MORUYA HEADS said...
Hmmm..
Perhaps a % of membership $ to AKSA should dedicated to an Australian system being set up ?
As we should be able to stand on our own feet, and not have to make use of a OS scam organisation such as IKO.
AKSA aware of this and finger on the pulse should be doing something about ASAP.. as they are the ones pushing for us all to be insured every year and to practice safe kiting !
I'm sure you mean well, however your comments come across as a bit "out of touch" with the reality of our sports current situation.
Pointing the finger at AKSA (which is actually run by a bunch of fellow kiters with full time jobs careers and families), is just not going to add anything useful to this discussion.
AKSA promotes the idea of safe kiting for sure, however it is YOU that must practice safe kiting (you includes everyone that kites).
Insurance is actually about being responsible sports people and maintaining access to kiting spots, its not about have a get out of jail card that allows you to kite like a jerk.
Membership of AKSA (are you actually a member??) is the single most important thing that anyone that kites can do to help preserve access to kiting spots. A large membership base is what gets us respect in the general community we all live in. Size and numbers is that counts as the most important thing in determining who gets to do what and where. Look at what WAKSA achieved in Mullaloo, Perth recently!!
Setting up an Australian Kitesurfing Instructors Association, under AKSA, should happen, and is needed for sure. AKSA should draw on the knowledge base of the pioneers of our sport to help formulate a training standard, etc.
Before any of that can happen though some individuals will need to step up and be prepared to create the AKIA or whatever it might be called.
AKIA will not happen by complaining about AKSA or by pointing the finger at the volunteers who have guided the organisation to where it is today.
Regardless of my personal thoughts about IKO, the fact is that it is irrelevant in Australia. IKO Insurance was never recognised by Councils that gave instructors permits to operate. IKO has no legal jurisdiction here, they have no office or staff here IKO have no idea of the needs of instructors here in Australia, and the systems they have to control instructors are unfair, appear to be primarily based on IKO income needs and open to rorting as has been seen in Australia and overseas. IKO do not expend any of the income they collect from instructors and students back into the sport, and that would be the biggest criticism that I've heard leveled at the IKO.
Setting up an AKIA will not be easy, Darren Marshall, Mike Walker, Jon Ashmore and many others have discussed it at length. The work required is massive, and the head of AKIA really should be a paid position and possibly with a paid secretary too. AKSA is preparing itself to be elligible for government funding, and together with its current bank assets (and a levy applied to each State Assoc too) it should be in a position to hire a person to head up an AKIA, soon, hopefully?
Register your interest with your State assoc, become a member of your State Assoc, get hooked up with other like minded people and start working on the things that matter, not just wasting time writing stuff on the splinterweb.
I'd be willing to lend a hand when needed.