Poll - barnets shark control

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
boofta
boofta
NSW
179 posts
NSW, 179 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:49pm
4+
grow up treehuggers
westozwind
westozwind
WA
1418 posts
WA, 1418 posts
30 Jan 2014 10:21am
For
stevebh
stevebh
WA
6 posts
WA, 6 posts
30 Jan 2014 10:29am
for
sameh
sameh
WA
310 posts
WA, 310 posts
30 Jan 2014 10:45am
for
MacNeil
MacNeil
WA
2 posts
WA, 2 posts
30 Jan 2014 10:49am
100% For
Ioz
Ioz
WA
495 posts
Ioz Ioz
WA, 495 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:11am
For
Toph
Toph
WA
1886 posts
WA, 1886 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:26am
What I find interesting is that although we have some West Coasters against and some East Coasters for, the majority so far against the drum lines are from the east and the majority for, are from the west.

I'm not suggesting anything. Just making an observation.
hiho
hiho
WA
65 posts
WA, 65 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:29am
For
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:31am
Against


pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:33am
Count me in.

Gee,.. just looking at the start of this post, see how fast all the shark huggers were off the mark shouting out their "NO".

And now they've used up their vote so they will have to invent more logins to try and make it look like they are in the majority.

Also note, when a tv station brings a camera out, they are equally fast and loud with their objections and NO vote, which makes it look like a huge majority are against a targeted cull.
In fact, the genuine shark huggers are a small minority but the apparent numbers are swelled by all the professional protesters and the the opportunist hangers on, such as the local labor leader Mark McGowan, who thinks there might be a vote in it if he sides with the apparent majority of people against the cull. Apparently he is fooled by the volume of their protestations rather than the logic of their argument.
I think he will find he is sadly mistaken on that matter and it will cost him votes at the next election when the matter is dragged up and made more public.
He sees the short term gain but not the long term pain.

lurch
lurch
WA
312 posts
WA, 312 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:35am
For
LateStarter
LateStarter
WA
589 posts
WA, 589 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:44am
1948, 1967, 1995, 97, 2000, 04, 05, 08, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 13

These are all the numbers you need. The Government couldn't possibly stand by and do nothing.

I support the current Mitigation Strategy, especially now that Barnett has announced that large sharks would be kept for research as opposed to being disposed of offshore.

+1 FOR
JSMatrix
JSMatrix
23 posts
23 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:49am
For
Oldmate78
Oldmate78
172 posts
172 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:51am
For
And bugger me ...I didn't think I'd get 43 replies in one night!
pweedas
pweedas
WA
4642 posts
WA, 4642 posts
30 Jan 2014 11:56am
jbshack said..
Against


Bit slow there jb.
All your "no" mates were here in the first five minutes.
Now stop slothing around, and get with the plan or you will be fired!
jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:05pm
pweedas said..


jbshack said..
Against



Bit slow there jb.
All your "no" mates were here in the first five minutes.
Now stop slothing around, and get with the plan or you will be fired!


Was busy this morning doing some work. Good news is I'm done for the day so can dedicate my entire time to making new log ons and voting

21 to 11 so far not bad..Not good for me either but it will be interesting to see if the Seebreeze community thinks..

Sorry i have just done what i didn't want to. Lets just keep this thread to for and against..
Cassa
Cassa
WA
1305 posts
WA, 1305 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:09pm
Yep
Mackerel
Mackerel
WA
313 posts
WA, 313 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:16pm
For
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
ThinkaBowtit
ThinkaBowtit
WA
1134 posts
WA, 1134 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:48pm
For
Elroy Jetson
Elroy Jetson
WA
706 posts
WA, 706 posts
30 Jan 2014 12:54pm
For
cmc76
cmc76
WA
10 posts
WA, 10 posts
30 Jan 2014 1:05pm
For
Stuthepirate
Stuthepirate
SA
3591 posts
SA, 3591 posts
30 Jan 2014 3:52pm
For
surferstu
surferstu
1011 posts
1011 posts
30 Jan 2014 2:00pm
4
WA waverider
WA waverider
WA
79 posts
WA, 79 posts
30 Jan 2014 2:02pm
for sure drum lines rule
the gibbo
the gibbo
WA
776 posts
WA, 776 posts
30 Jan 2014 2:41pm
No not without more testing/tagging first, find out why the f attacks have spiked in last couple of years. If its because there are more sharks and they are breeding well, ok cull them, if its not leave em alone, i will take my chances and live or not by that decision.

Now if they kill a ship load of them we will never know why will we. Then it will happen again in a few years when stocks are back up again, genius Colin.
DARTH
DARTH
WA
3028 posts
WA, 3028 posts
30 Jan 2014 2:49pm
the gibbo said..

No not without more testing/tagging first, find out why the f attacks have spiked in last couple of years. If its because there are more sharks and they are breeding well, ok cull them, if its not leave em alone, i will take my chances and live or not by that decision.

Now if they kill a ship load of them we will never know why will we. Then it will happen again in a few years when stocks are back up again, genius Colin.


Best comment on the subject imo..
jenkz
jenkz
WA
793 posts
WA, 793 posts
30 Jan 2014 2:50pm
For
surferstu
surferstu
1011 posts
1011 posts
30 Jan 2014 4:00pm
Poll results so far

97 for

22 against
Glug
Glug
WA
106 posts
WA, 106 posts
30 Jan 2014 4:03pm
FOR

Ahh the irony of QLD posters against, who have been kiting among drum lines for 40 years now.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply