help put an end to climate change

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
da vecta
da vecta
QLD
2515 posts
QLD, 2515 posts
30 Oct 2006 5:20pm
If you haven't already, log onto this site and help put an end to climate change. (we have all talked about it)

They are aiming for a record-breaking target of 250,000 people to help create a groundswell for change in every electorate across the country.

Its easy and in just a few clicks you get to see your number come up in your location.


http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/ClimateActionNow

Thanks Da Vecta
sleek1
sleek1
VIC
672 posts
VIC, 672 posts
30 Oct 2006 7:00pm
climate change equals more wind and vic wont be so bloody cold. bring on the greenhouse gasses. bring back leaded engines and everyone go cut a tree down for humanity
ran
ran
VIC
333 posts
ran ran
VIC, 333 posts
30 Oct 2006 7:44pm
ending climate change is all well and good but really is it going to happen??? Will you stop driving a car, will you give up the way of life you have now, signing up to a website and not using plastic bags just isnt going to cut it. Hey we kiteboard at least thats not too bad, well besides manufacturing the gear and driving to the beach..lol
We are ****ed i think, we might slow it down but we have done the damage, im all for trying to fix it, ill do my best to come on board but until the big blokes sitting in those big buildings making all the rules change we are gonna be screwed. JMO
LookUp
LookUp
WA
124 posts
WA, 124 posts
30 Oct 2006 5:08pm
Change starts from the bottom - we are the consumers, it is our decisions that influence the 'big blokes'. If you feel you need a 4x4 to go shopping and get your kite gear to the beach, then you are just playing into their hands. Every small thing you can do (or don't do) can make a difference, so why not do it? If you saw a bleeding man in the street, would you also say 'oh he's screwed, I'm not doing anything' - I doubt it. You'd find something to stop the flow. Same with your world - don't just walk on by. Be something in your life, make a difference. Or you could just sit back and, get old and let it all go to **** - including yourselves.
matto
matto
VIC
210 posts
VIC, 210 posts
30 Oct 2006 10:13pm
Nup, I am with Ran on this one.

Classic example - these stupid water restrictions we are all going through. Do you think the big boys are hvaing water restrictions - NOT LIKELY. The power stations are still using our "PRECIOUS" water to cool their cooling towers, when they should ahve been the first across to "grey water". The same obviously goes for the citylink tunnel, which pumps megalitres through in minutes.

Until change happens from the top their is no point, and that isnt going to happen because big business has big money to lobby the gov't about why they shoudlnt change their ways.
ran
ran
VIC
333 posts
ran ran
VIC, 333 posts
31 Oct 2006 7:37am
lookup im not saying dont do anything, im just saying face reality. As i said im all for fixing it, and trying to make a difference. Your example of a bleeding man is kinda off the mark, anyway we are on the same page for the most part. Sure we little poeple can make a change, but really ARE we????
peanuticus
peanuticus
NSW
341 posts
NSW, 341 posts
31 Oct 2006 9:27am
for those that can read go and get yourself a copy of a book called 'The Weather Makers' that will wake up any one who is in doubt.

Its a great read, lots of long words and stuff but don't let that put you off. it will show you the certian governments (aus) are total muppets when it comes to CO2 emissions.. Yes everyone can help towards slowing down climate change, don't think about yourselves think about your kiddies and grand kiddies! that is if any of us can still have kids after the nut slammers that you get kiting!
silviu
silviu
VIC
663 posts
VIC, 663 posts
31 Oct 2006 8:13pm
quote:
Originally posted by sleek1

climate change equals more wind and vic wont be so bloody cold. bring on the greenhouse gasses. bring back leaded engines and everyone go cut a tree down for humanity


And some gas masks as well.
How selfish, are you really a kitesurfer?
dan OK?
dan OK?
VIC
253 posts
VIC, 253 posts
31 Oct 2006 8:23pm
quote:
Originally posted by peanuticus

for those that can read go and get yourself a copy of a book called 'The Weather Makers' that will wake up any one who is in doubt.

Its a great read, lots of long words and stuff but don't let that put you off. it will show you the certian governments (aus) are total muppets when it comes to CO2 emissions.. Yes everyone can help towards slowing down climate change, don't think about yourselves think about your kiddies and grand kiddies! that is if any of us can still have kids after the nut slammers that you get kiting!



Balls! I saw a film once which had a big gorilla in it climbing the empire state building. No big words though.
Dont believe it just cause they want you to! The non chicken little scientists are just accepting that yes the average temperature is up a little since they started keeping records, because on a planetery time scale we are still coming out of an ice age.
31 Oct 2006 6:06pm
To add to debate re recorded temperature change.

Saw a show on kn SBS once that basicall went through and debunked the planks on which the supporter of rapid climate change rely on. Can't remember them all, but here are two:

1) Increased Recorded Temperatures - of course recorded temperatures are rapidly rising. Urban areas are a conglomerate of bitumin, buildings, etc with very little vegetation. Such areas trap more heat. Where is temperature largely recorded? - in the middle of cities that have rapidly grown over the past 50 years. An example was given of large temperature change in Las Vegas (nothing more than a small village 50 years ago) as compared to a nearby town that had not grown at all where the measured temperature has largely remained the same
2) observed changes in the level of the sea in Pacific - argues that the sea has not risen as these islands are actually sinking.

Although the show did not conclude Greenhouse is rubbish, it argued that the forecast changes are not as severe as the climate "expects" are otherwise making out. It argues that proponents of Greenhouse are rewarded by government funding, sale of books, etc, and gave examples. Further (which seems to be the problem in kn America - the land of free speech - not), you will be a pariah if you dare to argue against Greenhouse (like will probably happen on this Forum).

So kn there


bondo
bondo
QLD
699 posts
QLD, 699 posts
31 Oct 2006 9:01pm
I hereby pledge to stop eating baked beans.
azza
azza
1338 posts
1338 posts
1 Nov 2006 2:03am
quote:
Originally posted by bondo

I hereby pledge to stop eating baked beans.



But you'll starve to death... you can't cook anything else.
peanuticus
peanuticus
NSW
341 posts
NSW, 341 posts
1 Nov 2006 7:34am
Ahh, all comments from people who have not actually read the book. IF you had then you'd realise that its a view from the fence from both sides of the arguement, but also if you had read the book you'd know there is more to it than just warmer temperatures. And yes there is already proof that things are happening, ignoring it and saying that a bunch of scientists are wrong isn't going to help now is it.
GreenPat
GreenPat
QLD
4107 posts
QLD, 4107 posts
1 Nov 2006 2:51pm
To those who say that it means f-all on the geological time scale, so do humans. If we all die the earth will still be here, but that doesn't help us.

It sounds to me like a whole lot of you are sticking your heads in the sand because you don't want things to have to change. Ok so what if it is a load of malarky? What if it isn't? Can you be sure either way? So wouldn't it to be best to err on the side of caution and try and reduce carbon emissions anyway. Does it hurt to put your name down on a website saying you're concerned? I have done it and I haven't recieved any hassles, no spam or anything like that.

And then if you think there might be something to it you can start riding your bicycle to work or catching public transport, the bicycle idea having added benefit for your health as well.

If there is global warming going on we don't want too many of those days that get so hot they cancel the Doctor's visits. That's my biggest concern (apart from lack of food and water because of drought). The Perth season better still turn it on, otherwise I'm moving there for nothing...
sleek1
sleek1
VIC
672 posts
VIC, 672 posts
1 Nov 2006 6:09pm
quote:
Originally posted by silviu

quote:
Originally posted by sleek1

climate change equals more wind and vic wont be so bloody cold. bring on the greenhouse gasses. bring back leaded engines and everyone go cut a tree down for humanity


And some gas masks as well.
How selfish, are you really a kitesurfer?


how long u been in australia for ? a week? if you dont like my humour dont read my posts ole fart.
waveslave
waveslave
WA
4263 posts
WA, 4263 posts
1 Nov 2006 3:58pm
If the climate changes back to an ice-age,
we now know how to fix that.
Just chop down all the trees and pump gases into the sky.
Easy.
Globe warms up nicely.
silviu
silviu
VIC
663 posts
VIC, 663 posts
1 Nov 2006 7:51pm
quote:
Originally posted by sleek1

quote:
Originally posted by silviu

quote:
Originally posted by sleek1

climate change equals more wind and vic wont be so bloody cold. bring on the greenhouse gasses. bring back leaded engines and everyone go cut a tree down for humanity


And some gas masks as well.
How selfish, are you really a kitesurfer?


how long u been in australia for ? a week? if you dont like my humour dont read my posts ole fart.



Now I know for sure
dan OK?
dan OK?
VIC
253 posts
VIC, 253 posts
1 Nov 2006 8:13pm
Scientists are people!
People believe all sorts of bull!
Half of everyone on this planet thinks there's a God!
Scientists actually say they have proof there is a god.
They might even write a book.
If it makes it to a book then thats it its all over!
Someone will read that book and take that as proof!

GreenPat
GreenPat
QLD
4107 posts
QLD, 4107 posts
1 Nov 2006 7:54pm
Ok then, rather than trying to prove that there is global warming, since you won't believe it, you prove to me that there isn't.

head in sand, head in sand....
dan OK?
dan OK?
VIC
253 posts
VIC, 253 posts
1 Nov 2006 9:41pm
Ok, I have Scientists so it must be real.
Phillip Stott, London university proffessor of biogeography.

"we had a medievil warm period from 800 to 1300 followed by a little ice age until around 1900". "during the medievil warm period the world was warmer than it is today".

I found this in a book, It must be true!
2 Nov 2006 7:11am
you are never going to kn convince GREENpat!
bondo
bondo
QLD
699 posts
QLD, 699 posts
2 Nov 2006 11:07am
quote:
Originally posted by GreenPat

Ok then, rather than trying to prove that there is global warming, since you won't believe it, you prove to me that there isn't.

head in sand, head in sand....



when sensationalist claims are made the burden of proof is on the claimer.

head up arse, head up arse....
getfunky
getfunky
WA
4485 posts
WA, 4485 posts
2 Nov 2006 3:09pm
For the last election Rachael Seiwart (Perth Greens candidate) gave me a very simple and succinct bumper sticker that read:
GIVE A S**T - VOTE GREEN

Unfortunately it lasted less than one day as some fossil fuel lovin redkneck ripped it away from my windscreen in front of my house!!!

Boy some people just love the taste of carbon I spose????

Anyway giving the afore mentioned motion is better than "oh well it really is too big for little old me to do anything about.... so I'll just keep doin burn outs in my f**k off big shiny 4wd that never even goes up a curb let alone near bush"

PS I reckon most 4wd owners buy one because they don't know what a decent bush looks like anyhoo
junglist
junglist
VIC
701 posts
VIC, 701 posts
2 Nov 2006 6:21pm
Ah yes the good old Ice Age theory.

I like this one.

I don't suppose it matters much that the 'experts' behind this 'theory' are funded by Exxon now does it?

No, not at all
junglist
junglist
VIC
701 posts
VIC, 701 posts
2 Nov 2006 6:36pm
For those that are interested:

www.theguardian.com/environment/2006/sep/19/ethicalliving.g2
dan OK?
dan OK?
VIC
253 posts
VIC, 253 posts
2 Nov 2006 10:23pm
quote:
Originally posted by junglist

Ah yes the good old Ice Age theory.

I like this one.

I don't suppose it matters much that the 'experts' behind this 'theory' are funded by Exxon now does it?

No, not at all



Probably then that can be my last point (bored now!)

You have a scientist who supports you.
I have a scientist who supports me.
You can spend forever discrediting me and mine and vice versa.

Why not throw all of your energies behind some of the worlds real problems. The ones that dont need to be argued because, they just are!
Try poverty,aids,racial inequality, terrorism,north korea and a real nuclear threat coming from a rogue country with a military of over a million.
We dont need 'hippies' making up problems for this world, we got plenty!



GreenPat
GreenPat
QLD
4107 posts
QLD, 4107 posts
3 Nov 2006 1:41am
quote:
Originally posted by bondo



when sensationalist claims are made the burden of proof is on the claimer.

head up arse, head up arse....



Proof has been offered in many forms, including the book 'The Weather Makers' and the documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth'. But since you insist on discrediting these sources so that you can feel like there's nothing wrong and we don't have to make any effort to fix things then there's no point saying anything else is there? No matter what evidence is offered you will deny it. So there's really no point me typing anything else is there?

I wonder what the accepted truth will be ten years from now?

And yeah, I am a bit of a greenie I suppose , possibly the only greenie mining engineer around. I even have two green kites...
bondo
bondo
QLD
699 posts
QLD, 699 posts
3 Nov 2006 9:45am
except I never actually said any of those things - you just assumed that is what I believe. Your attitude is typical of global warmening fanatics, as is the vilification of scientists that present alternative views based on their reputation or funding. Typically in science the results of research is presented along with the methodology that produced the results, meaning the study can be conducted by other parties to confirm or discredit the result. The new climate science method is to ignore both the result and the methodology if it doesn't confirm the warmening trend and vilify the scientists by discrediting them personally or tracing the funding back to big oil or other nefarious groups. In the long run this will not help us understand our climate, which is a more complex system than is being presented to us by the media, and it will be bad for science as a whole. But hey, you've read the weather makers and watched Big-Als movie, so I guess they are the final conclusive words on the topic.

Also - Its pretty funny that you're a mining engineer, and you're lecturing people about the environment. You'd fit in well with all the pseudo greenies that spend two hours in traffic getting to and from their office every day.
sinker
sinker
WA
255 posts
WA, 255 posts
3 Nov 2006 8:04am

FOR GOD'S SAKE...

The debate about wether or not climate change is actually happening was over 5 years ago. There's no longer any serious argument against it.


I can't believe people are quite willing to expend the energy and time to reply to this forum just to make the point that they can't be bothered to support this campaign....

Read this:

http://www.abc.net.au/southwestvic/stories/s1737971.htm
GalahOnTheBay
GalahOnTheBay
NSW
4188 posts
NSW, 4188 posts
3 Nov 2006 11:37am
In the words of a good friend of mine...

Folks, Id like to sing a song about the Australian Dream
About me, about you
About the way our Australian hearts beat way down in the bottom of our chests
About that special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts
Maybe below the cockles,
Maybe in the sub cockle area,
Maybe in the liver, maybe in the kidneys,
Maybe even in the colon, we dont know

Im just a regular Paul, with a regular job
Im your average white, suburbanised slob
I like kitesurfing and porno and books about porn
I got an average house, with a dodgy carpet floor
My wife and my job, my kids and my car
My feet on my table, and a Jamaican "cigar"

But sometimes that just aint enough to keep a man like me interested
(oh no, no way, uh uh)
No I gotta go out and have fun at someone elses expense
(woah yeah, yeah yeah, yeah yeah yeah)
I kite really slow in the ultra flat water
While people behind me are going insane

Im an ass**** (hes an ass**** ,what an ass**** )
Im an ass**** (hes an ass**** , such an ass**** )

I use public beaches and I leave my lines out
I walk around in the summer time saying "where's the north easterly?"

Im an ass**** (hes an ass**** ,what an ass**** )
Im an ass**** (hes the worlds biggest ass**** )

Sometimes I kite in windsurfer spaces
While windsurfer people make windsurfer faces

Im an ass**** (hes an ass**** ,what an ass**** )
Im an ass**** (hes a real freaking ass**** )

Maybe I shouldnt be singing this song
Ranting and raving and carrying on
Maybe theyre right when they tell me Im wrong...
Nah


you get the point...
sinker
sinker
WA
255 posts
WA, 255 posts
3 Nov 2006 10:27am
Hi Bondo,

The Australian "Keeping the Nation informed"?

The article you have linked to is written by somebody, who, like you, wants to sound like they are better informed than the majority of the worlds scientific community.

The article is inspired by the work of Mr Bjørn Lomborg who is a Danish political scientist and author of a book called "The Skeptical Environmentalist" (which has kept him in sild since it's publication).

"..I wish I could conclude by saying that Lomborg's book has had some benefit to science, perhaps by way of emphasizing the need for robustness in modeling, or the need for critical evaluation of data. As it happens, those already are central tenets of scientific inquiry, as they have been throughout the history of environmental debate. All that Lomborg has accomplished is to try, without much success, to expose the soft underbelly of science. That underbelly is the uncertainty that invariably accompanies the initial investigations of natural and physical phenomena. That's why the study of problems like global warming is so easy to attack. There is now general consensus that global warming is a genuine phenomenon, but the uncertainty among studies as to its scope and speed provide more than enough ammunition for those determined to seek weaknesses in the arguments, and thus dither away while the problem intensifies. "

Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply