A discussion about AKSA

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
hirschausen
hirschausen
WA
422 posts
WA, 422 posts
6 Nov 2007 6:11pm
I agree with the Poor
dachopper
dachopper
WA
1802 posts
WA, 1802 posts
6 Nov 2007 10:07pm
on the topic of insurance for comps..... if you hold an event the local council normally require to see your form of insurance as an organiser, AKSA can provide it's insurance policy to which the council says yay or nay,if they do say yay, then ofcourse you can't just rock up to an event that has been allowed under AKSA'a insurance policy and try to use someone else's policy... when the council has allowed you to use their land as long as everyone is covered under this particular policy.. so it may seem like extra $$ but getting multiple offshore insurance policies approved would probably never happen
dachopper
dachopper
WA
1802 posts
WA, 1802 posts
6 Nov 2007 10:08pm
on the topic of insurance for comps..... if you hold an event the local council normally require to see your form of insurance as an organiser, AKSA can provide it's insurance policy to which the council says yay or nay,if they do say yay, then ofcourse you can't just rock up to an event that has been allowed under AKSA'a insurance policy and try to use someone else's policy... when the council has allowed you to use their land as long as everyone is covered under this particular policy.. so it may seem like extra $$ but getting multiple offshore insurance policies approved would probably never happen
jan
jan
WA
1119 posts
jan jan
WA, 1119 posts
7 Nov 2007 1:25am
As there is now a paid position to look after the website for AKSA, when can we expect to see an improvement?

I trust some part allocation of the funds put aside for this will trickle down to the webmasters of local associations.




youngbull
youngbull
QLD
826 posts
QLD, 826 posts
7 Nov 2007 2:46am
the prob with any sport is money and insurance.....

I used to race thundercats and my stepdad was the president only after me saying how we need to orginize events to suit us

He got envolved and the sport progressed to TV/ Radio / Newspapers and international race's. I even made 7 papers and several TV spots including a special on channel 9

Then the insurance guy's started to bite and hitched up there prices. even though NO accidents had occured

The problem is promoting the sport comes at a cost. And i can assure you no -one including me wants to chip in to help it progress for the simple reason is why should I when i am part of it and spend enough time and money just doing it. ( and yes for many it can be expensive - to have the gear )

My stepdad never got paid for it. It was more of an enjoyment seeing me and others promoting the sport due to the social and happyness it could offer many.

Do not take the little guy's for granted they all help and do the best they can.
Money is great but no matter how good i ever got which was 3rd in Australia 12th in the world i never even came close to regaining the cost, just to get to the event.

youngbull
youngbull
QLD
826 posts
QLD, 826 posts
7 Nov 2007 2:47am
.
user
user
WA
1140 posts
WA, 1140 posts
7 Nov 2007 6:40am
Thank God those Thundercats have just about disapeared !

Bunch of w**kers destroying the surf and seeking glory!

Worse than jetskis ! They would want to take over a whole beach for the day just so they can blast in and out in a straight line!

They tried it at one of my local beaches once and got told to rack off !
silviu
silviu
VIC
663 posts
VIC, 663 posts
7 Nov 2007 9:37am
The issue here gentlemen is not what AKSA is doing for us, but, as a great American president said, what are WE doing for AKSA.
To let an organization (a committee or of few members or a secretary) resolve and organize everything... you must be joking.
If we love the sport and are so committed, we have to ask AKSA: how can I help?
Not to expect to receive everything on a "silver plate" because we paid few bucks a year.
Let's face it, there are so many great examples what the power of many can do: look at Noosa River Mouth issue few time ago.
We put shoulder together and, the council, had to listen to our say. I think that was a fantastic effort with a great outcome.
I really appreciate Darren's effort to bring to public comment the issues, we have to discuss and show the committee what we believe it should look like, this shows a real commitment and love for the sport.
He throw the ball, we have to catch it and start doing something about, because just bitching about AKSA and not getting our bumps up and do something about is not going to have any positive outcome.
junglist
junglist
VIC
701 posts
VIC, 701 posts
7 Nov 2007 9:43am
A quick question then, as it has been cleared up by AKSA that insurance DOES NOT include for personal injury.

Why can these guys get personal injury cover: http://www.britishkitesurfingassociation.co.uk/content/blogcategory/14/33/

And we can not?

Personally I might join BKSA as, at least, they give worldwide cover!

Should AKSA be speaking to BKSA's insurance company?

Cheers
JB
JB
NSW
2232 posts
JB JB
NSW, 2232 posts
7 Nov 2007 10:00am
Great post Silviu, As a former P, VP and Committee member of the AKSA (over 3+ years), I can appreciate how hard it is to get anything done, which is why the AKSA decided to pay a full time secretary. This just start in my final year on the AKSA committee. Before then we were all volunteers as most of the committee still are now, many of the committee members have kids, full time jobs and other obligations. and when you do put your self out and work many hours a week to try and better the chances of this sports survival, all you recieve from the majority of the kiting comunity is criticism. AKSA does need help from volunteers, if you don't like something offer to help, it is important that the AKSA survive, some states associations are not strong enough yet for the AKSA to become a shell. I wish I still had time to be on the committee, but I am lucky to get 1 hours kiting a week, little lone spend the needed hours to be of use to the committee.

A big well done to all AKSA committee members both previous and existing, it is a thankless and time consuming job with no perks.

My 2 cents,

JB
brooksy
brooksy
WA
498 posts
WA, 498 posts
7 Nov 2007 9:07am
Junglist, I belive the AKSA policy covers you world wide except USA/Canada. Have to read the policy to check. BKSA also does not cover you in USA/Canada. I understand this is because USA/Canada only allows domestic insurers.

Note BKSA will only cover if you are overseas for less than 30 days otherwise at the insurer's discretion. AKSA provides insurance no matter how long you are overseas.

Participant to participant is not covered by BKSA - same as AKSA.

airush geoff
airush geoff
974 posts
974 posts
7 Nov 2007 11:01am
I feel the need to put my two cents worth in...

We decided to get our South Australian association back up and running about eight months ago. Any emails to AKSA were answered promptly and thoroughly and large amounts of assistance were offered.

I personally think the job that AKSA does is important and the loss of one nationals is not their fault.

All those people who are having a say on this thread step back and ask yourselves if instead of moaning on a forum maybe you could volunteer and get involved.

There is only so much that a small group of people can do- volunteer your services and with more people more will get done, it really is that simple.

Cheers all- happy riding.
junglist
junglist
VIC
701 posts
VIC, 701 posts
7 Nov 2007 6:34pm
brooksy said...



Participant to participant is not covered by BKSA - same as AKSA.



No it is not the same! BKSA cover for personal injury whereas AKSA cover for third party only!

Cheers
Em G
Em G
NSW
5 posts
NSW, 5 posts
7 Nov 2007 7:20pm
Hi All
Well I've finally joined just so I can shed some further truths and give some news.

The AKSA committee voted that the AGM would be moved to March so as a new committee was not starting up right in the busiest part of the year. WAKSA made this same decision a year back also for good reason. So at this stage (unless the committee votes otherwise this week) the AGM will not be at Mambo. Just because it has been the past 2 years doesnt mean one can assume it will be again. It was unsuccessful both years and I personally don't believe the Mambo entrants are the essence of our membership.

The Freestyle Nationals are going ahead. It was never stated by AKSA that there was definitely not going to be one, just that there was a possibility that there may not be one. So anyway I am pleased to say the AKSA Committee voted that the group consisting of Hudson Godfrey-Smith, Bill Crang and myself are organising the 2008 Freestyle National Championships. Julian Kidd will also be assisting us. Im stoked to work with these guys and have done for various events in the past. Given my level of commitment to AKSA and the sport (which BTW I don't parktake in) and the dedication of these 3 guys, I'm sure we will put on a good show. Location and dates are still to be fully finalised but looks like 1st week of March. These details will be advised asap.

In regard to AKSA and the threads contents, this year's financials will be posted on our website on Friday along with other missing info as requested. Unfortunately the website has always been lacking for AKSA for various reasons stated by Mike earlier.

I am only a part-time Secretary for AKSA, not full-time as has been stated. I do not get paid for all my time and effort contributed to AKSA and I believe the position could easily be full-time at this time of the year. (But I am not putting my hand up) I also strongly believe that more paid people are what AKSA requires to move forward....I say this without hesitation and doubt....it is just plain commonsense for mine.

I will address all other inaccuracies and outstanding info from this thread and offer my personal view on Friday also. To say this thread is not meant to be emotional or personal is bull****. I know more than anyone how much does get done by AKSA and also how much doesnt get done by AKSA, along with having a fair idea of same about state and local associations. What pisses me off is people say things that are completely untrue. I agree some totally valid points have been raised and believe there are good things to come from this but I do not believe it was raised or posted in an ideal fashion. I also believe that one should not raise issues from major industry players if those players won't be made public...I think it sheds much doubt on the validity of the comment.

In the mean time, as has been said by some of you, ask and you will be answered.

Until Friday, try and relax. Maybe you'll get some wind to unwind and realise its not all as bad as it seems.
paulio
paulio
QLD
890 posts
QLD, 890 posts
7 Nov 2007 10:48pm
Well done by AKSA, they do more in one year than I could do in three..

For those of you that can sit back contently, and honestly say that new ground was covered and issues were clarified for yourself for the good of the sport, then be contented.

If it was motivated by business and greed then your time will come!

For those of you that 'could always do better' then your chance is coming,why not be productive and put your name in,and if someone outside the circle deals your faults on a plate, please eat them with humbleness.

As for DM,surely as for the good of the sport,and laying it all one the table,why not get the 'many' people to express their concerns here????

Your reply would be most welcome

Paul
SEQKA President

waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
7 Nov 2007 10:17pm
junglist said...

brooksy said...



Participant to participant is not covered by BKSA - same as AKSA.



No it is not the same! BKSA cover for personal injury whereas AKSA cover for third party only!

Cheers


The thing is......
AKSA sells a cheap-arse cover.
It's not worth the paper it's printed on.
It's a total scam.
lol.

Fitzy
Fitzy
QLD
617 posts
QLD, 617 posts
7 Nov 2007 11:53pm
OK 'Slave'

Here's a job for you.

I hereby nominate 'Slave' to source member to member insurance, that also covers a kiter for public liability AND personal injury whenever kiting anywhere in Australia including all sanctioned competitions for less than $30 per year.

Now there's a challenge !!

Fitzy - SEQKA Treasurer
NSW, 4382 posts
8 Nov 2007 12:58am
Well its interesting to be away for a few days being cut off from the net and the news kiting in epic conditions down at Sandy Point and come home to read this.

From my own experience I have to say that I have confidence in the current AKSA committee and Emma in particular has promptly replied to several emails I have sent this year.

Having been one of the founders of AKSA several years ago, and then serving on the committee for years until bitching business politics forced me to resign and vow never to join the committee again, it is sad to see the wheel turning full circle again. The same sad crap is happening again, and the committee is becoming the focus of complaints that seem very much to be unfounded.

The point of AKSA was always to promote the sport in a positive and safe way, and to represent the sport to the various authorities that control, our access, to the spots we love.

Our strength comes from the numbers we have, together, united, we are strong!!!
Divided, over personality and business issues and politics, we (AKSA/us) are weak and we (AKSA/us) will fail for our sport.

Without resorting to naming people who cannot defend themselves, past committee and office bearers were always kept in check by the fact that the committee behind them had INTEGRITY, and I feel that the current committee has similar strong integrity and honesty.

Running AKSA was always, and probably will always be a largely thankless task, and it seemed we were damned if we did and damned if we didn't. However that was always by people who never volunteered to get involved and help out!
Funny that eh?

This forum can be a good place to voice concerns for sure, however it would be wise to be sure of the facts before levelling criticism at a hard working bunch of volunteers, or implying they are dishonest or lacking integrity.

Personally, I disagree that it was always intended that AKSA become a shell run by the office bearers of the State Assocs, its was just one of a few ideas. Again, personally, I think we do need an AKSA Committee with all positions filled by quality people. They can be from within or without the wholesale or retail industry that is an integral part of the sport.

Its about the people, not what they do for a living.

Licensing and constant monitoring of instructors accreditation are two things that I think need to be addressed in the not too distant future if this sport is to be sustainable.

The over promotion of the sport by any sector on the industry will cause more and more congestion at your local, this is not a sport for the faint hearted and it should never be promoted in the way I see many in the industry do it.

There is a glut of brands, beach selling is rife, poorly skilled kiters are teaching their dangerous ideas to others. Bow/flat/hybrid kites are being dishonestly promoted as "super safe". The pursuit of the dollar seems to overide much common sense.

I was there at the beggining, I put down my own money to seed fund AKSA, and I drove into Sydney central and registered the Association with my own time and money.
It was started with the only motive being to preserve access for the sport and give the sport a sustainable future. Nothing about those needs has changed.
Insurance, like it or not, is critical to maintaining access!!!!!!!!!!

The work in dealing with the insurance industry alone, requires the existence of an AKSA committee. Maintaining and processing memberships is another reason.

Let the AKSA committee do their jobs, leave the Nationals and other comps to those that want to organise them.

Join up, be part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Cya and

Goodwinds

Steve
Kitehard
Kitehard
WA
2782 posts
WA, 2782 posts
7 Nov 2007 11:00pm
Hi Emma,

I'm so sorry that you feel the way you do. As I'm sure you are aware, I admire and respect you as a person and as the secretary of AKSA. My objective was not to cause personal harm. If you choose not to believe that, well I'm disappointed but I can't change the way you think.

The result is action and awareness, everyone now has a new insight into AKSA and maybe respects the Assoc a bit more for what has been done and for the hard work that has gone into it thus far. I know how thankless the task is, I've been there. I am not on a committee in WAKSA due to my current business committments. I cannot spare any productive time and therefor sit out rather than waste others time.

For Paulio,

Can you tell me what good naming names will do at this point in time? Apart from create unease, further embarrassment and more angst than what has already been created? Or is it just so you can dish out the kind of resentment I have been sent or talk and bitch about someone else. If you feel you need to bitch about someone, bitch about me.

Those persons may respond if and when they see fit but really, the outcomes have been achieved so what's the point? AKSA is more transparent, people have a greater depth of understanding of the role of AKSA and the committee members and AKSA have been reminded that they must be accountable to all members. Members shouldn't have to ask, the AKSA should not be run in a closed door secret society fashion. It is a public position and they must always be accountable.

Regardless of what you think of me, AKSA is in greater stead and the members are more informed. This is a positive outcome! Anyone who knows me, knows my intentions are honourable and knows what I stand for. Get to know me before you cast judgement.

Enough said! I have said my peace and will not keep re-iterating the same message. If you think I did this for self profit reasons of personal gain, think again, the only gain I have received is the same as every other member, greater clarity, just about balances the flak I have copped.

Good winds,

waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
7 Nov 2007 11:01pm
Fitzy said...

OK 'Slave'

Here's a job for you.

I hereby nominate 'Slave' to source member to member insurance, that also covers a kiter for public liability AND personal injury whenever kiting anywhere in Australia including all sanctioned competitions for less than $30 per year.

Now there's a challenge !!

Fitzy - SEQKA Treasurer


Why the less than $30 per year ?
Where did you pluck that number from ?

If AKSA can't deliver the proper cover, they shouldn't offer up second-rate good for nothing 'protection'.

Spacemonkey!
Spacemonkey!
SA
2288 posts
SA, 2288 posts
8 Nov 2007 12:49am
Slave' the idea of third party insurance is to keep our beaches open, not for us to claim on faulty hips. If the council knows we have third party insurance they know that if we take someone out on the beach that we can cover it and that they won't sue the council.
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
7 Nov 2007 11:32pm
Spacemonkey! said...

Slave' the idea of third party insurance is to keep our beaches open, not for us to claim on faulty hips. If the council knows we have third party insurance they know that if we take someone out on the beach that we can cover it and that they won't sue the council.



Check your policy, dude.
Look for the loophole clause.
That's the one in fineprint and headed 'negligence'.
It would be careless of you to disregard it.
lol.
gruezi
gruezi
WA
3464 posts
WA, 3464 posts
8 Nov 2007 12:43am
Thanks for the QLD numbers Fitzy; at the mom. WA is running about 330. Hear that total AKSA membership was around 1200 last year.

Agree that Slave could help out find out about insurance as he seems to have a handle on this......this whole insurance thing seems to be absolutely critical.

Has AKSA asked the membership what kind of insurance cover it would like and how much they are willing to pay?

Thanks to all of you for spending the time to help us all understand a bit more about the sport we love.
brooksy
brooksy
WA
498 posts
WA, 498 posts
8 Nov 2007 10:31am

junglist said...

brooksy said...



Participant to participant is not covered by BKSA - same as AKSA.



No it is not the same! BKSA cover for personal injury whereas AKSA cover for third party only!



BKSA does not cover member to member. This is the same as AKSA.

BKSA does say it covers personal injury (this cannot be caused by another member) to a grand total of 10,000 pounds for death, permanent loss of sight in one or both eyes, permanent los of one or more limbs and permanent total disability at an approved event only.

I'm sure Emma can comment on this but I don't believe any Australian insurance policy will offer this, you would have to have your own life or income insurance. 10,000 pounds is minimal cover anyway and only at approved events. What good would that be for you slave, you don't compete anyway?

As for slave's comments re negligence you must take all reasonable care. There is no exlcusion for negligence in the Policy or Schedule.

Slave, you are welcome to find a better policy




Fitzy
Fitzy
QLD
617 posts
QLD, 617 posts
8 Nov 2007 11:39am
Hi 'Slave'

The $30 mentioned is a "per member" amount.

The reference to $30 as a premium amount is based on the current membership fees.

AKSA fee is $65 per year per member. Of this, $35 goes to the local state association and the remaining $30 to AKSA.

With this $30 AKSA have to fund the insurance premium, forward tags to each member, pay administrative and other associated costs.

The cost of the current insurance is considerably less than $30 per member. Good value IMO !

The challenge is - Can you do better ???

Fitzy - SEQKA Treasurer
jan
jan
WA
1119 posts
jan jan
WA, 1119 posts
8 Nov 2007 11:06am
I don't think it is WAKSA (my local) / AKSA's place to be offering personal injury insurance. Surely this sort of thing you get from medibank or your life insurance company and is never something that AKSA is going to be able to be competitive providing as a service

what does frustrate me is the member to member waiver.

it kinda sucks that if i DON'T join AKSA i am in a better position if one of the out of control idiots that we are seeing more and more of hit and hurt me.

i feel like i have to weigh up the pro of indemnifying against hurting someone else on the beach against the con of waiving my rights against someone hurting me especially when it feels like i am trying to do the right thing and act responsibly on the water and look after my equipment whilst said idiots dont give a damn and ride dodgy equipment often in conditions beyond their abilities.
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
8 Nov 2007 11:39am


BKSA does say it covers personal injury

As for slave's comments re negligence you must take all reasonable care. There is no exlcusion for negligence in the Policy or Schedule.

Slave, you are welcome to find a better policy


Negligence is defined in the dictionary as carelessness.
So.....
"You must take all reasonable CARE".
Yep, that's the loophole I was referring to earlier.
Here are some examples of not taking reasonable care.
Launching a kite within 30m upwind of anybody.
Landing a kite within 30m upwind of anybody.
Land-jumping near anybody.
Heel-dragging near anybody.
Dicking-around near anybody. lol.
Standing on the beach flying a kite at 12 o'clock for freakin' ever.

Carry-on.

jjd
jjd
WA
705 posts
jjd jjd
WA, 705 posts
8 Nov 2007 3:16pm
waveslave said...



BKSA does say it covers personal injury

As for slave's comments re negligence you must take all reasonable care. There is no exlcusion for negligence in the Policy or Schedule.

Slave, you are welcome to find a better policy


Negligence is defined in the dictionary as carelessness.
So.....
"You must take all reasonable CARE".
Yep, that's the loophole I was referring to earlier.
Here are some examples of not taking reasonable care.
Launching a kite within 30m upwind of anybody.
Landing a kite within 30m upwind of anybody.
Land-jumping near anybody.
Heel-dragging near anybody.
Dicking-around near anybody. lol.
Standing on the beach flying a kite at 12 o'clock for freakin' ever.

Carry-on.




Slave,

you don't know what you are talking about.

Almost all public liability insurance policies (from the extension to your householders policy, to a broadform liability policy covering a large corporation) require the insured to take "reasonable care" whilst providing legal liability arising out of negligence.

"Reasonable care" will not encompass the situations you refer to above in most circumstances. The "reasonable care" condition must be read down having regard to what the policy covers.

I doubt you will find a policy that does not exclude the insured from taking reasonable care.

Here's a task for you. In addition to tracking down a better policy for AKSA, see if you can find a household policy that does not require the insured to "take reasonable care" (or words to that effect).

Regards
JJD
LLB
MRWHITE AKRM
MRWHITE AKRM
QLD
21 posts
QLD, 21 posts
8 Nov 2007 8:43pm
This is to you waveslave,YOU SAY THE INSURANCE IS A SCAM , ITS CHEAP ASS COVER AND ITS NOT WORTH THE PAPER ITS PRINTED ON. Well my friend you should do your home work before you comment,so far every thing you have said is untrue, if you think its funny bagging the insurance,then take up FITZYs challandge. Stop whyning and come up with some real facts. Your just stering sh##, you have stepped over the line and your talking bable, so if you have something possitive to say, then please do so, the AKSA is not a punching bag, its run by volenters. You have no idear how hard EMA worked to get the insurense we have today, your comments are ungrateful and unwelcome, i hope your going to come back with some possitive answers. HAPPY DAYS MRWHITE AKRM
dachopper
dachopper
WA
1802 posts
WA, 1802 posts
8 Nov 2007 9:28pm
I'm pretty sure AKSA have been looking at different policies to suit us the best for a while, and no right minded insurer would insure some1 for gross negligence anyway.

I have no problems paying, and in return you get insurance, membership to a club, the right to vote for who runs it, council support if needed, and shell organisation of national level events and there may be a dvd in the future, and through your state association you get the right to spend the rest of the money on local stuff that you participate in, and if you want something in particular, become a member of the local club or group and ask for state funding?

Because AKSA is volunteer run, and it's nature requires the people running it to have a good idea on the sport, it lends itself to the fact that most of the time, shop owners, school instructors etc.... will end up on the committee. Some people will call it a conflict of interest but really.... if no-one else puts their hands up to do volunteer stuff then what do you expect? it's that or nothing.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply