Gestalt said..Chris 249 said..
Ok guys, what about we buy all the Decathlon 3.1 kids rigs for $99 (see the thread). If we get half a dozen of them at the Nats I'll donate trophies for a class. We've bought two of them for our grandkids.
ok, so you are a 10-12 yo kid. which rig do you choose. the sail that looks like it was designed during an episode of playschool and offers nothing in the way of performance or a sail that looks like the sail Jaeger uses and has performance.

For a start, why assume that you know so much more about what appeals to 9 year olds than the people who run one of the world's most successful sports retailers do? I used to work with graphic artists and marketers; they are not all morons, so why assume they chose the wrong graphics for the Decathlon rig?
Secondly, what proportion of kids who could get into LTs etc know who Jaeger Stone is, and how many of them care? How many of them know enough about sails to think that the transparent one is (allegedly) less cool than the one with black lines all over it? How many of them may think that a monofilm sail looks less like the Opti and the Laser 4.7 sails and is therefore more interesting?
Thirdly, where is your evidence that the Redback is more efficient? It's close to 40% heavier. Is that "more efficient"? It appears to have a much more open leach and less draft, with the draft further forward. All that may be great in a shortboard, but an LT or OD is not a shortboard and is often sailed in conditions which leave a shortboard on the beach or schlogging. The LT or OD need a tighter leach, more draft, and draft further back. So there is no evidence that the Redback is more efficient. You said it's like a wavesail, but the LT and OD go better with other sail styles.
Fourthly, is the Redback actually worth about three times the Decathlon's standard price? To who?
Finally, WTF? All I've done is offer to spend some more of my own time and cash on kid's windsurfing, and you complain about the idea. Jeezers......