I am conservative - (its ageist thing - but also socialist).
My vote is dominantly preferred party lower house - neutral or opposite party in upper house (Good choice living in QLD

).
But there is no way I can vote for a party headed by a "Lay-bye-priest" who is a biggot, needs 24x7 minders to keep his foot out of his mouth and has modeled himself on the poorest of Howard's campaign themes. -- It would be easy to go on....
Imagine if he had succeeded in gaining the independent votes at the last election - do you honestly think he would still be in power - consensus and lay-bye - (equivalent to oil and water)!!!!
With a close to balanced parliament - it would be an ideal opportunity to run some policies through the house by gaining the extra votes - show some capacity to deal with the nation as a would be leader. His current capacity is all limited to sounding like a really strident ultra left wing union leader without the power base.
I have enjoyed the extra and mostly balanced commentary provided by the independents not hamstrung by party line crap.
Until lay-bye goes I will not vote conservative.
Gillard,... well not first choice either, but Kevin self-destructed (narcissistic extremous).
Gillard has the job, and if only the knee jerk response to the yip yip yip brigade was given a 48 hour fuse, life would be much calmer.
BTW if you owned 80% of a company involved in minerals lets say in Brunei and you heard that they wanted to increase the tax directly impacting on your returns what would you do??? (Yip Yip Yip Yip with a Humungus war chest - sounds familiar???)
Scare-mongering over substance - it is naff.
AP