JB, and many others - well said!
My own thoughts are that a kitesurfing event should be judged by kitesurfers, not surf comp judges.
The best competitor should win, and equipment choice should be at the sole discretion of the competitor, to suit prevailing conditions, and not to suit the bias or scores weighting of the non kiting judging panel.
This concept of non kiting judges is a misguided, and calculated attempt by a minority group, to appeal to the huge mass of surfers, in a lame attempt to get cred and magazine coverage. Maybe its even being pushed by some industry insiders to capture a new potential market of surfers.????
Reminds me of the scheming and collusive "one trick wins it" wakeboard bias at previous comps - aimed at getting wakeboarders into our sport.
Non kiting judges is a strange concept to say the least. Should we suggest to the ASA that the next Bells Classic and all surfing events be judged by non surfers?
Do you think they might take us seriously?

This concept makes a mockery of all of us, it basically says to us kiters we are not good enough to judge our own events.
Kitesurfing is about kites AND boards, on waves. Strapped riders should not be penalised.
Unstrapped riders are trying to keep a level playing field, but in the process will have created an unfair biased system that has no cred with the majority of kiters.
If enough kiters want an unstrapped event, make one, and make it so that only unstrapped riders can compete.
This is similar to surfing where they have say, lonboard events.
But surfers would not be so dumb as to allow a vocal few to change the rules to allow guys on shortboards to enter and weight the judging to favour them, and then have the comp judged by blue haired ballroom dancing judges.
We are kitesurfers, lets have kitesurfing events.
Cya and
Good WINDS and waves
Steve