quote:
Originally posted by Kitepower Australia
The big problem for foil kites in light wind is that they need airflow and the subsequent airpressure inside the kite, to maintain the kites profile and stability, otherwise all foils will tip fold as soons as the wing speed drops near the edge of the window. A skillful pilot can get better bottom end and keep the kite out of the water, than one less experienced for sure, but I would still prefer a Contra 17M or my SB16 for absolute lightest possible conditions.
Steve, you make it sound as if foils have problems in light wind. If there is any area where foils are better than LEI's (though perhaps the lightwind bows have caught up) it in light stuff. They are lighter than tube kites and less likely to drop from the sky in lulls. Also easy to relaunch in very light wind. Anyone that's dropped their huge LEI in a lull and been unable to relaunch in the light wind will appreciate this.
I only compared the Speed to the Ozone Razor because it's the second highest aspect foil I've flown, 3.9 to Speed's 5.9.
quote:
Originally posted by Kitepower Australia
Botany Bay locals will back me up when I say that under 10-12knots the wind meters around the bay are not accurate, we always take off a few knots for real wind strengths.
So when you say 6-7 knots you mean when the BOM says 9-10?
quote:
Originally posted by Kitepower Australia
There is a guy here in Sydney with a big Flysurfer, it has similar bottom end to the SB16 or CB16, when he is using his big board. But it does not turn anywhere near as well as the two tube kites I mentioned, or the legendary 20M R2, or R4. Its ok for straight line cruising
I hope I get a chance to compare the Speed 17 and Contra 17 sometime, maybe we could have a little lightwind challenge?