"Class 6" rules

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
20 May 2009 4:34pm
kiwi307 said...

Ai I was the one who asked the VERY INNOCENT QUESTION I feel that I must apologise for the hornets nest which I appear to have poked with a stick.
Please please again, let's not get caught up in this as sailors, somehow agree on something and let's get on with it! BTW mine is about 1/2 built would comply with NZ 6, LLmini, but what has been shown on this site for Mini and the "latest 6, frankly, I don't care, it's got way out of hand, and doing the sport no good at all.
Again, sorry for having raised this originally. After close on 40 years around the sport I am very saddened by this outcome. Perhaps the slowness of letters was a good thing, gave time for people to think before they sprang into public debate?


2 things:

Firstly I want to see pictures of your build!

Secondly I was going to say I think this debate is going well! You should have seen some of the sh|+fights that went on here in the early days. I think we've progressed well as an online community.

kiwi307
kiwi307
488 posts
488 posts
20 May 2009 5:07pm
Ok 2 things,
The build progressed last night, then the latest round of "rules" caused me to re-think quite a bit! I take it that the consensus will be the Mini as posted, so I am happy to worrk with that. It means a few of my "rule stretches" will be discarded, but so be it, doesn't bother me. I will build them for my own interest, one day!
The rig is totally discarded! The platform(trolley) will fit LL mini specs, Class 6 seems to be a dead duck so, let's get on with it.
If the apparent consensus is an agreed position, I am happy, I don't agree with it all, but I can happily work within it. If I stimulated this I suppose something has been achieved, even if it looked a bit ugly for a while!
Clem, I have sent you an email re the ratios, I hope this helps your thinking.
Hiko
Hiko
1229 posts
1229 posts
20 May 2009 5:14pm
Like hills I think its been a good discussion
I for one have got a lot out of it
Where else would you get this? nowhere I know of
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
20 May 2009 7:01pm
My thoughts on the size in my design book at the moment is a LLMini size chassis, which would fit into Mini3 with a small sail or Mini2 with a larger sail.
At least this size you are equal to the blokart, and "Landyacht" and "cisco" need some rivalry from SA.
I couldn't see much point in building a Mini of similar size to a class5, If you wanted a yacht that size for racing at least class 5 has got the the numbers.
boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
20 May 2009 10:46pm
cisco said...

Gizmo said...

Rules???
So cisco, you might like to answer your own question ...

I would like to challenge that and say that a blokart with the POD skin fitted but not the perspex screen over the top WILL be compliant with the "class 6" rule.

In conjunction with class6 rules perhaps ask yourself why do I want to push the limits?


I am a minimalist when it comes to rules. But the old adage "It doesn't matter what the rules are, but it does matter that one knows what they are." still holds true.

If a person was to turn up at a race being run as a class 6 race with a blokart fitted with pod but no screen and was challenged by the scrutineer concerning the pod, it is argueable that the pod does not form a covering over the pilot and would have to be allowed.




Hey Cisco
i think you need to read the ALSA Mini rules regarding Blokart Pods.

Pay special attention to rule 9.

I have sailed a Blokart for over 5 years and there would be no human in the world that could touch the ground with their feet with the Pod side skirts on.

Maybe the could cut holes in them !!!!!!!!!!

ALSA Mini Rules




cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
20 May 2009 11:45pm
You are referring to Mini Rules. I am referring to class 6 rules. It is generally known on the forum that the class 6 rules as written by Brian Reynolds in 1985 are still current within ALSA.

If ALSA has changed that in the last couple of months it would probably be a good idea for ALSA to communicate this to the wider land sailing community that generally shares news and views on this forum.

ALSA communicating with the wider land sailing community via this forum, as foriegn an idea as it seems to be to the ALSA Committee, could have the unexpected benefit of precipitating an increase of membership numbers in ALSA affiliated land sailing clubs.

If, contrary to the stated aims of ALSA in it's constitution, the committee does not want an increase in affiliate members, it should signal that by continueing it's silence on and absence from this forum. Cheers Cisco
BeeGee
BeeGee
VIC
99 posts
VIC, 99 posts
20 May 2009 11:50pm
If I can add my two cents worth to this blokart pod vs Class 6 rules discussion, the best I can make out is that the intent of the rule is not to have something that "traps the pilot". A very laudable goal, but rather than stating the actual requirement, the rule describes one of the things that *could* cause the problem. The issue is that under the rule, you could have some sort of brace or bracket that does trap the pilot and that would be legal, yet the blokart pod that does not impact a pilot's egress in any way is banned.

If the intention is not to trap the pilot, then say so. For example, specify the clearance necessary to allow someone to get out of the vehicle. If the intention is not to allow aerodynamic enhancements to improve speed, then sure, ban coverings. As it stands, the rule and its justification do not line up.

Clinton does raise a good point. It is not possible to put your feet out in a blokart with a pod. This prevents one major potential for injury, making the pod a contributor to safety. I wince every time I see someone in a production blokart stick their foot out to 'scoot'.
boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
21 May 2009 12:16am
CISCO

Why refer to rules that where made in the 1980's, It is 2009.
There is no such official class listed on FISLY or in Australia, New Zealand or the USA.

Are you not going to enter the 2010 Australian championships because there is no so called class 6 section?

Do you not want to compete against international sailors at the Pacrims because ALSA is using Mini Rules and not class 6?

The Mini land yacht rules are set by ALSA and if you where a member of an affiliated club and ALSA you would know of these rules. The Lefroy mini you built fits into these mini rules, So whats your problem?

And YES I am not a member of a club or ALSA (I will be soon) but I do support their Mini Rules and YES I will be competing in a MINI.

As for ALSA not communicating on this public forum, it is made up from delegates from each affiliated club. If you want information speak to your delegate.

All this negativity is dragging the sport down and making the world laugh at us, get into the present and stop referring to class 6. IT DOES NOT EXSIST.
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
21 May 2009 2:17am


This Mini Class Rule is flawed to billieo. Is it a set of rules for Mini Yachts or a mini set of rules??

If the pilot's weight is to be included in the minimum weight of the yacht a more definitive rule on ballast needs to go with it, ie type and placement.

Clause 9 states that the pilots feet must be able to touch the ground. Why?? So that the pilot can perform instant acrobatics throwing their feet behind their head with no physical effort on their part??? Or maybe we are trying to support the medical fraternity with a flood of broken ankles???

If an insurance risk assessor with any understanding of the dynamics of a land yacht were to read this rule he would pull the plug on the risk undertaking quick as a wink.

The pilots feet NOT being able to touch the ground is a core safety requirement of the class5 rule. With Mini Yachts we are talking about 50-70 kmh in moderate conditions with capabilities of 100 kmh plus in stronger conditions. Would you stick your leg out of a car door at 20 or even 10 kmh???

Why do blokarts have leg restraining straps fitted??? Certainly not because they look sexy.

Further, this rule is fractured. You have a Mini class 1,2 and 3.

The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule.
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule.
The class 2 is a limited class 5.
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6.

Would I race a yacht under this "Mini Class Rule"??? There is about as much chance of that happening as there is for a snowflake in hell.

The "Australian Class 6 Rule" does exist and it was written in 1985 by a very intelligent and forward thinking person who saw a gap in the market place for a more portable and user friendly yacht for ladies and children without restricting the development of go fast yachts. This was done before the advent of most of the commercially built yachts we see today.

If ALSA will not encompass or endorse the "Australian Class 6 Rule", that is their problem and loss of potential new affiliate members.


I am not posting "negativity". I post positive comments about how to fix flaws that I see.

The world is not laughing at us. The world sees what is going on here for what it is, a discussion of a difference of opinion between a supposedly authoritarian faction and the independants.
Cheers Cisco
niaychi
niaychi
97 posts
97 posts
21 May 2009 12:00pm
cisco said...

You are referring to Mini Rules. I am referring to class 6 rules. It is generally known on the forum that the class 6 rules as written by Brian Reynolds in 1985 are still current within ALSA.

If ALSA has changed that in the last couple of months it would probably be a good idea for ALSA to communicate this to the wider land sailing community that generally shares news and views on this forum.

ALSA communicating with the wider land sailing community via this forum, as foriegn an idea as it seems to be to the ALSA Committee, could have the unexpected benefit of precipitating an increase of membership numbers in ALSA affiliated land sailing clubs.

If, contrary to the stated aims of ALSA in it's constitution, the committee does not want an increase in affiliate members, it should signal that by continueing it's silence on and absence from this forum. Cheers Cisco

As a member of ALSA i am getting peeved of your continued attacks on the association,the workings of the association are there for the members and they dont have to publish any of the committee decisions to the general public.
I have not for example seen the water sailing national body on this forum telling us what is going on,so why should ALSA.
You seem to have a lot to say about how it should be run ,well join a club get on the committee
How do know if the class 6 rules are still valid,maybe they have been replaced by the new Mini rules.
If i was a delegate for my club i would not be very happy about some of the comments that have been posted in this forum as there are some precious princesses making noise about the way things have been done, if it has been done by the rules tuff .
boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
21 May 2009 2:26pm
Hey Cisco
Do you sail a Blokart?
Dont they have weight class for there pilots?

its is a minimum weight not a maximum weight.
If we sail in a Mini class 3 and you weigh 98ks including yacht and
I weigh 125ks including yacht who do you think would be faster.

So adding the pilots weight to the overall is a bad thing?

you say these rules are flawed they are not, its is just people like you on your high horse
trying to keep landsailing in the dark ages

Brians 1985 Australian only class 6 rules fit under the new MINI RULES

Your statements:
The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule. So all home made yachts are out
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 2 is a limited class 5. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6. Again all home made yachts are out

Wake up man...stop canning rules and enjoy sailing
trumpy
trumpy
QLD
27 posts
QLD, 27 posts
21 May 2009 2:41pm
Gizmo said...

Here is a few snipits from the blokart manual
blokart.com/

and with just these you can assume from these they hold little or no liability







Hi Gizmo

In Reply to the above!!!

As distributors for blokarts in Australia we hold a $20 million dollar Products Liability Insurance Policy, blokart International in NZ also hold a $20 million dollar Products Liablity Cover, in short this means, in the event of an accident and it's due cause is product failure then our insurer is liable, a comforting factor for all parties concerned.
Without Product Liabilty Cover you would be personally liable and under Australia's Litigation laws that could become extremely expensive.

This type of cover isn't something that you just buy off the shelf, Underwriters want to see product history, manufacturing programes, etc etc, ensuring that there backing is in the right place.

Just to clarify, all blokart products are stress tested before going to the market, and from an Insurers point of veiw, we would be crazy and totally irresponsoble to do otherwise

Like it or not, Liability Insurance Cover play's an extremely big part in today's society,

Cheers
Phil
cisco
cisco
QLD
12365 posts
QLD, 12365 posts
21 May 2009 3:01pm
boogie said...


Your statements:
The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule. So all home made yachts are out
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 2 is a limited class 5. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6. Again all home made yachts are out

Wake up man...stop canning rules and enjoy sailing


Again all home made yachts are out

I don't know how you deduced that from what I said. But it does look like it is going that way.

If the rules are not allowed to be questioned, that is tyranny or despotism and I will not be part of that.

boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
21 May 2009 4:53pm
cisco said...

boogie said...


Your statements:
The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule. So all home made yachts are out
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 2 is a limited class 5. Again all home made yachts are out
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6. Again all home made yachts are out

Wake up man...stop canning rules and enjoy sailing


Again all home made yachts are out

I don't know how you deduced that from what I said. But it does look like it is going that way.

If the rules are not allowed to be questioned, that is tyranny or despotism and I will not be part of that.




### Edited by admin - personal insult removed###

Again I will quote you from an earlier CISCO Post:
The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule.
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule.
The class 2 is a limited class 5.
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6.

You (CISCO) are telling the world that you do not want these rules or home made landyachts sailing at ALSA events.

Again I will justify the rules to you.
These mini rules cover ALL MINI landyachts whether homemade or commercially available.

You have all the rights in the world to question the rules if
You are a member of an Affiliated club and an ALSA member.



boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
21 May 2009 5:00pm
I would like to apologize to the ALSA committee regarding these discussions.

I believe that landsailing will grow in this country and be better than it's early hayday.

It gets my back up when non members of any association or club start posting stupid comments
and making out that they are greatest thing since sliced bread.

Again I apologize and lets get sailing

Clinton
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
21 May 2009 4:49pm
boogie said...

The Mini land yacht rules are set by ALSA and if you where a member of an affiliated club and ALSA you would know of these rules. The Lefroy mini you built fits into these mini rules, So whats your problem?

And YES I am not a member of a club or ALSA (I will be soon) but I do support their Mini Rules and YES I will be competing in a MINI.

As for ALSA not communicating on this public forum, it is made up from delegates from each affiliated club. If you want information speak to your delegate.

All this negativity is dragging the sport down and making the world laugh at us, get into the present and stop referring to class 6. IT DOES NOT EXSIST.

boogie.. your not a member of ALSA and yet you seem to be their spokesperson (Oh fool you!!)
And if your not a member how did you get the information? and how do you actually know its correct?

cisco said...

The "Australian Class 6 Rule" does exist and it was written in 1985 by a very intelligent and forward thinking person who saw a gap in the market place for a more portable and user friendly yacht for ladies and children without restricting the development of go fast yachts. This was done before the advent of most of the commercially built yachts we see today.


Thanks for the compliment cisco, all i tried to do at the time was to provide a framework to support an encourage new people coming into the sport.

niaychi said...
As a member of ALSA i am getting peeved of your continued attacks on the association,the workings of the association are there for the members and they dont have to publish any of the committee decisions to the general public.
I have not for example seen the water sailing national body on this forum telling us what is going on,so why should ALSA.
You seem to have a lot to say about how it should be run ,well join a club get on the committee
How do know if the class 6 rules are still valid,maybe they have been replaced by the new Mini rules.
If i was a delegate for my club i would not be very happy about some of the comments that have been posted in this forum as there are some precious princesses making noise about the way things have been done, if it has been done by the rules tuff .



niaychi, Who are you?
you say you are a member but you have not said on your profile actually who you are?
and how do we know your not just a stooge stirring the pot?
And the reason that the water sailing national body doesnt communicate on the forum is they actually act as a professional body should, they have a web site for ALL to see....
http://www.yachting.org.au/ Does ALSA????... no!!!

boogie said...

Brians 1985 Australian only class 6 rules fit under the new MINI RULES


Could you please explain how the "Sandpiper" yacht fits into the new mini rules?
you will find a pic in the register... And it does fit into class6 rules!!!

boogie said...

I would like to apologize to the ALSA committee regarding these discussions.

I believe that landsailing will grow in this country and be better than it's early hayday.

It gets my back up when non members of any association or club start posting stupid comments
and making out that they are greatest thing since sliced bread.

Again I apologize and lets get sailing

Clinton


And you should!!!!
Aren't you a "non member of an association or club posting stupid comments" ......
as i said (Oh fool you!!)



Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
21 May 2009 4:55pm
trumpy said...

Just to clarify, all blokart products are stress tested before going to the market, and from an Insurers point of veiw, we would be crazy and totally irresponsoble to do otherwise

Cheers
Phil


Did I hear correct the a few years ago that someone in Queensland was badly hurt when something on a blokart failed? That lead to legal action or did I get my story wrong?
boogie
boogie
VIC
21 posts
VIC, 21 posts
21 May 2009 5:51pm
Gizmo

"boogie.. your not a member of ALSA and yet you seem to be their spokesperson (Oh fool you!!)
And if your not a member how did you get the information? and how do you actually know its correct?"
If you look through this forum you will find a ALSA Constitution and the Mini rules.

"Thanks for the compliment cisco all i tried to do at the time was to provide a framework to support an encourage new people coming into the sport."
I have only stated that rules written in 1985 are not current in today's enviroment. At the time they where written they where excellent and you deserve a pat on the back

Could you please explain how the "Sandpiper" yacht fits into the new mini rules?
you will find a pic in the resgister ... And it does fit into class6 rules!!!
Maybe a good design in 1984 ...... Is there any left?? Or is that the only one??
Remove the stays and it's legal to run



"niaychi, Who are you?
you say you are a member but you have not said on your profile actually who you are?
and how do we know your not just a stooge stirring the pot?
And the reason that the water sailing national boby doesnt communicate on the forum is they actually act as a professional body should, they have a web site for ALL to see....
http://www.yachting.org.au/ Does ALSA?... no!!!"
Sorry i dont know him/her
ALSA Do have a website that I built for them.....Many Many hours.....Why is it not live???i dont know


And you should!!!!
Aren't you a "non member of an association or club posting stupid comments" ......
as i said (Oh fool you!!)
I was a member and was privy to some info whilst building ALSA's website.....I let my membership lapse due to some very long work hours over the last three years

Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
21 May 2009 5:35pm
boogie said...

Gizmo

"boogie.. your not a member of ALSA and yet you seem to be their spokesperson (Oh fool you!!)
And if your not a member how did you get the information? and how do you actually know its correct?"
If you look through this forum you will find a ALSA Constitution and the Mini rules.

[Thats right the one that says they need to have an AGM? and the mini rules you posted]

"Thanks for the compliment cisco all i tried to do at the time was to provide a framework to support an encourage new people coming into the sport."
I have only stated that rules written in 1985 are not current in today's enviroment. At the time they where written they where excellent and you deserve a pat on the back

Could you please explain how the "Sandpiper" yacht fits into the new mini rules?
you will find a pic in the resgister ... And it does fit into class6 rules!!!
Maybe a good design in 1984 ...... Is there any left?? Or is that the only one??
Remove the stays and it's legal to run


[Yes there are some left... remove the mini rule #7 and it stays in .... the "Sandpiper" was there first!!!]

"niaychi, Who are you?
you say you are a member but you have not said on your profile actually who you are?
and how do we know your not just a stooge stirring the pot?
And the reason that the water sailing national boby doesnt communicate on the forum is they actually act as a professional body should, they have a web site for ALL to see....
http://www.yachting.org.au/ Does ALSA?... no!!!"
Sorry i dont know him/her
ALSA Do have a website that I built for them.....Many Many hours.....Why is it not live???i dont know


And you should!!!!
Aren't you a "non member of an association or club posting stupid comments" ......
as i said (Oh fool you!!)
I was a member and was privy to some info whilst building ALSA's website.....I let my membership lapse due to some very long work hours over the last three years

[Doesn't the word "privy" come from the word "PRIVATE", something you actually don't understand do you?]



kiwi307
kiwi307
488 posts
488 posts
21 May 2009 4:16pm
Again, as the originator of this post my very sincere apologies to all.
I had a large number of years of intense competition and fun, then too a break for the usual reasons, family, money, kids sport etc.
I was looking to return to the sport for FUN.
The absolute vindictiveness, crap and such like shown on this forum has made me re-consider. I don't think I want to be part of this.
I served for many years on the NZLYA as Secretary and President, 3 + years as the ACTIVE FISLY rep in Europe for both of our countries. I find it very difficult to believe what is being shown here. I have read messages which I thought showed a very direct link to your National body, which in the end prove not to be so.
This sport needs clear guidelines and strong communication.
It appears not to be so.
Those who enjoy this mud-slinging and mis-quoting are doing the sport absolutely no good at all.
niaychi
niaychi
97 posts
97 posts
21 May 2009 4:43pm
Gizmo said...

boogie said...

Gizmo

"boogie.. your not a member of ALSA and yet you seem to be their spokesperson (Oh fool you!!)
And if your not a member how did you get the information? and how do you actually know its correct?"
If you look through this forum you will find a ALSA Constitution and the Mini rules.

[Thats right the one that says they need to have an AGM? and the mini rules you posted]

"Thanks for the compliment cisco all i tried to do at the time was to provide a framework to support an encourage new people coming into the sport."
I have only stated that rules written in 1985 are not current in today's enviroment. At the time they where written they where excellent and you deserve a pat on the back

Could you please explain how the "Sandpiper" yacht fits into the new mini rules?
you will find a pic in the resgister ... And it does fit into class6 rules!!!
Maybe a good design in 1984 ...... Is there any left?? Or is that the only one??
Remove the stays and it's legal to run


[Yes there are some left... remove the mini rule #7 and it stays in .... the "Sandpiper" was there first!!!]

"niaychi, Who are you?
you say you are a member but you have not said on your profile actually who you are?
and how do we know your not just a stooge stirring the pot?
And the reason that the water sailing national boby doesnt communicate on the forum is they actually act as a professional body should, they have a web site for ALL to see....
http://www.yachting.org.au/ Does ALSA?... no!!!"
Sorry i dont know him/her
ALSA Do have a website that I built for them.....Many Many hours.....Why is it not live???i dont know


And you should!!!!
Aren't you a "non member of an association or club posting stupid comments" ......
as i said (Oh fool you!!)
I was a member and was privy to some info whilst building ALSA's website.....I let my membership lapse due to some very long work hours over the last three years

[Doesn't the word "privy" come from the word "PRIVATE", something you actually don't understand do you?]




well i dont know you and i intend to stay anonomous ,BUT I AM A FULLY FINACIAL MEMBER OF ALSA and i am getting fed up with the comments from as i said before precious little princesses attacking alsa
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
21 May 2009 6:36pm
niaychi said...
well i dont know you and i intend to stay anonomous ,BUT I AM A FULLY FINACIAL MEMBER OF ALSA and i am getting fed up with the comments from as i said before precious little princesses attacking alsa


Unfortunately by you remaining anonymous give you little or no crediblity, and good for you that your a member.
ALSA and its committee on many occasions have been invited to be part of this forum, they haven't, it's their choice, but they shouldn't cry foul when things might get posted that they don't agree with.
They do have a right of reply!!!

Thats how forums work.....

hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
21 May 2009 6:42pm
kiwi307 said...

Again, as the originator of this post my very sincere apologies to all.
I had a large number of years of intense competition and fun, then too a break for the usual reasons, family, money, kids sport etc.
I was looking to return to the sport for FUN.
The absolute vindictiveness, crap and such like shown on this forum has made me re-consider. I don't think I want to be part of this.
I served for many years on the NZLYA as Secretary and President, 3 + years as the ACTIVE FISLY rep in Europe for both of our countries. I find it very difficult to believe what is being shown here. I have read messages which I thought showed a very direct link to your National body, which in the end prove not to be so.
This sport needs clear guidelines and strong communication.
It appears not to be so.
Those who enjoy this mud-slinging and mis-quoting are doing the sport absolutely no good at all.


That's too bad Kiwi!! As I said previously this sort of stuff blows up occasionally. I must admit now it is starting to sound a bit more like it did in the "good 'ol days". One thing I can definitely tell you from first hand experience, once you start flying down the beech at some insane speed, this all just become a very distant memory as I'm sure you'd be aware! You're in control, if you don't like whats going on in this thread, recharge your batteries by reading some of the great build threads - that works for me!
niaychi
niaychi
97 posts
97 posts
21 May 2009 7:01pm
cisco said...



This Mini Class Rule is flawed to billieo. Is it a set of rules for Mini Yachts or a mini set of rules??

If the pilot's weight is to be included in the minimum weight of the yacht a more definitive rule on ballast needs to go with it, ie type and placement.

Clause 9 states that the pilots feet must be able to touch the ground. Why?? So that the pilot can perform instant acrobatics throwing their feet behind their head with no physical effort on their part??? Or maybe we are trying to support the medical fraternity with a flood of broken ankles???

If an insurance risk assessor with any understanding of the dynamics of a land yacht were to read this rule he would pull the plug on the risk undertaking quick as a wink.

The pilots feet NOT being able to touch the ground is a core safety requirement of the class5 rule. With Mini Yachts we are talking about 50-70 kmh in moderate conditions with capabilities of 100 kmh plus in stronger conditions. Would you stick your leg out of a car door at 20 or even 10 kmh???

Why do blokarts have leg restraining straps fitted??? Certainly not because they look sexy.

Further, this rule is fractured. You have a Mini class 1,2 and 3.

The Mini class 1 & 2 have no place in a Mini yacht rule.
The class 1 does not even fit the class 5 rule.
The class 2 is a limited class 5.
The class 3 is a limited Australian class 6.

Would I race a yacht under this "Mini Class Rule"??? There is about as much chance of that happening as there is for a snowflake in hell.

The "Australian Class 6 Rule" does exist and it was written in 1985 by a very intelligent and forward thinking person who saw a gap in the market place for a more portable and user friendly yacht for ladies and children without restricting the development of go fast yachts. This was done before the advent of most of the commercially built yachts we see today.

If ALSA will not encompass or endorse the "Australian Class 6 Rule", that is their problem and loss of potential new affiliate members.


I am not posting "negativity". I post positive comments about how to fix flaws that I see.

The world is not laughing at us. The world sees what is going on here for what it is, a discussion of a difference of opinion between a supposedly authoritarian faction and the independants.
Cheers Cisco
where did you get the pilots feet NOT being able to touch the ground is a core saftey requirement of the class 5 rule ,
At present cant find my rule book,but Pacrim 2006 under chassis rule C6 states clearly {An effective brake shall be fitted to the yacht when the pilots FEET CANNOT TOUCH THE GROUND} ,so i would assume that the class 5 rules would be the same
wanabee
wanabee
NSW
39 posts
NSW, 39 posts
21 May 2009 9:32pm
Hey Cisco ,
Have you ever been to a landyacht event , we all know there is not to much going on around Bundaberg, we all thought that you were more of an expert on Blokarts, But you dont get involved with that, So could you please tell us what is your back ground,

##edited by admin - personal insult removed###
landyacht
landyacht
WA
5921 posts
WA, 5921 posts
21 May 2009 7:50pm
### edited by admin - inferred swearword###
glad Ive been busy having a midweek sail instead of sitting front of a computer, welcome back beegee, glad to see your still up for a sail.see you on a lake and keep up the good work
niaychi
niaychi
97 posts
97 posts
21 May 2009 7:59pm
wanabee said...

Hey Cisco ,
Have you ever been to a landyacht event , we all know there is not to much going on around Bundaberg, we all thought that you were more of an expert on Blokarts, But you dont get involved with that, So could you please tell us what is your back ground,
### edited by admin - personal insult removed ###
Good question wanabee

wanabee
wanabee
NSW
39 posts
NSW, 39 posts
21 May 2009 10:28pm
niaychi said...

wanabee said...

Hey Cisco ,
Have you ever been to a landyacht event , we all know there is not to much going on around Bundaberg, we all thought that you were more of an expert on Blokarts, But you dont get involved with that, So could you please tell us what is your back ground,
### personal insult removed ###
Good question wanabee




Good to see that other ALSA members are getting a bit sick of the rubish that is posted , Im happy to say that im a member and proud of it.
Im quite sure that some other sport would love to have Cisco, what would they use him for PR?
wheelnut
wheelnut
WA
90 posts
WA, 90 posts
21 May 2009 8:59pm
wanabee,
thanks for your many informative and varied postings in the forums since you joined in 2007
where
hills
hills
SA
1622 posts
SA, 1622 posts
21 May 2009 11:09pm
wanabee said...
Good to see that other ALSA members are getting a bit sick of the rubish that is posted , Im happy to say that im a member and proud of it.
Im quite sure that some other sport would love to have Cisco, what would they use him for PR?


Which affiliated club are you a member of Wanabee? (I'm not being smart, just curious)
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply