Proto No 3....ready to rock!

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Cam Gillies
Cam Gillies
SA
216 posts
SA, 216 posts
6 Oct 2009 1:55pm
Not world, just NZ
boarder paul said...

LSD was so good to send me dimentions for a custom, But sad to say shapers here are to scared to do it.

To big/ To much hassel/ No blanks wide enough/ Bay not larg enough

My god, What the hell is wrong with the world


LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
6 Oct 2009 2:28pm
Scotty Mac said...

You had to put a 2kg repair on the tail?

No the original board was...6.3kg or so what ever.
I creased the tail & knocked the box loose after the board had blown away down the beach. it now weighs about 7kg after repair
Sorry.....where did the 8kg come from?
If you rode a 6kg board for 4 months, sometimes 3 times a day & it suddenly gains 1/2 a kilo, are you trying to tell me you wouldnt notice ? I think you would.
If your board was 14 kg..... no you would not.

LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
6 Oct 2009 2:34pm
Cam,
I you ask 100 different board makers how to make a board you will get 100 different ways.
Thats why I say find your own answers, then you can & adapt to the methods you want to use.
So how did the cut & shut go? It would have been a good way to learn about the materials.
Cheers
daletor
daletor
VIC
301 posts
VIC, 301 posts
6 Oct 2009 2:38pm
SL works for me. Minimal foot compression after 2 months of 3-4 times per week. No other damage.

If you want a heavier board use heavier foam.

The info from Johnathan was impressive. Great data. Is your last name Sumner Miller?
Cam Gillies
Cam Gillies
SA
216 posts
SA, 216 posts
6 Oct 2009 2:16pm
Dean,
I did 2 cut and shut, not a massive fan of the way they surfed, too wide in the tail, they live under the house now. I have made 5 others boards using same method as you have been doing, my last board (8'10 pin tail ) is by far the best I have made, and the best board I have surfed. I reckon the narrower tails work alot better on SUPs ( for me ). The board I am making at the moment is a bit of a Laguna Bay copy, I ordered a custom which is about 4 weeks away. I'm hoping I like it better than boards I have made.
Cam
LSD said...

Cam,
I you ask 100 different board makers how to make a board you will get 100 different ways.
Thats why I say find your own answers, then you can & adapt to the methods you want to use.
So how did the cut & shut go? It would have been a good way to learn about the materials.
Cheers


JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
6 Oct 2009 4:42pm
Thanks Dale, had a natural afro when I was a kid and I'm guessing with the bit missing in the middle and the mature grey if I let it grow I'd look something like a cross between Coco the Clown and the good Professor!

Ronnie, the little anomaly with the density and compressive strength is all because the foam guys are very cagey about quoting actual densities. It's obviously something very hard to control when they create the EPS foam, they tend to quote maximum and minimum figures for each grade. I have this funny feeling they make the foam then weigh it and that determines what grade they sell it as.
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
6 Oct 2009 8:34pm
Hey Guys,

I think all this talk about board weight for the average SUPer is just a crock.

If you can surf relatively well to very well and have progressed down the board chain then I agree that you will notice a significant difference pulling radical turns in smaller waves say up to 3ft.

In bigger more powerful waves then the heavier boards come back into thier own for obvious reasons.

I have recently seen all sorts of statements being made by people about boards weights etc and would challenge the average beginer SUPer at a demo day to even get close to guessing board weights before they put them on a scale.

The only way to compare is to pick up 2 boards at the same time and see if there is a noticable difference. Even if there is a weight difference it is still all about how well "you" can surf the board.

It all comes back to one thing reality, how you actually surf the board in real life, not what you have fantasies about PMSL.

Get someone to take video of you surfing both boards in similar conditions and then you can make real life comparisons.

The rest is all hot air.

Phill



STNDUP
STNDUP
VIC
248 posts
VIC, 248 posts
6 Oct 2009 9:19pm
JonathanC said...


Ronnie, the little anomaly with the density and compressive strength is all because the foam guys are very cagey about quoting actual densities. It's obviously something very hard to control when they create the EPS foam, they tend to quote maximum and minimum figures for each grade. I have this funny feeling they make the foam then weigh it and that determines what grade they sell it as.


Thanks mate! Yeah, I was just looking at the chart and the density in kg/m3 is a different ratio than the lb/ft3. Just thought it a bit odd..............It would be really interesting to know how much of a variation there actually is in the same type/class of foam as there may actually be heaps of variation in the same class of foam.


BTW-Dean, you make a great looking board! Cant wait until my skill level is up to trying one out. Cheers for trying out different theories and helping to push our sport in the right direction.

Ronnie
tha dogman
tha dogman
NSW
2912 posts
NSW, 2912 posts
6 Oct 2009 10:31pm
OG SUP said...

Hey Guys,

I think all this talk about board weight for the average SUPer is just a crock.

If you can surf relatively well to very well and have progressed down the board chain then I agree that you will notice a significant difference pulling radical turns in smaller waves say up to 3ft.

In bigger more powerful waves then the heavier boards come back into thier own for obvious reasons.

I have recently seen all sorts of statements being made by people about boards weights etc and would challenge the average beginer SUPer at a demo day to even get close to guessing board weights before they put them on a scale.

The only way to compare is to pick up 2 boards at the same time and see if there is a noticable difference. Even if there is a weight difference it is still all about how well "you" can surf the board.

It all comes back to one thing reality, how you actually surf the board in real life, not what you have fantasies about PMSL.

Get someone to take video of you surfing both boards in similar conditions and then you can make real life comparisons.

The rest is all hot air.

Phill






well said phil

horses for coarses

and all that crap

what ever floats your boat

or sinks your sup

Gorgo
Gorgo
VIC
5126 posts
VIC, 5126 posts
6 Oct 2009 11:47pm
OG SUP said...

Hey Guys,

I think all this talk about board weight for the average SUPer is just a crock.

...


Most SUPs are too heavy. There's no need for scales in most cases. It either feels heavy or it doesn't. It's comfortable to carry or it isn't.

The measure that really matters is whether it feels heavy under your arm for the carry down the beach or lifting on the roof rack. Who wants a board that gives you a hernia or a sore shoulder or needs two people to carry to the beach?

If you really care about such things you can take your bathroom scales to the shop when you make your final decision.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 12:33am
IMO bigger more powerful waves help bridge the performance gap between heavy and light boards. I think heavier boards tend to bounce around less if it's big and lumpy but thats the only positive I can think of (maybe hold there momentum better as well).

2 boards of the same specs, one light and the other heavy. The lighter board should improve your surfing and make it easier for quicker, tighter turns whether you're a beginner or advanced.

Not everyone wants quicker and tighter turns though, like Dogman said "horses for courses".

I guess the thing here though, only Dean can really comment as he is the only one on here that has SUP surfed a board less than 6kgs (plus maybe a couple of proud Surf Shapes owners and Dale). Phill was telling me about a rio Dean did that was off the hook. I'm guessing his light weight board would have something to do with this.
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 12:38am
Gorgo said...
The measure that really matters is whether it feels heavy under your arm for the carry down the beach or lifting on the roof rack. Who wants a board that gives you a hernia or a sore shoulder or needs two people to carry to the beach?



I'd be more concerned about weight of the board you are surfing. If a light board performs better then the weight carrying it to the beach is an added bonus. If a heavy board performed better I'd drag it to the surf if I had to.
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
7 Oct 2009 1:06am
Brendon,

The simple point is if you cant surf well a lighter board wont help, I believe it causes more problems!

In fact IMHO a heavier board is much easier for a beginer to learn on as it is no where near as wind effected, chop effected, balance effected etc.

In comp conditions or when you really want to blow it up then sure the lighter boards to a point will out perform the heavier boards in smaller conditions.

Your weight significantly effects the way the board performs as well. Many people on the forum make broad sweeping comments that this is a tank etc or this is unstable.

The review only relates to thier weight, experience and current level of skill. The same person with 6 months more experience could find the same board simple to ride.

As to Gorgos comments on the hernia issue completely valid no argument.

People do have to realize thought that in most circumstances light does mean you will have a reduction in durability. So where a PSH or a Nash or a Starboard will accept a harsh treatment the lighter boards I have seen need to be treated with far more respect and kid gloves.

LSD's boards from what I have seen are the most durable of the lighter constructed boards.

Everything in life is a trade off.

Phill



Bnaccas said...

IMO bigger more powerful waves help bridge the performance gap between heavy and light boards. I think heavier boards tend to bounce around less if it's big and lumpy but thats the only positive I can think of (maybe hold there momentum better as well).

2 boards of the same specs, one light and the other heavy. The lighter board should improve your surfing and make it easier for quicker, tighter turns whether you're a beginner or advanced.

Not everyone wants quicker and tighter turns though, like Dogman said "horses for courses".

I guess the thing here though, only Dean can really comment as he is the only one on here that has SUP surfed a board less than 6kgs (plus maybe a couple of proud Surf Shapes owners and Dale). Phill was telling me about a rio Dean did that was off the hook. I'm guessing his light weight board would have something to do with this.


Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 1:43am
OG SUP said...

Brendon,

The simple point is if you cant surf well a lighter board wont help, I believe it causes more problems! IMO if someone can surf ok (but not well) weight will make a difference. But also length, width, bottom shape etc

In fact IMHO a heavier board is much easier for a beginer to learn on as it is no where near as wind effected, chop effected, balance effected etc. Agree to a point. More so learning on the right sized board would be ideal

In comp conditions or when you really want to blow it up then sure the lighter boards to a point will out perform the heavier boards in smaller conditions. Agree, most SUP comps won't be in much over 4ft unless it's the nationals or similar. Due to liability risks

Your weight significantly effects the way the board performs as well. Many people on the forum make broad sweeping comments that this is a tank etc or this is unstable. Agree

The review only relates to thier weight, experience and current level of skill. The same person with 6 months more experience could find the same board simple to ride. Agree

As to Gorgos comments on the hernia issue completely valid no argument. Agree, but to me (and you I'm guessing) if a 20kg board performed the best I'd find a way to get it from the car to the water.

People do have to realize thought that in most circumstances light does mean you will have a reduction in durability. So where a PSH or a Nash or a Starboard will accept a harsh treatment the lighter boards I have seen need to be treated with far more respect and kid gloves. Agree, as long as production boards are manufactured the way they are at the moment this will be the case. Naish could be an exception, they seamed to have found a middle ground between weight and durability

LSD's boards from what I have seen are the most durable of the lighter constructed boards. Agree, the way Dean has done his development is spot on!

Everything in life is a trade off.

Phill



Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 1:52am
Curious if someone knows the answer here, Jonathan maybe?

Does 1 litre of air make 1kg of weight neutral in water?
Common sense says a lot less air would make 1kg neutral but interested to know if anyone has the answer.

Is there some sort of formula to work this out?
JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
7 Oct 2009 4:15pm
Hey Brendan, not exactly sure what you are asking but the whole board litre thing relates to the volume of water that the board will displace, put a 140 litre board fully under water in a tank and the level will rise as if there is 140 litres more water in the tank.

So if the board weighs 10kg it will sink to a level where 10 litres of water is displaced. When you stand on it it will sink enough to displace the weight of the board plus your weight.

Doesn't matter whether the board is hollow it's just about the volume it displaces .

The whole board weight think seems to be almost irrelevant when you think of your weight on top of it - why risk a fragile board to save weight when I could just eat one less pie!

It's all about manoeuvrability, the less weight the board has the easier it will be to swing around because it has less momentum. Formula for momentum is pretty simple, momentum = mass x velocity. If one board weighs twice as much as another it will be twice as hard to speed up or slow down - but don't forget you are speeding up or slowing down your weight as well, changing direction is pretty complex but it all comes back to swing weight or mass and basically the same rules apply.

The funny thing about the weight issue is when you relate it to push bikes, same basic rules apply about momentum and the fact that the weight of the bike is a relatively small part of the total weight of bike and rider, but anyone knows that it takes heaps less effort to ride a really light bike than it does to ride a heavy bike, maybe in the bike it's more to do with the weight of the wheels and tyres that you have to get from stopped to very high speed, would be interesting to try a heavy bike with really light wheels to see if it makes a difference.

But as Phil pointed out the greater mass is sometimes a help, it will have more momentum and be less likely to be thrown off course by chop or wind.

For years identical windsurfer shapes have been made in different constructions, you pay more to buy lighter and maybe stronger construction. A few years ago Boards UK Magazine did a test to try and quantify the difference and the surprise result was that in terms of getting planing and general use people really couldn't tell the difference. Thing is with windsurfers the difference was usually only a kilo, so you were going from 6.5kg to 7.5 for a waveboard - not 7.5 to 12! Big weight changes you will really feel.

My thinking is that light is good for fast quick changes of direction (waves) and maybe in really big boards like 16' down wind boards it's much easier to accelerate them onto a wave with a stroke or two if they are light and change their direction to take advantage of swells running in different directions - and of course for getting them on and off cars etc.

Heavy is probably good to smooth things out, even though the whole combo of you and the board might weigh 100kg, when you are in small pitchy seas the board is doing a see-saw thing with you in the middle, a lot of what makes it hard to paddle is the pitching over small ripples and maybe a heavier board will be less likely to be picked up as the nose smacks into a ripple and more likely to plough through it so feel much more stable and takes less effort to balance. Bit of a fine line there though, if the ploughing slows you down every time you hit a wave then you are constantly putting in more effort to get the board back up to speed. Guess that is why open water boards and down-wind boards have fine noses, to stop the board slowing down if it ploughs.

No simple solution but I know that if there were two identical boards that had similar durability and price I'd go for the light one any day! Surfing on big big waves on a gun - bit of weight in the board would be good. Beginner / family - probably should be light, cheap and strong, vacuum formed ABS or light weight roto moulded poly or something like that, that is once the shapes settle down and manufacturers can get them stiff enough and have the volume to justify tooling costs. You would have to e pretty brave to invest in a shape and expect it to last for more than a year or two right now.
LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
7 Oct 2009 5:44pm
Nice essay Jonathan full marks A+
How many WPM do you type?...that would have taken me the same time as making a board!
daletor
daletor
VIC
301 posts
VIC, 301 posts
7 Oct 2009 7:45pm
JonathanC said...

Hey Brendan, not exactly sure what you are asking but the whole board litre thing relates to the volume of water that the board will displace, put a 140 litre board fully under water in a tank and the level will rise as if there is 140 litres more water in the tank.

So if the board weighs 10kg it will sink to a level where 10 litres of water is displaced. When you stand on it it will sink enough to displace the weight of the board plus your weight.

Doesn't matter whether the board is hollow it's just about the volume it displaces .

The whole board weight think seems to be almost irrelevant when you think of your weight on top of it - why risk a fragile board to save weight when I could just eat one less pie!

It's all about manoeuvrability, the less weight the board has the easier it will be to swing around because it has less momentum. Formula for momentum is pretty simple, momentum = mass x velocity. If one board weighs twice as much as another it will be twice as hard to speed up or slow down - but don't forget you are speeding up or slowing down your weight as well, changing direction is pretty complex but it all comes back to swing weight or mass and basically the same rules apply.

The funny thing about the weight issue is when you relate it to push bikes, same basic rules apply about momentum and the fact that the weight of the bike is a relatively small part of the total weight of bike and rider, but anyone knows that it takes heaps less effort to ride a really light bike than it does to ride a heavy bike, maybe in the bike it's more to do with the weight of the wheels and tyres that you have to get from stopped to very high speed, would be interesting to try a heavy bike with really light wheels to see if it makes a difference.

But as Phil pointed out the greater mass is sometimes a help, it will have more momentum and be less likely to be thrown off course by chop or wind.

For years identical windsurfer shapes have been made in different constructions, you pay more to buy lighter and maybe stronger construction. A few years ago Boards UK Magazine did a test to try and quantify the difference and the surprise result was that in terms of getting planing and general use people really couldn't tell the difference. Thing is with windsurfers the difference was usually only a kilo, so you were going from 6.5kg to 7.5 for a waveboard - not 7.5 to 12! Big weight changes you will really feel.

My thinking is that light is good for fast quick changes of direction (waves) and maybe in really big boards like 16' down wind boards it's much easier to accelerate them onto a wave with a stroke or two if they are light and change their direction to take advantage of swells running in different directions - and of course for getting them on and off cars etc.

Heavy is probably good to smooth things out, even though the whole combo of you and the board might weigh 100kg, when you are in small pitchy seas the board is doing a see-saw thing with you in the middle, a lot of what makes it hard to paddle is the pitching over small ripples and maybe a heavier board will be less likely to be picked up as the nose smacks into a ripple and more likely to plough through it so feel much more stable and takes less effort to balance. Bit of a fine line there though, if the ploughing slows you down every time you hit a wave then you are constantly putting in more effort to get the board back up to speed. Guess that is why open water boards and down-wind boards have fine noses, to stop the board slowing down if it ploughs.

No simple solution but I know that if there were two identical boards that had similar durability and price I'd go for the light one any day! Surfing on big big waves on a gun - bit of weight in the board would be good. Beginner / family - probably should be light, cheap and strong, vacuum formed ABS or light weight roto moulded poly or something like that, that is once the shapes settle down and manufacturers can get them stiff enough and have the volume to justify tooling costs. You would have to e pretty brave to invest in a shape and expect it to last for more than a year or two right now.



Johnathan Sumner Miller


JonathanC
JonathanC
VIC
1024 posts
VIC, 1024 posts
7 Oct 2009 8:15pm
Yeah well I was on hold to Optus! Kinda like keyboard doodling - sorry about that!
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 9:45pm
Jonathan, you didn't answer my question!


Yeah I understand displacement so what I guess I was getting at was would a 1kg weight tied to an empty 1lt carton of milk sink, float or sit neutral at sea level. I was guessing the carton would still remain mostly above the water or at least half the carton but looks like my initial thought were correct that it would sit neutral.

Still hard to believe, I might need to have a milk shake to finish off the milk so I can test it out.
LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
7 Oct 2009 10:03pm
Bnaccas said...

Jonathan, you didn't answer my question!


Yeah I understand displacement so what I guess I was getting at was would a 1kg weight tied to an empty 1lt carton of milk sink, float or sit neutral at sea level. I was guessing the carton would still remain mostly above the water or at least half the carton but looks like my initial thought were correct that it would sit neutral.

Still hard to believe, I might need to have a milk shake to finish off the milk so I can test it out.



your getting tricky now.....is that 1kg weighed in air or water?
If its a 1kg weight out of water, will it be a 1 kg weight in water? No, the density of the material will need to be taken into account, eg....a 1kg lump of wood will float next to the 1 litre bottle!, where 1kg of lead will mostly submerge the 1 kg of air, minus the difference in density between water & lead.
i havent explained that very well.....get jonathan to do it lol
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 10:10pm
Dean, yeah that makes perfect sense, pretty much what I was thinking. But it's a litre of air, not kg of air.
LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
7 Oct 2009 10:18pm
Bnaccas said...

Dean, yeah that makes perfect sense, pretty much what I was thinking. But it's a litre of air, not kg of air.


if you submerge a litre of air in water it is 1kg, thats what i mean........jonathan? .......jonathan?......elaborate for us
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
7 Oct 2009 10:25pm
Actually if you submerge 1 litre of air in water the pressure differential means it will no longer be 1 litre.

And for that matter who the Farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrk cares!

Still comes back to can you ride the board.

Less bull **** more fun.

You can tell its onshore by the depth of the crap lol.

Phill
Bnaccas
Bnaccas
VIC
1722 posts
VIC, 1722 posts
7 Oct 2009 11:27pm
OG SUP said...


Less bull **** more fun.

You can tell its onshore by the depth of the crap lol.

Phill


Lumers, where'd ya post go, you're spot on, weight is only one thing! My board didn't work at
all until I put some side fins in. Length, width, bottom shape are just as important as weight.
Get one really wrong and the board is a dog.

Only onshore on the west coast. Right Point was 2' to 3' late this arvo and lightish offshore.
Some really good ones coming through. Looks really good for Fri & Sat as well then maybe
Invi bar on the low tide Sunday.
oliver
oliver
3952 posts
3952 posts
7 Oct 2009 9:15pm
Bnaccas said...

Looks really good for Fri & Sat as well then maybe
Invi bar on the low tide Sunday.


I'll have to check the conditions out - I'm heading that way this w/e. With everyone else in Studley Park, I should have it to myself.
OG SUP
OG SUP
VIC
3516 posts
VIC, 3516 posts
8 Oct 2009 9:44am
I agree with you Oliver,

SUPVIC should run more BBQs in Melb, clears out the lineup nicely.

Phill



STNDUP
STNDUP
VIC
248 posts
VIC, 248 posts
8 Oct 2009 10:34am
Oliver/Phil-----where are you guys heading this weekend?

Just to make sure I dont completely hijack this thread with the above-----Yes, I would like to have an ultralight board that would hold up at least reasonably well over a given period of time. At this point, this just really isn't much an option. It was pretty interesting to hear that everyone in the industry Dean had spoken to weren't interested in making lighter boards--so, for the time being I am a pop out kinda guy.

Now, I need to go have a paddle!
LSD
LSD
VIC
763 posts
LSD LSD
VIC, 763 posts
8 Oct 2009 10:40am
STNDUP said...

Oliver/Phil-----where are you guys heading this weekend?

Just to make sure I dont completely hijack this thread with the above-----Yes, I would like to have an ultralight board that would hold up at least reasonably well over a given period of time. At this point, this just really isn't much an option. It was pretty interesting to hear that everyone in the industry Dean had spoken to weren't interested in making lighter boards--so, for the time being I am a pop out kinda guy.

Now, I need to go have a paddle!



Interesting comment stndup....what would you think a "given" length of time was for a $900 board to hold up in reasonable condition?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply