Seabreeze.com.au
Buy & Sell
Gallery
Gallery
Seabreeze Seabreeze
Weather
Buy & Sell Forums Gallery Login Join (Free) Help
Create new topic
Search Subscribed Active Create new topic

Are you one of the unlucky ones??

3 years ago
Locked
This topic has been locked
Shooting the breeze.
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
remery
remery
WA
3709 posts
remery remery
WA, 3709 posts
17 Apr 2023 7:58pm


D3 said..

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?
(Edit for typo)


Scientists rarely cry about data. Data is data. Scientists appreciate the learnings and move on to new understanding.
IanR
IanR
NSW
1360 posts
IanR IanR
NSW, 1360 posts
17 Apr 2023 10:29pm
japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.


Die plaas Japie praat kak
Die apartheidsregering het met sy kop gemors
remery
remery
WA
3709 posts
remery remery
WA, 3709 posts
17 Apr 2023 9:03pm
Samsweringsteoretiese breine is klein.
TonyAbbott
TonyAbbott
924 posts
TonyAbbott TonyAbbott
924 posts
18 Apr 2023 6:37am
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 7:20am
You say we should protect vulnerable populations and rely on herd immunity.

How do you suggest we do that while also recommending "If you are under 17 then don't even bother with the vax.'?

It's pretty clear that our elderly population are most at risk, but the next highest group on the risk list are children.

Sure there is a non zero chance of death from COVID for Teens, kids and infants. This risk increases as the age reduces.
Then there are the other impacts that COVID has on kids: hospitalisation and ICU admission with covid, hospitalisation and ICU admission with COVID related Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome, stay home from school sick requiring (non-elderly) family member supervision.

And, yes the relative rates are low, but the sheer numbers of children repeatedly getting sick from this disease will mean we see higher numbers of them getting seriously sick.
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 7:27am
TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines


Sorry hear that.


Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.

So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
japie japie
NSW, 7146 posts
18 Apr 2023 9:44am
D3 said..

japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.




Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)


Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
japie japie
NSW, 7146 posts
18 Apr 2023 9:45am
IanR said..

japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.



Die plaas Japie praat kak
Die apartheidsregering het met sy kop gemors


Great response?? Like interacting with pillow stuffing!
Flying Dutchman
Flying Dutchman
WA
1752 posts
Flying Dutchman Flying Dutchman
WA, 1752 posts
18 Apr 2023 9:16am
D3 said..
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years

You sure about that?

amp.smh.com.au/national/fatal-heart-attacks-have-surged-in-australia-here-s-why-20230117-p5cd22.html
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15109 posts
FormulaNova FormulaNova
WA, 15109 posts
18 Apr 2023 9:57am
Flying Dutchman said..
D3 said..
Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years

You sure about that?

amp.smh.com.au/national/fatal-heart-attacks-have-surged-in-australia-here-s-why-20230117-p5cd22.html


Delayed care and affects of the virus are causing these problems? How does that fit in with the anti-vaccine brigade?

Oh dear, that link shows thngs you don't want to talk about:

"
Coronavirus has been implicated in an increased risk of cardiovascular problems, with a study published in the prestigious science journal Nature finding that rates of heart attacks and stroke were substantially higher in military veterans who had recovered from COVID-19, compared to those who hadn't had the disease.
"

What, you mean the actual virus may have increased the rates of heart attacks and strokes?

"
A recent Australian study also found hospitalisations from myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (swelling of the membrane surrounding the heart), pulmonary embolism, heart attack and stroke were significantly more frequent after COVID?19."
"

What! The same virus actually causes these heart problems including myocarditis and pericarditis?

For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:

Covid virus can lead to heart problems.
remery
remery
WA
3709 posts
remery remery
WA, 3709 posts
18 Apr 2023 10:41am
www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2302134
myscreenname
myscreenname
2483 posts
myscreenname myscreenname
2483 posts
18 Apr 2023 1:05pm
FormulaNova said..
For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:

Covid virus can lead to heart problems.

I'm still on the fence on all of this.

Have you got a chart, meme or rumble video to illustrate your point?
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 1:21pm
japie said..

D3 said..


japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.





Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)



Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!


You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?

The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?

Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.

But you know who is?
hitch_hiker
hitch_hiker
WA
492 posts
hitch_hiker hitch_hiker
WA, 492 posts
18 Apr 2023 1:23pm
D3 said..

TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines



Sorry hear that.


Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.

So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon


What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15109 posts
FormulaNova FormulaNova
WA, 15109 posts
18 Apr 2023 2:26pm
myscreenname said..
FormulaNova said..
For those that need a graphic to understand not complex statements:

Covid virus can lead to heart problems.

I'm still on the fence on all of this.

Have you got a chart, meme or rumble video to illustrate your point?


I could rustle up a 'join the dots' image for you if you want? Maybe with a lot of dots so that imbeciles (not you of course) can see exactly what it is I am trying to make them think, but also at the same time make them feel special for 'figuring it out'.

If that fails there are heaps of internet memes I can steal and paste my own stuff over the top. Is that good enough?
Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7300 posts
Carantoc Carantoc
WA, 7300 posts
18 Apr 2023 2:56pm
FormulaNova said..
I could rustle up a 'join the dots' image for you if you want? Maybe with a lot of dots so that imbeciles (not you of course) can see exactly what it is I am trying to make them think, but also at the same time make them feel special for 'figuring it out'.


Hey FN,

Be careful there, sounds like you are heading towards proclaiming you are of superior intellect.

And we have seen where that leads.......

Holy guacamole, what an abonomination that would be. Don't go all adieu on us...., I know you could draw a picture of the scene better than anyone else, but be a strong supporting column (74) and keep standing....
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 4:31pm
hitch_hiker said..

D3 said..


TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines




Sorry hear that.


Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.

So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon



What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.


Agreed insensitive
Apologised
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 5:03pm
japie said..

D3 said..


japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.





Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)



Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!


The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?

Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?

Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15109 posts
FormulaNova FormulaNova
WA, 15109 posts
18 Apr 2023 5:25pm
D3 said..
hitch_hiker said..

D3 said..


TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines




Sorry hear that.


Deaths from Ischaemic heart disease have stayed relatively consistent over the past 4 years, in fact there were more related to chronic IHD than Acute.

So while it is sad to hear another loss in their prime of life, maybe don't use it to push your own agenda. Especially soon



What a **** thing to say to someone who just lost a friend.
You a doctor or a scientist that works in this area?
Maybe don't be a hypocrite and push your own agenda.


Agreed insensitive
Apologised


Nah, if someone brings it up in the context of blaming the vaccines, without any direct correlation by the sound of it, they are using it to forward their own opinion.

If they just said the first part, sure, but the second part is clearly something else, without any supporting evidence.

People have been having heart attacks in their 40s and 50s and even 60s for a long long time. Blame living too long if you want to blame something, evolution doesn't care.
remery
remery
WA
3709 posts
remery remery
WA, 3709 posts
18 Apr 2023 5:33pm
"DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music." - Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden.
myscreenname
myscreenname
2483 posts
myscreenname myscreenname
2483 posts
18 Apr 2023 5:57pm
D3 said..
Apologised

See Harrow, it's not hard to apologise
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
japie japie
NSW, 7146 posts
18 Apr 2023 8:54pm
D3 said..

japie said..


D3 said..



japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.






Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)




Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!



The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?

Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?

Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?


You win. Should know better than to prove Mark Twain wrong.
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
18 Apr 2023 7:32pm
japie said..

D3 said..


japie said..



D3 said..




japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.







Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)





Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!




The same Kennedy who got blasted by his own family?

Who got called out by his own wife for the crazy stuff he comes out with?

Do you reckon he's right? That you are braver than Anne Frank hiding from the Germans?



You win. Should know better than to prove Mark Twain wrong.


I'm ok with having my ideas challenged and being proven wrong.

But when the guy throwing out the accusations has a decades long history of making wild claims that aren't backed up with scientific evidence (at least good Science) that don't stand up to analysis. I'm probably not keen on spending money to read a book that is apparently just one long personal attack.

Out of interest, have you read it?
ok
ok
NSW
1089 posts
ok ok
NSW, 1089 posts
18 Apr 2023 10:05pm
TonyAbbott said..
Found out a friend died of a heart attack last night

Late 40's

All too common these days, it should not be though

FU covid vaccines

Sorry for your losss.
www.gofundme.com/f/loving-memory-of-eddie-dos-santos?utm_campaign=p_cp+share-sheet&utm_content=undefined&utm_medium=copy_link_all&utm_source=customer&utm_term=undefined

Bloke my age from my town in my circle of friends died of brain aneurysm last week.



Anyone else want to start the conversation about the rise in cases of vertigo n strokes following these jabs? The guys at risk of vertigo / stroke are the common age of users on seabreezerssss


I wonder how bad it's got to get before there's a proper investigation? WHY ARE ALL THE HEADS OF THE TGA, health ministers all quitting???

I don't think anyone who didn't get jabbed regrets not getting jabbed. Even terminator has apologised for his mistake in encouraging it.
remery
remery
WA
3709 posts
remery remery
WA, 3709 posts
18 Apr 2023 8:29pm
ok said..

I don't think anyone who didn't get jabbed regrets not getting jabbed. Even terminator has apologised for his mistake in encouraging it.


You seem to be surrounded by unlucky people. It's hard for people who didn't get jabbed to express regret when they are dead from COVID. Well there are a few who's last words were, "I should have got the vaccine".

The most recent research I read indicated that if 800 vaccinated people caught COVID, one died. If 800 unvaccinated people caught COVID over 6 died. I'm happy to be in the "one died group".

Antivax misinformation is killing people.
snoidberg
snoidberg
QLD
529 posts
snoidberg snoidberg
QLD, 529 posts
18 Apr 2023 11:55pm
D3 said..

japie said..


D3 said..



japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.






Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)




Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!



You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?

The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?

Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.

But you know who is?



D3 said..

japie said..


D3 said..



japie said..
As soon as the many eminent scientists and medical experts began to be censored in the press and social media it was obvious that the narrative was not robust enough to weather criticism and debate.

Robust scientific hypothesis welcomes debate and examination. Same reason the justice system operates in the way it does. Anyone whose had anything to do with kids knows that to find out the truth of a matter it is essential to listen to both sides.

Our eminent Seabreeze researchers appear to have waived this tenet.

It would be amusing were it not for the misery this period of history has witnessed.






Here we go again.
Which eminent scientists were censored?
I know there were many who claimed to be so when their scientific hypotheses and methodology were examined and found to be insufficient.

Many of these would cry they were being censored while still being free to publish as they wished, because they couldn't admit they made some incorrect assumptions.

They cried they were being censored even when they were invited to the Whitehouse to brief the president and his staff (the 45th, not the current guy).

If they were truly being censored instead of being scientists unwilling to admit hat their analyses, studies, papers, investigations were proven to be incorrect or inaccurate at best (all the while claiming the same about the mainstream information that they were challenging), how did you hear about it?
Why is their 'censored' material still widely available?


(Edit for typo)




Look it up. Better still expand your research and read Kennedy's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Funny how the man has a book written about him that absolutely lambastes his whole professional career and yet he avoids challenging any of it!



You mean the Childrens Health Defender: Bobby Kennedy Jr?

The one who actively campaigns against Gardasil (a vaccine that prevents certain cancers)?

Yeah, I can see why Fauci wouldn't bother addressing it. I mean it's not like Faucis trying to run for president, he's not trying to win approval for political gain.

But you know who is?


Gardasil Lawsuits...
Safe and effective?
www.wisnerbaum.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/
I Just hope that the covid vaccine scam encourages people to look onto all vaccines.

Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?

This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15109 posts
FormulaNova FormulaNova
WA, 15109 posts
18 Apr 2023 9:55pm
remery said..
"DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is. And we dance to its music." - Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden.


I like that.

I find it funny when someone will start telling me that 'evolution will end up with...'. I don't think they really understand what is happening and why.
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
19 Apr 2023 6:48am

snoidberg said..

Gardasil Lawsuits...
Safe and effective?
www.wisnerbaum.com/prescription-drugs/gardasil-lawsuit/
I Just hope that the covid vaccine scam encourages people to look onto all vaccines.

Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?

This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.



Be interesting to see where that civil lawsuit gets based on such poor evidence? They're relying on only a couple of outdated VAERS reviews (unsubstantiated claims of injury, mostly self reported) and desperately trying to get large numbers of claimants to participate by asking for anyone who may have possibly been injured after vaccination, 'even if the injury occurred years after vaccination'

Safety? It's pretty darn safe considering the number of doses world wide. And (despite Bobby Kennedys best efforts) extremely low numbers of verified adverse reactions.

Effective: considering that cervical cancers tend not to present until women are in their mid - late 20s, probably not seeing much impact of the vaccine rollout on cancer just yet.
However, the significant 'reductions in the prevalence of infections with vaccine-included oncogenic HPV types, anogenital warts and histologically confirmed HSIL have already been documented in young women, including a reduction in vaccine-included type infections in unvaccinated young women'. Looks like herd immunity from vaccination is helping prevent young people get the disease across the board.
Even rumours we could essentially eradicate it.

And everyone should know I get my information from Seabreeze, not Facebook; ABS, not TV; DuckDuckGo, not Google
D3
D3
WA
1593 posts
D3 D3
WA, 1593 posts
19 Apr 2023 7:35am
snoidberg said..

Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?

This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.


I'm sorry to hear that your nephew is experiencing developmental delays.
Fingers crossed it's something that he grows out of in short order.

As far as I was aware, there was no clear mechanism for how autism spectrum disorders occur in children? Most science points towards primarily a genetic component but environmental factor contributions haven't been ruled out. Just difficult to pin point anything beyond inaccurate correlation.

Last I heard there was a study of autism prevalence in Denmark that potentially linked (read: haven't been able to entirely rule out) lithium in drinking water supply to increased rats of ASD. Not a definitive study, but shows that we're investigating every possibility to find out more about this significant impact on children.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15109 posts
FormulaNova FormulaNova
WA, 15109 posts
19 Apr 2023 7:58am
D3 said..
snoidberg said..

Last week my brothers son (the only child out of 8 in our family that got any childhood vaccines) is showing signs of autism and going to the doctor next week.
I literally told him he would get autism if he gets the ridiculous amount of vaccines on the childhood schedule but his wife wanted free childcare and government payments.
Just another coincidence that the only vaccinated child is the only one with health problems?
Why do you think they eradicate the placebo in vaccine study's?

This isn't Fauci's first rodeo.
Please just stop listening to the TV, stop using Google and Facebook and look deeper with platforms that don't censor whats happening.


I'm sorry to hear that your nephew is experiencing developmental delays.
Fingers crossed it's something that he grows out of in short order.

As far as I was aware, there was no clear mechanism for how autism spectrum disorders occur in children? Most science points towards primarily a genetic component but environmental factor contributions haven't been ruled out. Just difficult to pin point anything beyond inaccurate correlation.

Last I heard there was a study of autism prevalence in Denmark that potentially linked (read: haven't been able to entirely rule out) lithium in drinking water supply to increased rats of ASD. Not a definitive study, but shows that we're investigating every possibility to find out more about this significant impact on children.


You are too kind.

If he grows out of it "it would have been the vaccines that caused it".

If he doesn't, "it will be the vaccines".

If he never had it, "it was the effect of the vaccines".

See the pattern? I wonder if there is a genetic link?
Please Register, or first...
This topic has been locked
Topics Subscribe Topic Is Locked

Weather

Sydney weather

Melbourne weather

Brisbane weather

Perth weather

Adelaide weather

Darwin weather

Hobart weather

Canberra weather

Location Map

Location Search

Rain Radar

Activities

Kitesurfing

Windsurfing

Stand up paddle

Surfing

Boating

Sailing

Fishing

News

Articles

About

About us

Contact us

Support

Write To Us

Help/FAQ

Report Bug

Suggestion Box

Copyright © 1997-2026 Seabreeze.com.au
Terms of use
Privacy policy