Bnaccas said...
Looks REALLY good Dean!
Why the width over 30"?
My board is 2" longer but just under 29 1/2" and still super stable. Enough that I might
try go a bit narrower next time around, say 29" and slightly thinner. I though you might
try go a bit narrower.
In regards to narrow, Been there done that, the 7'10" below is 27 1/2" less of a versatile board, Not much fun in less than smooth conditions.
My previous boards have been 27" & 28" & no where near as good as the current boards, even in a bit of power..over head waves.
I can make a van load of boards, but I would rather have one good board that is as versatile as possible. I like to get a board really dialed, I find it easer to recognise small design changes in new boards.
The flame is 31"x7'10" it's too wide for my 80kg, the 7'10"x 271/2" is only good in smooth conditions, & lacks small wave performance. The 9' x 27" a bit stiff, no where as loose as the current 30 1/2".
I think what is making the fat boards turn well in small waves is the contrast in mid width to tail width...very curvy, so the turn is not restricted.
The new green flame board I will get to try in the morning at prk, the waves may not be ideal for a proper assesment but I should get an idea what the mods have done.