D3 said..
I think you missed a few numbers in there....
Yep, that was I was saying.
Numbers missing - like deaths from covid along with deaths "with" covid, the % of the group over 60, the average age of death excluding the covid factor etc. etc. Yep, lots of numbers missing but I guess that if you rely on a quokka for your statistical analysis you might miss a few things. Quokkas might be good at many things, but I don't think maths is one of them.
The latest advice from the WHO seems to be if you are otherwise fit and healthy then don't bother with anything more than the vax and one booster because it isn't worth it. If you are under 17 then don't even bother with the vax.
So the 'must have booster within 6 months' part of the efficacy statistics argument seems to be old news, no longer considered relevant, only to be dragged up to (as the article says) "twist legitimate information to exploit the gullibility..."
Most official advice seems to be getting back to where it started. Herd immunity, vax for the at risk and carry on with normal life.
Then again I think the medical advice has always been that. It was the political and media advice that wasn't.