292 posts
16 Aug 2011 7:16pm
^ Killing sheep for wool?? Could we also kill some more cows for milk?
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
16 Aug 2011 7:46pm
Just checking that you're all paying attention.
Mr. No-one
Mr. No-one
WA
921 posts
WA, 921 posts
16 Aug 2011 7:23pm
smicko said...

Mr. No-one said...

Give em sh!t Russh.
18 months ago I'd just landed my hangglider on the beach at Shellys/ Albany when some bogans pulled in a 4ft hammerhead. Before he killed it I said "It's undersized, are you going to throw it back or will I" very firmly. He backed down, I had no idea if it was legal but he wasn't a happy camper, I'm sure the crowd that started forming had my back when I walked it out.
I'm not sure if I crossed a line but it seemed the right thing to do at the time.


Why did it seem the right thing to do? You self righteous twat! You openly admitted you have no idea of the legalities yet you wade in all guns blazing feeding these "bogans" complete and utter bull$hit.
FYI, most of the fish n chips served in WA is shark and the "scallops" are rings punched out of stingray flaps. There is no minimum size for sharks in WA but there is a maximum size limit.
Both ray's and sharks are legal prey for fishers in WA, if you don't like it, lobby the government to change the law. Don't go threatening innocents.
Ignorant pratt!


Getting pretty high and mighty yourself there Smucko!
I didn't threaten anyone and they were catching plenty of fish. This 4 ft hammer seemed quite small and I don't agree with your kill anything you can that's legal mentality. They took a few photos but the guy that caught it wasn't game to pick it up alive, the spectators were happy to see it go back or where they wrong to? Hey, I love my fishing to but just because it's legal doesn't make it right as in the earlier posts of others.
To be fair, you had to be there and they had more than enough already.
DUDE
DUDE
NSW
1132 posts
NSW, 1132 posts
16 Aug 2011 9:33pm
wbailey said...

In Terrigal NSW at a spot called the Haven there used to be 2 large black Stingrays which would come in to the shallows at the evening for a free feed from the local restaurants. They were there for years. Quite an attraction.

Then one weekend some bogons from Sydney came up and speared one of them, killing it and then leaving it in the water. They thought it was great they had killed the ray and they were big tough guys.

A few of the locals told the d*** heads what they thought of them but it had no effect. They just laughed it off.

Another one to the morons.... Karma will get them.




I miss the Rays at the haven,used to give us a scare at times when surfing out there and was always stoked that it was them and not a bitey,I remember the day it happened, and yep the locals were pissed.
MrRubberbely
MrRubberbely
WA
64 posts
WA, 64 posts
16 Aug 2011 8:12pm
Mr. No-one said...

smicko said...

Mr. No-one said...

Give em sh!t Russh.
18 months ago I'd just landed my hangglider on the beach at Shellys/ Albany when some bogans pulled in a 4ft hammerhead. Before he killed it I said "It's undersized, are you going to throw it back or will I" very firmly. He backed down, I had no idea if it was legal but he wasn't a happy camper, I'm sure the crowd that started forming had my back when I walked it out.
I'm not sure if I crossed a line but it seemed the right thing to do at the time.


Why did it seem the right thing to do? You self righteous twat! You openly admitted you have no idea of the legalities yet you wade in all guns blazing feeding these "bogans" complete and utter bull$hit.
FYI, most of the fish n chips served in WA is shark and the "scallops" are rings punched out of stingray flaps. There is no minimum size for sharks in WA but there is a maximum size limit.
Both ray's and sharks are legal prey for fishers in WA, if you don't like it, lobby the government to change the law. Don't go threatening innocents.
Ignorant pratt!


Getting pretty high and mighty yourself there Smucko!
I didn't threaten anyone and they were catching plenty of fish. This 4 ft hammer seemed quite small and I don't agree with your kill anything you can that's legal mentality. They took a few photos but the guy that caught it wasn't game to pick it up alive, the spectators were happy to see it go back or where they wrong to? Hey, I love my fishing to but just because it's legal doesn't make it right as in the earlier posts of others.
To be fair, you had to be there and they had more than enough already.


Yeah Smicko, what's up, too many angry pills this morning?
Mr No-one took exception to an objectionable act and did something about it.
Too often objectionable things happen and nobody does anything. This time No-one did something, and the outcome was good, for the hammerhead anyway.

smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
16 Aug 2011 9:02pm
Mr No One took exception to and intimidated some poor bloke who was perfectly within his rights to take the fish that he had caught. And I quote him again;

Before he killed it I said "It's undersized, are you going to throw it back or will I" very firmly. He backed down, I had no idea if it was legal but he wasn't a happy camper, I'm sure the crowd that started forming had my back when I walked it out.

If that's not intimidation, I don't know what is. Hammers are one of the most common and fecund species of sharks along our coastline and you'll have a far lesser impact on the environment by removing one of them than by removing a slow growing demersal like a Dhu, Snapper or a Groper.

Mr NoBalls (if we are going to resort to juvenile name calling) would you still have had a dig if it'd had been a size Dhuie that he had caught? I highly doubt it.
I too love my fishing mate and I choose to release well over 90% of what I catch. Doesn't give me the right to act like a right wing PETA farkwit.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply