F-one Frigate v2

Thursday
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Jve
Jve
57 posts
Jve Jve
57 posts
27 Aug 2026 8:18pm
I don't think this was supposed to be published, but here is what seems to be the dealer info on the new Frigate v2. Seems like F one goes a significantly other way than Ozone.

fulltiltfoiling.com.au/products/f-one-frigate-v2?srsltid=AfmBOooO4rgj-A6JIfcSYIuHRYdmFFer72KThcdBPalouY1cl1XpYJcf&variant=45380942430323

F-One Frigate V2 Pocket Wing
PREORDER NOW for the Frigate 2, available in 3.0m, 3.5m, 4.0m and 4.5m - arriving September 2026!!
Why the V2 Frigate?

The Frigate V2 project was initially meant to be a direct evolution of the Frigate V1 — this is in fact the concept shown at the Dakhla show. But during development, the brand identified the limit of that concept: the V1 base had already been optimized to its maximum. To go further, it was necessary to break from it rather than evolve it.

A change of base, not a simple update
The Frigate V2 is built on an entirely new shape, with different forms and bridle layouts than the V1. At the same time, an internal project for a higher-performance wing — developed independently — was integrated into the V2 program to combine the best of both approaches. The result: a product that no longer has much in common with the prototypes tested at Dakhla.

The guiding thread of the design: reducing points of complexity
The design philosophy rests on a simple principle communicated internally: potential problems increase with the square of the number of line attachment points. With a three-line system, 3×3 = 9 possible sources of problems; with two lines (dynamic dual bridle), 2×2 = 4. This logic guided the architecture of the V2, in contrast to the yoke or bridge solutions adopted by much of the competition to simplify their bars.

What's New

⇄ Dynamic dual bridle
Inherited from the Quest. The hand can travel the full length of the bar to the wing without any blocking effect at maximum sheet-out — unlike yoke systems, which beyond a certain point have no more effect on the wing. Result: a complete and progressive sheet-out, a wing that stays healthy even when fully sheeted in, and reduced central luffing when sheeted out (less drag, less performance loss).

↗ Increased aspect ratio
Like the Bandit → Banger → Trigger progression on the kite side, a higher aspect ratio gives more acceleration ("0 to 100"). Every gust is better exploited, every pump is more efficient for getting going in very light wind.

◫ 11 ribs instead of 9
More structure, a stiffer wing that's more responsive to pumping and sheeting — a compromise chosen after testing a 22-rib prototype, judged excessive. For comparison: the Pocket Rocket V2 (Ozone) stays at 9, the Afterburner goes up to 22.

— Shortened, fully spliced lines
Lines 10 to 15 cm shorter than the V1 (the biggest gain on medium sizes such as 4 / 4.5). From the bar to the wing, the lines are now 100% spliced as on the Quest: no more drag or friction in the hands.

◐ Targeted weight reduction (relieved canopy)
Cutouts are made on the diagonals and the front of the wingtips to save weight without losing performance. The rear areas are deliberately not relieved, since they bear significant pulling angles linked to the dynamic dual bridle. This makes relaunch more technical and reserves the wing for already-experienced riders (full detail in Part 4).

▤ Redesigned trailing edge
The triangular facets of the V1 give way to a continuous rounded curve, further reducing flapping in strong wind — a point several competing brands have since tried to match.

▦ Lighter fabric on the larger sizes
On the 5.5 and 6.5, the rear two-thirds of the wing use a fabric 20% lighter than the one used at the front. Result: remarkable hang time from as little as 8-9 knots.

▣ New technical backpack
A backpack that can be used directly on the water, quick-drying (a few minutes in the sun), drawstring closure, integrated water drainage in case of waves. A single reference regardless of wing size. Pack-assist kept identical to the Quest for simple, fast folding.

V1 VERSUS V2 FRIGATE
Performance consistency across the wind range
Frigate V1 — high peak, drop-off outside the optimal range.
Frigate V2 — near-constant performance from light to strong wind.

Number of ribs
V1 — 9
V2 — 11

QUEST V2 FRIGATE
The Quest and the Frigate V2 will coexist in the range for the long term. They don't target the same rider profile and don't cannibalize each other: this is a complementary duo to present together in-store.

On pure peak performance (speed/angle ratio within the optimal range), the Frigate V2 and Quest are comparable. The difference appears as soon as you leave that optimal range: in a gust or a lull, the Frigate V2 keeps performing where a Quest-style sheeted wing stays stable without progressing. The gain is only noticeable for a rider already committed to their practice — no point selling it to a customer who rides permanently "sheeted out."

The Wrap Up Points on the V2 Frigate

1 A consistent wind range, from light to strong wind
Unlike the V1, performance no longer drops off outside the peak.

2 Acceleration that never stops
"The more I sheet in, the faster I go" — even beyond 30 knots. The rider becomes the limit, not the wing.

3 Up to 2 sizes saved in the quiver
A 6.5 can now cover what previously required a 6.5 and a 4.

4 Safer to use: over-sheeting is no longer possible
The risk of going into reverse, present on the V1, is virtually eliminated.

5 The best of both worlds, without the drawbacks of a hybrid
The sheeting and gentleness of a Quest, plus the performance, without the extra weight or folding complexity of a double-chamber wing.

6 A coherent range duo, not cannibalization
Quest for accessibility and versatility, Frigate V2 for committed perf ormance: two products, two customer profiles, at nearly the same price.
maxpwr
maxpwr
QLD
72 posts
QLD, 72 posts
28 Aug 2026 7:37am
Jve said..
◐ Targeted weight reduction (relieved canopy)
Cutouts are made on the diagonals and the front of the wingtips to save weight without losing performance. The rear areas are deliberately not relieved, since they bear significant pulling angles linked to the dynamic dual bridle. This makes relaunch more technical and reserves the wing for already-experienced riders (full detail in Part 4).


There don't seem to be further details on this, interested to know more on the more technical relaunch.
MeonAsh
MeonAsh
126 posts
126 posts
28 Aug 2026 5:54am
this video probably wasn't meant to be posted either ... www.facebook.com/reel/2494787540933433
maxpwr
maxpwr
QLD
72 posts
QLD, 72 posts
28 Aug 2026 8:02am
A bunch of clips popping up today, guess they relaxed the influencer embargo.

www.instagram.com/reels/DciY90zOjSR/
www.instagram.com/reels/DcjnzhltZLt/
Thatspec
Thatspec
463 posts
463 posts
28 Aug 2026 9:25am
😴

Single skin performance limits were already maxed out 18 months ago. All that's possible now are improvements in packability and handling (along with bold new graphics), while hopefully maintaining that performance. Would prefer to see manufacturers put more efforts into double skin packability, and line / weight reduction. As many of these companies are paraglider manufacturers they know where this is headed already. Feeding us tiny incremental improvements and counting on human nature / FOMO is good business.

Stormus
Stormus
8 posts
8 posts
28 Aug 2026 9:38am
Pricing is pretty sharp. Look forward to hearing how the performance is compared to the other contenders.

From fulltiltfoiling.com.au:

2.0m $1,289.00
2.5m $1,349.00
3.0m $1,409.00
3.5m $1,479.00
4.0m $1,539.00
4.5m $1,599.00
5.5m $1,669.00
6.5m $1,789.00
AnyBoard
AnyBoard
NSW
476 posts
NSW, 476 posts
28 Aug 2026 12:47pm
Thatspec said..
😴

Single skin performance limits were already maxed out 18 months ago. All that's possible now are improvements in packability and handling (along with bold new graphics), while hopefully maintaining that performance. Would prefer to see manufacturers put more efforts into double skin packability, and line / weight reduction. As many of these companies are paraglider manufacturers they know where this is headed already. Feeding us tiny incremental improvements and counting on human nature / FOMO is good business.




I thinks it the other way around for single skins. We enjoyed packability at the expense of performance. These latest offerings from ozone and Fone will perform way ahead of anything 18 months old unless you are learning or intermediate and for that there has been great offerings for a long time
Thatspec
Thatspec
463 posts
463 posts
28 Aug 2026 10:54am
Stormus said..
Pricing is pretty sharp. Look forward to hearing how the performance is compared to the other contenders.

From fulltiltfoiling.com.au:

2.0m $1,289.00
2.5m $1,349.00
3.0m $1,409.00
3.5m $1,479.00
4.0m $1,539.00
4.5m $1,599.00
5.5m $1,669.00
6.5m $1,789.00


That's refreshingly reasonable, assuming those are in AUD. I was assuming that would be the USD pricing. I guess it's just Ozone thats lost it's mind.
Stormus
Stormus
8 posts
8 posts
28 Aug 2026 11:53am
Thatspec said..

Stormus said..
Pricing is pretty sharp. Look forward to hearing how the performance is compared to the other contenders.

From fulltiltfoiling.com.au:

2.0m $1,289.00
2.5m $1,349.00
3.0m $1,409.00
3.5m $1,479.00
4.0m $1,539.00
4.5m $1,599.00
5.5m $1,669.00
6.5m $1,789.00



That's refreshingly reasonable, assuming those are in AUD. I was assuming that would be the USD pricing. I guess it's just Ozone thats lost it's mind.

Should be $AUD - it's an AU site.

Reading through the press release and looking at the panel count I think this is more of high end "standard" parawing like the PRv2 or Hatch v2 than a competitor to the Afterburner or S3.



slashdotdash
slashdotdash
20 posts
20 posts
29 Aug 2026 12:00am
Frigate V2 sizes from 3m to 4.5m are now in stock and available to buy in Europe. More information listed too.


www.kiteworldshop.com/en/parawing/14669-f-one-frigate-v2-pocket-wing.html
Retina
Retina
121 posts
121 posts
29 Aug 2026 1:15am
There nothing new and won't give me any performance peak. I was hoping for more. :/ I'll stick to my hybrid/LTX.
FranP
FranP
162 posts
162 posts
29 Aug 2026 4:56am
I'm sure the new PW is great, but the whole product marketing text seems to be over-processed though AI
😀
Urgull
Urgull
31 posts
31 posts
29 Aug 2026 10:35am



Already ordered a 5.0 here, but now I see this and I wonder what's the purpose for those holes...
hilly
hilly
WA
8176 posts
WA, 8176 posts
29 Aug 2026 11:54am
Thatspec said..

Stormus said..
Pricing is pretty sharp. Look forward to hearing how the performance is compared to the other contenders.

From fulltiltfoiling.com.au:

2.0m $1,289.00
2.5m $1,349.00
3.0m $1,409.00
3.5m $1,479.00
4.0m $1,539.00
4.5m $1,599.00
5.5m $1,669.00
6.5m $1,789.00



That's refreshingly reasonable, assuming those are in AUD. I was assuming that would be the USD pricing. I guess it's just Ozone thats lost it's mind.


Why no 5m?
maxpwr
maxpwr
QLD
72 posts
QLD, 72 posts
31 Aug 2026 7:07am
What level of skill would make frigate 2 be worthwhile over the quest?

I've had a shocking team learning with my 4m PT skin, generally under or overpowered. I've

Urgull said..



Already ordered a 5.0 here, but now I see this and I wonder what's the purpose for those holes...


You sure it's a 5m? Haven't seen that size mentioned.

The cut outs are just weight saving afaik, 777 etc use them too.



Urgull
Urgull
31 posts
31 posts
31 Aug 2026 8:23pm
maxpwr said..
What level of skill would make frigate 2 be worthwhile over the quest?

I've had a shocking team learning with my 4m PT skin, generally under or overpowered. I've


Urgull said..



Already ordered a 5.0 here, but now I see this and I wonder what's the purpose for those holes...



You sure it's a 5m? Haven't seen that size mentioned.


Unless my dealer in Japan is kidding me... Yeah, I'm getting a 5.0 in a month.
But I'll believe it when I see it:)
lobodomar
lobodomar
28 posts
28 posts
1 Sep 2026 7:17am
The cut outs are just weight saving afaik, 777 etc use them too.


Primary reason for the cutouts is turning performance (less "lateral" drag so to speak)
MeonAsh
MeonAsh
126 posts
126 posts
2 Sep 2026 2:38am
I've purchased a 3.5m Frigate v2 to review it. Not sure when it will arrive but I suspect my review will likely trail the sponsored riders / shop reviews as they will probably get to use it ahead of me.
pitbulldoug
pitbulldoug
200 posts
200 posts
3 Sep 2026 8:05am
just a guess is you will be waiting quite awhile knowing Fone hope its worth the wait, until then keep riding the PR V2 3.6 be surprised if it is any better than the PR V2,my biggest gripe about frigate V1 besides getting ahold of it in the first place LOL,was the line quality had issues with line color jacket/sleeves fraying with minimal hrs on it,hope they upgraded lines on V2🙏
hilly
hilly
WA
8176 posts
WA, 8176 posts
3 Sep 2026 8:32am
pitbulldoug said..
just a guess is you will be waiting quite awhile knowing Fone hope its worth the wait, until then keep riding the PR V2 3.6 be surprised if it is any better than the PR V2,my biggest gripe about frigate V1 besides getting ahold of it in the first place LOL,was the line quality had issues with line color jacket/sleeves fraying with minimal hrs on it,hope they upgraded lines on V2🙏



I find the opposite. Have Frigate V1s and PR V2s. Prefer the Frigate lines, no fraying issues, although they are a bit sharp. Do not tangle like the PRV2s do.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply